help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stav, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stav, D.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 177. pp. 462, (2008)
© 2008 American Thoracic Society


Correspondence

Modalities for Diagnosis of Peripheral Lung Diseases

To the Editor:

I read with interest the article by Dr. Eberhardt and colleagues (1), which demonstrates that a combination of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) improves the diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopy in peripheral lung lesions compared with either of the procedures individually. Furthermore, the combination does not compromise safety. Their primary outcome was the diagnostic yield and secondary outcomes included analysis of yield by lesion size, lobar location, and lesion pathology.

The more important comparison relevant for the clinician, however, is whether the EBUS and ENB combination procedure is superior to or of the same value as computed tomography (CT)–guided transthoracic needle aspiration and/or biopsy (TTNA/B) in diagnosing peripheral lung lesions. Several aspects of the TTNA/B procedure offer special advantages over the EBUS and ENB combination procedure. The TTNA/B procedure offers a higher diagnostic yield of up to 90% of those tested (2), and the suspected nodule may be smaller than 10 mm (3). The TTNA/B procedure is done under local anesthesia, whereas the combined procedure is done under general anesthesia or moderate sedation. In addition, the cost of TTNA/B is much lower than the combined EBUS and ENB procedure.

Two aspects of the EBUS and ENB procedure, nevertheless, are worth noting. First, Eberhardt and coworkers reported that pneumothorax occurred in only about 10% of those tested, compared with a 20% rate in transthoracic biopsies. However, the incidence of pneumothorax also relates to the degree of obstructive airway disease (3); the authors didn't report the FEV1 level or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) status of their patients. Furthermore, following pneumothorax, EBUS and ENB cannot be repeated due to anatomical changes after partial collapse of the lung, while with CT-guided needle aspiration, biopsy is still possible. A second aspect relevant in the United States is that bronchoscopy-based procedures are usually done by pulmonologists, while CT-based procedures are done by radiologists. In other countries, however, pulmonologists perform the CT-guided transthoracic biopsy as well. Table 1 tabulates our last 3 years of cumulative experience with TTNA/B. The overall diagnostic rate was 83%, and the pneumothorax rate 19%. Only 4% of patients required treatment with chest tube, and no fatality occurred.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. SINGLE PULMONARY NODULE: DIAGNOSTIC YIELDS BY SIZE, LOCATION, AND DISEASE TYPE, AND PNEUMOTHORAX RATE

 
In summary, TTNA/B is superior to EBUS and ENB for diagnostic purposes, and less expensive. A comparison of the complication rates between the two approaches awaits the presentation of valuable data on the degree of COPD in their patients.

David Stav

Assaf Horafeh Medical Center
Zerrifin, Israel

FOOTNOTES

Conflict of Interest Statement: D.S. has no financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.

REFERENCES

  1. Eberhardt R, Anantham D, Ernst A, Feller-Kopman D, Herth F. Multimodality bronchoscopic diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;176:36–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ohno Y, Hatabu H, Takenaka D, Imai M, Ohbayashi C, Sugimura K. Transthoracic CT-guided biopsy with multiplanar reconstruction image improves diagnostic accuracy of solitary pulmonary nodules. Eur J Radiol 2004;51:160–168.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Wisnivesky JP, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF. Diagnostic percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy does not affect survival in stage I lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;174:684–688.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stav, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stav, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2008 American Thoracic Society