help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on January 26, 2006, doi:10.1164/rccm.200411-1595OC
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200411-1595OCv1
173/8/847    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waters, B.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waters, B.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, M.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 173. pp. 847-851, (2006)
© 2006 American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200411-1595OC


Original Article

Acinar Structure in Symptom-free Adults by Helium-3 Magnetic Resonance

Barnaby Waters, John Owers-Bradley and Mike Silverman

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham; and Department of Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation (Child Health), University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Prof. Mike Silverman, M.D., Department of Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation (Child Health), University of Leicester, Leicester, UK LE2 7LX. E-mail: ms70{at}le.ac.uk


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Rationale: The apparent diffusion coefficient of hyperpolarized 3He in the lungs has been shown to correlate directly in animal models with the peripheral airspace size and can detect changes in lung microstructure.

Objectives: To study in vivo the 3He apparent diffusion coefficient and to demonstrate its sensitivity to changes in lung morphometry as a result of aging, exposure to cigarette smoke, and lung inflation.

Methods: We assessed the variation in the diffusion of hyperpolarized 3He gas in the lungs by magnetic resonance techniques. Spirometric lung volumes were recorded.

Measurements: We measured the dependence of 3He diffusion on age and on reported cigarette smoke exposure in 32 symptom-free adults. We also measured the dependence of the apparent diffusion coefficient on the degree of lung inflation.

Results: In healthy never-smokers, the apparent diffusion coefficient increased with age from 0.115 to 0.155 cm2 · s–1 at 20 and 70 yr, respectively, increased linearly with lung inflation and was independent of individual's lung size after correcting for age. For active and passive smokers, the apparent diffusion coefficient increased by up to 40% compared with never-smokers with mean values significantly higher (p = 0.016 and p = 0.0007, respectively).

Conclusions: Peripheral airspace size increases with age and after exposure to smoke in healthy adults in agreement with previous histologic studies. We have confirmed in vivo that peripheral airspace size is independent of intersubject lung size.

Key Words: age • diffusion • hyperpolarized noble gas • smoking

Alveolar dimensions and density have mainly been studied using histologic techniques applied to excised or postmortem lung samples, and the only in vivo data have been collected using aerosol washout techniques such as aerosol-derived airway morphometry (ADAM) (1, 2). These studies have yielded much information. It is thought that alveolarization is complete by the age of 2 to 3 yr (35), after which alveoli simply enlarge with childhood growth. In healthy adults, the size of alveoli is relatively constant, so that alveolar number is proportional to lung size (2, 57). With senescence, however, alveolar dimensions increase (1, 2, 810), an effect that is exaggerated in active smokers (11).

A simple technique for measuring changes in peripheral airspace size in vivo would have many applications. It could form the basis for longitudinal studies of development and senescence and of the impact of disease, adverse environmental exposures, and therapeutic agents on these processes. It could also provide the structural basis for those measurement techniques that describe peripheral lung function, improving our understanding of structure–function relationships at the alveolar level. As the era of "alveolar therapy" dawns (12, 13), techniques for measuring peripheral airspace size can be used as an outcome measure. The prospect of this form of therapy lends urgency to longitudinal studies of peripheral airspace size to identify the onset of emphysema and the risk factors for its development.

Certain stable isotopes of noble gases, such as 129Xe and 3He, when hyperpolarized, can be detected in very low concentrations by magnetic resonance (MR) techniques and can therefore be used as tracers to study gas distribution in the lungs (14).

Within any porous structure such as the lungs, the rate of diffusion of a gas is restricted and is known as the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). The ADC of 3He can be measured by MR by monitoring the decay of spin-echo signals in the presence of a sensitizing magnetic field gradient. The ADC of 3He gas within the lung is approximately four times smaller than its free diffusion coefficient. ADC has been shown in rat studies to correlate with alveolar internal area and mean linear intercept (15). Modeling work by Yablonskiy and colleagues (16) has demonstrated that ADC can be related to the peripheral airspace size. The 3He imaging technique has also been applied in human subjects to visualize ventilation (1719) and to assess the degree of emphysema (15). We have developed a system capable of producing hyperpolarized 3He (20, 21) and of measuring 3He diffusion with MR. We used this to investigate changes in peripheral lung morphology in symptom-free adult volunteers resulting from aging and exposure to smoke.

