help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on April 24, 2003, doi:10.1164/rccm.200207-675OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 168, Number 1, July 2003, 92-101

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200207-675OCv1
168/1/92    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rice, T. J
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, J. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rice, T. J
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, J. A

Submitted on July 9, 2002
Accepted on April 23, 2003

Controlled vs Assisted Mechanical Ventilation Effects on Respiratory Motor Output in Sleeping Humans

Tony J Rice1, Hideaki Nakayama1, Hans C Haverkamp1, David F Pegelow1, James B Skatrud1, and Jerome A Dempsey1*

1 Population Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jdempsey{at}wisc.edu.

Central apneas occur upon cessation of mechanical ventilation despite normocapnic conditions. We asked if this was due to ventilator-induced increases in respiratory rate or tidal volume. Accordingly, we compared the effects of increased tidal volume (135 to 220% of eupneic VT) with and without increased respiratory rate, using controlled and assist control mechanical ventilation, respectively, upon transdiaphragmatic pressure in sleeping humans. Increasing ventilator frequency +1/min and tidal volume to 165-200% of baseline eupnea eliminated Pdi during controlled mechanical ventilation and prolonged expiratory time (2-4 times control) following mechanical ventilation. During and following assist control mechanical ventilation at 135-220% of eupneic tidal volume, transdiaphragmatic pressure was reduced in proportion to the increase in ventilator volume. However, every ventilator cycle was triggered by an active inspiration and immediately following mechanical ventilation expiratory time during spontaneous breathing was prolonged less than 20% of that observed following controlled mechanical ventilation at similar VT. We conclude that both increased frequency and tidal volume during mechanical ventilation significantly inhibited respiratory motor output via non-chemical mechanisms. Controlled mechanical ventilation at increased frequency plus moderate elevations in tidal volume reset respiratory rhythm and inhibited respiratory motor output to a much greater extent than did increased VT alone.


Key words: neuromechanical inhibition; resetting of rhythm generation; assisted mechanical ventilation; controlled mechanical ventilation; sleep




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
J. A. Dempsey
Crossing the apnoeic threshold: causes and consequences
Exp Physiol, January 1, 2005; 90(1): 13 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2003
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 239 - 253.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Control of Breathing, Respiratory Muscles, Pulmonary Function Testing in AJRCCM 2003
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 254 - 264.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2003 American Thoracic Society
  ATS State of the Art 2009