help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on March 6, 2008, doi:10.1164/rccm.200706-867OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 177, Number 11, June 2008, 1262-1267

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200706-867OCv1
177/11/1262    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitrow, M. J
Right arrow Articles by Harding, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitrow, M. J
Right arrow Articles by Harding, S.

Submitted on June 14, 2007
Accepted on March 6, 2008

Ethnic Difference in Adolescent Lung Function: Anthropometric, Socioeconomic, Psychosocial Factors

Melissa J Whitrow1* and Seeromanie Harding1

1 Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Medical Research Council, Glasgow, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: melissa{at}sphsu.mrc.ac.uk.

Objective: To examine ethnic differences in lung function in relation to anthropometry, social and psychosocial factors in early adolescence. Methods: 3924 pupils aged 11-13yrs, 80% were ethnic minorities, with satisfactory lung function measures. Data were collected on economic disadvantage (SES), psychological well-being, tobacco exposure, height, Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC). Results: The lowest FEV1 was observed for Black Caribbeans/Africans after adjusting for standing height (SH) (Whites: boys 2.475Litres [95% Confidence Interval 2.442, 2.509], girls 2.449L [95%CI 2.464, 2.535]; Black Caribbeans: boys -14% [-16, -12], girls -13% [-16, -11]; Black Africans: boys -15% [-17, -13], girls -17% [-19, -14]; Indians: boys -13% [-16, -11], girls -11% [-14, -8]; Pakistanis/Bangladeshis: boys -7% [-9, -5], girls -9% [-11, -6]). Adjustment for upper body segment (UBS) instead of SH achieved a further reduction in ethnic differences of 41-51% for Black African origin children, and 26-39% for the other groups. Overcrowding (boys) and poor psychological well-being (boys and girls) were independent correlates of FEV1, explaining up to a further 10% of ethnic differences. Similar patterns were observed for FVC. Social exposures were also related to height components. Conclusions: Differences in UBS explained more of the ethnic differences in lung function than SH, particularly among Black Caribbeans/Africans. Social correlates had a smaller but significant impact. Future research needs to consider how differential development of lung capacity is compromised by the social patterning of growth trajectories.


Key words: anthropometry, spirometry, ethnicity, socioeconomic factors, adolescence







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2008 American Thoracic Society
  ATS State of the Art Course 2008