Published ahead of print on June 1, 2004, doi:10.1164/rccm.200311-1583OC
© 2004 American Thoracic Society doi: 10.1164/rccm.200311-1583OC
Small Size at Birth and Greater Postnatal Weight GainRelationships to Diminished Infant Lung FunctionAllergy and Inflammation Sciences Division, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital; and MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Keith M. Godfrey, B.M., Ph.D., MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. E-mail: kmg{at}mrc.soton.ac.uk
Recent evidence suggests that impaired lung development is linked with diminished lung function and an increased risk of chronic obstructive airway disease in adulthood. To examine environmental influences on early lung development, we measured lung function in 131 normal-term infants aged 514 weeks. Adjusting for age at measurement, FEV at 0.4 seconds fell by 4.4% for each standard deviation decrease in birth weight (p = 0.047); when adjusted for FVC, FEV at 0.4 seconds was not related to birth weight but fell by 3.2% per standard deviation increase in infant weight gain (p = 0.001). Age- and sex-adjusted total respiratory system compliance fell by 7.0% per standard deviation decrease in birth weight (p < 0.001) but was not related to infant weight gain. In univariate analyses, age-adjusted forced expiratory flow at functional residual capacity was not related to birth weight, but decreased by 11.0% per standard deviation increase in infant weight gain (p = 0.007). The respiratory rate rose by 5.1% per standard deviation increase in infant weight gain (p = 0.001). Lung function measurements were not related to infant feeding. The observations suggest that lower rates of fetal growth and higher rates of early infancy weight gain are associated with impaired lung development.
Key Words: infant FEV forced expiratory flow rates lung function weight gain The normal physiologic growth and development patterns of the airways and parenchyma remain poorly understood, but epidemiologic studies measuring premorbid lung function in infancy indicate the importance of genetic and environmental factors during fetal and early postnatal life (18). Children and adults who were small at birth tend to have reduced lung function (911) and an increased risk of respiratory morbidity and mortality (12, 13). Although the mechanisms linking early lung development with lung function in later life are unknown, impaired airway and alveolar growth may be important. Airway branching is complete by 16-weeks gestation, and alveolar formation begins before birth. Between birth and 18 months of age there is a rapid increase in alveolar number and size, while airway diameter continues to grow. Environmental influences during both prenatal and early postnatal life therefore have the potential to affect lung development. Maternal smoking before and after birth has been associated with impaired lung function of the offspring in some, but not all, studies (6, 1417). Fetal growth and postnatal growth have been associated with later atopy and asthma. Links between a large neonatal head circumference and a raised total serum IgE in childhood (18, 19) and adulthood (20) led to the hypothesis that factors influencing fetal growth may program the developing respiratory or immune systems (21). Birth length and weight have been associated with later asthma (19), but this was not replicated in another study (13). The conflicting results may reflect the age at which the relationship is examined and whether persistent wheezing associated with atopy is considered separately from transient wheezing in children with small airways who are predisposed to wheeze with viral infections (35).
The rapid thoracoabdominal compression (RTC) technique to measure forced expiratory flow at functional residual capacity (
We have examined the hypothesis that fetal and early postnatal growth, because of their effects on lung growth and development, will predict premorbid lung function, with implications for the general hypothesis that impaired early lung development impairs subsequent respiratory health. Here we report analyses of size at birth and weight gain in early infancy in relationship to lung function measured by FEV0.4, total respiratory system compliance (Crs),
Additional details on the study population, methods, and statistical analysis are provided in an online supplement. In brief, white infants, born at 37 weeks or more of gestation (calculated using menstrual and ultrasound data) and without major congenital anomalies, were recruited from babies born to healthy pregnant women in the Southampton Women's Survey. We used questionnaires to ascertain maternal cigarette smoking (before conception and at infant testing) and infant feeding. We approached 362 women about the study; 219 (60%) declined, and 12 (3%) agreed but were excluded because of recent upper respiratory tract infection or other illness, leaving 131 (36%) who took part. None had previously had a lower respiratory tract illness or had evidence of infection at testing. The Southampton and South West Hants Joint Research Ethics Committee approved the study, and we obtained parental informed written consent. Infant weights and crownheel lengths were measured at birth and at lung function testing, and neonatal head circumference was recorded. Lung function was measured 514 weeks after birth during quiet sleep augmented by chloral hydrate 75100 mg/kg. Data were collected using RASP software (Physiologic Ltd., Newbury, UK) and analyzed in SQUEEZE (Paul Dixon, London, UK). An inflatable jacket connected to a rapid inflation system was placed around the infant's chest and abdomen. A facemask attached to a Fleisch pneumotachograph (Dynasciences, Blue Bell, CA) measuring airway pressure and flow was placed over the nose and mouth. Flow and volume, calculated by digital integration of the flow signal, were displayed during RTC squeezes, passive inflations, and raised volume RTC.
