help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on November 30, 2006, doi:10.1164/rccm.200605-665OC
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200605-665OCv1
175/5/480    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJRCCM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hermans, G.
Right arrow Articles by Van den Berghe, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hermans, G.
Right arrow Articles by Van den Berghe, G.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 175. pp. 480-489, (2007)
© 2007 American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200605-665OC


Original Article

Impact of Intensive Insulin Therapy on Neuromuscular Complications and Ventilator Dependency in the Medical Intensive Care Unit

Greet Hermans1, Alexander Wilmer1, Wouter Meersseman1, Ilse Milants2, Pieter J. Wouters2, Herman Bobbaers1, Frans Bruyninckx3 and Greet Van den Berghe2

1 Medical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, 2 Department of Intensive Care Medicine, and 3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Prof. G. Van den Berghe, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: greta.vandenberghe{at}med.kuleuven.be


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Rationale: Critical illness polyneuropathy/myopathy causes limb and respiratory muscle weakness, prolongs mechanical ventilation, and extends hospitalization of intensive care patients. Besides controlling risk factors, no specific prevention or treatment exists. Recently, intensive insulin therapy prevented critical illness polyneuropathy in a surgical intensive care unit.

Objectives: To investigate the impact of intensive insulin therapy on polyneuropathy/myopathy and treatment with prolonged mechanical ventilation in medical patients in the intensive care unit for at least 7 days.

Methods: This was a prospectively planned subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of intensive insulin versus conventional therapy on morbidity and mortality in critically ill medical patients. All patients who were still in intensive care on Day 7 were screened weekly by electroneuromyography. The effect of intensive insulin therapy on critical illness polyneuropathy/myopathy and the relationship with duration of mechanical ventilation were assessed.

Measurements and Main Results: Independent of risk factors, intensive insulin therapy reduced incidence of critical illness polyneuropathy/myopathy (107/212 [50.5%] to 81/208 [38.9%], p = 0.02). Treatment with prolonged (>= 14 d) mechanical ventilation was reduced from 99 of 212 (46.7%) to 72 of 208 (34.6%) (p = 0.01). This was statistically only partially explained by prevention of critical illness polyneuropathy/myopathy.

Conclusion: In a subset of medical patients in the intensive care unit for at least 7 days, enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of intensive insulin therapy, those assigned to intensive insulin therapy had a reduced incidence of critical illness polyneuropathy/myopathy and were treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation less frequently.

Key Words: polyneuropathy • blood glucose • myopathy



    AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Scientific Knowledge on the Subject
Critical illness polyneuropathy/myopathy causes limb and respiratory muscle weakness, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and extended hospitalization. Besides controlling risk factors, no specific prevention or treatment exists.

What This Study Adds to the Field
Intensive insulin therapy prevents critical illness polyneuropathy in medical ICU patients and is associated with reduced requirements for prolonged mechanical ventilation.

 
Critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) is a primary axonal motor and sensory neural disease that occurs in critically ill patients, predominantly in those with sepsis and multiple organ failure. The reported incidence of CIP in this group is 70 to 82% (1, 2). CIP complicates patient recovery due to varying degrees of limb weakness (35) and may also cause weaning difficulties due to phrenic nerve involvement (1, 48). CIP lengthens hospital stay (7), and mortality rates in these patients are increased more than seven times (9). In these patients, a coexistent primary muscle disease is often present, termed "critical illness myopathy" (CIM) (5, 8, 10).

Several risk factors for this disease have been identified, such as the use of corticosteroids (11), neuromuscular blocking agents (9, 1214), vasopressors (15, 16), or aminoglycosides (1719), organ failure (20), and parenteral nutrition (9), renal replacement therapy (9), and duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (15). Until recently, the only possible way to affect the incidence of CIP or CIM was to reduce the risk factors (8). However, strict glycemic control in a surgical ICU substantially reduced the incidence of CIP in the subset of patients who stayed in the ICU for at least 7 days. This was accompanied by a lower incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation (15). In the current study, we examine the effect of the same therapeutic intervention in a medical ICU population, which, by the nature of the diseases for which ICU admission is required, has a greater exposure to the known risk factors for CIP and CIM as compared with surgical patients.

