help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJRCCM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y. C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkosz, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y. C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkosz, S.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 178. pp. 3-5, (2008)
© 2008 American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200804-616ED


Editorials

Malignant Pleural Effusions

Fixing the Leaky Faucet

Y. C. Gary Lee, M.B.Ch.B., Ph.D., F.C.C.P., F.R.A.C.P.

Oxford Center for Respiratory Medicine
and
University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital
Oxford, United Kingdom

Sylwia Wilkosz, Ph.D.

Centre for Respiratory Research
University College London
London, United Kingdom

Malignant pleural effusion affects over 150,000 patients each year in the United States, often depriving patients with cancer of their quality of life, and is associated with significant health care costs (1). Metastatic adenocarcinomas, especially from primary lung and breast cancers, are the commonest causes. Pulmonologists, in an international survey of 859 participants (2), were generally dissatisfied with available treatments, including pleurodesis, for malignant pleural effusions. For decades, research efforts have focused on developing more potent pleurodesing agents and on drainage techniques but have yet to produce significant breakthroughs. Talc pleurodesis, first introduced in 1930s, remains the mainstay of treatment.

The study by Stathopoulos and colleagues (3), in this issue of the Journal (pp. 50–59), is both topical and exciting. In a murine model of malignant pleural effusions, administration of zoledronic acid significantly reduced pleural effusion and tumor load, and prolonged survival. This study is timely because the principle and safety of pleurodesis have increasingly been questioned. The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in the United Kingdom has recently sought to reexamine the safety and licensure of talc preparations (4). Talc pleurodesis has a suboptimal success rate (~75%), even in selected patients in whom lung reexpansion is achieved (5). Randomized controlled trials have disproved the belief that thoracoscopic poudrage improves the likelihood of success (5, 6). Worse, talc pleurodesis has been shown to impair gaseous exchange (7, 8) as a result of talc-induced systemic and lung inflammation (7). A study of 482 patients revealed a mortality of 2.3% from acute respiratory failure after talc pleurodesis (5). Novel treatments are urgently needed.

Stathopoulos and coworkers examined an appealing management approach through targeting the formation of malignant effusions. This has been a challenging task, hampered by a lack of suitable preclinical models. Animals with intact immunity can usually eliminate injected human cancer cells. Prior studies of malignant effusions had to use mice rendered immunodeficient, which prohibited the study of host defense interactions or evaluation of therapeutic compounds. The authors have recently overcome this hurdle by developing a model of malignant pleural effusions in immunocompetent mice using murine (Lewis) lung adenocarcinoma cells (9). This model represents a giant step forward for translational research in pleural malignancies.

Malignant pleural diseases involve a complex interplay among metastatic cancer cells, resident mesothelial cells, and inflammatory cells (10). An array of mediators produced by these cells, and those derived from systemic circulation, induce vascular permeability, plasma extravasation, and resultant fluid accumulation. Antiangiogenic compounds that can reduce tumor neovascularization and vascular hyperpermeability are therefore attractive therapeutic candidates for pleural malignancies (11).

This study is the first to examine the effect of bisphosphonates in pleural diseases. Recent literature suggests that nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, among which zoledronic acid is the most potent, have strong antiangiogenic and anticancer activities (12). Patients with cancer who were given zoledronic acid had reduced circulating levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a key mediator of pleural vascular hyperpermeability (12). Although bioavailability of zoledronic acid in the pleura is unknown, bisphosphonates are structurally similar to technetium Tc 99m hydroxymethylene diphosphonate, a bone scintigraphic tracer known to diffuse readily into malignant pleural effusions (13). Zoledronic acid inhibits the mevalonate pathway and prenylation of small G-proteins in cancer cells and impairs their survival, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis (12, 14). Additional immunomodulatory actions against cancer have also been reported (14). Zoledronic acid is active against many cancer cell types in vitro and in vivo (13, 14).

In the model of pleural adenocarcinoma used by Stathopoulos and colleagues, treated mice had an approximately 50% reduction of pleural effusion volume, resulting from reduced tumor deposits, inhibition of neovascularization, and decreased vascular permeability. Treatment with zoledronic acid reduced tumor load—from enhanced apoptosis and alteration of proinflammatory and angiogenic mediators—and prolonged survival.

Successful application of antiangiogenics to stop effusion formation in pleural malignancy can potentially revolutionize clinical care and negate the need for interventional procedures, such as pleurodesis. This approach may benefit patients with trapped lung (malignant encasement prohibiting full lung expansion), in whom pleurodesis is contraindicated (1). It could potentially provide dramatic symptom control for dyspnea, and improve quality of life.

Zoledronic acid is clinically available, affordable, and well tolerated (11). The results from Stathopoulos and colleagues lay the foundation for clinical assessment of zoledronic acid in malignant effusions. In particular, whether the therapeutic effects of zoledronic acid against murine Lewis carcinomas apply to human cancers will require evaluation by clinical trials.

This report is a proof-of-principle study in which malignant effusion was examined in a compartmentalized fashion because adenocarcinoma cells were introduced intrapleurally. In humans, metastatic malignancies are not confined to the pleura; mortality is dictated strongly by tumor spread outside the pleural cavity. It is questionable whether the survival benefits suggested by this study would hold true if the tumor is present systemically. On the other hand, mesothelioma is a universally fatal cancer of rising incidence and is largely confined within the pleural cavity. Zoledronic acid has shown activity in a peritoneal model of mesothelioma (15); patients with pleural mesothelioma would be an ideal population for early-phase trials.