Some of the results of this study have previously been reported in the form of abstracts (2224).


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The 32 volunteers (27 males, 5 females) were recruited without preselection from among the staff and students of the University of Nottingham. Their ages ranged from 18 to 74 yr and included 13 individuals who had never smoked, five active smokers (2.5–85 pack-years; median, 10 pack-years), and 14 passive smokers (the latter are defined as having lived with a smoker or suffered significant exposure to smoke or fumes in their work environment). Of these 32 volunteers, 30 were symptom-free and were not using medication for any respiratory diseases. The other two volunteers suffered from asthma. One, a never-smoker, was included because the asthma was very mild and controlled using only intermittent bronchodilator. The second person with asthma regularly used a corticosteroid inhaler and was excluded. Spirometric lung function tests were performed to standard criteria (25) on all volunteers using a calibrated electronic spirometer (Jaeger Flowscreen; Viasys Healthcare, Coventry, UK). At this point, two other subjects who had never smoked were excluded from analysis because they had abnormal lung function (FEV1/FVC < 70%), leaving 11 healthy never-smokers, 13 passive smokers, and five smokers.

Hyperpolarized 3He gas was produced via metastable optical pumping (21). For each acquisition, 10 ml of polarized 3He gas was mixed with 300 ml of 4He and transported to the MR scanner in a 1-L Tedlar gas sample bag (SKC Ltd., Blandford Forum, UK). All measurements were made with the volunteers' lungs in the tidal volume range. Each volunteer was asked to inhale the 310-ml bolus of helium gas by mouthpiece at the end of a normal exhalation (FRC), then immediately to take an extra small intake of air (100–150 ml) to flush the helium into the lung periphery, and finally to breath-hold for 3 s. The 3He ADC was measured during the final second of the breath-hold, at a volume of about FRC + 400–450 ml.

The MR scanner used was a 0.15-T permanent magnet system (Intermagnetics General Corporation, New York, NY) with an MR Research Systems console (Surrey, UK). A global ADC measurement for both lungs was obtained using a diffusion sequence based on a 64 echo Rapid Acquisition with Refocused Echoes sequence (echo time = 14 ms, acquisition time = 896 ms) with the slice select and phase gradients switched off. This gave a series of 64 echoes with incrementally decreasing amplitude from diffusion weighting. The b-value used was 0.3 s · cm–2. During the time of this measurement, the gas can sample several alveoli and therefore the measurement is sensitive to the peripheral airspace size rather than the size of individual alveoli. A global ADC value for the lungs was calculated by fitting to the exponentially decaying echo train. For all but two volunteers, the echo decay was monoexponential, indicating that the ADC value was approximately the same over the whole lung and therefore that a global ADC value was sufficient to describe helium diffusion in the lung. A weighted mean ADC was used for the two variant subjects. The ADC value given for each volunteer is the mean of at least two separate measurements.

To demonstrate that ADC depends on peripheral airspace size, we performed a series of measurements on three healthy never-smokers (aged 27, 37, and 68 yr) in which the ADC was measured as a function of lung inflation. Each volunteer was asked to exhale maximally to residual volume. The 310-ml 3He and 4He gas mixture was then inhaled and followed by an accurately measured volume of air. The measurement was repeated for a range of air volumes in 1-L increments. Further details of the calculation are given in the online supplement.

The significance of differences in lung function and ADC between groups of subjects were evaluated using t tests, allowing for different population variances where needed and linear regression.

Ethics approval had been obtained from the Medical School Ethics Committee, University of Nottingham. Volunteers gave verbal informed consent.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The three groups of subjects covered similar age ranges (Table 1). There was no significant difference in the mean FEV1 or FVC values, expressed as a percentage of the expected value (26), among the three groups. FEV1/FVC values for never-smokers were significantly higher than for passive smokers (p = 0.031) and active smokers (p = 0.004).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. SUBJECT CHARACTERISTICS

 
The within-subject coefficient of variation of ADC from repeated measurements within all individuals was 4% by analysis of variance.

