help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Payne, D. N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bush, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Payne, D. N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bush, A.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 170. pp. 1385, (2004)
© 2004 American Thoracic Society


Correspondence

"Refractory" Eosinophilic Airway Inflammation in Severe Asthma

To the Editor:

The recent study by ten Brinke and colleagues (1) should make us pause to consider the direction in which research into the mechanisms of refractory asthma is heading. Their data demonstrate that use of intramuscular triamcinolone, in patients with refractory asthma, leads to a reduction in sputum eosinophils and rescue medication score and an increase in FEV1. The authors suggest that a possible explanation for their findings is that triamcinolone may reach areas of the lung, as well as the bone marrow, that are inaccessible to inhaled corticosteroids. However, this does not explain why intramuscular treatment should be superior to oral, unless there is a problem with gastrointestinal absorption. The authors also acknowledge, albeit without much conviction, that poor adherence to maintenance corticosteroids might play a role.

Many believe that poor treatment adherence is an important cause of refractory asthma. However, there are surprisingly few published data to support this view, and compared with the advances made in understanding the cellular and molecular basis of refractory asthma, the assessment of adherence remains a neglected area. All the currently available methods for assessing adherence to inhaled therapy, including electronic monitors, have their limitations (2), which may explain why only one of several recent descriptive studies of patients with refractory asthma has attempted to provide objective data on adherence to inhaled therapy (3). Several groups have measured serum prednisolone and cortisol to assess adherence to oral prednisolone (1, 36), although this method also has drawbacks. Detectable prednisolone only reflects short-term adherence, whereas measurement of cortisol is an indirect method, which assumes that demonstration of adrenal suppression reflects corticosteroid use. However, a single cortisol measurement only reliably reflects adrenal suppression when the level is low (< 100 nM) (4). Levels greater than 100 nM are harder to interpret.

These difficulties most likely explain the paucity of published data. One of the advantages of administering intramuscular triamcinolone is that adherence is assured. In their study, ten Brinke and colleagues (1) have demonstrated that significant improvements are possible, even in adults with refractory, eosinophilic asthma, providing patients receive an adequate corticosteroid dose. This highlights the need to establish what proportion of those with refractory asthma really are receiving the corticosteroid dose they are prescribed and to develop ways of improving adherence, where appropriate. Our own practice is to diagnose steroid-insensitive asthma only after a failed trial of intramuscular triamcinolone, and we suggest that this be incorporated into the definition of this problem.

Donald N. R. Payne and Andrew Bush

Royal Brompton Hospital London, United Kingdom

FOOTNOTES

Conflict of Interest Statement: A.B. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this letter; D.N.R.P. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this letter.

REFERENCES

  1. ten Brinke A, Zwinderman AH, Sterk PJ, Rabe KF, Bel EH. "Refractory" eosinophilic airway inflammation in severe asthma: effect of parenteral corticosteroids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170:601–605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Cochrane MG, Bala MV, Downs KE, Mauskopf J, Ben-Joseph RH. Inhaled corticosteroids for asthma therapy: patient compliance, devices, and inhalation technique. Chest 2000;117:542–550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ranganathan SC, Payne DN, Jaffe A, McKenzie SA. Difficult asthma: defining the problems. Pediatr Pulmonol 2001;31:114–120.[Medline]
  4. Payne D. Adrenal response to glucocorticoid treatment [letter]. Lancet 2000;355:1458.[Medline]
  5. Robinson DS, Campbell DA, Durham SR, Pfeffer J, Barnes PJ, Chung KF. Systematic assessment of difficult-to-treat asthma. Eur Respir J 2003; 22:478–483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Wenzel SE, Szefler SJ, Leung DY, Sloan SI, Rex MD, Martin RJ. Bronchoscopic evaluation of severe asthma: persistent inflammation associated with high dose glucocorticoids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156: 737–743.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Payne, D. N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bush, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Payne, D. N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bush, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2004 American Thoracic Society