help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on December 4, 2003, doi:10.1164/rccm.200305-645OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 169, Number 4, February 2004, 512-517

A more recent version of this article appeared on February 15, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200305-645OCv1
169/4/512    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moreau, D.
Right arrow Articles by Azoulay, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moreau, D.
Right arrow Articles by Azoulay, E.

Submitted on May 31, 2003
Accepted on November 25, 2003

Junior versus Senior Physicians for Informing Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients

Delphine Moreau1, Dany Goldgran-Toledano1, Corinne Alberti1, Merce Jourdain1, Christophe Adrie1, Djilali Annane1, Maite Garrouste-Orgeas1, Jean-Yves Lefrant1, Laurent Papazian1, Philippe Quinio1, Frederic Pochard1, and Elie Azoulay1*

1 Service de Reanimation Medicale, Hopital Saint-Louis, Paris, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: elie.azoulay{at}sls.ap-hop-paris.fr.

To compare the effectiveness of information delivered to family members of critically ill patients by junior and senior physicians, we performed a prospective randomized multicenter trial in eleven French ICUs. Patients (n=220) were allocated at random to having their family members receive information by only junior or only senior physicians throughout the ICU stay; there were 92 and 93 evaluable cases in the junior and senior groups, respectively, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Between days 3 and 5, one family representative per patient was evaluated for comprehension of the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment in the patient; satisfaction with information and care; and presence of symptoms of anxiety and depression. No significant differences were found between the two groups for any of these three criteria. Family members informed by a junior physician were more likely to feel they had not been given enough information time (additional time wanted: 3 [0-6.5] vs. 0 [0-5] minutes, P=0.01) and to have sought additional explanations from their usual doctor (48.9% vs. 34.4%, P=0.004). Specialty residents, if given opportunities for acquiring experience, can become proficient in communicating with families and share this task with senior physicians.


Key words: Intensive care unit, Comprehension, Communication, Residents, Learning




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
C. J. Watling and J. B. Brown
Education Research: Communication skills for neurology residents: Structured teaching and reflective practice
Neurology, November 27, 2007; 69(22): E20 - E26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
E. Azoulay
The End-of-Life Family Conference: Communication Empowers
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2005; 171(8): 803 - 804.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. Angus, A. Ishizaka, M. Matthay, F. Lemaire, W. MacNee, and E. Abraham
Critical Care in AJRCCM 2004
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2005; 171(6): 537 - 544.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2003 American Thoracic Society
  CCM abstracts