help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on January 4, 2007, doi:10.1164/rccm.200608-1085OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 175, Number 8, April 2007, 840-845

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 15, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200608-1085OCv1
175/8/840    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, P.
Right arrow Articles by Clancy, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, P.
Right arrow Articles by Clancy, L.

Submitted on August 3, 2006
Accepted on January 4, 2007

Effects of the Irish Smoking Ban on Respiratory Health of Bar Workers and Air Quality in Dublin Pubs

Patrick Goodman1, Michelle Agnew2, Marie McCaffrey3, Gillian Paul4, and Luke Clancy5*

1 School of Physics, DIT, Dublin, Ireland, 2 Respiratory Laboratory, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 3 Department of Environmental Health, HSE, Dublin, Ireland, 4 Department of Epidemiology, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, 5 Department of Research, Research Institute for a Tobacco Free Society, Dublin, Ireland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lclancy{at}tri.ie.

Background Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) causes disease in non-smokers. Workplace bans on smoking are interventions to reduce exposure to ETS to try to prevent harmful health effects. The Irish Government on the 29th March 2004 introduced the first national comprehensive legislation banning smoking in all workplaces including bars and restaurants. This study examines the impact of this legislation on air quality in pubs and on respiratory health effects in bar workers in Dublin. Methods Exposure study Concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 particulate matter in 42 pubs were measured and compared before and after the ban. Benzene concentrations were also measured in 26 of the pubs. Health effects study Eighty one (81) barmen volunteered to have full pulmonary function studies, exhaled breath carbon monoxide (CO) and salivary cotinine levels performed before the ban and repeated one year later after the ban. They also completed questionnaires on exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and respiratory symptoms on both occasions. Findings Pub air study There was an 83% reduction in PM2.5 and an 80.2% reduction in Benzene concentration in the bars. Barmen study There was a 79% reduction in exhaled breath CO and an 81% reduction in salivary cotinine. There were statistically significant improvements in measured pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and significant reductions in self reported symptoms and exposure levels in volunteer non-smoking barmen after the ban. Conclusions A total workplace smoking ban results in a significant reduction in air pollution in pubs and an improvement in respiratory health in barmen.


Key words: smoking ban, exposure, health benifits




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
T. S. Nawrot, E. Alfaro-Moreno, and B. Nemery
Update in Occupational and Environmental Respiratory Disease 2007
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2008; 177(7): 696 - 700.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. Clancy and P. Goodman
Particulate Air Pollution in Irish Pubs Is Grossly Underestimated
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2008; 177(2): 237 - 238.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Travers and K. Lee
Particulate Air Pollution in Irish Pubs Is Grossly Underestimated
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2008; 177(2): 236 - 237.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
S. Semple, L. Maccalman, A. A. Naji, S. Dempsey, S. Hilton, B. G. Miller, and J. G. Ayres
Bar Workers' Exposure to Second-Hand Smoke: The Effect of Scottish Smoke-Free Legislation on Occupational Exposure
Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2007; 51(7): 571 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. F Garvey, P. McElwaine, T. S Monaghan, and W. T McNicholas
Confessions of an accordion cleaner
BMJ, September 29, 2007; 335(7621): 630 - 630.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. J Haw and L. Gruer
Changes in exposure of adult non-smokers to secondhand smoke after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland: national cross sectional survey
BMJ, September 15, 2007; 335(7619): 549 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. D. Eisner
Indoor Air, Passive Smoking, and COPD
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2007; 176(5): 426 - 427.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
F. Godfrey
Hold the Front Page: Smoking Bans Good for (Most) Workers' Health
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2007; 175(8): 751 - 753.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2007 American Thoracic Society