help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tam, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tam, C. M.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 177. pp. 1290, (2008)
© 2008 American Thoracic Society


Correspondence

Inhaled Corticosteroids Might Not Protect against Lung Cancer

To the Editor:

We read with interest the cohort study by Dr. Parimon and colleagues (1), which suggested a reduced risk of lung cancer among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). As lung cancer is the most common cause of death among patients with COPD (25), it might be tempting to consider ICS for chemoprevention of lung cancer. However, there may be a few concerns.

A major concern was the limited number of ICS users included in the cohort study (1). In using ICS dose as a continuous categorical variable, it is conceivable that a minor decrease in lung cancer events among higher-dose ICS users, either by chance or by virtue of death from other causes, could generate an apparent protection of ICS against lung cancers by its high leverage. Another concern was the lack of a definite dose–response relationship shown by the study (1). A considerable lag period is expected between onset of early precancerous lesions (where ICS is postulated to act) and detection of lung cancer. However, the median time interval for detecting lung cancer was only 1.4 years. If we assume that current usage of ICS indicates chronic usage, it might be better to study ICS usage itself, rather than the much less stable dosage. Based on Parimon and coworkers' original data, Table 1 shows that lung cancer rates are similar for nonusers and all ICS users combined, with lower-dose ICS users actually demonstrating a higher rate than nonusers.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. NO SIGNIFICANT ASSOCIATION BETWEEN INHALED CORTICOSTEROIDS AND LUNG CANCER*

 
The investigators emphasized a similar point estimate in the adjusted hazard ratio (around 0.4) for the higher-dose ICS, despite modifying various conditions in their analysis. Again, the small number of ICS users might limit the robustness of multivariable analysis. If the protective effect were indeed so early and strong for ICS doses equivalent to 1,200 µg or more of triamcinolone per day, it would probably have been detected by a recent randomized controlled trial involving more than 3,000 patients receiving fluticasone 1,000 µg (equivalent to 4,000 µg of triamcinolone) daily, with or without salmeterol, followed up for 3 years (6).

Kwok Chiu Chang, Chi Chiu Leung and Cheuk Ming Tam

Department of Health
Hong Kong, China

FOOTNOTES

Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.

REFERENCES

  1. Parimon T, Chien JW, Bryson CL, McDonell MB, Udris EM, Au DH. Inhaled corticosteroids and risk of lung cancer among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175:712–719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Miller YE, Keith RL. Inhaled corticosteroids and lung cancer chemoprevention. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175:636–637.[Free Full Text]
  3. Lung Health Study Research Group. Effect of inhaled triamcinolone on the decline in pulmonary function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1902–1909.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Burge PS, Calverley PM, Jones PW, Spencer S, Anderson JA, Maslen TK. Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the ISOLDE trial. BMJ 2000;320:1297–1303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Anthonisen NR, Skeans MA, Wise RA, Manfreda J, Kanner RE, Connett JE; Lung Health Study Research Group. The effects of a smoking cessation intervention on 14.5-year mortality: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:233–239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Calverley PM, Anderson JA, Celli B, Ferguson GT, Jenkins C, Jones PW, Yates JC, Vestbo J; TORCH Investigators. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:775–789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tam, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tam, C. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2008 American Thoracic Society