Some of the results in this article have been presented as an abstract (21).


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study is a prospectively planned subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial (n = 1,200) of medical ICU patients allocated to either intensive or conventional insulin therapy (Figure 1). Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) was aimed at blood glucose levels of between 80 and 110 mg/dl. The conventional insulin therapy (CIT) approach required insulin only when blood glucose rose above 215 mg/dl and tapering or stopping insulin when blood glucose fell below 180 mg/dl. Details of the entire patient population have been described elsewhere (22). Details on measurement of blood glucose, ventilation, weaning, and feeding strategies are given in the online supplement.


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. CONSORT diagram. ENMG = electroneuromyography; ICU = intensive care unit.

 
Here, we assessed the impact of IIT on CIP and/or CIM (CIP/CIM), and duration of mechanical ventilation, and compared the incidence of CIP/CIM and its risk factors between medical and surgical patients in the ICU for at least 7 days.

Diagnosis of CIP/CIM
The diagnosis of CIP was made using electroneuromyography (ENMG) (4, 23, 24). Differentiation between CIP and CIM based on electrophysiologic data without muscle biopsy is only possible in cooperative patients or in those with strictly sensory CIP (4, 5, 8, 24). At this time, there is no evidence that differentiating between neuropathy and myopathy has any impact on patients' prognosis (4, 24). Therefore, we will use the term "critical illness polyneuropathy/myopathy" (CIP/CIM) in this study. Further details on the diagnosis of CIP/CIM are given in the online supplement.

Statistics
Data were analyzed using Statview 5.0 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) software. Baseline and outcome variables were depicted as means ± SD or medians (interquartile ranges). Results were compared using Student's t test, chi-square test, or Mann-Whitney U test when appropriate.

Time to weaning from mechanical ventilatory support was evaluated using cumulative hazard estimates and proportional hazard regression analysis, corrected for baseline risk factors and censoring for early deaths. The definition of prolonged mechanical ventilation was 14 days or more, which is the same as in our surgical study (15). Time to the first positive ENMG was also evaluated using cumulative hazard estimates and Cox regression analysis.

A univariate analysis of outcome was performed for the development of CIP/CIM and prolonged mechanical ventilation, evaluating the effect of treatment allocation, baseline risk factors, and known risk factors occurring during ICU stay. These risk factors are mentioned in the online supplement.

In addition to these univariate analyses of outcome, the effect of treatment allocation on the occurrence of CIP/CIM and prolonged mechanical ventilation was assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis, correcting for those risk factors that showed at least a trend toward significance (p <= 0.1) in the univariate analysis. To examine whether affecting the incidence of CIP/CIM could explain the effect of IIT on prolonged mechanical ventilation, presence or absence of CIP/CIM was entered into the multivariate logistic regression analysis for prolonged mechanical ventilation. Finally, to assess which component of IIT (blood glucose control or insulin dose) best explained its possible impact on CIP/CIM and prolonged mechanical ventilation, mean blood glucose level and insulin dose were added to the models. Parameters were checked for linearity, and nonlinear parameters were entered into the model as nominal variables.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patient Characteristics
A total of 443 of 1,200 patients were in the ICU for at least 7 days (Figure 1). ENMG data were unavailable for 23 of the 443 patients either due to technical problems or to preexisting neuromuscular disease. Of the remaining 420 patients, 212 were in the CIT group, and 208 in the IIT group. Demographic data and baseline and outcome characteristics of these patients are shown in Table 1. The CIT and IIT groups were comparable on ICU admission, apart from a slightly younger age, and a slightly lower baseline creatinine level, in the intensive group. Censoring patients in the ICU for fewer than 7 days did not lead to selection bias because outcome in the censored group was not affected by IIT (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INTENTION-TO-TREAT GROUP, PATIENTS SCREENED FOR CRITICAL ILLNESS POLYNEUROPATHY (UNCENSORED), AND THOSE EXCLUDED (CENSORED)

 
Glycemic Control
As per protocol, median A.M. blood glucose levels were 159 (interquartile range [IQR], 139–172) mg/dl in the conventional group and 102 (IQR, 97–115) mg/dl in the intensive group (p < 0.0001). These levels were achieved with 22 (5–43) units insulin per day in the conventional group and 71 (52–101) units in the intensive group (p < 0.0001).

