Published ahead of print on January 19, 2006, doi:10.1164/rccm.200503-450OC Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 173, Number 8, April 2006, 877-881 A more recent version of this article appeared on April 15, 2006
Submitted on March 22, 2005 Trans-Tracheal Open Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Secondary to Severe COPD ExacerbationCesare Gregoretti1*,1 Dipartimento di Emergenza e Accettazione, Ospedale CTO, Torino, Italy, 2 Terapia Intensiva, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy, 3 Dipartimento di Anestesiologia e Terapia Intensiva, S.C.D.U. Anestesia 1-Rianimazione, Azienda Ospedaliera "Maggiore della Carita," Universita del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy, 4 Pneumologia Riabilitativa e Terapia Intensiva Respiratoria, Fondazione S. Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.gregoretti{at}tiscali.it.
Rationale: Patients who fail noninvasive ventilation are generally intubated and are then subjected to complications of invasive mechanical ventilation. With trans-tracheal open ventilation, ventilator support is delivered through an uncuffed small bore minitracheostomy tube, which eliminates pooling of secretions above the cuff and thus reduces the risk of tracheo-bronchial microbial colonization. Objective: To compare trans tracheal open ventilation (treatment group) with conventional invasive ventilation (control group) in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who initially failed noninvasive ventilation. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive trans-tracheal open ventilation (n=19) or conventional invasive ventilation (n=20). Measurements and Main Results: There was no difference in arterial blood gases after one and thirty hours between the two groups. Two patients receiving trans-tracheal open ventilation and 13 undergoing conventional ventilation had complications (p < 0.0001). Compared to conventional ventilation, trans-tracheal open ventilation significantly decreased both the duration of mechanical ventilation (7.6 ± 4.7 days vs. 18.6 ± 10.6 days, p < 0.0001) and length of stay in the intensive care unit (10.2 ± 4.5 days vs. 21.3 ± 9.7 days, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Trans-tracheal open ventilation was as effective as conventional ventilation in maintaining adequate gas exchange and reducing complications, duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit length of stay. Key words: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Acute respiratory failure, Noninvasive mechanical ventilation, Trans-tracheal open ventilation, Controlled clinical trial
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||