Respiratory rate was measured during quiet tidal breathing. To record partial expiratory flow volume curves, a stable end expiratory level was established before performing an RTC at the lowest pressure to achieve the best
FEV0.4, Crs, Neonatal weight, head circumference, and crownheel length were adjusted for sex and weight and length at lung function testing adjusted for age/sex by conversion to SD scores compared with reference values for British neonates and infants (25). We derived SD scores for weight gain between birth and testing that are conditional on birth weight and take account of regression to the mean (26).
Lung function tests were performed on 131 infants (66 males). Their median (10th90th percentile) weights and crownheel lengths at birth and at lung function testing are shown in Table 1, together with their head circumference and duration of gestation at birth. Seven percent were less than the 10th percentile of birth weight for gestational age using standard Child Growth Foundation charts for the United Kingdom. The distributions of weight, crownheel length, head circumference, and gestation at birth are graphically portrayed in the online supplement (Figure E1). Table 1 also shows the distributions of the infant's lung function measurements. Full lung function data were not collected in all cases because of the infant waking before completion of the protocol or unacceptable data quality (see online supplement). Ten percent of subjects were tested during the same session by a second researcher; in all cases, the interoperator differences in FEV0.4 and maxFRC were within 10%.
Age at Test and Sex Lung function was measured between 5 and 14 weeks after birth (Table 1); the median (10th90th percentile) age at testing was 9.4 (7.012.4) weeks. FEV0.4, Crs, and maxFRC increased with increasing infant age at testing; for each additional week of age, FEV0.4 rose by 4.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 6.4, p < 0.001), Crs by 5.2% (95% CI, 3.3 to 7.1, p < 0.001) and maxFRC by 7.2% (95% CI, 3.0 to 11.4, p = 0.001). The increases in FEV0.4 and Crs with increasing age were similar in infants of different birth weight, but in infants of below-average, average, and above-average birth weight, maxFRC rose by 1.2% (p = 0.8), 5.9% (p = 0.08), and 14.0% (p < 0.001), respectively, for each additional week of age. This interaction of birth weight in relationship to the association between maxFRC and infant age was strongly significant (p = 0.02). FVC-adjusted FEV0.4 was not related to age at test. The respiratory rate fell by 0.8% with increasing infant age, but this relationship was not statistically significant (p = 0.3). Crs was lower in female infants (by 8.6%; 95% CI, 0.7% to 15.9%, p = 0.03), but FEV0.4, FVC-adjusted FEV0.4, maxFRC, and respiratory rate were all similar in male and female infants. Table 2 shows the back-transformed geometric means of lung function parameters by thirds of age at testing and by infant sex. FEV0.4, FVC-adjusted FEV0.4, Crs, maxFRC, and respiratory rate were not related to the infant's duration of gestation at birth. In all further analyses of FEV0.4 and maxFRC, we adjusted for age at testing by including it as a covariate in the regression models; for Crs, we included both age at testing and infant sex in the regression models.
Infant Anthropometry and Weight Gain Age-adjusted FEV0.4 fell by 4.4% (95% CI, 0.1 to 8.9, p = 0.047) for each SD decrease in birth weight, by 3.7% (95% CI, 0.6 to 8.1%, p = 0.09) for each SD decrease in neonatal head circumference, and by 5.3% (95% CI, 0.8 to 10.0, p = 0.02) for each SD decrease in neonatal crownheel length. Although age-adjusted FEV0.4 had a positive association with crownheel length SD score at the time of lung function testing (p = 0.047), it was not related to the infant's weight SD score at this time (p = 0.96). A weak trend for FEV0.4 to fall with increasing weight gain SD score was not statistically significant (p = 0.1). Table 3 presents geometric mean age-adjusted FEV0.4 according to thirds of the infants' birth weight; within each birth-weight grouping, results are also shown according to thirds of weight gain between birth and lung function testing.
When adjusted for FVC, FEV0.4 fell by 0.5% (95% CI, 1.6% to 2.6%, p = 0.6) for each SD increase in birth weight and by 3.1% (95% CI, 1.2% to 4.9%, p = 0.002) for each SD increase in weight at lung function testing. FVC-adjusted FEV0.4 therefore had a strong relationship with infant weight gain, falling by 3.2% (95% CI, 1.4 to 4.9%, p = 0.001) for each SD increase in weight gain (Figure 1). The relationship between FVC-adjusted FEV0.4 and weight gain was strengthened by further adjustment for age at test (p < 0.001). FVC-adjusted FEV0.4 was not associated with respiratory rate (r = 0.12, p = 0.3) and adjustment for respiratory rate did not alter the relationship between infant weight gain and FVC-adjusted FEV0.4.
