help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on December 13, 2007, doi:10.1164/rccm.200705-771OC
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200705-771OCv1
177/7/793    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJRCCM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitada, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitada, S.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 177. pp. 793-797, (2008)
© 2008 American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200705-771OC


Original Article

Serodiagnosis of Mycobacterium avium–Complex Pulmonary Disease Using an Enzyme Immunoassay Kit

Seigo Kitada1, Kazuo Kobayashi2, Satoshi Ichiyama3, Shunji Takakura3, Mitsunori Sakatani4, Katsuhiro Suzuki4, Tetsuya Takashima5, Takayuki Nagai5, Ikunosuke Sakurabayashi6, Masami Ito7 and Ryoji Maekura1 for the MAC Serodiagnosis Study Group

1 Department of Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization (NHO) National Toneyama Hospital, Toyonaka-shi, Osaka, Japan; 2 Department of Immunology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan; 3 Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, Japan; 4 Department of Internal Medicine, NHO Kinki-chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai-shi, Osaka, Japan; 5 Department of Medicine, Osaka Prefectural Medical Center for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Habikino-shi, Osaka, Japan; 6 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama-shi, Saitama, Japan; and 7 Department of Internal Medicine, Sakamoto Hospital, Toyonaka-shi, Osaka, Japan

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Seigo Kitada, M.D., Department of Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization National Toneyama Hospital, 5-1-1 Toneyama, Toyonaka-shi, Osaka 560-8552, Japan. E-mail: kitadas{at}toneyama.hosp.go.jp


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Rationale: The diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium–complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) and/or its discrimination from pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is sometimes complicated and time consuming.

Objectives: We investigated in a six-institution multicenter study whether a serologic test based on an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit was useful for diagnosing MAC-PD and for distinguishing it from other lung diseases.

Methods: An EIA kit detecting serum IgA antibody to glycopeptidolipid core antigen specific for MAC was developed. Antibody levels were measured in sera from 70 patients with MAC-PD, 18 with MAC contamination, 37 with pulmonary TB, 45 with other lung diseases, and 76 healthy subjects.

Measurements and Main Results: Significantly higher serum IgA antibody levels were detected in patients with MAC-PD than in the other groups (P < 0.0001). Setting the cutoff point at 0.7 U/ml resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of the kit for diagnosing MAC-PD of 84.3 and 100%, respectively. Significantly higher antibody levels were also found in patients with nodular-bronchiectatic disease compared with fibrocavitary disease in MAC-PD (P < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between the extent of disease on chest computed tomography scans and the levels of antibody (r = 0.43, P < 0.05) in patients with MAC-PD.

Conclusions: The EIA kit is useful for the rapid diagnosis of MAC-PD and for differentiating MAC-PD from pulmonary TB and, if validated by studies in other populations, could find wide application in clinical practice.

Key Words: nontuberculous mycobacteria • immunocompetence • sensitivity and specificity



    AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Scientific Knowledge on the Subject
The diagnosis of pulmonary disease due to ubiquitous Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is complicated, and requires clinical findings together with repeatedly positive sputum culture.

What This Study Adds to the Field
An enzyme immunoassay kit for measuring human serum antibody to glycopeptidolipid core antigen specific for MAC was developed. The kit is useful for the serodiagnosis of MAC pulmonary disease and could find wide application in clinical practice.

 
The prevalence of disease due to nontuberculous mycobacteria has been increasing recently (15). In Japan, Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) accounts for approximately 70% of nontuberculous mycobacterial disease (6). MAC is now widely recognized as an important pathogen that causes chronic and progressive pulmonary disease even in immunocompetent patients and not only in those who are immunosuppressed. The diagnosis of MAC-PD is complicated because, in contrast to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, MAC contamination of clinical specimens can come from environmental sources such as water, dust, and soil, and because this organism may colonize the respiratory tract without any accompanying invasive disease (4). Thus, isolation of MAC from sputa is often of no clinical significance. Diagnosis of pulmonary disease due to MAC is complicated and time consuming when made according to the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) (1), because MAC is ubiquitous in nature and the diagnosis requires clinical findings and its repeated isolation from sputum. In addition, it is also difficult to discriminate MAC-PD from infection due to other mycobacteria in the absence of culture results, because clinical features, such as symptomatic or radiographic findings, are very similar in mycobacterial diseases. In the context of infection control, it is particularly important to distinguish between MAC-PD and pulmonary tuberculosis (TB).

