Published ahead of print on October 29, 2004, doi:10.1164/rccm.200406-804OC
© 2005 American Thoracic Society doi: 10.1164/rccm.200406-804OC
Sildenafil Inhibits Altitude-induced Hypoxemia and Pulmonary HypertensionLaboratoire Réponses cellulaires et fonctionnelles à l'hypoxie, Université Paris 13, Bobigny; Service de Physiologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles, hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny; Service d'Anesthésie-réanimation, hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Lyon; Service de Physiologie, hôpital Jean-Verdier, Bondy; Ecole Nationale de Ski et d'Alpinisme, Chamonix; Laboratoire de Physiologie, hôpital Necker, Paris, France Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Jean-Paul Richalet, M.D., Ph.D., UFR. SMBH, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017 Bobigny Cedex, France. E-mail: richalet{at}smbh.univ-paris13.fr
Exposure to high altitude induces pulmonary hypertension that may lead to life-threatening conditions. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the effects of oral sildenafil on altitude-induced pulmonary hypertension and gas exchange in normal subjects were examined. Twelve subjects (sildenafil [SIL] n = 6; placebo [PLA] n = 6) were exposed for 6 days at 4,350 m. Treatment (3 x 40 mg/day) was started 6 to 8 hours after arrival from sea level to high altitude and maintained for 6 days. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (echocardiography) increased at high altitude before treatment (+29% versus sea level, p < 0.01), then normalized in SIL (–6% versus sea level, NS) and remained elevated in PLA (+21% versus sea level, p < 0.05). Pulmonary acceleration time decreased by 27% in PLA versus 6% in SIL (p < 0.01). Cardiac output and systemic blood pressures increased at high altitude then decreased similarly in both groups. PaO2 was higher and alveolar-arterial difference in O2 lower in SIL than in PLA at rest and exercise (p < 0.05). The altitude-induced decrease in maximal O2 consumption was smaller in SIL than in PLA (p < 0.05). Sildenafil protects against the development of altitude-induced pulmonary hypertension and improves gas exchange, limiting the altitude-induced hypoxemia and decrease in exercise performance.
Key Words: cardiac output • exercise • gas exchange • hypoxia Exposure to high altitude leads to hypoxemia, which induces several physiologic or pathophysiologic responses in normal humans. Among those, the hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction leads to an increase in pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa), which may have adverse consequences. High Ppa has been recognized to be one of the main causing factors of high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE), a serious acute condition that has a mortality rate of 44% in untreated patients (1, 2). Moreover, ventilation–perfusion mismatch has been correlated to increasing Ppa at high altitude, probably by the development of interstitial and perivascular edema, aggravating the hypoxemia (3). In the early phase of exposure to high altitude, signs of acute mountain sickness (AMS) may develop and have been shown to be worsened by aggravating hypoxemia, although the precise mechanisms of AMS have not been elucidated (4). Altitude hypoxia induces a dramatic decrease in physical aerobic performance, as assessed by the maximal O2 consumption (4). Several steps in the oxygen transport from the ambient air to the cell can be responsible for the limitation in aerobic performance, among which O2 transfer within the lungs, cardiac output, and tissue diffusion of O2 may play an important role (5). Altogether, acute altitude-induced hypoxemia leads to an adverse condition where, at least, overall well-being is altered by AMS and reduction in performance, and life is possibly threatened by the development of high Ppa and HAPE. Any treatment or condition that limits the increase in Ppa and reduces the altitude-induced hypoxemia may be beneficial for humans acutely exposed to high altitude. The treatment currently recommended for HAPE is rapid reoxygenation combined with a calcium-channel blocker (6, 7). The partial efficacy of this treatment and its systemic adverse effects (hypotension), however, limit its use. Inhalation of nitric oxide has also been used, and has demonstrated its efficacy in this condition, but its use in the field is difficult (8). L-Arginine supplementation has also been found to improve gas exchange at high altitude, further