In a similar pattern to that found for FEV0.4, age- and sex-adjusted Crs fell by 7.0% for each SD decrease in birth weight (95% CI, 3.6 to 10.6, p < 0.001), by 5.8% (95% CI, 2.2 to 9.5, p = 0.002) for each SD decrease in neonatal head circumference, and by 7.1% (95% CI, 3.5 to 10.9, p < 0.001) for each SD decrease in neonatal crownheel length. Age- and sex-adjusted Crs fell by 4.6% for each SD decrease in infant weight at lung function testing (95% CI, 0.8 to 8.6, p = 0.02) and by 7.5% (95% CI, 3.9 to 11.3, p < 0.001) for each SD decrease in infant crownheel length but was not related to infant weight gain (p = 0.8). Table 4 presents mean age- and sex-adjusted Crs according to thirds of the infants' birth weight and infant weight gain.
Age-adjusted maxFRC was not related to birth weight (p = 0.7) or to neonatal head circumference (p = 0.8) and crownheel length (p = 0.4). Age-adjusted maxFRC was also not related to crownheel length SD score at the time of lung function testing (p = 0.7) but did, however, decrease by 8.6% for each SD increase in weight at this time (95% CI, 0.3 to 16.2, p = 0.04) and by 11.0% for each SD increase in infant weight gain (95% CI, 3.2 to 18.2, p = 0.007). Table 5 presents mean age-adjusted maxFRC according to thirds of the infants' birth weight and infant weight gain. Although the effect of higher infant weight gain on lower maxFRC was strongest in the lowest birth-weight grouping, there was no statistically significant interaction between the effects of birth weight and infant weight gain (data not shown).
Respiratory rate rose by 2.9% (95% CI, 0.1 to 5.8, p = 0.06) for each SD decrease in birth weight, by 2.7% (95% CI, 0.3 to 5.6, p = 0.08) for each SD decrease in neonatal head circumference, and by 3.2% (95% CI, 0.2 to 6.1, p = 0.04) for each SD decrease in neonatal crownheel length. Respiratory rate tended to rise with increasing weight and crownheel length at lung function testing, but these associations were not significant (p = 0.2 and p = 0.5, respectively); each SD increase in infant weight gain was, however, associated with a 5.1% (95% CI, 2.1 to 8.2, p = 0.001) rise in respiratory rate. Table 6 presents mean respiratory rate according to thirds of the infants' birth weight and infant weight gain. Although there was no statistically significant interaction between the effects of birth weight and infant weight gain (data not shown), in a simultaneous analysis, respiratory rate was inversely related to weight at birth (p = 0.001) and positively related to weight at lung function testing (p = 0.003).
Confirmatory analyses omitting the infant's age from the analyses of FEV0.4 and maxFRC and age and sex from the analyses of Crs showed little change in the associations between lower birth size and lower FEV0.4 and Crs; maxFRC remained not associated with size at birth. Omitting age as a co-variate in the analyses of weight gain SD score marginally strengthened the inverse associations with FEV0.4 (p = 0.03) and maxFRC (p = 0.001); Crs remained not associated with weight gain (p = 0.4). Back-transformed mean values of FEV0.4, Crs, maxFRC, and respiratory rate according to thirds of birth weight and infant weight gain are graphically portrayed in the online supplement (see Figure E2 in the online supplement).
Maternal Smoking and Infant Feeding
Age at Test This is one of the largest studies measuring raised volume RTC in healthy infants of this age range and, therefore, contributes to the limited population-based data that have been published. Our study had a narrow age window for testing, but we found that age at test nonetheless had a major influence on FEV0.4, Crs, and maxFRC. This has important implications for accurate reporting of age at test in future studies. Other studies over much larger age ranges have also found a correlation between age and lung function (27, 28), but our data highlight that even an additional week can lead to a significant change in FEV0.4, Crs, and maxFRC. However, we found that among infants of below-average birth weight there was no increase in maxFRC with age. As our data are cross-sectional, further work is required to confirm and explain this observation. Nonetheless, if a high proportion of normal infants of below-average birth weight are essentially increasing their lung size over the first two months of life (greater FEV0.4 and Crs) but failing to increase their maximal forced expiratory flows at FRC, this is a potentially important finding that could have major implications for respiratory health. Confirmation of how lung development evolves over the first months of life is needed, but using currently available techniques, the practical and ethical issues of conducting longitudinal studies to investigate lung function in infancy are considerable.
