help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on October 5, 2006, doi:10.1164/rccm.200602-212OC
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200602-212OCv1
175/2/184    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, S.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 175. pp. 184-189, (2007)
© 2007 American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200602-212OC


Original Article

Endogenous Secretory Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products in Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Seiichi Kobayashi, Hiroshi Kubo, Takashi Suzuki, Kota Ishizawa, Mitsuhiro Yamada, Mei He, Yasuhiko Yamamoto, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Hironobu Sasano, Hidetada Sasaki and Satoshi Suzuki

Departments of Geriatric and Respiratory Medicine, and Department of Pathology, Tohoku University School of Medicine; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Institute of Development, Aging, and Cancer, Tohoku University; Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai; and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Vascular Biology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Hiroshi Kubo, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Geriatric and Respiratory Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryoumachi, Aobaku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan. E-mail: hkubo{at}geriat.med.tohoku.ac.jp


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Rationale: The receptor for advanced glycation end products is a multiligand receptor that plays an important role in regulating the invasiveness and metastatic potential of cancer cells. A recently discovered novel splice variant, the endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end products, mediates the receptor for advanced glycation end-product–associated cell responses by functioning as a decoy receptor.

Objectives: To evaluate the expression pattern of endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end products in non–small cell lung carcinoma, and analyze its impact on prognosis.

Methods: We performed immunohistochemical evaluation in 182 non–small cell lung carcinoma surgical specimens. The effect of an overexpressed receptor in cancer cell proliferation was also evaluated.

Measurements and Main Results: The endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end-product expression in cytoplasm was reduced or absent in 137 of the 182 (75%) carcinomas in contrast to normal lung tissues. mRNA expression was also suppressed in cancer cells. Overexpression of the secretory receptor in lung cancer cell lines had an inhibitory effect on cell proliferation, suggesting the reduced receptor expression accelerated tumor growth. Among patients with low expression of the cytoplasmic secretory receptor, the overall survival rate was significantly lower than that of patients with normal expression (p = 0.0003). This association was most prominent in TNM stage I patients (p = 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, endogenous secretory receptor immunoreactivity was an independent prognostic factor with a relative risk of 3.1.

Conclusions: The cytoplasmic endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end-product expression has the potential to be a prognostic factor for predicting the outcome of curative surgery in patients with non–small cell lung carcinoma.

Key Words: clinical study • lung cancer • prognostic factor • receptor • surgery



    AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Scientific Knowledge on the Subject
Recent trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected lung cancer have demonstrated an improved outcome over surgery alone. However, there is no prognostic factor to identify patients most likely to benefit from chemotherapy.

What This Study Adds to the Field
Determining expression levels of cytoplasmic endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end-product has the potential to characterize prognosis in patients with non–small cell lung cancer.

 
Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Despite the recent advances in cancer treatment, the relative 5-yr survival rate for all lung cancers is only 15% (1). Lung cancer is histologically classified into non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and small cell lung carcinoma. The most effective treatment for early-stage NSCLC is surgical resection; however, even with resection, the 5-yr survival of stage I lung cancer is only 65% (24). Currently, stage is the main criterion used to identify surgical candidates. Recently, several randomized trials of adjuvant chemotherapy have demonstrated an improved outcome over surgery alone (59). Consequently, it would be beneficial to identify prognostic factors that could be used to identify those patients most likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), a multiligand receptor of the immunoglobulin superfamily (10), recognizes a variety of ligands, including advanced glycation end products (AGEs), amyloid beta-peptides, S100/calgranulines, and high-mobility group protein (HMGB)-1/amphoterin (1012). RAGE and its ligands participate in cell migration and differentiation (13, 14) and cell homeostasis under pathophysiologic conditions (12, 15). RAGE expression is closely associated with gastric (16), colorectal (17), and prostate cancers (18). Blockade of the RAGE signal suppresses tumor growth and metastasis in these cancers (19, 20). In contrast to these tumors, RAGE is highly expressed in normal lungs (11), especially in the alveolar epithelium (21, 22). Down-regulation of RAGE expression has been reported in a small number of patients with NSCLC (2325). The contribution of this down-regulation to the pathophysiology of NSCLC is still unknown.

