help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on July 19, 2002, doi:10.1164/rccm.200203-231OC
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200203-231OCv1
166/10/1326    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lechtzin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Diette, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lechtzin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Diette, G. B.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 166. pp. 1326-1331, (2002)
© 2002 American Thoracic Society


Original Article

Patient Satisfaction with Bronchoscopy

Noah Lechtzin, Haya R. Rubin, Peter White, Jr., Mollie Jenckes and Gregory B. Diette

Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Departments of Epidemiology and Health Policy and Management, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Noah Lechtzin, M.D., M.H.S., Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe Street, Jefferson B1-170 Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail: nlechtz{at}mail.jhmi.edu

We conducted a cohort study to characterize patient satisfaction with flexible bronchoscopy (FB) and to determine patient characteristics, care factors, and patient evaluations of bronchoscopy that are associated with a patient's willingness to return for repeat FB. Physicians and patients completed surveys between February 1997 and June 1998. Data from 481 patients were analyzed. Over 80% of the patients rated physicians as very good or excellent, but they were least satisfied with the information that they were provided about FB, waiting time before and after FB, and the FB environment. Seventy-one percent of the patients would definitely return, and 22% would probably return for a repeat FB. Better health status (odds ratio [OR] 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–1.7), not being bothered by scope insertion (OR 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2–3.3), better rating of information quality (OR 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0–1.3), and better rating of physician quality (OR 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0–1.2) were associated with patients reporting that they would definitely return for a repeat FB. Although patient satisfaction with providers is high, there are specific patient and process of care factors that should be improved. Sicker patients may be at a risk of dissatisfaction with FB. Process of care measures that could improve satisfaction with FB include providing better information to patients and optimizing the experience of bronchoscope insertion.

Key Words: bronchoscopy • patient satisfaction • procedures • quality of care




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. Eberhardt, D. Anantham, A. Ernst, D. Feller-Kopman, and F. Herth
Multimodality Bronchoscopic Diagnosis of Peripheral Lung Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2007; 176(1): 36 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
R. Eberhardt, D. Anantham, F. Herth, D. Feller-Kopman, and A. Ernst
Electromagnetic Navigation Diagnostic Bronchoscopy in Peripheral Lung Lesions
Chest, June 1, 2007; 131(6): 1800 - 1805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
W. W. Lunn
Office-Based Bronchoscopy: Ready for Your Practice?
Chest, December 1, 2006; 130(6): 1900 - 1905.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. N. Chhajed and M. Tamm
Bronchoscopy for small pulmonary nodules and mediastinal staging of lung cancer: just do it!
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2006; 174(9): 961 - 962.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P. S. Chin, A. T. Berg, S. S. Spencer, M. L. Lee, S. Shinnar, M. R. Sperling, J. T. Langfitt, T. S. Walczak, S. V. Pacia, C. W. Bazil, et al.
Patient-perceived impact of resective epilepsy surgery
Neurology, June 27, 2006; 66(12): 1882 - 1887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. Atassi, G. Mangiapan, C. Fuhrman, S. Lasry, P. Onody, and B. Housset
Prefixed Equimolar Nitrous Oxide and Oxygen Mixture Reduces Discomfort During Flexible Bronchoscopy in Adult Patients: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 863 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Control of Breathing, Respiratory Muscles, and Pulmonary Function Testing in AJRCCM 2002
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2003; 167(3): 306 - 318.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. C. Mehta
Don't Lose the Forest for the Trees: Satisfaction and Success in Bronchoscopy
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2002; 166(10): 1306 - 1307.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2002 American Thoracic Society