Published ahead of print on July 28, 2004, doi:10.1164/rccm.200307-908OC
© 2004 American Thoracic Society doi: 10.1164/rccm.200307-908OC
Cells Derived from the Circulation Contribute to the Repair of Lung InjuryDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Section; Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Stephen I. Rennard, M.D., University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Section 985125 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 681985125. E-mail: srennard{at}unmc.edu
Bone marrow (stem/progenitor) cells have been shown to "differentiate" into cells in multiple tissues, including lung. A low number of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells also circulate in peripheral blood. The physiologic roles of these cells are still uncertain. This study was designed to test, using parabiotic mice that were joined surgically, whether stem/progenitor cells in blood contributed to the regeneration of lung after injury. Parabiotic mice were generated surgically by joining green fluorescent protein transgenic mice and wild-type littermates. These mice developed a common circulation (approximately 50% green cells in blood) by 2 weeks after surgery. The wild-type mouse was either uninjured or lethally irradiated or received intratracheal elastase or the combination of radiation with intratracheal elastase injection. Radiation or the combination of radiation with elastase significantly increased the proportion of bright green cells in the lungs of the wild-type mice. Morphologically, interstitial monocytes/macrophages, subepithelial fibroblast-like interstitial cells, and additionally type I alveolar epithelial cells immunostained for green fluorescent protein in wild-type mice. Approximately 5 to 20% of lung fibroblasts primary cultured from injured wild-type mice were green fluorescent protein expressing cells, indicating their blood derivation. This study demonstrates that stem/progenitor cells in blood contribute to the repair of lung injury in irradiated mice.
Key Words: lung repair parabiosis stem/progenitor cell in blood There is accumulating evidence that the tracheal epithelium contains cells with generally accepted properties of stem/progenitor cells (15), and like bone marrow stem cells (6), these cells may reside in niches. It is still less clear that there is a single multipotent stem/progenitor cell in the lung for different lineages, for example, tracheal gland duct cells versus tracheal basal cells versus Clara cells versus pulmonary neuroendocrine cells versus type II alveolar epithelial cells. Traditionally, type II alveolar epithelial cells have been believed to be progenitor cells of type I cells (7, 8). Recently, bone marrow or bone marrow stem/progenitor cells have been reported to differentiate into cells in multiple tissues, including lung (913) in mice. In these reports, bronchial epithelial cells (9), type I alveolar epithelial cells (11), and type II alveolar epithelial cells (9, 10) have been demonstrated to be derived from donor bone marrow cells. A low number of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells also circulate in blood. The physiologic roles of these cells are still uncertain. In human studies after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, "chimerism" in lung has been reported (14, 15). Similarly, significant chimerism of epithelial and endothelial cells in lungs of recipients has been demonstrated (14). Transplant models have been used to demonstrate population of the lung by circulating stem/progenitor cells. An interesting potential role for such cells is repair of the lung after injury. However, in transplant models, it is unclear when transplantation should be performed relative to the injury. It is also unclear whether systemic (irradiation) or local injuries of the lung are needed for stem cell engraftment. Consequently, this study employed parabiotic pairs of transgenic enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) expressing and wild-type littermate mice in which the wild-type mouse was either uninjured or lethally irradiated (9.5 Gy, total body irradiated) or received intratracheal elastase (0.05 U/g) or both irradiation and intratracheal elastase. Blood cells were examined to determine whether parabionts shared vascular communication. GFP+ cells in the lungs of both partners were detected by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis and immunocytochemically. Primary lung fibroblasts were cultured from wild-type mice of parabionts to detect whether any cells were donor derived.
Mice Transgenic GFP C57Bl/6-TgN (ACTbEGFP, 45 weeks) and wild-type littermate C57Bl/6 (45 weeks) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME).
Parabiosis
Lung Injury
Flow Cytometry Analysis of the Lung and Bone Marrow
Immunohistochemistry
Culture of Lung Fibroblasts
Statistical Analysis
Demonstration of Vascular Communication To investigate the vascular communication of the parabionts, blood samples were obtained retro-orbitally 2 weeks after surgery. As shown Figure 1, these mice developed a common circulation (approximately 50% green cells in blood) by 2 weeks after surgery. The wild-type mice in parabiotic pairs that were given irradiation (9.5 Gy) after vascular communication also maintained a common circulation (approximately 60% green cells in blood) when assessed 2 weeks after irradiation. After irradiation, chimerism appeared slightly increased (approximately 60%), perhaps because irradiation increased autofluorescence (data not shown) or because of the decreased proportion of circulating wild-type cells.