To overcome these difficulties, we have developed a serologic test for the glycopeptidolipid (GPL) antigen specific for MAC, and have reported its clinical usefulness (79). The levels of antibody to GPL core were measured by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) using sera of immunocompetent patients with MAC-PD. MAC-PD could be discriminated from pulmonary TB, Mycobacterium kansasii pulmonary disease and MAC colonization/contamination using this serologic test. Healthy subjects were seronegative. Of the different immunoglobulin (Ig) subclasses, best results were obtained by the measurement of IgA, with a sensitivity of 92.5% and specificity of 95.1%. These results suggest that the test is useful as a diagnostic aid. In the present study, to apply this test widely in clinical practice, we developed an EIA kit detecting serum IgA antibody specific for GPL core and investigated its usefulness in a multicenter study.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
See the online supplement for additional methodologic details.

Patients and Serum Samples
Six institutions participated in this study. Between June 2003 and December 2005, serum samples were collected from 70 patients with MAC-PD, 18 with MAC contamination, 36 with pulmonary TB, 45 with other lung diseases, and 76 healthy subjects. All patients with MAC-PD met the ATS guidelines (1). Of the 70 patients with MAC-PD, 64 had previously received combination chemotherapy for mycobacterial diseases recommended by the ATS guidelines, but had MAC-positive cultures at the time of serum collection. Pulmonary TB was confirmed by culture positivity for M. tuberculosis. Patients with pulmonary TB who had an underlying pulmonary disease or past history of treatment for pulmonary TB were excluded. Individuals with MAC contamination showed a single culture positive for MAC in small amounts, but were asymptomatic and had no significant chest computed tomography (CCT) findings indicating active mycobacterial disease. The other lung diseases included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 15), idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (n = 11), lung cancer (n = 11), bacterial pneumonia (n = 4), pulmonary sarcoidosis (n = 2), and bronchiectasis (n = 2). All sera were stored at –20°C until assayed for IgA GPL core antibody. None of the patients was seropositive for HIV type 1 or 2. The patients with MAC-PD were classified into two groups on the basis of the chest radiography: fibrocavitary disease and nodular-bronchiectatic (NBE) disease (1).

Fibrocavitary disease was defined as the presence of cavitary forms in upper lobes. NBE disease was defined as the presence of bronchiectasis and multiple nodular shadows on CCT. Disease conforming to neither of these types was considered unclassifiable. Forty-five patients underwent CCT and serodiagnosis at the same time. A correlation between the extent of disease and antibody levels was investigated. The extent of disease was expressed as the number of MAC-involved CCT segments, as described in the previous study (9).

The studies in human subjects were approved by the research and ethical committees of the NHO National Toneyama Hospital, and written, informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

EIA Kit
The EIA kit was developed by Tauns Laboratories, Inc. (Shizuoka, Japan), with a slight modification of the method described previously (8). Results are given as arbitrary U/ml in relation to a standard curve that was constructed by mixing sera from three patients with MAC-PD as a reference. The intra- and interplate coefficients of variation were 2.27–9.29% and 0.57–8.86%, respectively, which indicated good reproducibility. The linearity of measurement was confirmed. The influence of blood elements and temperature was examined, and revealed good stability. The assay was performed by a technologist with no prior knowledge of the clinical data.

Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 4 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). Antibody levels in patient groups are expressed as means ± SD. For comparison of the mean values of multiple groups, data were compared by analysis of variance and nonparametric analysis. A probability value of less than 0.05 was regarded as significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Study Subjects
The characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1. Patients with pulmonary TB and healthy subjects were younger than patients with MAC-PD (P < 0.001), and there was a larger proportion of females in the latter group (P < 0.001). Of the 70 patients with MAC-PD, 15 had underlying pulmonary disease, all of which were the sequelae of pulmonary TB. Of the 18 individuals with MAC contamination, 15 had underlying pulmonary diseases (8 patients with the sequelae of pulmonary TB, 2 with lung cancer, 2 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 1 with emphysema, 1 with pneumoconiosis, and 1 with sarcoidosis. Of the patients with MAC-PD, 19 were classified as having fibrocavitary disease, and 35 as having NBE disease, with 16 patients unclassifiable. The MAC-PD group included infections with M. avium (n = 56), Mycobacterium intracellulare (n = 12), or both (n = 2). The MAC contamination group included M. avium (n = 16) and M. intracellulare (n = 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDY SUBJECTS

 
Level of GPL Core IgA Antibody
The level of serum IgA antibody to GPL core was quantified using the EIA kit (Figure 1). As expected, patients with MAC-PD had significantly higher levels than patients with MAC contamination, those with pulmonary TB, those with other lung diseases, and healthy subjects—namely, 10.7 ± 7.9, 0.2 ± 0.1, 0.1 ± 0.1, 0.0 ± 0.1, and 0.0 ± 0.0 U/ml, respectively (P < 0.0001). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed for MAC-PD and the other groups to establish the best cutoff value (Figure 2). Setting the cutoff value at 0.7 U/ml resulted in 100% specificity, at a sensitivity of 84.3% (Table E1). Using the EIA kit allowed clear discrimination between patients with MAC-PD and MAC contamination, pulmonary TB, and other lung diseases, as well as healthy subjects.


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. The level of serum IgA antibody to glycopeptidolipid (GPL) core antigen. Serum samples from six different institutions included 70 patients with Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD), 18 with MAC contamination, 37 with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), 45 with other lung diseases, and 76 healthy subjects. Antibody levels in MAC-PD were significantly higher than in the other groups (P < 0.0001). All results are expressed as individual data, and horizontal bars indicate geometric means.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Receiver operating characteristic curve constructed for patients with Mycobacterium avium–complex pulmonary disease and the other groups.

 
Next, we compared levels of serum IgA antibody to GPL core in fibrocavitary disease and NBE disease of MAC-PD. Significantly higher levels were found in NBE (P < 0.05) (Figure 3). With the cutoff value set at 0.7 U/ml, positivity in NBE and fibrocavitary disease was 91.4 and 63.2%, respectively. In contrast, in patients with MAC-PD, no significant differences between M. avium and M. intracellulare as causative agents were observed (P = 0.403). The erythrocyte sedimentation rate in MAC-PD was 32.6 ± 28.6 mm/hour and there was a significant positive correlation between the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and antibody levels in patients with MAC-PD (r = 0.294, P < 0.05).


Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Levels of IgA antibody to glycopeptidolipid core antigens in nodular-bronchiectatic (NBE) and fibrocavitary subtypes of patients with Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD). Significantly higher levels were found in patients with MAC-PD with NBE compared with fibrocavitary disease (P < 0.05).

 
Radiographic Severity and the Level of GPL Core Antibody
Forty-five patients with MAC-PD (10 with fibrocavitary disease, 26 with NBE disease, and 9 with unclassifiable type disease) underwent CCT and serodiagnosis at the same time. Four patients with unclassifiable type disease were excluded from the investigation because it was hard to discriminate between MAC lesions and underlying pulmonary disease. There was a positive correlation between the extent of disease and the levels of the antibody (r = 0.43, P < 0.05) (Figure 4). The total numbers of involved segments were not different (7.8 ± 4.9 and 7.9 ± 4.2 in fibrocavitary and NBE disease, respectively). Of 26 patients with NBE disease, 9 had small thin wall cavities. A tendency toward elevated GPL core antibody levels was found in NBE patients with cavities compared with those without, but this trend was not statistically significant (P = 0.08).


Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Correlation between antibody levels and radiographic severity using chest computed tomography in 41 patients with Mycobacterium avium–complex pulmonary disease. There was a positive correlation between the extent of disease and the levels of antibody (r = 0.43, P < 0.05). Closed circles represent patients with nodular-bronchiectatic disease, open circles represent patients with fibrocavitary disease, and open squares represent patients with unclassifiable type disease.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We previously established a serologic test for MAC-PD using a mixture of GPLs and GPL core antigen, and reported the clinical application of the EIA method for quantifying antibody levels (7, 8). GPL is an antigen located on the surface of the MAC cell wall and determines the serotype. At present, 31 distinct serotype-specific GPLs have been identified, of which the complete structures of 14 have been identified (1012). GPL consists of a core common to all MAC serotypes and a serotype-specific oligosaccharide. In the initial study to establish the serodiagnosis of MAC-PD, we used the whole GPL antigen, a mixture of 11 serotype-specific GPLs (7). We then found that the GPL core was the dominant antigenic epitope of GPL, and subsequently developed a serologic test using GPL core antigen (8). In the previous study, GPL core antibody (IgG, IgA, and IgM) levels were found to be elevated in sera of patients with MAC-PD, but not pulmonary TB, M. kansasii–PD, MAC colonization/contamination, and healthy subjects. The study showed that this serologic test was useful for diagnosing MAC-PD and for differentiating it from pulmonary TB and M. kansasii–PD. Consistent with this, Fujita and colleagues (13) reported elevated levels of antibody against the GPL core antigen in patients with MAC-PD but not in those with pulmonary TB. In our previous study (8), of the different Ig classes, best results were obtained by IgA, including an association with CCT findings. Thus, a higher level of serum IgA antibody to GPL core indicated a wider extent of MAC disease and larger nodule formation on CCT (9). Therefore, we have attempted to develop and to assess an EIA kit for quantifying serum IgA antibody to GPL core in the present study. Optical density levels were converted to U/ml using standard serum samples, which provided reliable and reproducible results. In this multicenter study, using the EIA kit, it was confirmed that patients with MAC-PD could be clearly differentiated from those with pulmonary TB, those with MAC contamination, those with other lung diseases, and healthy subjects. Similar to our previous studies (79), the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing MAC-PD by the kit was high and the level of the antibody correlated with the extent of MAC-PD assessed using CCT.

Distinguishing pulmonary TB from MAC-PD in clinical practice using the EIA kit has proven useful. Differentiating TB from MAC is difficult because symptoms and radiographic findings are often similar among patients with pulmonary mycobacterial diseases. Patients with pulmonary TB require immediate treatment and isolation, whereas the diagnosis of MAC-PD does not necessitate rapidly starting antimicrobial therapy (1), and isolation is not required. GPL antigens, which are major cell surface antigens of MAC, are not present in the cell wall of M. tuberculosis complex (11). On the basis of this observation, patients with TB do not produce anti-GPL antibody. Indeed most patients with TB did not possess serum antibodies against GPLs (Figure 1) (7, 8). However, we cannot exclude the possibility that disease in patients with TB was of too short duration (MAC-PD, 4.8 ± 4.6 yr, vs. TB, 0.3 ± 0.2 yr) to have allowed immune responses and shed mycobacterial antigen. In this present study, with a cutoff level of 0.7 U/ml, all patients with TB were classified as seronegative. The levels of GPL core antibody in patients with pulmonary TB were very low or absent (0.1 ± 0.1 U/ml). In contrast, in previous studies (7, 8, 13), GPL seropositivity in patients with pulmonary TB ranged between 5.2 and 25%. One possible explanation for this previously reported lack of specificity may be that there was latent coinfection of MAC in patients with pulmonary TB. In the present study, however, we attempted to exclude patients with such latent coinfection because the entry criteria precluded patients having underlying lung disease or past history of pulmonary TB. Patients with lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease associated with smoking, bronchiectasis, previous mycobacterial disease, cystic fibrosis, and pneumoconiosis are prone to have MAC coinfection (1). In addition, future studies are needed to verify the cutoff value obtained from the ROC analysis using another sample of cases and controls on a much larger scale.

