help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baram, D.
Right arrow Articles by Smaldone, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baram, D.
Right arrow Articles by Smaldone, G.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 174. pp. 724, (2006)
© 2006 American Thoracic Society


Correspondence

Tracheal Collapse versus Tracheobronchomalacia: Normal Function versus Disease

To the Editor:

We read the recent article regarding tracheobronchomalacia (TBM) and bronchiolitis obliterans by Ghanei and colleagues (1) and would like to offer an alternate explanation for the tracheal collapse seen on computerized tomography (CT) of patients with bronchiolitis after exposure to mustard gas. Tidal flow limitation in patients with small airway obstruction can lead to expiratory collapse of a normal trachea. There are no data in the article proving an anatomic or functional tracheal abnormality.

Dynamic intrathoracic tracheal compression during expiration has been understood for years (2). During flow-limited breathing, the trachea becomes compressed and can be almost completely collapsed during forced expiration and cough. The Starling resistor model shows that the pressure drop occurs across a very short length of airway and that proximal airway (downstream) resistance should not affect flow. Pressure catheters demonstrate this flow-limiting choke point and the lack of any further pressure drop in airways between the mouth and flow-limiting segment (3). As the choke point in adult humans is often located at the level of the lobar bronchi, tracheal collapsibility should not impede flow. The model predicts that replacing the trachea with a fully collapsible Penrose drain should not affect the expiratory flow–volume curve of a lung.

Flow limitation during tidal breathing is not uncommon; patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, symptomatic asthma, and obesity are often flow-limited (4). Bronchoscopic or radiologic detection of expiratory tracheal compression should trigger a search for causes of airflow obstruction within the lung, not the trachea. Stenting of the large airways in these patients will not improve airflow, as there is no demonstrable pressure drop along their course (5).

There appears to be a piqued interest in TBM, likely due to increased use of CT scanning and increased availability of tracheal stenting. Numerous studies published recently have used radiographic evidence of tracheal compression as proof of tracheal disease without supporting physiologic data. Visualizing weakness or collapse of tracheal cartilage during expiration is not normal, but even this does not prove functional significance. Tracheal disease manifests as functional obstruction only when there is a stenotic component; diseases that purely increase collapsibility should not limit flow. Studies reporting "abnormal" tracheobronchial collapse need careful assessment for flow limitation, as normal tracheas collapse in conditions that cause flow limitation during tidal breathing.

Daniel Baram and Gerald Smaldone

Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York

FOOTNOTES

Conflict of Interest Statement: Neither author has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.

REFERENCES

  1. Ghanei M, Moqadam FA, Mohammad MM, Aslani J. Tracheobronchomalacia and air trapping after mustard gas exposure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:304–309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Pride NB, Permutt S, Riley RL, Bromberger-Barnea B. Determinants of maximal expiratory flow from the lungs. J Appl Physiol 1967;23:646–662.[Free Full Text]
  3. Smaldone GC, Smith PL. Location of flow-limiting segments via airway catheters near residual volume in humans. J Appl Physiol 1985;59:502–508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Takishima T, Grimby G, Graham W, Knudson R, Macklem PT, Mead J. Flow-volume curves during quiet breathing, maximum voluntary ventilation, and forced vital capacities in patients with obstructive lung disease. Scand J Respir Dis 1967;48:384–393.[Medline]
  5. Miyazawa T, Miyazu Y, Iwamoto Y, Ishida A, Kanoh K, Sumiyoshi H, Doi M, Kurimoto N. Stenting at the flow-limiting segment in tracheobronchial stenosis due to lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 169:1096–1102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baram, D.
Right arrow Articles by Smaldone, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baram, D.
Right arrow Articles by Smaldone, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2006 American Thoracic Society