Mean ADC values for men and women were similar (Table 2). The mean ADC in individuals who had never smoked increased with age (Figure 1). There was no significant correlation between FVC and age in this group (Figure 2). The mean ADC values for passive and active smokers were significantly higher than for never-smokers (p = 0.013 and p = 0.011, respectively; Figure 1). Because of the close dependence of ADC on age of the never-smokers, ADC was adjusted to produce age-normalized ADC values (NADC) for subsequent analysis (see the online supplement). The mean values of NADC for passive and active smokers remained above those for never-smokers (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.016, respectively; Table 2).


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Plot of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) against age for asymptomatic never-smokers; solid line is ADC = 9.055 x 10–2 + 1.336 x 10–3 x Age – 6.271 x 10–6 x Age2 (r2 = 0.97); dashed lines are ± 95% confidence intervals; solid diamonds, male; solid squares, female; +, passive smoker; x, active smoker.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of lung volume and smoking on age-normalized ADC (NADC). Fitting to the never-smokers data, the solid line is NADC = 1.054–0.011 x FVC (p = 0.091, r2 = 0.284); dashed line represents FVC independent of NADC. Solid diamonds, male; solid squares, female; +, passive smoker; x, active smoker; *, two symptom-free never-smokers with abnormal airway function (see text).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT AND AGE-NORMALIZED APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT OF 3HE FOR NEVER-SMOKERS, ACTIVE SMOKERS, AND PASSIVE SMOKERS

 
The NADC values of the never-smokers showed a nonsignificant negative dependence on FVC (p = 0.091, r2 = 0.28; Figure 2). NADC had no significant dependence on FEV1/FVC. There were two never-smokers with particularly low FEV1/FVC ratios (FEV1/FVC < 70%) who also had high values of NADC (Figure 2).

There was a simple linear relationship between change in the volume of gas in the lungs and the corresponding change in ADC, relative to their values at FRC (Figure 3), which allowed us to relate changes in ADC to changes in alveolar wall area per unit volume (AWUV). The conversion procedure from ADC to AWUV is fully described in the online supplement. We then compared our data with histologic data of Gillooly and Lamb (9). We compared our age dependence of AWUV with the histologic measurements. The AWUV calculated from ADC measurements in never-smokers declined with age at a rate that matched that described by Gillooly and Lamb (9) (Figure 4). For comparison, our AWUV data for active and passive smokers are also plotted alongside and are seen to relate closely to the smoker data collected by Gillooly and Lamb (11).


Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Change in ADC (%) against change in volume of gas in the lungs (%) for three healthy never-smokers with ages as follows: solid circles = 27, solid triangles = 37, and solid squares = 68 yr.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Plot of alveolar wall area per unit volume (AWUV) against age for never-smokers; solid circles = our never-smoker results; open circles = histologic nonsmoker results of Gillooly and Lamb (9); + = passive smoker; x = active smoker; the solid line represents a fit to our never-smoker results; the dashed line is the nonsmoker linear fit from Gillooly and Lamb (9); the short dashed line is the smoker linear fit from Gillooly and Lamb (11).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The ADC in healthy never-smokers was determined in this study with a high degree of repeatability and found to increase with age (Figure 1). This finding correlates well with the previous histologic study by Gillooly and Lamb (9) (Figure 4). The histologic data demonstrated that the mean alveolar size increased with aging. We were able to simulate this process by measuring ADC as the lungs were inflated. This is discussed further in BIOLOGICAL ISSUES. The similarity between our data and histologic data is supported by the only other in vivo method, ADAM (1, 2).

NADC had only a trivial dependence on lung size (FVC) in never-smokers, implying that for a given age, the peripheral airspace size is the same for all healthy adult never-smokers. Hence, assuming that ADC is a true measure of alveolar size, alveolar number is proportional to adult lung volume as has been previously described in excised lungs (5, 6) and in vivo by ADAM (1, 2). In healthy subjects, FVC is highly correlated with the other "static" lung volumes: total lung capacity, FRC, and residual volume (27).

