help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on September 28, 2005, doi:10.1164/rccm.200502-273OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 173, Number 1, January 2006, 98-104

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200502-273OCv1
173/1/98    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goss, C. H
Right arrow Articles by Aitken, M. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goss, C. H
Right arrow Articles by Aitken, M. L

Submitted on February 18, 2005
Accepted on September 27, 2005

Clinical Trial Participants Compared To Non-Participants in Cystic Fibrosis

Christopher H Goss1*, Gordon D Rubenfeld1, Bonnie W Ramsey2, and Moira L Aitken1

1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2 Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: goss{at}u.washington.edu.

Rationale: The randomized clinical trial has been an important tool for expanding our knowledge of disease. This study is the first to compare trial participants to the entire eligible population. Methods: We performed a cohort analysis using data from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Registry database from 1992 to 1998. Measurements and Main Results: There were 8,735 patients over six years of age followed for the entire period. Of the patients, 2,635 patients (30.2%) were enrolled in at least one of 32 IRB approved clinical trials with an average annual participation rate of 7%. Patients enrolled in clinical trials had more advanced disease as judged by FEV1% predicted (68% vs 77%, p<0.001), higher rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection (71% vs 65%, p<0.01), and were more likely to have private insurance (OR=1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.37) and be Caucasian (OR=1.98, 95% CI 1.44-2.70). No gender differences were noted. Despite the worse clinical status at baseline, clinical trial participants had a lower average annual rate of decline in lung function (1.33% per year, 95% CI 1.20, 1.46 compared to 1.52%, 95% CI 1.43). Conclusions: These results show that the overall participation rate is very high. Despite more advanced disease at baseline, lung function decline was lower in trial participants; the cause of this difference is unclear. The differences seen in insurance status are concerning. Efforts should be made to ensure adequate representation from different social demographic groups.


Key words: cystic fibrosis, clinical trial, participation, generalizability




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
E. J. Boyko and J. P. Palmer
Is It Time to Take a Different Approach to Screening People at High Risk for Type 1 Diabetes?
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2009; 32(5): 966 - 967.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
F. J. Accurso
Update in Cystic Fibrosis 2006
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2007; 175(8): 754 - 757.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2005 American Thoracic Society