In the study by Stathopoulos and colleagues, zoledronic acid inhibited cancer cell growth independently of effects on Rho-A and angiogenic cytokines, such as VEGF. The possibility of synergism between zoledronic acid and other antiangiogenics and/or chemotherapeutic agents in pleural malignancies deserves exploration (14). It has been suggested that zoledronic acid may have a direct antinociceptive mechanism—a potential added benefit for those with chest pain from cancer infiltration of the parietal pleura.

In this animal study, zoledronic acid was equally effective when administered near the time of tumor injection (preventive model) or delayed until malignant effusion developed (regression model). The concept of preventing metastatic pleural disease is intriguing. With advances of cancer genetics and epidemiology, it may be possible in the future to identify patients with cancer at high risk of developing pleural effusions, for which a preventive approach may be possible.

Malignant pleural effusion is a growing problem. This report rekindles interest in tackling this important clinical issue by attacking the root of the problem—excessive fluid formation. It also provides a validated preclinical model that will help provide much needed insight into the pathophysiology of malignant pleural diseases. Antiangiogenic agents have shown early promise against benign recurrent exudative effusions (16). The benefits of ‘turning off’ pleural fluid formation may well extend beyond pleural effusions of malignant etiologies.

Acknowledgments

The authors received research grants from the Medical Research Council (UK) and Rosetrees Trust.

FOOTNOTES

Conflict of Interest Statement: Y.C.G.L. is a co-investigator of a British Lung Foundation funded randomized trial on indwelling pleural catheters; the catheters used in the trial are provided free by Rocket UK, Ltd. S.W. has no financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.

REFERENCES

  1. Davies HE, Lee YCG. Pleurodesis. In: Light RW, Lee YCG, editors. Textbook of pleural diseases, 2nd ed. London: Arnold Press; 2008. pp. 569–582.
  2. Lee YCG, Baumann MH, Maskell NA, Waterer GW, Eaton TE, Davies RJO, Heffner JE, Light RW. Pleurodesis practice for malignant pleural effusions in five English speaking countries: survey of pulmonologists. Chest 2003;124:2229–2238.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Stathopoulos GT, Moschos C, Loutrari H, Kollintza A, Psallidas I, Karabela S, Magkouta S, Zhou Z, Papiris SA, Roussos C, et al. Zoledronic acid is effective against experimental malignant pleural effusion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;178:50–59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Davies HE, Lee YCG, Davies RJO. Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion: Talc, toxicity and what next? Thorax (In press)
  5. Dresler CM, Olak J, Herndon JE II, Richards WG, Scalzetti E, Fleishman SB, Kernstine KH, Demmy T, Jablons DM, Kohman L, et al. Phase III intergroup study of talc poudrage vs talc slurry sclerosis for malignant pleural effusion. Chest 2005;127:909–915.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Yim AP, Chan AT, Lee TW, Wan IY, Ho JK. Thoracoscopic talc insufflation versus talc slurry for symptomatic malignant pleural effusion. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1655–1658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Maskell NA, Lee YCG, Gleeson FV, Hedley EL, Pengelly G, Davies RJO. Prospective randomized trials comparing the influence of talc of different particle sizes and tetracycline on lung and systemic inflammation after pleurodesis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170:377–382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Janssen JP, Collier G, Astoul P, Tassi GF, Noppen M, Rodriguez-Panadero F, Loddenkemper R, Herth FJ, Gasparini S, Marquette CH, et al. Safety of pleurodesis with talc poudrage in malignant pleural effusion: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2007;369:1535–1539.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Stathopoulos GT, Zhu Z, Everhart MB, Kalomenidis I, Lawson WE, Bilaceroglu S, Peterson TE, Mitchell D, Yull FE, Light RW, et al. Nuclear factor-{kappa}B affects tumor progression in a mouse model of malignant pleural effusion. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2006;34:142–150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Mutsaers SE, Wilkosz S. Structure and function of mesothelial cells. Cancer Treat Res 2007;134:1–19.[Medline]
  11. Grove CS, Lee YCG. Vascular endothelial growth factor: the key mediator in pleural effusion formation. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2002;8: 294–301.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Santini D, Schiavon G, Angeletti S, Vincenzi B, Gasparro S, Grilli C, La Cesa A, Virzi V, Leoni V, Budillon A, et al. Last generation of amino-bisphosphonates (N-BPs) and cancer angio-genesis: a new role for these drugs? Recent Patents Anticancer Drug Discov 2006;1:383–396.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Sandler ED, Hattner RS, Parisi MT, Miller TR. Clinical utility of bone scan features of pleural effusion: sensitivity and specificity for malignancy based on pleural fluid cytopathology. J Nucl Med 1994;35:429–431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Yuasa T, Kimura S, Ashihara E, Habuchi T, Maekawa T. Zoledronic acid: a multiplicity of anti-cancer action. Curr Med Chem 2007;14: 2126–2135.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Wakchoure S, Merrell MA, Aldrich W, Millender-Swain T, Harris KW, Triozzi P, Selander KS. Bisphosphonates inhibit the growth of mesothelioma cells in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:2862–2868.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Hoyer RJ, Leung N, Witzig TE, Lacy MQ. Treatment of diuretic refractory pleural effusions with bevacizumab in four patients with primary systemic amyloidosis. Am J Hematol 2007;82:409–413.[CrossRef][Medline]

Related articles in AJRCCM:

Zoledronic Acid Is Effective against Experimental Malignant Pleural Effusion
Georgios T. Stathopoulos, Charalampos Moschos, Heleni Loutrari, Androniki Kollintza, Ioannis Psallidas, Sophia Karabela, Sophia Magkouta, Zongmin Zhou, Spyros A. Papiris, Charis Roussos, and Ioannis Kalomenidis
AJRCCM 2008 178: 50-59. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJRCCM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y. C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkosz, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y. C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkosz, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2008 American Thoracic Society