Neuromuscular Outcome
An ENMG diagnosis of CIP/CIM was significantly more frequent in the CIT group (107/212 [50.5%]) than in the IIT group (81/208 [38.9%]) (p = 0.02 with the chi-square test) (Figure 2). Furthermore, the cumulative risk of CIP/CIM over time was significantly reduced by IIT (Figure 3, upper panel). As shown in Table 2, there was no difference in the incidence of known risk factors for CIP/CIM between the IIT and CIT groups, except for the maximal sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score during ICU stay (p = 0.02) and ICU stay itself (p = 0.02), which were significantly lower in the IIT group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, correcting for those risk factors that showed at least a trend toward significance in the univariate analysis (Table 3), demonstrated that treatment allocation to IIT remained an independent protective factor for ENMG diagnosis of CIP/CIM (p = 0.02; odds ratio [OR], 0.61 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43–0.92]) after correction for baseline severity of illness and for the known risk factors occurring during ICU stay (Table 4).


Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Incidence of critical illness polyneuropathy/critical illness myopathy (CIP/CIM) and of prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) in conventionally treated versus intensive insulin therapy–treated medical patients in the ICU for at least 7 days. *p < 0.05 obtained by chi-square test.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Cumulative hazard plots for time to weaning from mechanical ventilation and time to first ENMG positive for CIP/CIM. Filled circles represent the intensive insulin therapy group and open circles the conventionally treated group. The p value for weaning was obtained by proportional hazard regression analysis, corrected for risk factors and censored for early deaths. The p value for CIP/CIM was obtained by Cox regression analysis. C = conventional treatment group; I = intensive treatment group.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. INCIDENCE OF KNOWN RISK FACTORS DURING ICU STAY FOR CIP/CIM IN THE INTENTION-TO-TREAT GROUP, PATIENTS SCREENED FOR CIP/CIM (UNCENSORED), AND THOSE EXCLUDED FOR ANALYSIS (CENSORED)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS FOR CIP/CIM AND PROLONGED MECHANICAL VENTILATION

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4. MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR THE RISK FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CIP/CIM AND PROLONGED MECHANICAL VENTILATION

 
Prolonged infusion of neuromuscular blocking agents was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of at least one positive ENMG (p = 0.02; OR, 2.01 [1.10–3.99]). Other independent protective factors were age (p = 0.003; OR, 0.98 [0.96–0.99], per year added) and number of days of treatment with glucocorticoids (p = 0.02; OR, 0.97 [0.94–0.99], per added day). Glucocorticoids were given in 71.2% of the patients in the CIT group and 74.5% of the IIT patients. Methylprednisolone was the most frequently used drug and its indications were immunosuppressive or antiinflammatory therapy. Hydrocortisone was given for presumed adrenal failure, and dexamethasone was given for cerebral edema and was rarely used. When this analysis was done for the CIT- and IIT-treated patients separately, the reduced risk of CIP/CIM associated with the use of glucocorticoids was only present in the IIT group (p = 0.8; OR, 0.99 [0.96–1.04], per day added, for the conventional group; and p = 0.002; OR, 0.91 [0.86–0.97], per day added, for the IIT group).

When entering mean daily blood glucose level and mean daily insulin dose into the model, neither of these could independently explain the prevention of CIP/CIM with IIT (IIT: p = 0.08; OR, 0.50 [0.23–1.07]; mean daily insulin dose: p = 0.8; OR, 1.00 [1.00–1.00]; mean daily glucose level: p = 0.5; OR, 1.00 [0.99–1.00]).

Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation
The cumulative chance of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation was increased by IIT, as shown by the cumulative hazard plots in Figure 3, lower panel (p = 0.01). The number of days on the ventilator was reduced from a median of 14 (922) to 12 (820) days (p = 0.04).

IIT significantly reduced the incidence of treatment with prolonged mechanical ventilation from 99 of 212 patients (46.7%) in the CIT group to 72 of 208 patients (34.6%) in the IIT group (p = 0.01). IIT remained an independent protective factor against treatment with prolonged mechanical ventilation (p = 0.01; OR, 0.56 [0.36–0.87]) in the multivariate logistic regression model. Independent risk factors were as follows: an on-admission diagnostic category of "respiratory" (p = 0.03; OR, 4.17 [1.12–15.50]) as compared with "cardiovascular," number of days of treatment with glucocorticoids (p = 0.04; OR, 1.05 [1.002–1.09]) per day added, number of days of treatment with norepinephrine (p = 0.0008; OR, 1.10 [1.04–1.16]) per day added, and bacteremia (p = 0.001; OR, 3.53 [1.67–7.48]). Finally, exclusively receiving parenteral nutrition appeared to be a protective factor (p = 0.04; OR, 0.51 [0.27–0.97]).

Adding the diagnosis of CIP/CIM to the multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that IIT remained an independent protective factor (p = 0.02; OR, 0.058 [0.37–0.90]), whereas CIP/CIM is also an independent risk factor (p = 0.009; OR, 1.85 [1.17–2.93]). When mean daily insulin dose and mean A.M. glycemia also were added to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the effect of IIT in reducing the incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation independently from the effect on CIP/CIM was attributable to the daily insulin dose (IIT: p = 0.5; OR, 0.7 [0.25–2.03]; mean daily glucose: p = 0.6; OR, 0.99 [0.98–1.01]; mean daily insulin dose: p = 0.01; OR, 0.99 [0.99–0.99]).

Comparison between Medical and Surgical Patients in the ICU for at Least 7 Days
The incidence of CIP/CIM in the conventional insulin group (50.5%) was comparable to that in the surgical ICU population (49%) (15). The absolute reduction by IIT of the risk for CIP/CIM was even greater in the surgical population (–24%) than in the medical population (–11.6%). However, the incidence of some classical risk factors for CIP/CIM, such as use of neuromuscular blocking agents, corticosteroids, and dialysis, was clearly higher in the medical population (Table 5) (15).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 5. INCIDENCE OF KNOWN RISK FACTORS FOR CIP/CIM IN PATIENTS IN THE SURGICAL AND MEDICAL ICU FOR AT LEAST 7 DAYS

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
CIP/CIM
CIP/CIM is an important and frequent complication in critically ill patients and associated with considerable morbidity and increased mortality. In our surgical ICU population, the occurrence of CIP/CIM was significantly reduced by IIT, which was aimed at blood glucose levels between 80 and 110 mg/dl (15). In the current study, we demonstrated that IIT, in a medical population who stayed in the ICU for at least 7 days, significantly reduced the incidence of CIP/CIM.

We noticed a comparable incidence of CIP/CIM in the conventional treatment groups of both the surgical and medical long-stay population in the presence of substantially different risk factor pressure. This suggests that these risk factors per se might be less important than the sustained presence of metabolic disturbances over time in the ICU, which can be at least partially prevented by IIT. Indeed, the protective effect of IIT on the occurrence of CIP/CIM in the medical ICU population confirms the beneficial effect, even in a population that is theoretically considered to be at much higher risk.