Maternal Smoking and Sex
Our data suggest that male infants have more compliant lungs, but we found no sex difference in
Size at Birth in Relationship to FEV0.4 and Crs We found that Crs was highly correlated with birth weight and length, with larger babies having more compliant respiratory systems. Crs is influenced by chest wall compliance as well as lung compliance and interpretation of these data needs caution. Joyce and colleagues found that Crs was lower in term growth-restricted lambs than in control animals (33) and that the lung component was significantly lower in the growth-restricted group. If restricted fetal growth is associated with less compliant lungs, it has important implications for future respiratory health; if smaller infants have decreased elastic tissue laid down in utero, they are likely to have an increased rate of respiratory decline with aging. There is increasing evidence from animal studies that fetal growth restriction influences lung development (34, 35) and function (33) and that some of these effects persist (36). A number of mechanisms are likely to contribute to diminished lung function in infants of below-average birth weight, including reduced fetal nutrient supply and an altered endocrine milieu. Impaired prenatal nutrition in animal models is associated with reduced surfactant (37, 38) or surfactant activity (39), a reduction in lung DNA or protein content (38), loss of respiratory drive (40), decreased alveolarization (38), and decreased lung cellularity (38, 39). Some of these abnormalities of lung development may be direct consequences of nutrient deficiencies. However, the nutritional stress may also induce fetal endocrine responses that themselves affect lung development (41). Our data cannot definitively identify the timing of the intrauterine effect on lung development and infant lung function. However, lower infant FEV0.4 and Crs and faster respiratory rate had similar relationships with lower birth weight, neonatal head circumference, and crownheel length, suggesting symmetrical growth restriction. Symmetrical restriction of fetal growth is thought to originate in early pregnancy, whereas asymmetrical growth restriction reflects impaired soft tissue accretion in late pregnancy. Our data provide weak evidence for an early pregnancy effect on infant FEV0.4, Crs, and respiratory rate, perhaps mediated by impaired development of the bronchial tree, which is complete by 16-weeks gestation. Alveolar development does not begin until airway growth is complete but continues through both prenatal and postnatal life until 810 years of age; alveolar number at birth has been reported as being anything between 8% and 50% of the eventual adult number (42, 43).
Postnatal Weight Gain in Relationship to
We found that the lowest An alternative explanation for the association between increased postnatal weight gain and diminished lung function is that above-average weight gain is itself impairing lung development. There has been considerable interest in the relationship between asthma and obesity in recent years (4447), but this is the first study to suggest that increased weight gain in early infancy is associated with worse lung function. It is unlikely that different feeding modes are responsible for this finding, as infants who were breast-fed and bottle-fed had similar lung function. As children who have high weight gain in early infancy tend to have a higher body mass index and a more central fat distribution in childhood, our data offer a possible explanation for the association of asthma and obesity.
Respiratory Rate In conclusion, we describe associations of birth anthropometry and early postnatal weight gain with lung function measured in the first few months of life. We have shown that even a 1-week increase in age is significant when reporting these infant lung function parameters. The absence of serial measurements in our study precludes definitive conclusions, but the observations suggest that lower rates of fetal growth and higher rates of early infancy weight gain are associated with impaired lung development. The association with higher infant weight gain appears paradoxical but could reflect catch-up in infants whose fetal growth faltered in late gestation. This may result in some infants having relatively small lungs, which have not grown at the same rate as the "infant." These findings may have implications for respiratory health in childhood and later life.
The authors acknowledge the help of parents and infants who participated in this study. They are grateful to the staff of the Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility and Karen Collins for assisting with collection of infant lung function data. They are also grateful to the staff of the Southampton Women's Survey for the collection of data on the mothers and for obtaining the birth anthropometric measurements. Dr. Jean Mulligan kindly provided assistance with derivation of the infant size SD scores. The authors would like to thank Professor Janet Stocks for her practical support and assistance in setting up and developing the Southampton Infant Lung Function Laboratory.
Supported by the British Lung Foundation, SPARKS (Sport Aiding medical Research for Kids), Hope, and the Medical Research Council, United Kingdom. This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents online at www.atsjournals.org Conflict of Interest Statement: J.S.L. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; H.M.I. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; K.M.G. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; C.T.F. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; J.O.W. is chairman of a scientific advisory board overseeing the conduct of two studies (ETAC and EPAAC) investigating the early life origins of allergy and the effect of cetirizine and levocetirizine for UCB Pharma and has given lectures for a number of pharmaceutical companies, including UCB Pharma, Novartis, SHS International, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline, and AstraZeneca and over the last three years has received small grants from UCB Pharma for investigator-led research studies; R.K.G. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; J.B.C. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript Received in original form November 20, 2003; accepted in final form May 31, 2004
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||