help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on July 31, 2003, doi:10.1164/rccm.200210-1167OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 168, Number 10, November 2003, 1205-1209

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 15, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200210-1167OCv1
168/10/1205    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. D
Right arrow Articles by Smaldone, G. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. D
Right arrow Articles by Smaldone, G. C

Submitted on October 17, 2002
Accepted on July 25, 2003

AEROSOL DELIVERY AND MODERN MECHANICAL VENTILATION: IN VITRO / IN VIVO EVALUATION

Dorisanne D Miller1, Mohammad M Amin2, Lucy B Palmer2, Akbar R Shah2, and Gerald C Smaldone2*

1 Respiratory Care, State University of New York, University Hospital, Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA, 2 Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, State University of New York, School of Medicine, Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gerald.smaldone{at}stonybrook.edu.

Aerosol delivery via mechanical ventilator remains unregulated with no standards for drug delivery to intubated patients. Bench models predicting drug delivery have not been validated in vivo. For modern ventilator designs we chose to identify, on the bench, the most important variables affecting aerosol delivery and to correlate in vitro predictions of aerosol delivery with in vivo endpoints independent of patient response. Test aerosols of albuterol and antibiotics were compared. Bench measurements of inhaled mass (%nebulizer charge, mean±SEM) ranged from 5.7±0.5% to 37.4±1.6% with breath actuated nebulization and humidity identified as the most important factors determining aerosol delivery. In patients, sputum levels of deposited antibiotics varied from 1.10 to 19.6 mg/mL/mg. Variation in sputum levels correlated with predictions from the in vitro model. Aerosol delivery in ventilated patients can be efficient and reproducible only if defined ventilator parameters are tightly controlled. Key parameters can be determined via in vitro bench testing defining delivery standards for clinical trials of drugs with narrow therapeutic/toxicity ratios.


Key words: Aerosolized antibiotics, nebulizers, bronchodilators, humidification, sputum




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
E. Ioannidou, I. I. Siempos, and M. E. Falagas
Administration of antimicrobials via the respiratory tract for the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a meta-analysis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2007; 60(6): 1216 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
T. G. O'Riordan, W. Mao, L. B. Palmer, and J. J. Chen
Assessing the Effects of Racemic and Single-Enantiomer Albuterol on Airway Secretions in Long-term Intubated Patients
Chest, January 1, 2006; 129(1): 124 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2003
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 239 - 253.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. Dhand
Aerosol Therapy during Mechanical Ventilation: Getting Ready for Prime Time
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2003; 168(10): 1148 - 1149.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2003 American Thoracic Society