The mean NADC of active and passive smokers was significantly greater than that of never-smokers, although some individual values fell within the normal range. This difference was ascribed to an increase in mean peripheral airspace size and thus a decrease in AWUV. Published histologic data demonstrate a decreased AWUV in smokers (11), in agreement with our findings as shown on Figure 4.

Methodologic Issues
When measuring ADC, we have made several assumptions. It is assumed that the 3He gas has reached the lung periphery. The volume of air inhaled by volunteers to flush the helium into the lung periphery was about 100 to 150 ml, similar to the anatomic dead space of about 2 ml/kg (26), and should have been sufficient to make sure that most of the 3He reached the lung periphery. The contribution from any gas left in the dead space was removed during analysis. In a gas with a high rate of diffusion, equilibration within the alveolar space is expected to occur rapidly. The ADC measurement is based on the rate of MR signal loss, and it is assumed that intraalveolar diffusion is the dominant source of signal loss. Because bulk flow (convection) is negligible in the lung periphery during breath-hold and because signal losses from the depolarizing effect of paramagnetic oxygen are much slower than signal losses from diffusion (in vivo T1 = 36 s) (28), this is a safe assumption. We have verified that ADC measurements do not depend on the applied magnetic field gradient strength (20) at the strengths used in this study.

No effect of cardiac motion was observed in ADC profiles. A recently published study based on an animal model confirmed a trivial effect of cardiac motion on ADC (29). A monoexponential echo decay in all but two cases indicated that the ADC was isotropic throughout the lungs, justifying our reliance on a single value to describe the mean alveolar dimensions. This was confirmed by examining the variation of ADC across the lung for all our volunteers. Images of 3He ventilation confirmed that the gas was distributed to all areas within the lung.

Biological Issues
Although the subjects for this study were simply a cross-section of healthy volunteers, the distribution of ADC for never-smokers was remarkably consistent, with tight confidence intervals. The procedure we employed assumed that the 300-ml bolus of helium was inhaled at FRC. In a relaxed, supine subject, within the quiet confines of the MR scanner, this is probably a relatively reproducible volume for each individual. However, FRC increases with age (26) as a result of loss of lung elasticity. Thus, some of the decrease in AWUV with age could be explained by the enlargement of alveolar dimensions associated with this increase in lung volume. The increase in FRC predicted for a 1.7-m tall male between the ages of 18 and 68 is 15% (26). However, AWUV, which is proportional to the inverse of the mean alveolar radius, has been shown to decrease by more than 30% (Figure 4). This corresponds to the mean volume per alveolus more than doubling. Therefore, only approximately 15% of the decrease in AWUV is due to the increase in FRC with age; the remaining 85% must be due to accumulated structural effects at the acinar level. The same argument applies to ADC.

NADC values were significantly higher in healthy smokers than in never-smokers because of smoking-related damage to the alveolar walls and peripheral airways. This effect has been reported in histologic data from excised lungs of smokers (11). Damage to the intraacinar airways, known as fenestration, can create connections between alveoli and their adjacent terminal airways (respiratory bronchioles and alveolar ducts). This fenestration has also been described in lungs of smokers (30). The fenestrae are much larger both individually and in proportion to alveolar surface area than the interalveolar pores of Kohn. Even without a change in size of airspaces, the presence of such fenestrae will allow more gas diffusion and hence give the impression of larger peripheral airspaces and fewer alveoli per unit lung volume.

The similar findings in passive smokers were surprising. Although it may be reasonable to assume that active smoking affects centriacinar lung structure, passive smoking would not be expected to do so to the same extent. However, this study is both small and cross-sectional. It is not possible to estimate how much of the effect on apparent alveolar size was due to a toxic effect of passive smoke inhalation during adult life, from the impact of passive smoking in early childhood on the process of alveolarization itself, or simply an effect of confounding factors that may be associated with passive smoking.

Implications and Future Directions
3He ADC is clearly very sensitive to structural changes in the lung periphery. The 3He-MR method is simple and, as far as is known, totally safe. Apart from ADAM (1, 2), it is the only method that is feasible and safe for repeat studies and studies in children. The technique should have important applications to the study of lung development. If alveolarization is complete by age 2 to 3 yr (35), then the regulation of adult lung size is predetermined by factors operating during fetal life and infancy. It is feasible to use the 3He-MR technique to explore the impact of these factors in cohorts of children. It may be possible to determine whether alveolarization can occur beyond infancy. An important first step will be to determine the normal pattern of alveolar growth and development during childhood.