MAC-PD has recently been classified into two distinct subtypes: fibrocavitary disease and NBE disease (1). Fibrocavitary disease, the most common manifestation of MAC-PD, is usually seen in middle-aged or elderly men predisposed to lung disease due to smoking and alcohol drinking. This subtype of disease, generally progressive, is similar to pulmonary TB on chest radiography. If left untreated, it can lead to extensive lung destruction and death. In contrast, NBE disease is mostly seen in nonsmoking middle-aged or elderly women without predisposing lung disease. The clinical course is usually slower and less dramatic. Patients with NBE are presumed to have had a long subclinical period before appearance of disease manifestations. Significantly higher levels of GPL core antibody were seen in NBE than in fibrocavitary disease (P < 0.05) and higher seropositivity was found in patients with the former (91.4% compared with 63.2%). There were no significant differences of extent of disease between the two groups in patients who underwent CCT and serodiagnosis at the same time. Therefore, the results suggested the possibility that the antibody levels tend not to elevate in patients with fibrocavitary disease. This may reduce the utility of serodiagnosis for discriminating cavitary MAC from cavitary TB. However, the antibody would probably be present at high levels in patients with extensive lesions in fibrocavitary disease as was indeed found in three patients (17.9 ± 5.9 U/ml) who had extensive lesions (more than 13 segments) (Figure 4). Further investigations are required for confirmation of this notion in a larger study.

Of the 70 patients with MAC-PD, 64 had previously received combination chemotherapy, as recommended by the ATS guidelines (1). However, all had MAC-positive cultures at the time of serum collection, and were considered to have active MAC-PD. Thus, antibody levels were not changed by the failure of chemotherapy—that is, there was no conversion to seronegative from seropositive status (8); therefore, effects of the previous treatment on antibody levels were limited. Obviously, it would nonetheless be better to enroll chemotherapy-naive patients from diverse ethnic and racial populations and different geographic areas in future studies.

At present, the diagnosis of MAC-PD is usually made according to the ATS guidelines, which include clinical, radiographic, and microbiological criteria (1). The latter requires multiple positive cultures for MAC from sputum, a positive culture from bronchial lavage or a lung biopsy specimen, together with the other diagnostic features. Although it is easy to meet the criteria in advanced-stage MAC-PD, it is often difficult in early-stage disease. In clinical routine, it is impractical to obtain multiple sputum samples or perform bronchoscopy to obtain bronchial washings or lung tissue in all patients. It is also time consuming, because a long duration is required before the results of multiple cultures are available. There are several rapid methods for identification of MAC, but they have some limitations. The liquid culture–based system using radiometry and fluorometry allows the detection of mycobacterial growth at an early stage, fewer than 7 days for nontuberculous mycobacteria. However, limitations of this system include the inability to observe colony morphology, difficulty in recognizing mixed cultures, overgrowth by contaminations, cost, and radioisotope disposal. Rapid identification of MAC is also possible using DNA hybridization, nucleic acid amplification, or high-pressure liquid chromatography (1). The use of molecular biological technology has shortened the time required to identify mycobacteria from several weeks to as little as 1 day. The overall sensitivity for detecting MAC varies between 70 and 100%, with a specificity greater than 98%. However, the inability to distinguish live and dead organisms precludes nucleic acid amplification for definite diagnosis of active disease (14).

The EIA kit is a rapid (within a few hours) and noninvasive assay with high sensitivity (84.3%) and specificity (100%) for diagnosing MAC-PD. Using the EIA kit, as reported here, MAC-PD could be efficiently differentiated from MAC contamination. "MAC contamination" defined in the present study was considered to represent contamination from the environment, because patients were asymptomatic and revealed no significant CCT findings indicating active mycobacterial disease. Most of those people classified into the MAC contamination group were so categorized based on a single positive MAC culture by chance during the follow-up period after completion of chemotherapy for pulmonary TB or at routine examination on admission for other diseases. It is difficult to be certain that MAC contamination, as defined here, does not indicate subclinical infection because no confirmatory pathology was obtained. However, if MAC contamination does reflect subclinical infection, it is of little clinical importance and does not mandate therapy.

