help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathur, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mathur, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 173. pp. 683, (2006)
© 2006 American Thoracic Society


Correspondence

Oxygenation Index as a Predictor of Outcome in Children with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

To the Editor:

We have several concerns related to methodology and applicability of the findings in the recent article by Trachsel and colleagues (1), which sought to identify determinants of prognosis in pediatric acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). First, the ventilation strategy used by the authors is unclear. The reader is referred to the online supplement, but no further details have been provided. Were lung protective strategies incorporating permissive hypercapnia or acceptance of lower oxygen saturation employed? Were compliance characteristics used to determine adequate lung recruitment? How was "aggressive" use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) defined? Judging by Trachsel and coworkers' Figures E1 and E2, the mean peak PEEP in the patients who died appears to be around 10 cm H2O and mean airway pressure (MAP) around 18 cm H2O over the first 48 hours. In many centers, these values would constitute early settings during aggressive management of AHRF, and involve progression to using higher PEEP, or the employment of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) with a significantly higher MAP.

The authors attribute the observed mortality of 27% to the presence of underlying medical conditions or multiorgan dysfunction. Could objective composite scores such as the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score (PELOD) (2) have helped discriminate the impact of organ dysfunction in this heterogeneous population? In addition, the authors do not present information about actual Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) scores, even though they conclude that it is an independent predictor of mortality.

Could the authors provide additional specifics about the ventilator parameters and escalation of ventilator strategy employed for the 35 patients who died, and especially in the 16 children described as dying of "refractory oxygenation failure," to help in interpreting the significance of these findings. A last PaO2 of less than 50 mm Hg alone does not indicate refractoriness and could be found if a blood gas is obtained in most dying intensive care unit patients. Were HFOV or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) considered in their management?

With additional data and further clarification from the authors, it may become clearer whether the mortality risk assessment determined in this study can be applied to patients at other centers using aggressive conventional or oscillatory ventilation strategies.

Mudit Mathur and Darren Bullock

Loma Linda Children's University Hospital, Loma Linda, California

FOOTNOTES

Conflict of Interest Statement: Neither author has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.

REFERENCES

  1. Trachsel D, McCrindle BW, Nakagawa S, Bohn D. Oxygenation index predicts outcome in children with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;172:206–211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Leclerc F, Leteurtre S, Duhamel A, Grandbastien B, Proulx F, Martinot A, Gauvin F, Hubert P, Lacroix J. Cumulative influence of organ dysfunctions and septic state on mortality of critically ill children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:348–353.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathur, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mathur, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2006 American Thoracic Society