suggesting that the nitric oxide synthase (NOS)–nitric oxide system is involved in the hemodynamic changes in the lungs (9). Recently, sildenafil, a selective inhibitor of type-5 phosphodiesterase, has been shown to lower Ppa and was used successfully in the treatment of severe primary or secondary pulmonary hypertension (10–18). In most cases, sildenafil was not given as a unique treatment but associated with inhaled nitric oxide, intravenous epoprostenol, or inhaled iloprost. Only two studies have evaluated the effect of oral sildenafil (50–100 mg, single dose) in normal subjects exposed to acute hypoxia, in a randomized double-blind study (13, 14): hypoxia-induced increase in Ppa was almost abolished with sildenafil and no important effect on systemic circulation was observed. Deleterious effects of high altitude occur after several hours of exposure, however, and no double-blind controlled study has evaluated the effect of sildenafil on the adverse effects of prolonged altitude exposure in normal humans. Sildenafil has also been reported to increase arterial PO2 (17) and improve physical performance (14, 15, 18) in various cases of severe pulmonary hypertension, but no study has explored the effect of a several-day treatment by sildenafil on these variables in normal subjects exposed to altitude conditions. The objective of the present study was to explore the effects of oral sildenafil in normal subjects exposed for 6 days to an altitude of 4,350 m, in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled manner. The hypothesis was that sildenafil would reduce the hypoxia-induced increase in Ppa and ameliorate the pulmonary hemodynamics and gas exchange conditions, increasing the arterial PO2, alleviating the clinical symptoms, and limiting the reduction in aerobic performance. Some of the results of this study have been previously reported in the form of abstracts (19, 20).
Subjects Twelve male normal subjects (aged 29 ± 6 years) participated in the study. Anthropometric characteristics were as follows: height 181 ± 6 cm, body weight 79 ± 11 kg. They were healthy, unacclimatized to altitude, moderately trained subjects, with no particular medical history, and no previous episode of severe altitude sickness. They gave their informed consent to participate in the study, which was approved by the Ethics Committee of Necker Hospital, Paris.
Procedure
Clinical Questionnaire and Systemic Hemodynamic Parameters A daily questionnaire was filled three times a day (8:00–9:00 A.M., 1:00–2:00 P.M., and 6:00–7:00 P.M.), including the Lake Louise consensus questionnaire, to evaluate the symptoms of AMS (22), and some specific questions related to the possible adverse effects of sildenafil (headache, muscle pain, dyspepsia, flushing). A score of sleep disturbances was evaluated in the morning (from 0, normal sleep, to 3, very poor sleep). Ataxia and dyspnea were also evaluated (from 0 to 3) according to the Lake Louise consensus (22). At the same moment, heart rate and O2 saturation were evaluated by pulse oximetry (Ohmeda Biox 3740; Medical Supplies & Equipment Co.), and systemic systolic and diastolic blood pressure were evaluated in a supine position by sphygmomanometry.
Echocardiography
Maximal Exercise Test
Color Vision Test
Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate and Sildenafil
Treatment
Statistics
Tolerance Exposure to high altitude and treatment were well tolerated by all subjects. Subject 4 (PLA) showed some low values of SaO2 (under 60%) at various occasions at high altitude, without any abnormal clinical symptoms, except moderate headache and fatigue. His cardiac and lung auscultation and neurologic examination were strictly normal. He was maintained in the study and given inhaled O2 (1 L/minute) for 4 hours during sleep from Days 4 to 5, at distance from any test involved in the study. It is noteworthy that the significance of all results presented is not modified if Subject 4 is excluded from the study. Frequency of expected adverse events was not different between the two groups: one SIL and two PLA subjects suffered from dyspepsia; three SIL and one PLA subjects showed flushing of the face; muscle pain was noticed by two SIL and three PLA subjects. All these complaints were occasional. Sildenafil treatment had no effect on color vision. Acute exposure to high altitude (Day 1) was associated with a slight alteration in color vision score in both groups (Day 1 versus sea level pre, p < 0.05); then values returned to normal levels (Table 1).