There were 15.7% false-negative EIA determinations in patients with MAC-PD. In such cases, diagnosis of MAC-PD should be made according to the ATS guidelines, as previously described. There are several possible explanations for these false-negative results, including the following: (1) recently diagnosed disease; (2) change of GPL core antigenicity after chemotherapy; or (3) diversity of immune responses to GPL core in individual patients, potentially governed by HLA genes (15). Therefore, it might be expected that not all patients with MAC-PD are capable of producing antibody to GPL core. Although the specificity determined here for the EIA kit was high, there remains also the possibility of false-positive results in patients with disease due to other mycobacteria, such as Mycobacterium fortuitum, Mycobacterium chelonae, Mycobacterium abscessus, and Mycobacterium scrofulaceum, because these organisms also possess GPL on their cell wall surface (10, 11, 16). Indeed, we have detected seropositivity in several patients with culture-positive M. fortuitum (data not shown). The incidence of pulmonary disease due to these other mycobacteria is relatively low (<5%) in Japan and the United States (6, 17), but a report from South Korea documented a high incidence of pulmonary infection by M. abscessus or M. fortuitum (33 and 11%, respectively (18). Therefore, caution is necessary when interpreting the results of the EIA kit in locations where other mycobacterial infections are endemic.

A recent study using high-resolution CT documented that characteristic findings with multiple small nodular shadows combined with bronchiectasis are predictive for culture-positive MAC with a relatively high probability. Swenson and colleagues (19) reported that, of 15 patients with these characteristic findings, 8 (53%) had cultures positive for MAC. Tanaka and coworkers (20) reported that, of 26 similar patients, 13 (50%) had positive cultures for MAC in bronchial washings. Therefore, combining positive results obtained by the EIA and the characteristic findings of high-resolution CT should yield a definitive diagnosis of MAC-PD even in patients with sputum culture–negative results for MAC. This approach may be useful especially in elderly patients with complications, in whom bronchoscopy cannot be performed.

In summary, the EIA kit for detection of serum IgA antibody specific for GPL core antigen is useful for rapid and accurate serodiagnosis of MAC-PD. Taken together with clinical, radiographic, and microbiological criteria, the kit may be a valuable tool for the diagnosis of MAC-PD. Validation of the EIA kit in the diagnosis of MAC-PD requires a larger controlled study in diverse populations.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Supported by grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (Research on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, Health Sciences research grants); the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology; Tauns Laboratory, Inc.; and the Osaka Tuberculosis Research Foundation.

This article contains an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents at www.atsjournals.org

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200705-771OC on December 13, 2007

Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.