A novel splice variant of RAGE, endogenous secretory RAGE (esRAGE), was recently identified (26). esRAGE is similar to, but more stable than, a previously described form of secretory RAGE (sRAGE) (26, 27). By functioning as a decoy receptor, esRAGE is able to protect vascular cells from injury (28). This suggests that esRAGE is a mediator that controls RAGE-associated cell responses.

In this study, we measured the distribution of esRAGE expression in NSCLC and showed that overexpression of RAGE had an inhibitory effect on tumor growth. We also confirmed that esRAGE expression could be used as a prognostic factor to predict a good surgical outcome.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients and Tissue Specimens
One hundred eighty-two NSCLC surgical specimens were obtained from patients who were treated from 1993 to 1995 by the Department of Surgery, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai, Japan. The mean age of the patients was 65.3 yr (range, 23 – 82 yr). Patients included in this study did not receive radiation therapy or chemotherapy before surgery. The mean follow-up time was 4.4 yr (range, 17–3,695 d). Patients were classified according to the size of the primary tumor (T), nodal involvement (N), and the presence of distant metastasis (M) into TNM stages I–IV (29). Tumor histology was classified according to the World Health Organization classification system (30).

Research protocols for this study were approved by the ethics committee at Tohoku University School of Medicine and Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai, Japan.

Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed in the specimens using an anti-human polyclonal antibody for esRAGE (26, 31), a goat antibody against the C-terminal of human RAGE protein (C-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), a monoclonal antibody for Ki-67 (MIB1; Dako, Carpinteria, CA), and a monoclonal antibody for p53 (DO-7; Novocastra, Newcastle, UK). The antibody against esRAGE recognizes the unique C-terminal 16-amino acid of esRAGE; C-20 recognizes the full-length and N-terminally truncated RAGE proteins (26, 31). After completely reviewing all immunostained sections for each carcinoma, two pathologists (T.S. and H.S.) independently and blindly divided the carcinomas into three groups: +, positive; +/–, focally positive; and –, no immunoreactivity (32, 33). Ki-67 immunoreactivity was scored on more than 1,000 carcinoma cells per case and counted independently by the same pathologists, and the percentage of labeling index determined. For esRAGE immunohistochemistry, an immunohistochemical preabsorption test was performed as a negative control. No specific immunoreactivity was detected in these tissue sections (Figure 1B).


Figure 1
View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Immunohistochemistry for endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end products (esRAGE) and full-length RAGE in the non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues. (A) Immunoreactivity for esRAGE was detected in the cytoplasm of bronchial epithelial cells in morphologically normal lung tissue. (Stromal cells were also focally positive for esRAGE [arrowheads]). (B) In the same area as that shown in panel (A), no significant immunoreactivity of esRAGE was detected in the section used in the immunohistochemical preabsorption test for the negative control. (C and E) esRAGE staining. (D and F) Full-length RAGE staining. (C) esRAGE immunoreactivity was detected in the cytoplasm of adenocarcinoma cells. (D) In contrast, full-length RAGE immunoreactivity was not detected in the same patient as in C. (E and F, sequential sections are shown) In some patients, esRAGE was not detected in the cytoplasm, but full-length RAGE was present. Bars represent 100 µm.

 
Laser Capture Microdissection and Reverse Transcriptase–Polymerase Chain Reaction
To localize esRAGE gene expression, microdissection was conducted using the Laser Scissors CRI-337 (Cell Robotics, Inc., Albuquerque, NM) as previously described (34). Approximately 100 carcinoma or intratumoral stromal cells were collected separately under the microscope from 36 specimens of frozen NSCLC tissue. Total RNA was extracted from laser-transferred cells, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed. Real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase (RT)–PCR was performed using a LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) and QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen K.K., Tokyo, Japan), according to the procedure provided by the manufacturers. The primer sequences used to analyze human esRAGE (AB061668) mRNA expression were forward 5'-AGG AAA GCC GTG CTG TCA-3' and reverse 5'-ACA TGT GTT GGG GGC TAT-3'; primers for full-length RAGE (AB036432) mRNA expression were forward 5'-CAT CAG CAT CAT CGA ACC AG-3' and reverse 5'-AAG ATG ACC CCA ATG AGC AG-3'. The transcript amount for the esRAGE or full-length RAGE gene was estimated from the respective standard curves and normalized to the human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; Hs_GAPDH_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay kit; Qiagen) transcript amount determined in corresponding samples.