Clinical Evaluation Subjects suffered from AMS until Day 4; then the Lake Louise score was not significantly different from normoxic baseline. Lake Louise score tended to be lower in SIL group at Day 1 (p = 0.054) before treatment and thereafter at Days 5 and 6, but the difference did not reach significance. Among clinical symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms and dizziness were similar in the two groups (results not shown). Headache, which is both a symptom of AMS and a possible adverse effect of sildenafil, was not significantly modified by the treatment. Fatigue score seemed slightly higher in PLA than in SIL, even after the return to normoxia, but the differences did not reach significance. Sleep was significantly altered during the first 2 nights at high altitude, with no effect of sildenafil. Only scarce cases of ataxia or dyspnea scores different from zero were noticed, with no effect of sildenafil (results not shown) (see Table 1).
Systemic Hemodynamic Parameters
Echocardiography As expected, sPpa increased with acute exposure to high altitude (Day 1) before treatment (Figure 3). After 1 to 2 days of treatment (Days 2–3), sPpa was significantly lower in SIL than in PLA (p = 0.025). After 4 to 5 days of treatment (Days 5–6), sPpa was lower in SIL than in PLA (p < 0.05). At Days 5 to 6, when compared with sea level, sPpa increased by 21% in PLA (p = 0.03) and decreased by 6% in SIL (not significant [NS]). Pulmonary acceleration time decreased in both groups at Day 1 (before treatment) and returned to basal normoxic values in SIL but stayed low in PLA at high altitude (p = 0.001, PLA versus SIL). All other echocardiographic parameters, especially those exploring left ventricular function, were strictly normal and similar in the two groups (Table 2). The diameter of the left ventricle slightly decreased in diastole and systole, leading to a transient increase in shortening fraction. Left atrium diameter and mitral early to late peak velocity ratio (E/A) progressively decreased with exposure to high altitude. Cardiac output measured by Doppler increased from sea level at Day 1 and Days 2 to 3 in both groups (p < 0.05), then returned to basal values, with no significant effect of treatment.
Aerobic Performance and Gas Exchange As expected, maximal O2 consumption decreased at high altitude (Day 2) and slightly (NS) increased with acclimatization (from Days 2–5) (Table 3 and Figure 2). The altitude-induced mean decrement in maximal O2 consumption was smaller in SIL (–29% at Day 2, –25% at Day 5) than in PLA (–39% at Day 2, –35% at Day 5) (p < 0.01, SIL versus PLA, Figure 2D). At high altitude, PaO2 was higher in SIL than in PLA, either at rest (p < 0.05 at Days 5–6) or at exercise (p < 0.01 at Days 5–6). Alveolar–arterial difference in PO2 at rest and at exercise decreased in both groups at high altitude, but the decrease was lower in PLA than in SIL (p < 0.001 at rest, p < 0.05 at exercise). On return to sea level, at rest, PaO2 was lower and alveolar–arterial difference in PO2 higher than in basal level values. As expected, PaCO2 decreased and pHa increased at high altitude (hyperventilation-induced hypocapnia and alkalosis); no difference was found between the two groups. Cardiac output at rest, measured by transthoracic impedencemetry, transiently increased at high altitude (p < 0.05) and was similar in the two groups. At ventilatory threshold, cardiac output was modified, neither by altitude nor by treatment. Heart rate at ventilatory threshold and at maximal exercise decreased at high altitude in both groups. After the return to sea level, maximal heart rate remained lower than before the hypoxic exposure. The intrathoracic fluid index increased in both groups at high altitude (Day 2), then decreased only in SIL and stayed elevated in PLA (p < 0.05 SIL versus PLA).