The mechanisms underlying these observations remain unclear. The peripheral effects of chronic hyperglycemia on the nervous system in diabetes are well known (25). As we have hypothesized before, in critically ill patients the peripheral nervous system might be at increased risk for the accelerated development of damage by hyperglycemia due to passive uptake of glucose and increased generation and/or a deficient scavenging system for reactive oxygen species (26). We hypothesized that avoiding hyperglycemia may exert a similar protective effect on neural mitochondrial structure and function (15), as in hepatocytes (27). Maintaining normoglycemia also reduces organ damage by endothelial protection through a diminished release of nitric oxide (28). As we have published before, insulin therapy itself, however, may also contribute to beneficial effects of the intensive therapy regimen due to endothelial protection, reduced inflammation, and improvement of dyslipidemia (26, 28, 29). However, in this study, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that neither hyperglycemia nor insulin dose was exclusively or independently responsible for the effect of IIT on CIP/CIM.

Interestingly, we found that corticosteroids appeared to exert a protective effect on the occurrence of CIP/CIM. This confirms our previous observation in the surgical population (15). Almost three-quarters of our patients received glucocorticoids. This figure may seem high, but the population studied was not an average ICU population but consisted of the sickest patients who were in ICU for at least 7 days. Data in the literature on the impact of corticosteroids on neuromuscular function have been controversial. Different reports have described an increase in CIM (12, 14) and CIP (13) in patients treated with a combination of corticosteroids and neuromuscular blocking agents. Most reports regarding the effect of steroids alone on CIP (9) or CIM (12, 30, 31) and CIP/CIM (20, 32) did not find such a correlation. In two reports, however, corticosteroids were found to be an important risk factor for the development of neuromuscular disorders in patients in the ICU (11, 33). Our results, however, indicated that corticosteroids, which are known to cause hyperglycemia and insulin resistance (34), may not exert deleterious effects on CIP/CIM when blood glucose levels are kept normal with insulin, and might even be protective. Whether antiinflammatory properties of glucocorticoids might also exert a beneficial effect on the neuromuscular system and explain this finding needs further investigation.

Our results also confirm the increased risk for CIP/CIM due to prolonged infusion of neuromuscular blocking agents. An unusual finding, however, was the protective effect of aging on the development of CIP/CIM. We do not have an explanation for this.

Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation
We also examined the effect of IIT on the incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation. IIT clearly reduced the incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Multivariate regression analysis showed that, after correction for baseline parameters for severity of illness and risk factors occurring during ICU stay, IIT itself significantly and independently reduced the risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation. This effect appeared not to be entirely explained by the reduction in the incidence of CIP/CIM. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed, however, that the effect of IIT in reducing the incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation, independent of the reduction in CIP/CIM, was entirely attributable to the daily insulin dose. Insulin is known to have an anabolic effect on the skeletal muscle (35). Further research needs to clarify if this mechanism can explain our results.

Interestingly, the number of days of treatment with glucocorticoids clearly increases the risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation. Glucocorticoids are indeed known to have catabolic effects on the skeletal muscle (36). We did notice that the diagnosis of CIP/CIM was made, and therefore risk factors were analyzed, over a median duration of 8 days. Concerning prolonged mechanical ventilation, risk factors were analyzed for all patients until Day 14. Currently, we can only speculate on a possible important time component of the effect of corticosteroids on the neuromuscular system to explain the beneficial effect on CIP/CIM on the one hand, and the detrimental effect on prolonged mechanical ventilation on the other hand. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and to clarify possible underlying mechanisms.

Finally, other risk factors identified for prolonged mechanical ventilation were days of treatment with norepinephrine and bacteremia, which are associated with severity of illness. Exclusively receiving parenteral nutrition paradoxically appeared to be protective for prolonged mechanical ventilation. We think this is due to a selection bias, because these patients had a significantly shorter ICU stay.