Flow Histogram Analysis of Cells in Parabionts Representative flow histograms of blood, bone marrow cells, and lung cell suspensions from parabionts 4 weeks after surgery are presented in Figure 2. Flow histograms of these cells before parabiosis are also shown for comparison. In GFP mice, GFP-expressing cells were not 100% of cells in either the bone marrow or lung even before parabiosis (Figure 2A). GFP-positive cells in the lungs of GFP mice were variable between mice (average 55.9%, range 33.480.1%). GFP-positive cells in bone marrow were also variable and relatively low compared with lung, liver, and spleen (liver, spleen data not shown). After parabiosis, these percentages of GFP+ cells were less than 100%, reflecting either mosaic expression of GFP or engraftment of nongreen GFP-derived cells. These results were consistent with data of immunostaining for GFP. Approximately 5% of bone marrow cells and lung cell suspensions from wild-type mice were bright green cells, indicating donor derivation. Therefore, even in the steady state, cells from the circulation contributed, albeit minimally, to cells in bone marrow and lung.
Effect of Elastase/Irradiation on the Proportion of GFP-positive Cells in the Lung of Wild-type Mice To investigate the contribution of blood-derived cells to the lung after injury, wild-type mice of parabiotic pairs were given elastase intratracheally (0.05 U/g) or irradiation (9.5 Gy) or the combination of irradiation (9.5 Gy) with elastase (0.05 U/g). As shown in Figure 3, elastase alone did not increase the proportion of green cells in the lungs of the wild-type mice compared with saline-treated mice. Irradiation or irradiation plus elastase significantly increased the proportion of GFP-positive cells in the lungs of wild-type mice.
Immunohistochemistry for GFP/Cytokeratin To determine which cell types were derived from the GFP donors, immunohistochemical analysis for GFP was performed. The lungs of GFP mice had a mosaic expression of GFP immunostaining (Figures 4A and 4C). Morphologically, in the wild-type parabionts, interstitial monocytes /macrophages (Figure 4E), subepithelial fibroblast-like interstitial cells (Figures 4G and 4H), and additionally type I-like alveolar cells (Figures 4I, 4J, and 4L) were immunostained for GFP. To confirm that these type I-like cells were alveolar epithelial cells, adjacent sections were immunostained with cytokeratin. As shown in Figures 4K and 4M, cells stained with GFP were also stained with cytokeratin, indicating that those cells both were donor derived and were alveolar epithelial cells. Morphologically, type II epithelial cells were not observed to be immunostained for GFP (Figures 4L and 4M). However, only one time point was evaluated.
Cultured Lung Fibroblasts from Wild-type Mice To examine whether lung fibroblasts were derived via the circulation, primary cultures of lung fibroblasts were established. As shown in Figure 5, GFP-expressing cells exhibited fibroblast-like morphology by fluorescence microscopy. More than 95% of these cells were immunostained with vimentin (data not shown). To quantify GFP-expressing lung fibroblasts, the cells were analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis, gating on bright green cells. Approximately 5 to 20% of cultured lung fibroblasts were GFP-expressing cells, indicating that the cells were donor origin (Figure 6). Lung injury induced by irradiation or by a combination of irradiation with elastase increased the proportion of GFP+-cultured lung fibroblasts. Double staining with CD45 by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis showed no contamination of lung fibroblasts with cells of hematopoietic origin (data not shown).
