Published ahead of print on July 21, 2004, doi:10.1164/rccm.200403-380OC
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 170, Number 8, October 2004, 845-850
A more recent version of this article appeared on October 15, 2004
Submitted on March 24, 2004
Accepted on July 17, 2004
An Effective Strategy for Diagnosing Occupational Asthma: Use of Induced Sputum
Frederic Girard1, Simone Chaboillez1, Andre Cartier1, Johanne Cote2, Frederick E Hargreave3, Manon Labrecque1, Jean-Luc Malo1, Susan M Tarlo4, and Catherine Lemiere1*
1 Department of Respirology, Hopital du Sacre-Coeur, Montreal, Quebec, Canada,
2 Department of Respirology, Hopital Laval, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada,
3 Department of Respirology, St-Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,
4 Department of Respirology, Toronto Western Hospital, and Gage Occupational and Environmental Health Unit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lemierec{at}crhsc.umontreal.ca.
Monitoring airway inflammation by means of induced sputum cell counts seems to improve the management of asthma. We sought to assess whether such monitoring at the end of periods at and away from work combined with the monitoring of peak expiratory flow (PEF) could improve the diagnosis of occupational asthma. We enrolled subjects suspected of having occupational asthma. Serial monitoring of PEF was performed during 2 weeks at and away from work. At the end of each period, induced sputum was collected. Specific inhalation challenge was subsequently performed. PEF graphs were interpreted visually by five independent observers. Forty-nine subjects, including 23 with positive specific inhalation challenge, completed the study. The addition of sputum cell counts to the monitoring of PEF increased the specificity of this test respectively by 18% (range 13.7-25.5) or 26.8% (24.8- 30.4) depending if an increase of sputum eosinophils greater than 1 or 2% when at work was considered as significant. The sensitivity increased by 8.2% (4.1 -13.4) or decreased by 12.3% (3.1-24.1) depending on the cut-off in sputum eosinophils chosen (greater than 1 or 2% respectively). The addition of sputum cell counts to PEF monitoring is useful to improve the diagnostic of occupational asthma.
Key words: occupational asthma, specific inhalation challenge, peak expiratory flow, induced sputum, eosinophils
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Fernandez-Nieto, B. Sastre, J. Sastre, C. Lahoz, S. Quirce, M. Madero, and V. del Pozo
Changes in Sputum Eicosanoids and Inflammatory Markers After Inhalation Challenges With Occupational Agents
Chest,
November 1, 2009;
136(5):
1308 - 1315.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Tarlo, J.-L. Malo, and on behalf of the Third Jack Pepys Workshop on Asth
An Official ATS Proceedings: Asthma in the Workplace: The Third Jack Pepys Workshop on Asthma in the Workplace: Answered and Unanswered Questions
Proceedings of the ATS,
August 1, 2009;
6(4):
339 - 349.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ferrazzoni, M. C. Scarpa, G. Guarnieri, M. Corradi, A. Mutti, and P. Maestrelli
Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Breath Condensate pH in Asthmatic Reactions Induced by Isocyanates
Chest,
July 1, 2009;
136(1):
155 - 162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R Castano, D Gautrin, G Theriault, C Trudeau, H Ghezzo, and J-L Malo
Occupational rhinitis in workers investigated for occupational asthma
Thorax,
January 1, 2009;
64(1):
50 - 54.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J-P. Rioux, J-L. Malo, J. L'Archeveque, K. Rabhi, and M. Labrecque
Workplace-specific challenges as a contribution to the diagnosis of occupational asthma
Eur. Respir. J.,
October 1, 2008;
32(4):
997 - 1003.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Tarlo, J. Balmes, R. Balkissoon, J. Beach, W. Beckett, D. Bernstein, P. D. Blanc, S. M. Brooks, C. T. Cowl, F. Daroowalla, et al.
Diagnosis and Management of Work-Related Asthma: American College of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement
Chest,
September 1, 2008;
134(3_suppl):
1S - 41S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M Tarlo
Standards of care for occupational asthma
Thorax,
March 1, 2008;
63(3):
190 - 192.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Chiry, A. Cartier, J.-L. Malo, S. M. Tarlo, and C. Lemiere
Comparison of Peak Expiratory Flow Variability Between Workers With Work-Exacerbated Asthma and Occupational Asthma
Chest,
August 1, 2007;
132(2):
483 - 488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-L. Malo and A. Newman Taylor
Defining occupational asthma and confirming the diagnosis: what do experts suggest?
Occup. Environ. Med.,
June 1, 2007;
64(6):
359 - 360.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Tarlo
Cough: Occupational and Environmental Considerations: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest,
January 1, 2006;
129(1_suppl):
186S - 196S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L.-P. Boulet
Future Directions in the Clinical Management of Cough: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest,
January 1, 2006;
129(1_suppl):
287S - 292S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Mapp, P. Boschetto, P. Maestrelli, and L. M. Fabbri
Occupational Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
August 1, 2005;
172(3):
280 - 305.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Fabbri, S. P. Peters, I. Pavord, S. E. Wenzel, S. C. Lazarus, W. MacNee, F. Lemaire, and E. Abraham
Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma, Airway Biology, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in AJRCCM in 2004
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
April 1, 2005;
171(7):
686 - 698.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2004 American Thoracic Society
|
|
|