help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on November 12, 2004, doi:10.1164/rccm.200404-528OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 171, Number 3, February 2005, 238-241

A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200404-528OCv1
171/3/238    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, K. G
Right arrow Articles by Bisgaard, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, K. G
Right arrow Articles by Bisgaard, H.

Submitted on April 22, 2004
Accepted on November 4, 2004

Hyperventilation with Cold versus Dry Air in 2 to 5 year old Children with Asthma

Kim G Nielsen1* and Hans Bisgaard2

1 Department of Pediatrics, Pulmonary Service, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2 COPSAC Clinical Research Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kgn{at}dadlnet.dk.

Cold air challenge (CACh) has been shown to discriminate between asthmatic and healthy young children. Hyperventilation with dry, room temperature air is a simplified alternative. We compared responsiveness in young asthmatic children between two standardized, single step protocols: dry air challenge performed as 6-minutes eucapnic hyperventilation with dry room temperature air, and CACh as 4-minutes hyperventilation. Response was measured as specific airway resistance by whole-body plethysmography and expressed as change from baseline in numbers of within-subject standard deviations (SDw). Challenge sequence was randomly assigned. A comparator challenge was performed ≥1 hour later if the first challenge gave a change of ≥3 SDw. Forty 2- to 5-year-old asthmatics were included. Responsiveness to cold versus dry air showed significant, but weak correlation (r2=0.34, p<0.0001), but responsiveness to CACh exceeded dry air challenge (7.6 vs 5.4 SDw, p<0.02). CACh seemed to induce reduction in response to the following dry air challenge (p < 0.01), while no such reduction was seen after dry air challenge. Conclusion: Responsiveness to CACh exceeded responsiveness to dry air challenge and CACh seemed to induce refractoriness in contrast to dry air challenge, probably because of the additional stimulus from airway cooling. This suggests CACh as the preferred method.


Key words: Hyperventilation, cold, dry, asthma, preschool




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A. M. Luks and E. R. Swenson
Travel to high altitude with pre-existing lung disease
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2007; 29(4): 770 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. E. Wenzel and R. Covar
Update in asthma 2005.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2006; 173(7): 698 - 706.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
H. Bisgaard and K. G. Nielsen
Plethysmographic Measurements of Specific Airway Resistance in Young Children
Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 355 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2004 American Thoracic Society
  ATS Coding and Billing Quarterly