help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on November 16, 2006, doi:10.1164/rccm.200602-255OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 175, Number 4, February 2007, 330-335

A more recent version of this article appeared on February 15, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200602-255OCv1
175/4/330    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharafkhaneh, A.
Right arrow Articles by Boriek, A. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharafkhaneh, A.
Right arrow Articles by Boriek, A. M

Submitted on February 20, 2006
Accepted on November 16, 2006

The Confounding Effects of Thoracic Gas Compression on Measurement of Acute Bronchodilator Response

Amir Sharafkhaneh1*, Tony G Babb2, Todd M Officer3, Nicholas A Hanania3, Hossein Sharafkhaneh3, and Aladin M Boriek3

1 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA, 2 UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA, 3 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: amirs{at}bcm.tmc.edu.

Rationale: Improvement in forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) is a main endpoint in clinical trials assessing the efficacy of bronchodilators. However, the effect of bronchodilators on maximal expiratory flow may be confounded by thoracic gas compression (TGC). Objective: To determine whether thoracic gas compression confounds effect of albuterol on FEV1. Methods: We evaluated the response to albuterol inhalation in ten healthy, nine asthma and fifteen COPD subjects with mean (SD) age in years of 38 (11), 45 (11), and 64 (8) respectively. Lung mechanics were measured at baseline and 20 minutes after inhalation of 180 micrograms of albuterol. We then applied a novel method to calculate FEV1 corrected for the effect of TGC (NFEV1). Results: Prior to albuterol administration, NFEV1 was significantly higher than FEV1. However, post-albuterol inhalation, FEV1 increased more than NFEV1 because of reduced TGC. In multiple regression analysis, the changes in TGC, inspiratory lung resistance and ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity post-albuterol, predicted more than 75% of FEV1 improvement in COPD patients. Conclusion: Improvements in FEV1 following albuterol in patients with COPD are due to reduction of lung resistance, hyperinflation and thoracic gas compression. The latter is negligible during tidal breathing. Thus, although reduction of lung resistance and hyperinflation may result in improved dyspnea with a bronchodilator, the contribution of TGC reduction to improvement of FEV1 may not exert any meaningful clinical effect during tidal breathing. This fact has to be taken in consideration when assessing the efficacy of new bronchodilators.


Key words: FEV1, COPD, Asthma, Inspiratory Lung Resistance, Expiratory Lung Resistance, Lung Mechanics, bronchodilator response, albuterol, thoracic gas compression




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
W. C. Moore
Update in Asthma 2007
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2008; 177(10): 1068 - 1073.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2006 American Thoracic Society