help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on September 4, 2003, doi:10.1164/rccm.200206-527OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 168, Number 11, December 2003, 1378-1382

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200206-527OCv1
168/11/1378    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ricard, J.-D.
Right arrow Articles by Saumon, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ricard, J.-D.
Right arrow Articles by Saumon, G.

Submitted on June 7, 2002
Accepted on September 3, 2003

Dose-response effect of perfluorocarbon administration on lung microvascular permeability in rats

Jean-Damien Ricard1, Didier Dreyfuss1, Jean-Pierre Laissy2, and Georges Saumon3*

1 Hopital Louis Mourier (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Service de Reanimation Medicale, Colombes, France; IFR02 Claude Bernard, EA 3512, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, Faculte de Medecine Xavier Bichat, Paris, France, 2 Hopital Bichat (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Service de Radiologie, Paris, France, 3 IFR02 Claude Bernard, EA 3512, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, Faculte de Medecine Xavier Bichat, Paris, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: saumon{at}bichat.inserm.fr.

The effect of different perflubron doses on overdistension lung injury was evaluated. Rats were given 0 (controls) to 20 ml/kg perflubron and ventilated with 33 ml/kg VT without or with 5 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Large (20 ml/kg), but not lower perflubron doses, aggravated lung capillary leak in the absence of PEEP. PEEP application aggravated capillary leak in controls, had no effect in those given a low (10 ml/kg) dose, but decreased the leak in rats ventilated with a large dose compared with ZEEP. In the presence of PEEP, this low dose decreased capillary leak compared to controls or rats given the large dose. Lung CT scans showed that the large dose increased functional residual capacity by 68% and produced gas trapping that was reduced by PEEP. Thus, large doses predispose to overdistension injury whereas low doses do not and may even have a protective effect in the presence of PEEP. The paradoxical beneficial effect of PEEP when large doses are given may be due to gas trapping reduction. These findings confirm that liquid ventilation does not aggravate volutrauma provided perflubron doses are adjusted. They provide a lead to further investigate partial liquid ventilation in the clinical setting.


Key words: Ventilator-induced lung injury, Partial liquid ventilation, ARDS, CT scan.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. L. J. Degraeuwe and L. J. I. Zimmermann
Why Partial Liquid Ventilation Did Not Fulfill Its Promise
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2006; 174(5): 615 - 615.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2003
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 239 - 253.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2003 American Thoracic Society
  ATS State of the Art Course 2008