© 2005 American Thoracic Society doi: 10.1164/rccm.2505004
Rebuttal from Dr. BousheyUniversity of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California For patients minimally troubled by symptoms of a disease, the rationale for prescribing regular treatment must be that it reduces the risk of impairment in the future, whether from episodic or permanent interference with full enjoyment of life. How do the studies cited by Dr. O'Byrnethe "OPTIMA" and "START" trials (1, 2)bear on this rationale? The "START" study enrolled only patients with asthma of recent onset. And neither study restricted enrollment to patients with "mild persistent asthma" as defined by the NIH or GINA Guidelines. Both included patients with a postbronchodilator FEV1 greater than or equal to 80% predicted. So patients with a low baseline FEV1 were enrolled, so long as they had a large bronchodilator response, which may itself be a marker of heightened risk of exacerbations (3). This may account for the exacerbation rates being so much higher than the authors expected (1). As for the finding of the START study that compared with placebo, prolonged treatment with budesonide increased postbronchodilator FEV1 after 1 and 3 years, it is too bad the investigators did not make this measurement after brief "open label" treatment with budesonide. The drug increases airway caliber, possibly because of its vasoconstrictor activity (4, 5), and even a single dose, let alone a few days of treatment, might have erased entirely the difference in postbronchodilator FEV1. Dr. O'Byrne actually seems actually to agree with the implications of the IMPACT study (6) in suggesting that a therapeutic trial of an ICS should be given to patients with mild persistent asthma, so that they can decide whether the benefit from its use is worth taking the medication daily. This restates a conclusion of the IMPACT study, that for patients with asthma of this low severity, the decision can be based on the value the patient assigns to the improvement in symptoms associated with ICS use. But what about controlling airway inflammation? O'Byrne recently wrote that "periodic fluctuations in symptoms and airway inflammation are characteristic of asthma, which means that treatment requirements... can vary over time," so that a treatment strategy providing additional antiinflammatory therapy when symptoms appear might be an effective approach to controlling the disease (7). A better statement of the rationale for the IMPACT study would be hard to find. REFERENCES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||