The technique has important potential as an outcome measure for the study of both environmental agents (e.g., tobacco smoke) and pharmaceuticals, including potential therapies for degenerative conditions such as emphysema (12, 13), and drugs that could have a potential adverse impact on early alveolarization, such as corticosteroids.

In conclusion, we have used the apparent diffusing capacity of hyperpolarized 3He determined by MR to detect changes in peripheral airspace size with a high degree of repeatability. The results imply that the mean peripheral airspace size increases with age throughout adult life and is larger in active and passive smokers than in healthy never-smokers. This is likely to be due to accumulated alveolar wall damage and the partial merging of alveoli. The age-normalized ADC is almost independent of FVC in never-smokers, confirming in vivo that peripheral airspace size is the same for adult healthy never-smokers of a given age. Hence, assuming that, in healthy subjects, ADC is a true measure of alveolar size, alveolar number is almost directly proportional to lung size. The technique opens up the possibility of studying alveolar development and senescence and the effects of disease and therapy in living people.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank all the staff and students from the School of Physics and Astronomy who agreed to take part in this study and Dawn Jotham for lung function measurements.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Supported by the following organizations: the EPSRC provided funding for a Ph.D. studentship, the Wellcome Trust provided funds for the design and construction of the 3He gas polarizer, and the U.K. Medical Research Council provided funds to purchase the magnetic resonance scanner.

This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents at www.atsjournals.org

Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.

Received in original form November 29, 2004; accepted in final form January 26, 2006