Acclimatization to High Altitude The physiologic parameters, characteristics of acclimatization to high altitude (PaCO2, pHa, heart rate), were modified from Days 2 to 5 as expected. No difference was found between SIL and PLA. PaCO2 at rest and at the ventilatory threshold decreased from Days 2 to 5 (SIL: p < 0.03, PLA: NS); pHa at the ventilatory threshold increased (SIL: p < 0.03, PLA: NS). Heart rate at the ventilatory threshold and at maximal exercise decreased from Days 2 to 5 (p < 0.05 for PLA and SIL). Sildenafil treatment had no effect on these parameters (Table 3).
Serum cGMP, Serum Sildenafil, and Hematocrit
This is the first double-blind controlled study evidencing the beneficial effect of oral sildenafil (3 x 40 mg/day for 6 days) in normal subjects exposed to prolonged high-altitude hypoxia. High-altitude hypoxia induces a specific pulmonary vasoconstriction and an acute sympathetic activation. Hence, after acute exposure to 4,350 m all the subjects exhibited a decrease in SaO2 and the expected changes in cardiac hemodynamics with an increase in heart rate, cardiac output, and systemic and pulmonary pressures. Acclimatization then occurred with a decrease in heart rate and an increase in ventilation. The main observed effect of sildenafil was a suppression of the hypoxia-induced increase in Ppa, associated with an increase in blood oxygenation. No adverse effect, such as systemic hypotension or alteration in color vision, was noticed. Only minor adverse effects (muscle pain, dyspepsia) have been recorded. Lastly, sildenafil hampered the hypoxia-induced decrease in exercise performance and did not interfere with acclimatization. The effect of sildenafil on Ppa, already observed in humans suffering from primary or secondary pulmonary hypertension (10–13, 15–18), has been found in normal subjects exposed to altitude-induced hypoxia. No adjunct treatment, such as nitric oxide or epoprostenol, has been used in the present study suggesting that the inhibition of PDE5 by itself can have a vasodilatory effect on pulmonary circulation, probably by increasing the availability of cGMP within the pulmonary vasculature (13). In the present study, plasma level of cGMP increased with sildenafil and was associated with a decrease in Ppa without significant decrease in cardiac output. This is in accordance with a direct effect of cGMP on pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cell rather than an effect on cardiac function. Increase in Ppa at high altitude was also confirmed by the decrease in pulmonary acceleration time, as shown at Day 1, which has been considered as an index of pulmonary hypertension (23). Sildenafil restored this index to basal values as soon as in Days 2 to 3, whereas it stayed low in PLA during the whole stay at high altitude. Although present at Days 2 to 3, the overall hemodynamic effects of sildenafil on pulmonary circulation were more marked on Days 5 to 6 when the plasma concentration of the drug was increased 25-fold. All parameters of left ventricular systolic function (Table 3) were not modified by the treatment, confirming that sildenafil has no effect on cardiac contractility and left ventricular afterload. Furthermore, sildenafil has been shown to have no or modest effects on systemic vasculature after a single dose of less than 100 mg (30). In the present study, sildenafil had no significant effect on systemic circulation because systemic arterial pressure and cardiac output transiently raised then returned to baseline values similarly in the two groups. Lastly, despite a lower heart rate in the treated group, cardiac output did not significantly change suggesting a lack of negative effect of sildenafil on cardiac inotropism. The lowering effect on heart rate may be indirect, by increasing SaO2, or direct through a negative chronotropic effect by increased cGMP (31). The decrease in E/A ratio, an index of left ventricular relaxation, observed in the two groups with exposure to high altitude was probably caused by a decrease in left ventricular filling as shown by the associated decrease in left arterial and systolic and diastolic left ventricular diameters. This phenomenon is probably linked to a lower venous return caused by an altitude-induced decrease in plasma volume previously observed in the same conditions (32). In the present study, plasma volume was not measured but indirect evidence can be drawn from the acute increase in hematocrit from 43 to 46%. The increase in PaO2 and SaO2 observed at rest and exercise, associated with a lower alveolar-arterial O2 difference and an unchanged PaCO2, is particularly interesting because it evidences a better oxygen transfer within the lungs, probably because of a better ventilation-perfusion adequacy or a decrease in lung diffusion impairment. Hypoxia-induced increase in Ppa has been shown to be