© 2005 American Thoracic Society
Antibiotic Therapy and Outcome in Critically Ill Patients with Pneumococcal BacteremiaTo the Editor:
With considerable interest we have read the article by Baddour and colleagues suggesting that combination antibiotic therapy improves outcome in critically ill patients with pneumococcal bacteremia (1). While this prospective study adds support to a previous retrospective observation, some concerns are raised. Empiric combination therapy with a A microbiological or clinical rationale to explain the survival advantage associated with combination antibiotic therapy still is lacking after the study by Baddour and coworkers (1). Whereas timely institution of appropriate antibiotic therapy is known to be an important prognostic factor both in community-acquired and nosocomial infection, this cannot explain the survival benefit of the current study, as the antibiotic therapy reported was highly heterogeneous but active in vitro (at least for one component). This absence of rationale should caution against hypotheses raised by statistical findings. As can be seen in Table 2 of Baddour and coworkers' article, adjustment for mechanical ventilation in bivariate analysis reduced the level of significance from 0.0015 to 0.04. It would be interesting to know whether the survival advantage associated with combination antibiotic therapy still would be significant when adjusted for other factors which are known to be related with outcome in critically ill patients, such as severity of illness, comorbidity and community-acquired versus nosocomial infection, nonantibiotic treatment such as activated protein C, early goal-directed therapy and corticosteroids (5). To avoid missing significant associations in multivariable analysis, it has been recommended to include all variables which have a theoretical or a priori probable association with the response variable, as well as all variables having a p < 0.25 association in univariate analysis (6). In conclusion, the superiority of combination antibiotic therapy in the treatment of pneumococcal bacteremia can only be proven in a randomized controlled trial.
Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium FOOTNOTES Conflict of Interest Statement: P.D. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; D.B. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; K.V. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; J.D. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. REFERENCES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||