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Brand P, Rieger C, Beinert T, Heyder J. Aerosol derived airway morphometry in healthy subjects. Eur Respir J 1995;8:1639–1646.[Abstract]
  2. Zeman KL, Bennett WD. Measuring alveolar dimensions at total lung capacity by aerosol-derived airway morphometry. J Aerosol Med 1995;8:135–147.[Medline]
  3. Thurlbeck WM. Postnatal human lung growth. Thorax 1982;37:564–571.[Abstract]
  4. Langston C, Kida K, Reed M, Thurlbeck WM. Human lung growth in late gestation and in the neonate. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;129:607–613.[Medline]
  5. Angus GE, Thurlbeck WM. Number of alveoli in the human lung. J Appl Physiol 1972;32:483–485.[Free Full Text]
  6. Ochs M, Nyengaard JR, Jung A, Knudsen L, Voigt M, Wahlers T, Richter J, Gundersen HJ. The number of alveoli in the human lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169:120–124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Armour J, Donnelly PM, Bye PT. The large lungs of elite swimmers: an increased alveolar number? Eur Respir J 1993;6:237–247.[Abstract]
  8. Thurlbeck WM. The internal surface area of nonemphysematous lungs. Am Rev Respir Dis 1967;95:765–773.[Medline]
  9. Gillooly M, Lamb D. Airspace size in lungs of lifelong non-smokers: effect of age and sex. Thorax 1993;48:39–43.[Abstract]
  10. Colebatch HJ, Ng CK. Estimating alveolar surface area during life. Respir Physiol 1992;88:163–170.[Medline]
  11. Gillooly M, Lamb D. Microscopic emphysema in relation to age and smoking habit. Thorax 1993;48:491–495.[Abstract]
  12. Massaro GD, Massaro D. Retinoic acid treatment partially rescues failed septation in rats and in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000;278:L955–L960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hind M, Maden M. Retinoic acid induces alveolar regeneration in the adult mouse lung. Eur Respir J 2004;23:20–27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Middleton H, Black RD, Saam B, Cates GD, Cofer GP, Guenther R, Happer W, Hedlung LW, Johnson GA, Juvan K, et al. MR imaging with hyperpolarized 3He gas. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:271–275.[Medline]
  15. Peces-Barba G, Ruiz-Cabello J, Cremillieux Y, Rodriguez I, Dupuich D, Callot V, Ortega M, Rubio Arbo ML, Cortijo M, Gonzalez-Mangado N. Helium-3 MRI diffusion coefficient: correlation to morphometry in a model of mild emphysema. Eur Respir J 2003;22:14–19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Yablonskiy DA, Sukstanskii AL, Leawoods JC, Gierada DS, Bretthorst GL, Lefrak SS, Cooper JD, Conradi MS. Quantitative in vivo assessment of lung microstructure at the alveolar level with hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:3111–3116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Salerno M, de Lange EE, Altes TA, Truwit JD, Brookeman JR, Mugler JP III. Emphysema: hyperpolarized helium 3 diffusion MR imaging of the lungs compared with spirometric indexes—initial experience. Radiology 2002;222:252–260.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Samee S, Altes T, Powers P, de Lange EE, Knight-Scott J, Rakes G, Mugler JP III, Ciambotti JM, Alford BA, Brookeman JR, et al. Imaging the lungs in asthmatic patients by using hyperpolarized helium-3 magnetic resonance: assessment of response to methacholine and exercise challenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;111:1205–1211.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Wild JM, Paley MN, Kasuboski L, Swift A, Fichele S, Woodhouse N, Griffiths PD, van Beek EJ. Dynamic radial projection MRI of inhaled hyperpolarised 3He gas. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:991–997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Owers-Bradley JR, Benattayallah A, Fichele S, McGloin CJ, Bowtell RW, Morgan PS, Moody AR. Diffusion and tagging of hyperpolarized 3He in the lungs. Proceedings of the 10th annual meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, 2002.
  21. Owers-Bradley JR, Fichele S, Bennattayalah A, McGloin CJ, Bowtell RW, Morgan PS, Moody AR. MR tagging of human lungs using hyperpolarized 3He gas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:142–146.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Waters BA, Owers-Bradley JR, Silverman M. Alveolar size in symptom-free adults. Proceedings of the British Chapter of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Conference, 2004; Oxford, UK.
  23. Waters BA, Owers-Bradley JR, Silverman M. Alveolar size in healthy smoking and non-smoking subjects determined by 3He-magnetic resonance. Proceedings of European Respiratory Society Annual Congress, 2005; Copenhagen, Denmark.
  24. Waters BA, Owers-Bradley JR, Silverman M. Alveolar size in symptom-free adults. Proceedings of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005; Miami, Florida.
  25. Medical Section of the American Lung Association. Standardization of spirometry, 1994 update, American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1107–1136.[Medline]
  26. Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault J-C. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows: report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal: official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 1993;6:5–40.[Medline]
  27. Cotes JE. Lung function assessment and application in medicine, 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1975.
  28. Bachert P, Schad LR, Bock B, Knopp MV, Ebert M, Grossmann T, Heil W, Hofmann D, Surkau R, Otten EW. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of airways in humans with use of hyerpolarized 3He. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:192–196.[Medline]
  29. Schreiber WG, Morbach AE, Stavngaard T, Gast KK, Herweling A, Søgaard LV, Windirsch M, Schmiedeskamp J, Heussel CP, Kauczor HU. Assessment of lung microstructure with magnetic resonance imaging of hyperpolarized Helium-3. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2005;148:23–42.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Cosio MG, Shiner RJ, Saetta M, Wang NS, King M, Ghezzo H, Angus E. Alveolar fenestrae in smokers: relationship with light microscopic and functional abnormalities. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986;133:126–131.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. A. Lutey, S. S. Lefrak, J. C. Woods, T. Tanoli, J. D. Quirk, A. Bashir, D. A. Yablonskiy, M. S. Conradi, S. T. Bartel, T. K. Pilgram, et al.
Hyperpolarized 3He MR Imaging: Physiologic Monitoring Observations and Safety Considerations in 100 Consecutive Subjects
Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 655 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. Bush
Update in Pediatric Lung Disease 2007
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2008; 177(7): 686 - 695.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. Verbanck and M. Paiva
Simulation of the apparent diffusion of helium-3 in the human acinus
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 249 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. Bush
Update in Pediatric Lung Disease 2006
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2007; 175(6): 532 - 540.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200411-1595OCv1
173/8/847    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waters, B.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waters, B.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2006 American Thoracic Society