help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohapatra, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mohapatra, P. R.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 170. pp. 920-921, (2004)
© 2004 American Thoracic Society


Correspondence

Fluoroquinolones in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

To the Editor:

Chan and coworkers have shown a good outcome of treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) with fluoroquinolones (1). Fluoroquinolones have become indispensable in the treatment of MDR TB (2). As measured by their in vitro activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the most potent of the currently available fluoroquinolones are, in descending order, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin (1). The first three of these drugs are commonly known as antipneumococcal quinolones used in community-acquired pneumonia. M. tuberculosis clinical isolates that demonstrate high-level phenotypic resistance to fluoroquinolones, which appears to be predominantly due to gyrA mutations, exhibit cross-resistance to all six important fluoroquinolones (3). Patients with prior exposure to any of the quinolones are likely to develop resistance to other quinolones. Quinolones being broad spectrum antibacterial agents, their widespread and indiscriminate use, often in subtherapeutic doses, is likely to rapidly enhance quinolone-resistant organisms, including mycobacteria. MDR TB is increasing due to noninclusion of its treatment protocol in DOTS program. For a long time now there has been no new established drug available for MDR TB. At present we are left with few bacteriostatic antitubercular drugs. Reports of quinolone-resistant tuberculosis are constantly pouring in (4) and should act as a warning sign for the bleak future of cases of MDR-TB, because we are rapidly losing a very effective group of drugs for the management of such cases. So there should be some restriction on the use of fluoroquinolones, to save these drugs for future use in MDR TB. Preventing the emergence of antimicrobial resistance is certainly an important goal.

In India (Delhi region), the combined prevalence of drug resistances during 1995 was 13.3% (5). However, even if 2% of new patients in India have MDR TB, this represents 20,000 new drug-resistant infectious cases every year. More than one million new patients with tuberculosis still do not have access to the basic program package in India (6).

Identifying patients with MDR TB saves costs by providing effective treatment protocols without wasteful, unnecessary, and ineffective treatment. Furthermore, the primary cycle of MDR TB gets controlled, thereby saving the future funds and indirect costs that would otherwise have to be diverted for the treatment of both sick individuals and those they infect.

Prasanta Raghab Mohapatra

Government Medical College Chandigarh, India

FOOTNOTES

Conflict of Interest Statement: P.R.M. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this letter.

Dr. Michael Iseman was given the opportunity to respond to this letter but declined to do so.

REFERENCES

  1. Chan ED, Laurel V, Strand MJ, Chan JF, Huynh M-LN, Globe M, Iseman MD. Treatment and outcome analysis of 205 patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169:1103–1109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Mukherjee JS, Rich ML, Socci AR, Joseph JK, Viru FA, Shin SS, Furin JJ, Becerra MC, Barry DJ, Kim JY, et al. Programmes and principles in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Lancet 2004;363:474–481.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Cheng AF, Yew WW, Chan EW, Chin ML, Hui MM, Chan RC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48:596–601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Sullivan EA, Kreiswirth BN, Palumbo L, Kapur V, Musser JM, Ebrahimzadeh A, Frieden TR. Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant tuberculosis in New York City. Lancet 1995;345:1148–1150.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Pablos-Mendez A, Raviglione MC, Laszlo A, Binkin N, Rieder HL, Bustreo F, Cohn DL, Lambregts-van Weezenbeek CS, Kim SJ, Chaulet P, et al. Global surveillance for antituberculosis-drug resistance, 1994–1997. World Health Organization-International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Working Group on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1641–1649.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Khatri GR, Frieden TR. Controlling Tuberculosis in India. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1420–1425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohapatra, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mohapatra, P. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2004 American Thoracic Society