Transfection, Cell Proliferation Assay, and Cell Cycle Analysis
The human lung carcinoma cell lines A549 and LK1 were transfected with human esRAGE, full-length RAGE, or dominant negative RAGE (dnRAGE) using a liposomal transfection reagent (Lipofectin Reagent; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. After 24, 48, 72, and 96 h of incubation, the cells were counted using alamarBlue (Biosource, Camarillo, CA). To evaluate the site of overexpressed esRAGE, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded transfected cells were immunostained as previously described. Cell cycle perturbations were determined at 48 h of incubation using FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Data were obtained and processed using the Lysis II software (Becton Dickinson). The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phases was evaluated on a DNA linear plot using the CellFit software (Becton Dickinson).

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using a one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni test or a cross-table {chi}2 test. Overall and disease-free survival curves were generated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with a proportional hazard model (Cox) using PROC PHREG in the SAS software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Fisher's exact test was performed using the SAS software. p values less than 0.05 were considered significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Immunohistochemistry for esRAGE in NSCLC
Consistent with a previous study (31), esRAGE immunoreactivity was readily detectable in the cytoplasm of bronchial epithelial cells in normal lung tissues (Figure 1A). esRAGE immunoreactivity was also positive in the stromal cells (Figure 1A). In contrast, esRAGE immunoreactivity was only variably detected in the cytoplasm of NSCLC cells (Figure 1C). The number of cases expressing immunoreactive esRAGE in each group are summarized as follows: +, n = 45 (24.7%); +/–, n = 78 (42.9%); and –, n = 59 (32.4%). Intratumoral stromal cells were positive for esRAGE. Cytoplasmic esRAGE was frequently negative in male patients (p = 0.0007) and in squamous cell carcinomas (p = 0.0001), and was inversely associated with the pathologic T factor (p = 0.0063), histologic differentiation (p = 0.0061), and Ki-67 labeling index (p < 0.0001) (Table 1). The number of cases expressing immunoreactive full-length RAGE in each group are summarized as follows: +, n = 53 (29.1%); +/–, n = 55 (30.2%); and –, n = 74 (40.7%). However, expression of esRAGE and full-length RAGE were not parallel (Figures 1C–1F), and there was no association between esRAGE and full-length RAGE immunoreactivity in NSCLCs (p = 0.199; Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN esRAGE IMMUNOREACTIVITY AND CLINICOPATHOLOGIC PARAMETERS IN 182 NON–SMALL CELL LUNG CARCINOMAS

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN EXPRESSION STATUS OF esRAGE AND FULL-LENGTH RAGE PROTEIN IN 182 NON–SMALL CELL LUNG CARCINOMAS

 
esRAGE mRNA Expression
To evaluate the localization of esRAGE mRNA expression in NSCLC, we performed laser capture microdissection followed by quantitative RT-PCR for the esRAGE and full-length RAGE mRNA. All samples from intratumoral stromal cells expressed both esRAGE and full-length RAGE mRNA. In contrast to the intratumoral stromal cells, either esRAGE or full-length RAGE mRNA were absent in 81% (29 of 36) of NSCLCs. Expression of esRAGE and full-length RAGE mRNAs were not parallel, and there was no association between esRAGE and full-length RAGE expression in NSCLCs (p = 0.468; Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN EXPRESSION STATUS OF esRAGE AND FULL-LENGTH RAGE mRNA IN 36 NON–SMALL CELL LUNG CARCINOMAS