Limitations
This study has some limitations. First, this study could not be blinded for obvious reasons. To minimize the bias, however, clear guidelines were used for sedation, mechanical ventilation, weaning, and patient discharge. Moreover, this is an analysis of the subgroup of patients in a randomized controlled trial who stayed in the ICU for at least 7 days. Because we did not collect ENMGs from patients who died or were discharged within the first week in the ICU, we could not perform an analysis on the total intention-to-treat population. By selecting the patients who were in the ICU for at least 1 week, we did select the more severely ill patients, who were often treated with corticosteroids, vasopressors, neuromuscular blocking agents, and renal replacement therapy. Hence, the high incidence of CIP/CIM we observed in the conventional group and the reduction by IIT may not necessarily apply to less sick patients who are in the ICU for less than 1 week. Moreover, the percentage of kilocalories administered by enteral route at 1 week was limited (22), despite the use of a formal feeding protocol. Others have also noticed a major difference between the goals of nutrition and the actual amount administered, due to gastrointestinal complications (37, 38) or procedures (39). It is unlikely, however, that this feeding aspect played a critical role because patients with CIP/CIM received equal amounts of parenteral feeding. Moreover, although a possible impact of parenteral feeding on CIP/CIM has been postulated, no study has shown a causal relationship between the administration of enteral or parenteral feeding and the development of CIP/CIM (8), and neither have we. Another limitation of the study is that we did not perform follow-up ENMG evaluation of the patients who were discharged from the ICU, which could have rendered information on the duration of and recovery from CIP/CIM.

Finally, IIT currently has only been proven to have beneficial effects in two large randomized controlled trials at our center. Results of two subsequent studies, which were ended prematurely due to difficulties in safely achieving blood glucose control, have not been published in peer-reviewed journals. Also, IIT can be complicated by hypoglycemia. In our studies, hypoglycemia did not cause early deaths, only minor immediate and transient morbidity in a minority of patients, and no late neurologic sequelae among hospital survivors (40). Nevertheless, prevention and early detection of hypoglycemia need to be a major concern when implementing this therapy.

We conclude that IIT is the only therapy that has been proven to actually decrease the incidence of CIP/CIM, and the incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation, not only in a surgical population but also in a medical ICU population in which the incidence of other known risk factors for CIP/CIM is much higher. Further studies are needed to fully understand the biological mechanisms underlying this finding, and multicenter trials are needed to confirm these results.


    FOOTNOTES
 
This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents at www.atsjournals.org

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200605-665OC on November 30, 2006

Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.

