help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on July 21, 2004, doi:10.1164/rccm.200403-260OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 170, Number 9, November 2004, 981-986

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200403-260OCv1
170/9/981    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwashyna, T. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iwashyna, T. J

Submitted on March 12, 2004
Accepted on July 19, 2004

Critical Care Use During the Course of Serious Illness

Theodore J Iwashyna1*

1 Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: iwashyna{at}alumni.Princeton.edu.

Despite its expense and importance, it is unknown how common critical care use is. We describe longitudinal patterns of critical care use among a nationally-representative cohort of elderly patients followed from the onset of common serious illnesses. A retrospective population-based cohort study of elderly patients in fee-for-service Medicare is used, with 1,108,060 Medicare beneficiaries age ≥68 newly diagnosed with serious illnesses: 1 of 9 malignancies, stroke, congestive heart failure, hip fracture, or myocardial infarction. Medicare inpatient hospital claims from diagnosis until death (65.1%) or fixed-right censoring (>4y) were reviewed. Distinct hospitalizations involving critical care use (ICU/CCU) were counted and associated reimbursements were assessed; repeated use was defined as ≥5 such hospitalizations. 54.9% of the cohort used any critical care sometime after diagnosis. Older patients were much less likely to ever use critical care (OR=0.31; comparing >90 to 68-70), even after adjustment. 31,348 patients (2.8%) were repeated users of critical care; they accounted for $3.6billion in hospital charges and $1.4billion in Medicare reimbursement. We conclude that critical care use is common in serious chronic illness and is not associated solely with pre-terminal hospitalizations. Use is uneven, and a minority of patients who repeatedly use critical care account for disproportionate costs.


Key words: intensive care use, end of life care, elderly, Medicare claims, health services research




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
R. A. Fowler MDCM MS, N. Sabur MD, P. Li PhD, D. N. Juurlink MD MSc, R. Pinto PhD, M. A. Hladunewich MD MS, N. K.J. Adhikari MDCM MS, W. J. Sibbald MD MPH, and C. M. Martin MD MSc
Sex-and age-based differences in the delivery and outcomes of critical care
Can. Med. Assoc. J., December 4, 2007; 177(12): 1513 - 1519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. Angus, A. Ishizaka, M. Matthay, F. Lemaire, W. MacNee, and E. Abraham
Critical Care in AJRCCM 2004
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2005; 171(6): 537 - 544.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2004 American Thoracic Society
  ATS State of the Art Course 2008