 
Association between Cytoplasmic esRAGE Status and Clinical Outcome of Patients with NSCLC
A reduction of esRAGE expression in cytoplasm was significantly associated with a worse clinical outcome in the 182 patients with NSCLC (p = 0.0003) (Figure 2A). This association was most apparent in the patients with TNM stage I NSCLC (p = 0.0001) (Figure 2B). In advanced stage NSCLC (TNM stage II and III), however, cytoplasmic esRAGE expression status was not predictive of clinical outcome (p = 0.2735), although patients with positive (+) esRAGE tended to show a better prognosis (Figure 2C). In contrast, full-length RAGE expression was not associated with overall survival (Figure 3). In a univariate analysis, pathologic TNM stage (p < 0.0001) and esRAGE immunoreactivity (– and +/– vs. +; p < 0.001) were both significant prognostic factors for overall survival (Table 4). In a multivariate analysis, both TNM stage (p < 0.0001) and esRAGE immunoreactivity (p = 0.0016) were independent prognostic factors, with relative risks over 1.0 (Table 4). Impact of the pathological T (pT) stage on survival was not significant (p = 0.0510) by univariate analysis (Table 4). In contrast, the pathological N (pN) stage was a significant prognostic factor for overall survival (p < 0.0001). When the pT and pN stages were incorporated in the multivariate analysis instead of the pTNM stage, the p value of esRAGE immunoreactivity changed to 0.0137 and the relative risk was 2.452 (1.202–5.004).


Figure 2
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. (A) Overall survival curves (Kaplan-Meier method) of patients with NSCLC demonstrating that down-regulation of cytoplasmic esRAGE contributed to a worse clinical outcome. (B) Cytoplasmic esRAGE expression was strongly associated with survival in patients with stage I NSCLC. (C) Cytoplasmic esRAGE expression tended to predict increased survival in stage II and III NSCLC, although the association was not significant.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Overall survival curve (Kaplan-Meier method) of patients with NSCLC (n = 182). There was no association of full-length RAGE expression with overall survival.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4. UNIVARIATE AND MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES FOR CLINICAL OUTCOME IN 182 PATIENTS WITH NON–SMALL CELL LUNG CARCINOMA

 
Role of Cytoplasmic Expression of esRAGE in Cell Proliferation
To investigate the role of cytoplasmic esRAGE in cell proliferation, esRAGE, full-length RAGE, or dnRAGE cDNA were cloned into the pCI expression vector (Promega, Fitchburg, WI) and transfected to A549 or LK-1 cells. esRAGE was overexpressed within the cytoplasm of the transfectants (Figure 4B) and resulted in significantly attenuated tumor growth in all cell lines (Figures 4C and 4D). In contrast, full-length RAGE expression had no effect on tumor growth. Finally, neither dnRAGE nor an empty vector affected tumor growth.


Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. (A, B) Representative immunohistochemistry for esRAGE in transfectants. (A) Empty vector transfected in A549 cells; (B) vector with esRAGE transfected in A549 cells. Bars represent 50 µm. (C, D) Changes in proliferation after overexpression of each RAGE. Overexpression of esRAGE results in reduced proliferation of (C) A549 and (D) LK-1 (D) cells. *p < 0.05 versus empty vector; {dagger}p < 0.05 versus full-length RAGE. (E) Flow cytometric analysis showed an increment of G0/G1 fraction rate in esRAGE transfected A549 and LK-1 cells. Columns, mean (n = 3). dn, dominant negative RAGE; full, full-length RAGE; es, esRAGE.

 
As demonstrated in Figure 4E, overexpression of esRAGE resulted in an increment of G0/G1 fractions in both A549 and LK-1 cells. As previously reported (25), overexpression of full-length RAGE also increased the G0/G1 fraction. However, the effect of esRAGE on G0/G1 fraction was greater than that of full-length RAGE.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we demonstrated that the lack of expression of esRAGE in the cytoplasm of NSCLC cells was associated with an increased patient mortality after complete surgical resection. This association was particularly prominent in patients with stage I lung cancer (Figure 1). Although complete tumor resection in the patients with stage I disease carries a relatively good prognosis, the 5-yr survival is only 60 to 72%, with death being due to the development of distant metastases (24). In this study, the 5-yr survival of patients with stage I cancer with an absence of esRAGE expression was less than 20% (Figure 2B). A multivariate analysis confirmed esRAGE immunoreactivity to be an independent factor for predicting the clinical outcome of patients with NSCLC after surgery (Table 4).

