© 2007 American Thoracic Society
Antituberculosis Drugs and HepatotoxicityFrom the Authors:Drs. Yew and Leung underscore several issues regarding the hepatotoxicity of antituberculosis medications. The recent ATS Statement was primarily focused on discussion of first-line agents, due to the substantial breadth and length of the document (1). The Statement does also review hepatotoxicity associated with fluoroquinolones and refers to that associated with para-aminosalicylic acid. Given the increasing need for second-line drugs to treat tuberculosis resistant to first-line agents, we agree there is basis for additional study of the former. We agree with Drs. Yee and Leung that rechallenge with a hepatotoxic agent with rapidly escalating doses may not generally be helpful, since most hepatotoxicity is idiosyncratic and not dose-related. The Statement, like Drs. Yee and Leung's letter, also discourages rechallenge with pyrazinamide after successful reintroduction of isoniazid and rifampin. As discussed in the Statement, rifampin and pyrazinamide are not generally recommended for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection due to hepatotoxicity of the regimen (1, 2). Drs. Yee and Leung suggest that the role of routine biochemical monitoring should be re-examined. Studies to assess the optimal monitoring strategy to identify and prevent hepatotoxicity are needed, as discussed in the Statement. Identification of factors that increase the risk of hepatotoxicity should prompt regular biochemical monitoring, and clinical monitoring should be provided for all treated patients.
FOOTNOTES Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. REFERENCES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||