Received in original form May 25, 2007; accepted in final form December 13, 2007


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, Holland SM, Horsburgh R, Huitt G, Iademarco MF, et al.; ATS Mycobacterial Diseases Subcommittee. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175:367–416.[Free Full Text]
  2. Subcommittee of the Joint Tuberculosis Committee of the British Thoracic Society. Management of opportunist mycobacterial infections: Joint Tuberculosis Committee guidelines 1999. Thorax 2000;55:210–218.[Free Full Text]
  3. Field SK, Fisher D, Cowie RL. Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease in patients without HIV infection. Chest 2004;126:566–581.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Field SK, Cowie RL. Lung disease due to the more common nontuberculous mycobacteria. Chest 2006;129:1653–1672.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Khan K, Wang J, Marras TK. Nontuberculous mycobacterial sensitization in the United States: national trends over three decades. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;176:306–313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Sakatani M. Nontuberculous mycobacteriosis: the present status of epidemiology and clinical studies. Kekkaku 1999;74:377–384.[Medline]
  7. Kitada S, Maekura R, Toyoshima N, Fujiwara N, Yano I, Ogura T, Ito M, Kobayashi K. Serodiagnosis of pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex with an enzyme immunoassay that uses a mixture of glycopeptidolipid antigens. Clin Infect Dis 2002;35:1328–1335.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Kitada S, Maekura R, Toyoshima N, Naka T, Fujiwara N, Kobayashi M, Yano I, Ito M, Kobayashi K. Use of glycopeptidolipid core antigen for serodiagnosis of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease in immunocompetent patients. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2005;12:44–51.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Kitada S, Nishiuchi Y, Hiraga T, Naka N, Hashimoto H, Yoshimura K, Miki K, Miki M, Motone M, Fujikawa T, et al. Serological test and chest computed tomography findings in patients with Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease. Eur Respir J 2007;29:1217–1223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Aspinall GO, Chatterjee D, Brennan PJ. The variable surface glycolipids of mycobacteria: structures, synthesis of epitopes, and biological properties. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem 1995;51:169–242.[Medline]
  11. Brennan PJ, Nikaido H. The envelope of mycobacteria. Annu Rev Biochem 1995;64:29–63.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Fujiwara N, Nakata N, Maeda S, Naka T, Doe M, Yano I, Kobayashi K. Structural characterization of a specific glycopeptidolipid containing a novel N-acyl-deoxy sugar from mycobacterium intracellulare serotype 7 and genetic analysis of its glycosylation pathway. J Bacteriol 2007;189:1099–1108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Fujita Y, Doi T, Maekura R, Ito M, Yano I. Differences in serological responses to specific glycopeptidolipid-core and common lipid antigens in patients with pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium complex. J Med Microbiol 2006;55:189–199.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Hellyer TJ, Fletcher TW, Bates JH, Stead WW, Templeton GL, Cave MD, Eisenach KD. Strand displacement amplification and the polymerase chain reaction for monitoring response to treatment in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 1996;173:934–941.[Medline]
  15. Arend SM, Geluk A, van Meijgaarden KE, van Dissel JT, Theisen M, Andersen P, Ottenhoff TH. Antigenic equivalence of human T-cell responses to mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific RD1-encoded protein antigens ESAT-6 and culture filtrate protein 10 and to mixtures of synthetic peptides. Infect Immun 2000;68:3314–3321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Chatterjee D, Khoo KH. The surface glycopeptidolipids of mycobacteria: structures and biological properties. Cell Mol Life Sci 2001;58:2018–2042.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. O'Brien RJ, Geiter LJ, Snider DE Jr. The epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases in the United States: results from a national survey. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;135:1007–1014.[Medline]
  18. Koh WJ, Kwon OJ, Jeon K, Kim TS, Lee KS, Park YK, Bai GH. Clinical significance of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from respiratory specimens in Korea. Chest 2006;129:341–348.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Swensen SJ, Hartman TE, Williams DE. Computed tomographic diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex in patients with bronchiectasis. Chest 1994;105:49–52.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Tanaka E, Amitani R, Niimi A, Suzuki K, Murayama T, Kuze F. Yield of computed tomography and bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:2041–2046.[Abstract]

Related articles in AJRCCM:

Help for the Diagnosis of Some, but Not All Cases of Mycobacterium avium–Complex Pulmonary Disease
Alvin S. Teirstein
AJRCCM 2008 177: 677-679. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
W. W. Yew and C. C. Leung
Update in Tuberculosis 2008
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2009; 179(5): 337 - 343.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
H. Yeager
The Lady Windermere Syndrome: Is There a Racial as Well as a Gender Bias?
Chest, October 1, 2008; 134(4): 889 - 890.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. S. Teirstein
Help for the Diagnosis of Some, but Not All Cases of Mycobacterium avium-Complex Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2008; 177(7): 677 - 679.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200705-771OCv1
177/7/793    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJRCCM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitada, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitada, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2008 American Thoracic Society