Consistent with a previous study, cytoplasmic esRAGE was ubiquitously present in the normal lung samples (31). In contrast, esRAGE expression disappeared or was reduced in most NSCLC tissues. Expression of esRAGE mRNA was also decreased in cancer cells isolated by laser capture microdissection. Full-length RAGE and esRAGE were differentially expressed in the same patients (Figures 1C–1D; Tables 2 and 3), suggesting that esRAGE expression is regulated independently of full-length RAGE expression.

Cytoplasmic esRAGE immunoreactivity was inversely correlated with the pathologic T factor, histologic differentiation, and Ki-67, but was not correlated with the pathologic N factor (Table 1). The T factor is determined by a combination of tumor size and invasiveness. Because esRAGE immunoreactivity was not correlated with the tumor size (Table 1), invasiveness is another key factor influenced by esRAGE. These findings suggest that cytoplasmic esRAGE plays a role in local proliferation of carcinoma and invasion. Transfection of full-length RAGE has an antiproliferative effect in cancer cell lines (20), and engagement of RAGE with its ligand amphoterin is the main pathway through which RAGE contributes to cancer growth (19, 20). In our study, however, overexpression of esRAGE in lung cancer cells attenuated the proliferation of cancer cell lines through increasing G0/G1 fraction. This inhibitory effect was much greater than what was produced by full-length RAGE, and occurred in the absence of amphoterin (Figure 4). We inferred from these findings that esRAGE independently controls cell proliferation, and that loss of esRAGE in cytoplasm accelerates the growth of the carcinoma.

Bartling and colleagues reported a similar inhibitory effect of full-length RAGE in tumor growth in NSCLCs, and they found that transfection of full-length RAGE demonstrated the decrease of S/G2 fraction in the cancer cell line (25). Because full-length RAGE and esRAGE expression seemed to be regulated independently, the role of full-length RAGE and esRAGE on lung cancer might be different. In addition, down-regulation of full-length RAGE had no impact on patient mortality after complete surgical resection (Figure 3).

The effect of full-length RAGE in different cancers is inconsistent. In gastric (16), colorectal (17), and prostate cancer (18), RAGE up-regulation is closely associated with tumor invasion and metastasis (14). In contrast, a decrease in RAGE signaling inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in neuroblastoma, melanoma (20), and lung cancer (25). The reason for the diametrically opposite effects of RAGE in different tumors is still under debate; however, it may in part be related to the expression pattern of esRAGE. esRAGE staining patterns can be considered to fall into one of four categories: pattern A is diffuse cytoplasmic staining, pattern B is supranuclear dotlike staining, pattern C is staining in the stromal area, and pattern D is diffuse staining in the secreted material. Interestingly, pneumocytes and neuronal cells, the progenitor cells for lung cancer and neuroblastoma, respectively, show pattern A staining. In contrast, pattern B staining is demonstrated in the progenitors of gastrointestinal and prostate cancer (31). This suggests that the pattern of esRAGE expression in the progenitor may contribute to the later effects of RAGE on tumor growth.

RAGE belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily (10). Recently, the associations of other immunoglobulin superfamily molecule expression in the cytosol with tumor growth were reported (3537). For example, the activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM/CD166) was up-regulated in colorectal cancer and breast cancer, and overexpression of ALCAM was reported as an independent prognostic factor of these carcinomas (35, 37). Our results and these reports suggest that some of the cytosolic immunoglobulin superfamily molecules play a role in tumor proliferation, and have potency as new prognostic factors.

In summary, the expression of cytoplasmic esRAGE, a novel splice variant of RAGE, decreased in lung cancer. Loss of esRAGE expression was associated with an increased risk of mortality after complete surgical resection, and was an independent predictor of the clinical outcome in patients with NSCLC. Our findings suggest that cytoplasmic esRAGE could be used in patients with stage I NSCLC to predict the outcome of curative surgery. Given the central role of esRAGE in tumor biology, it has the potential to predict the patients who will benefit from additional interventions such as adjuvant chemotherapy.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Dr. Koichi Tsuneyama (Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University) for his technical advice, and Dr. Masaru Yanai (Ishinomaki Red Cross Hospital) for his extensive encouragement.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Supported by a grant from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science No. 13670589 to H.K.

This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents at www.atsjournals.org

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200602-212OC on October 5, 2006

Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.