Received in original form May 17, 2006; accepted in final form November 30, 2006


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Witt NJ, Zochodne DW, Bolton CF, Grand'Maison F, Wells G, Young GB, Sibbald WJ. Peripheral nerve function in sepsis and multiple organ failure. Chest 1991;99:176–184.
  2. Berek K, Margreiter J, Willeit J, Berek A, Schmutzhard E, Mutz NJ. Polyneuropathies in critically ill patients: a prospective evaluation. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:849–855.[Medline]
  3. Zifko UA, Zipko HT, Bolton CF. Clinical and electrophysiological findings in critical illness polyneuropathy. J Neurol Sci 1998;159:186–193.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Latronico N, Shehu I, Seghelini E. Neuromuscular sequelae of critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005;11:381–390.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Pandit L, Agrawal A. Neuromuscular disorders in critical illness. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2006;108:621–627.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. De Jonghe B, Bastuji-Garin S, Sharshar T, Outin H, Brochard L. Does ICU-acquired paresis lengthen weaning from mechanical ventilation? Intensive Care Med 2004;30:1117–1121.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Garnacho-Montero J, Amaya-Villar R, Garcia-Garmendia JL, Madrazo-Osuna J, Ortiz-Leyba C. Effect of critical illness polyneuropathy on the withdrawal from mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in septic patients. Crit Care Med 2005;33:349–354.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Bolton CF. Neuromuscular manifestations of critical illness. Muscle Nerve 2005;32:140–163.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Garnacho-Montero J, Madrazo-Osuna J, Garcia-Garmendia JL, Ortiz-Leyba C, Jimenez-Jimenez FJ, Barrero-Almodovar A, Garnacho-Montero MC, Moyano-Del-Estad MR. Critical illness polyneuropathy: risk factors and clinical consequences. A cohort study in septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2001;27:1288–1296.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Latronico N, Fenzi F, Recupero D, Guarneri B, Tomelleri G, Tonin P, De Maria G, Antonini L, Rizzuto N, Candiani A. Critical illness myopathy and neuropathy. Lancet 1996;347:1579–1582.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, Authier FJ, Durand-Zaleski I, Boussarsar M, Cerf C, Renaud E, Mesrati F, Carlet J, et al. Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. JAMA 2002;288:2859–2867.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Leatherman JW, Fluegel WL, David WS, Davies SF, Iber C. Muscle weakness in mechanically ventilated patients with severe asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:1686–1690.[Abstract]
  13. Faragher MW, Day BJ, Dennett X. Critical care myopathy: an electrophysiological and histological study. Muscle Nerve 1996;19:516–518.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Larsson L, Li X, Edstrom L, Eriksson LI, Zackrisson H, Argentini C, Schiaffino S. Acute quadriplegia and loss of muscle myosin in patients treated with nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents and corticosteroids: mechanisms at the cellular and molecular levels. Crit Care Med 2000;28:34–45.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Van den Berghe G, Schoonheydt K, Becx P, Bruyninckx F, Wouters PJ. Insulin therapy protects the central and peripheral nervous system of intensive care patients. Neurology 2005;64:1348–1353.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Thiele RI, Jakob H, Hund E, Tantzky S, Keller S, Kamler M, Herold U, Hagl S. Sepsis and catecholamine support are the major risk factors for critical illness polyneuropathy after open heart surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;48:145–150.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Bischoff A, Meier C, Roth F. Gentamicin neurotoxicity (polyneuropathy–encephalopathy) [in German]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1977;107:3–8.[Medline]
  18. Leijten FS, Harinck-de Weerd JE, Poortvliet DC, de Weerd AW. The role of polyneuropathy in motor convalescence after prolonged mechanical ventilation. JAMA 1995;274:1221–1225.[Abstract]
  19. Leijten FS, de Weerd AW, Poortvliet DC, De Ridder VA, Ulrich C, Harink-De Weerd JE. Critical illness polyneuropathy in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and weaning from the ventilator. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:856–861.[Medline]
  20. Bednarik J, Vondracek P, Dusek L, Moravcova E, Cundrle I. Risk factors for critical illness polyneuromyopathy. J Neurol 2005;252:343–351.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Hermans G, Wilmer A, Meersseman W, Milants I, Wouters P, Bobbaers H, Bruyninckx F, Van den Berghe G. Intensive insulin therapy reduces critical illness neuromuscular complications and prolonged mechanical ventilation in a medical ICU. Intensive Care Med 2006;32:S106.
  22. Van den Berghe G, Wilmer A, Hermans G, Meersseman W, Wouters PJ, Milants I, Van Wijngaerden E, Bobbaers H, Bouillon R. Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;354:449–461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. van Mook WN, Hulsewe-Evers RP. Critical illness polyneuropathy. Curr Opin Crit Care 2002;8:302–310.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Latronico N. Neuromuscular alterations in the critically ill patient: critical illness myopathy, critical illness neuropathy, or both? Intensive Care Med 2003;29:1411–1413.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Ross MA. Neuropathies associated with diabetes. Med Clin North Am 1993;77:111–124.[Medline]
  26. Van den Berghe G. How does blood glucose control with insulin save lives in intensive care? J Clin Invest 2004;114:1187–1195.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Vanhorebeek I, De Vos R, Mesotten D, Wouters PJ, Wolf-Peeters C, Van den Berghe G. Protection of hepatocyte mitochondrial ultrastructure and function by strict blood glucose control with insulin in critically ill patients. Lancet 2005;365:53–59.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Langouche L, Vanhorebeek I, Vlasselaers D, Vander PS, Wouters PJ, Skogstrand K, Hansen TK, Van den Berghe G. Intensive insulin therapy protects the endothelium of critically ill patients. J Clin Invest 2005;115:2277–2286.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Hansen TK, Thiel S, Wouters PJ, Christiansen JS, Van den Berghe G. Intensive insulin therapy exerts antiinflammatory effects in critically ill patients and counteracts the adverse effect of low mannose-binding lectin levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:1082–1088.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. de Letter MA, Schmitz PI, Visser LH, Verheul FA, Schellens RL, Op de Coul DA, van der Meche FG. Risk factors for the development of polyneuropathy and myopathy in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2001;29:2281–2286.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Stibler H, Edstrom L, Ahlbeck K, Remahl S, Ansved T. Electrophoretic determination of the myosin/actin ratio in the diagnosis of critical illness myopathy. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:1515–1527.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Bercker S, Weber-Carstens S, Deja M, Grimm C, Wolf S, Behse F, Busch T, Falke KJ, Kaisers U. Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2005;33:711–715.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al Saidi F, Cooper AB, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, et al. One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003;348:683–693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Andrews RC, Walker BR. Glucocorticoids and insulin resistance: old hormones, new targets. Clin Sci (Lond) 1999;96:513–523.[Medline]
  35. Chow LS, Albright RC, Bigelow ML, Toffolo G, Cobelli C, Nair KS. Mechanism of insulin's anabolic effect on muscle: measurements of muscle protein synthesis and breakdown using aminoacyl tRNA and other surrogate measures. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2006;291:E729–E736.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Ma K, Mallidis C, Bhasin S, Mahabadi V, Artaza J, Gonzalez-Cadavid N, Arias J, Salehian B. Glucocorticoid-induced skeletal muscle atrophy is associated with upregulation of myostatin gene expression. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2003;285:E363–E371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Montejo JC. Enteral nutrition-related gastrointestinal complications in critically ill patients: a multicenter study. The Nutritional and Metabolic Working Group of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units. Crit Care Med 1999;27:1447–1453.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Heyland D, Cook DJ, Winder B, Brylowski L, Van deMark H, Guyatt G. Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a prospective survey. Crit Care Med 1995;23:1055–1060.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Rice TW, Swope T, Bozeman S, Wheeler AP. Variation in enteral nutrition delivery in mechanically ventilated patients. Nutrition 2005;21:786–792.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Van den Berghe G. Benefit of intensive insulin therapy in mixed medical/surgical ICU: benefit versus harm. Diabetes 2006;55:3151–3159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related articles in AJRCCM:

Critical Illness Neuromyopathy: From Risk Factors to Prevention
Bernard De Jonghe and Simon Finfer
AJRCCM 2007 175: 424-425. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
N. A. Ali, J. M. O'Brien Jr., S. P. Hoffmann, G. Phillips, A. Garland, J. C. W. Finley, K. Almoosa, R. Hejal, K. M. Wolf, S. Lemeshow, et al.
Acquired Weakness, Handgrip Strength, and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2008; 178(3): 261 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. A. Fowler, N. K. J. Adhikari, D. C. Scales, W. L. Lee, and G. D. Rubenfeld
Update in Critical Care 2007
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2008; 177(8): 808 - 819.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
R. Hyzy, S. Huang, J. Myers, K. Flaherty, and F. Martinez
Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Chest, November 1, 2007; 132(5): 1652 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Langouche, S. Vander Perre, P. J. Wouters, A. D'Hoore, T. K. Hansen, and G. Van den Berghe
Effect of Intensive Insulin Therapy on Insulin Sensitivity in the Critically Ill
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2007; 92(10): 3890 - 3897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
I. Vanhorebeek, L. Langouche, and G. Van den Berghe
Tight Blood Glucose Control With Insulin in the ICU: Facts and Controversies
Chest, July 1, 2007; 132(1): 268 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
B. De Jonghe and S. Finfer
Critical Illness Neuromyopathy: From Risk Factors to Prevention
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2007; 175(5): 424 - 425.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200605-665OCv1
175/5/480    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJRCCM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hermans, G.
Right arrow Articles by Van den Berghe, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hermans, G.
Right arrow Articles by Van den Berghe, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2007 American Thoracic Society