help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on May 3, 2007, doi:10.1164/rccm.200703-462PP

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 176, Number 3, August 2007, 224-230

A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200703-462PPv1
176/3/224    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, D. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, D. P

Submitted on March 21, 2007
Accepted on May 2, 2007

The Opportunities and Challenges of Developing Imaging Biomarkers to Study Lung Function and Disease

Daniel P Schuster1*

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, The Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, MO, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: daniel.schuster{at}wustl.edu.

Recent advances in imaging offer exciting opportunities to develop and validate lung-specific biomarkers as valuable adjuncts to diagnosis, tests of treatment efficacy, and/or treatment monitoring. State-of-the art structural, functional, and molecular imaging methods allow the lungs to be visualized non-invasively in vivo at sub-millimeter and sub-second spatial and temporal scales. However, the development and validation of imaging biomarkers presents some special challenges, including equipment evaluation, procedure standardization, data regarding reproducibility and replication, inter-rater variability, the production and measurement of reference standards, sensitivity to interventions or disease progression, inter-subject variance, choice of image reconstruction and segmentation algorithms, automated vs observer-dependent image analysis, data acquisition during conditions of standardized lung volume, whether a reliable association can be demonstrated between the imaging biomarker and a clinical endpoint, and whether its use will have a favorable cost-effective impact on drug development or disease management. Establishing such performance characteristics, especially for single investigators at single institutions, can be daunting if not impossible for costly biomarkers such as imaging. Therefore, to take full advantage of the opportunities presented by state-of-the-art imaging methods, new approaches to analytic and clinical validation must be developed in collaboration with industry, foundation, and federal funding agencies.


Key words: drug discovery, drug development, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, x-ray computed tomography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
W. C. Moore
Update in Asthma 2007
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2008; 177(10): 1068 - 1073.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2007 American Thoracic Society