one of the main mechanisms responsible for the development of the alveolar edema in HAPE (1, 2). Even in normal subjects, ventilation-perfusion mismatch has been shown to increase at high altitude with increasing Ppa, either by a nonuniform pulmonary vasoconstriction or by increasing the interstitial and perivascular edema (3). By lowering Ppa, sildenafil could reduce the pulmonary capillary leak and limit the development of interstitial edema. The observed decrease in intrapulmonary fluid index with sildenafil is in favor of this hypothesis. This amelioration of blood oxygenation, in turn, can have a beneficial effect on pulmonary vasculature, enhancing the effect of the drug. On return to sea level, all parameters tended to return to sea level basal values. In both groups at rest, however, PaO2 was lower and the alveolar-arterial difference in PO2 (A) higher than in basal conditions. This may not be linked to hypoventilation because PCO2 was not elevated. It could be related to a slight persistent interstitial edema or ventilation-perfusion mismatch after altitude exposure. No significant adverse event was evidenced and the treatment was well tolerated. The dose used (120 mg/day) is comparable with what is now commonly used (100–150 mg) in prolonged treatment of pulmonary hypertension (15, 18). No clear effect has been shown on the clinical signs of AMS, even if a tendency to lower the Lake Louise score was shown after 4 days of altitude exposure. Headache being a possible adverse effect of sildenafil, however, its probable increase in treated subjects may have jeopardize a possible beneficial effect on overall AMS score because of a better blood oxygenation. The indication of sildenafil in the treatment of HAPE has not been addressed in the present study because none of the subjects suffered from this severe condition. The beneficial effect on Ppa strongly suggests, however, that this drug could be highly effective in this condition, without adverse systemic effect, contrary to the classically proposed calcium blockers (6, 7). The beneficial effects of sildenafil on pulmonary circulation and gas exchange have been sufficient to limit the altitude-induced decrease in maximal aerobic performance. To the authors' knowledge, no pharmacologic treatment has been previously shown to reduce this disabilitating effect of prolonged high-altitude exposure. Sildenafil treatment did not interfere with the usual physiologic characteristics of acclimatization to high altitude. The decrease in PaCO2 and increase in pHa indicating a process of ventilatory acclimatization and the decrease in maximal heart rate, attributable to a progressive desensitization of cardiac ß-receptors (33), observed in the present study from Days 2 to 5, were not modified by the treatment. Similarly, an acute altitude-induced decrease in plasma volume probably accounts for the slight increase in hematocrit, without any significant effect of treatment. Sildenafil, by its vasodilating effect on pulmonary circulation, (1) suppresses the altitude-induced pulmonary hypertension; (2) ameliorates pulmonary hemodynamics and gas exchange, limiting the altitude-induced hypoxemia and favoring cardiovascular adaptation to exercise; and (3) does not alter the normal physiologic processes of acclimatization. Further studies will determine if sildenafil can replace calcium blockers in the treatment of HAPE.
The authors are grateful to Eric Jaudinot and Véronique Chauveau (Pfizer France), Ghazwan Butrous (Pfizer Sandwich) for supporting the project and providing sildenafil citrate, and Richard Hucker (Pfizer Sandwich) for the dosage of sildenafil. The authors thank all the volunteers for their participation in this study at Observatoire Vallot, the Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l'Environnement for the use of the facilities, Acuson/Siemens for providing the echocardiographic device (Cypress), and Bayer Diagnostics for providing the blood gases analyzer.
Supported by a grant from Pfizer S. A. France. This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents at www.atsjournals.org Conflict of Interest Statement: J.-P.R. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; P.G. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; P.R. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; I.P. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; M.D. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; A.J.-L. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; P.M. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; J.B. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; J.C. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. Received in original form June 24, 2004; accepted in final form October 24, 2004
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOP
ABSTRACT
METHODS
). The symbols #, +, *, and 