Received in original form February 13, 2006; accepted in final form October 5, 2006


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Ries LAG, Harkins D, Krapcho M, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Clegg L, Eisner MP, Horner MJ, Howlader N, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2003. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2003/
  2. Williams DE, Pairolero PC, Davis CS, Bernatz PE, Payne WS, Taylor WF, Uhlenhopp MA, Fontana RS. Survival of patients surgically treated for stage I lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981;82:70–76.[Abstract]
  3. Nesbitt JC, Putnam JB Jr, Walsh GL, Roth JA, Mountain CF. Survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:466–472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Spiro SG, Porter JC. Lung cancer—where are we today? Current advances in staging and nonsurgical treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:1166–1196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group. Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomized clinical trials. BMJ 1995;311:899–909.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kato H, Ichinose Y, Ohta M, Hata E, Tsubota N, Tada H, Watanabe Y, Wada H, Tsuboi M, Hamajima N, et al. A randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with Uracil-Tegafur for adenocarcinoma of the lung. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1713–1721.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Johnson BE, Rabin MS. Patient subsets benefiting from adjuvant therapy following surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:5022s–5026s.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Pisters KM, Le Chevalier T. Adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3270–3278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Winton T, Livingston R, Johnson D, Rigas J, Johnston M, Butts C, Cormier Y, Goss G, Inculet R, Vallieres E, et al. Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs. observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2589–2597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Neeper M, Schmidt AM, Brett J, Yan SD, Wang F, Pan YC, Elliston K, Stern D, Shaw A. Cloning and expression of a cell surface receptor for advanced glycosylation end products of proteins. J Biol Chem 1992;267:14998–15004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Schmidt AM, Vianna M, Gerlach M, Brett J, Ryan J, Kao J, Esposito C, Hegarty H, Hurley W, Clauss M, et al. Isolation and characterization of two binding proteins for advanced glycosylation end products from bovine lung which are present on the endothelial cell surface. J Biol Chem 1992;267:14987–14997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Schmidt AM, Du Yan S, Yan SF, Stern DM. The multiligand receptor RAGE as a progression factor amplifying immune and inflammatory responses. J Clin Invest 2001;108:949–955.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Hori O, Brett J, Slattery T, Cao R, Zhang J, Chen JX, Nagashima M, Lundh ER, Vijay S, Nitecki D, et al. The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a cellular binding site for amphoterin: mediation of neurite outgrowth and co-expression of RAGE and amphoterin in the developing nervous system. J Biol Chem 1995;270:25752–25761.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Huttunen HJ, Kuja-Panula J, Rauvala H. Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) signaling induces CREB-dependent chromogranin expression during neuronal differentiation. J Biol Chem 2002;277:38635–38646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Uchida T, Shirasawa M, Ware LB, Kojima K, Hata Y, Makita K, Mednick G, Matthay ZA, Matthay MA. Receptor for advanced glycation end-products is a marker of type I cell injury in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:1008–1015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kuniyasu H, Oue N, Wakikawa A, Shigeishi H, Matsutani N, Kuraoka K, Ito R, Yokozaki H, Yasui W. Expression of receptors for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) is closely associated with the invasive and metastatic activity of gastric cancer. J Pathol 2002;196:163–170.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Sasahira T, Akama Y, Fujii K, Kuniyasu H. Expression of receptor for advanced glycation end products and HMGB1/amphoterin in colorectal adenomas. Virchows Arch 2005;446:411–415.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Ishiguro H, Nakaigawa N, Miyoshi Y, Fujinami K, Kubota Y, Uemura H. Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and its ligand, amphoterin are overexpressed and associated with prostate cancer development. Prostate 2005;64:92–100.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Taguchi A, Blood DC, del Toro G, Canet A, Lee DC, Qu W, Tanji N, Lu Y, Lalla E, Fu C, et al. Blockade of RAGE-amphoterin signaling suppresses tumor growth and metastases. Nature 2000;405:354–360.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Huttunen HJ, Fages C, Kuja-Panula J, Ridley AJ, Rauvala H. Receptor for advanced glycation end products-binding COOH-terminal motif of amphoterin inhibits invasive migration and metastasis. Cancer Res 2002;62:4805–4811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Katsuoka F, Kawakami Y, Arai T, Imuta H, Fujiwara M, Kanma H, Yamashita K. Type II alveolar epithelial cells in lung express receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997;238:512–516.