help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on August 23, 2007, doi:10.1164/rccm.200704-588OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 176, Number 10, November 2007, 988-993

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 15, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200704-588OCv1
176/10/988    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, B. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, D.
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, B. J

Submitted on April 17, 2007
Accepted on August 23, 2007

Selective iNOS Inhibition has no Effect on Allergen Challenge in Asthma

Dave Singh1*, Duncan Richards2, Richard G Knowles2, Sheila Schwartz2, Ashley Woodcock1, Steve Langley1, and Brian J O'Connor3

1 Medicines Evaluation Unit, South Manchester University Hospitals Trust, University Of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2 GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, United Kingdom, 3 Department of Asthma, Allergy, and Respiratory Science, St. Thomas' School of Medicine at King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dsingh{at}meu.org.uk.

Introduction: Exhaled breath nitric oxide (FeNO) is increased in asthma. NO is produced predominantly by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). We evaluated the selective and potent iNOS inhibitor GW274150 in asthma. Methods: 28 steroid naive asthma patients participated in a double-blind, randomised, doubledummy, placebo controlled, 3 period cross-over study. Subjects received GW274150 90mg, montelukast 10mg or placebo once daily for 14 days. FeNO was assessed pre-dose on days 1, 7, 10 and 14. AMP challenge was performed on day 10, allergen challenge on day 14 followed by methacholine challenge (MCh) 24hr later, then bronchoscopy. Results: GW274150 reduced pre-dose FeNO by 73%, 75% and 71% on days 7, 10 and 14 respectively compared with placebo. Montelukast did not reduce FeNO. GW274150 did not inhibit AMP reactivity while for montelukast there was a trend for inhibition; mean doubling dose (DD) difference vs placebo 0.64 (CI 0 to 1.28). GW274150 did not inhibit the early (EAR) and late (LAR) asthmatic responses to allergen, or MCh reactivity, despite reduced FeNO levels. Montelukast inhibited EAR and LAR FEV1; mean difference vs placebo for minimum FEV1 =0.37L (CI 0.19 to 0.55) and 0.18L CI 0.04 to 0.32)respectively. MCh reactivity was inhibited by montelukast (mean DD difference vs placebo 0.51; CI 0.02 to 1.01). GW271540 also had no effect on inflammatory cell numbers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid post allergen challenge. Conclusion: Selective iNOS inhibition effectively reduces FeNO but does not affect airway hyperreactivity or airway inflammatory cell numbers post allergen challenge in asthmatics.


Key words: nitric oxide, bronchial hyperreactivity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
I. M. Adcock and P. J. Barnes
Molecular Mechanisms of Corticosteroid Resistance
Chest, August 1, 2008; 134(2): 394 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
W. C. Moore
Update in Asthma 2007
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2008; 177(10): 1068 - 1073.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2007 American Thoracic Society