help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on August 18, 2005, doi:10.1164/rccm.200407-880OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 172, Number 10, November 2005, 1283-1289

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 15, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200407-880OCv1
172/10/1283    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tassaux, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jolliet, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tassaux, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jolliet, P.

Submitted on July 7, 2004
Accepted on August 16, 2005

Impact of Expiratory Trigger Setting on Delayed Cycling and Inspiratory Muscle Workload

Didier Tassaux1, Marc Gainnier2, Anne Battisti1, and Philippe Jolliet1*

1 Medical Intensive Care, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland, 2 Medical Intensive Care, Sainte Marguerite University Hospital, Marseille, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jolliet{at}medecine.unige.ch.

Rationale: During pressure support ventilation, the ventilator cycles into expiration when inspiratory flow decreases to a given percentage of peak inspiratory flow ("expiratory trigger"). In obstructive disease, the slower rise and decrease of inspiratory flow entails delayed cycling, an increase in intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure and non-triggering breaths. Objectives: We hypothesized that setting expiratory trigger at a higher than usual percentage of peak inspiratory flow would attenuate the adverse effects of delayed cycling. Methods: Ten intubated obstructive patients undergoing pressure support were studied at expiratory trigger settings of 10, 25, 50 and 70 % of peak inspiratory flow. Measurements: Continuous recording of diaphragmatic electromyographic activity with surface electrodes, and esophageal and gastric pressures with a dual-balloon naso-gastric tube. Main results: Compared to expiratory trigger 10, expiratory trigger 70 reduced the magnitude of delayed cycling (0.25 ± 0.18 vs. 1.26 ± 0.72 seconds, p < 0.05), intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (4.8 ± 1.9 vs. 6.5 ± 2.2 cmH2O, p < 0.05), non-triggering breaths (2 ± 3 vs. 9 ± 5 breaths per minute, p < 0.05), and triggering pressure-time product (0.9 ± 0.8 vs. 2.1 ± 0.7 cmH2O.s, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Setting expiratory trigger at a higher percentage of peak inspiratory flow in obstructive patients during pressure support improves patient-ventilator synchrony and reduces inspiratory muscle effort. Further studies should explore whether these effects can influence patient outcome.


Key words: pressure support, cycling, expiratory trigger, mechanical ventilation, COPD




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
E. B. Milbrandt, A. Ishizaka, and D. C. Angus
Update in critical care 2005.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2006; 173(8): 833 - 841.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2005 American Thoracic Society
  ATS Best of the Web