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Shirasawa M, Fujiwara N, Hirabayashi S, Ohno H, Iida J, Makita K, Hata Y. Receptor for advanced glycation end-products is a marker of type I lung alveolar cells. Genes Cells 2004;9:165–174.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Schraml P, Bendik I, Ludwig CU. Differential messenger RNA and protein expression of the receptor for advanced glycosylated end products in normal lung and non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Res 1997;57:3669–3671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hofmann HS, Hansen G, Burdach S, Bartling B, Silber RE, Simm A. Discrimination of human lung neoplasm from normal lung by two target genes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170:516–519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Bartling B, Hofmann HS, Weigle B, Silber RE, Simm A. Down-regulation of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) supports non-small cell lung carcinoma. Carcinogenesis 2005;26:293–301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Yonekura H, Yamamoto Y, Sakurai S, Petrova RG, Abedin MJ, Li H, Yasui K, Takeuchi M, Makita Z, Takasawa S, et al. Novel splice variants of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products expressed in human vascular endothelial cells and pericytes, and their putative roles in diabetes-induced vascular injury. Biochem J 2003;370:1097–1109.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Malherbe P, Richards JG, Gaillard H, Thompson A, Diener C, Schuler A, Huber G. cDNA cloning of a novel secreted isoform of the human receptor for advanced glycation end products and characterization of cells co-expressing cell-surface scavenger receptors and Swedish mutant amyloid precursor protein. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 1999;71:159–170.[Medline]
  28. Yamamoto Y, Doi T, Kato I, Shinohara H, Sakurai S, Yonekura H, Watanabe T, Myint KM, Harashima A, Takeuchi M, et al. Receptor for advanced glycation end products is a promising target of diabetic nephropathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1043:562–566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH, editors. International Union Against Cancer (UICC): TMN classification of malignant tumors, 5th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1997.
  30. Travis WD, Colby TV, Corrin B, Shimosato Y, Brambilla E. Histological typing of lung and pleural tumours, 3rd ed. In: World Health Organization international histological classification of tumours. Berlin: Springer; 1999.
  31. Cheng C, Tsuneyama K, Kominami R, Shinohara H, Sakurai S, Yonekura H, Watanabe T, Takano Y, Yamamoto H, Yamamoto Y. Expression profiling of endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end products in human organs. Mod Pathol 2005;18:1385–1396.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Suzuki T, Moriya T, Ariga N, Kaneko C, Kanazawa M, Sasano H. 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 and type 2 in human breast carcinoma: a correlation to clinicopathological parameters. Br J Cancer 2000;82:518–523.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Suzuki T, Nakata T, Miki Y, Kaneko C, Moriya T, Ishida T, Akinaga S, Hirakawa H, Kimura M, Sasano H. Estrogen sulfotransferase and steroid sulfatase in human breast carcinoma. Cancer Res 2003;63:2762–2770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Miki Y, Nakata T, Suzuki T, Darnel AD, Moriya T, Kaneko C, Hidaka K, Shiotsu Y, Kusaka H, Sasano H. Systemic distribution of steroid sulfatase and estrogen sulfotransferase in human adult and fetal tissues. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:5760–5768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Weichert W, Knosel T, Bellach J, Dietel M, Kristiansen G. ALCAM/CD166 is overexpressed in colorectal carcinoma and correlates with shortened patient survival. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:1160–1164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Nair KS, Naidoo R, Chetty R. Expression of cell adhesion molecules in oesophageal carcinoma and its prognostic value. J Clin Pathol 2005;58:343–351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Burkhardt M, Mayordomo E, Winzer KJ, Fritzsche F, Gansukh T, Pahl S, Weichert W, Denkert C, Guski H, Dietel M, et al. Cytoplasmic overexpression of ALCAM is prognostic of disease progression in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 2006;59:403–409.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. Dubey and C. A. Powell
Update in Lung Cancer 2007
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2008; 177(9): 941 - 946.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
W. A. Franklin
RAGE in Lung Tumors
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2007; 175(2): 106 - 107.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200602-212OCv1
175/2/184    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2007 American Thoracic Society