In this study, we demonstrated by parabiosis that type I alveolar epithelial cells and lung fibroblasts as well as interstitial monocytes /macrophages could be derived from circulating stem/progenitor cells. Lung injury induced by irradiation and the combination of irradiation with elastase increased the homing of stem/progenitor cells into the lung. Culture of lung fibroblasts from wild-type mice of parabiotic pairs confirmed that 5 to 20% of lung fibroblasts could be derived from circulating blood, although such cells could not be cultured directly from blood. The origin of the circulating stem/progenitor cells and the way in which they generate type I alveolar epithelial cells and lung fibroblasts are unknown. It is possible that there are multiple stem/progenitor cell types in lung, some locally maintained and some derived from blood. The latter likely included CD45+ lymphohematopoietic as well as endothelial and fibroblasts precursors. The bronchial epithelial cells likely have their own primary local precursor (15). Although type I alveolar cells have been traditionally believed to be derived from type II alveolar cells, derivation from stem cells in the circulation is supported by this study. Kotton and colleagues have reported on cultured, plastic adherent bone marrow cells from Rosa-26 mice transplanted to wild-type recipients treated with intratracheal bleomycin or saline (11). They observed that type I alveolar cells, but not type II cells, were donor derived 30 days after transplantation in both bleomycin and saline-treated recipients. In contrast, Krause and colleagues observed type II alveolar epithelial cells in stem celltransplanted mice (9). They transplanted male bone marrow cells to lethally irradiated female recipients. Eleven months later, they performed fluorescent in situ hybridization and detected donor-derived type II cells. In this study, type II cells were not observed to be donor derived. The basis of these differences is currently unclear, but type II cells might be observed at later times post transplant than type I cells. The nature of the tissue damage might be also a regulating factor (21). Tissue damage by irradiation, chemotherapy, or immunosuppression is believed to facilitate homing of blood stem cells and their differentiation into cells of organs (22). This effect may be due to direct effects on stem cells or to effects on the "niches" in which lung stem cells reside. Interestingly, the different populations of lung cells, which likely have distinct stem/progenitor cell populations residing in different niches, may be differentially sensitive to injury-induced stem cell engraftment. In this regard, donor-derived hepatocytes and epithelial cells of the skin and gastrointestinal tract have been observed without the presence of tissue damage after human blood stem cell transplantation (23). Parabionts, generated surgically by joining two animals, have been used to demonstrate the involvement of circulating factors (16, 24, 25). Parabiotic mice have been reported to produce stable blood chimerism across major histocompatibility barriers (26). Much useful information has been obtained through parabiotic experiments evaluating hormones (24, 25), tumors (27), infections (28), and recently, stem cells (17, 29, 30). Wagers and colleagues reported in a study of parabiosis between GFP and wild-type mice that steady-state tissue maintenance derived predominantly from tissue resident progenitor cells, rather than from circulating cells (29). Very few circulation-derived cells were observed to contribute to tissue maintenance. Consistent with this, this study demonstrated relatively small contribution of circulating cells to lung in the absence of lung irradiation. After radiation, however, significant numbers of structural cells in the lung were GFP positive, indicating this derivation from the parabiotic partner via the circulation. Fibroblasts are the major type of mesenchymal cell present in connective tissue that have the capacity to secrete matrix components and other mediators that drive tissue remodeling (31). Grimm and colleagues have suggested the existence of a circulating mesenchymal precursor cell in a human study (32). Also, Bucala and colleagues have reported a population of circulating cells that specifically enter sites of tissue injury (33). Although we cultured total blood leukocytes from wild-type mice of parabiosis in the same manner as lung fibroblasts, no fibroblasts were observed (data not shown), suggesting that such cells are rare and/or have properties different from tissue fibroblasts. Circulating mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells potentially could migrate into injured sites, differentiate into fibroblasts, and might contribute the remodeling of the lung. Ortiz and colleagues have recently reported that circulating stem cells can be recruited into lung mesenchymal cell populations and can alter sensitivity to develop bleomycin-induced fibrosis (34). The possibility that an abnormal fibrotic response is being observed cannot be excluded. This study evaluated two forms of lung injury. Radiation greatly increased engraftment of circulation-derived cells into the lung. Elastase infusion alone had little effect, but elastase in combination with radiation showed slightly more engraftment than radiation alone. Radiation not only damages lung but has been shown to enhance engraftment of stem cells into a variety of tissues. This effect may be mediated by damage to stem cell population or to alteration of the niches in which stem cells reside. Elastase-induced injury characteristically leads to emphysema, as was the case in this study. Elastase-induced injury is followed by initiation of repair-type responses, including synthesis of new collagen and elastin. Inhibition of repair can worsen features of emphysema. This study suggests that circulating stem/progenitor cells can participate in repair after elastase-induced emphysema, at least when the lung has been "prepared" by irradiation. Consistent with our observations, Suratt and colleagues have reported chimerism in lungs using human lung samples after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (14). In their report, 35.7 to 42.3% of the endothelial and 2.5 to 8.0% of epithelial cells were donor derived. However, donor-derived fibroblasts were not observed. They noted the possibility that fibroblasts might not be derived from the constituents of cord blood. However, mesenchymal precursors have been reported in umbilical cord blood (35). It is possible that timing of stem cell transplantation, particularly relative to injury of the lung, may be crucial in providing cells that differentiate into fibroblasts. The use of parabiotic animals provides a continuous source of donor-derived cells in the circulation and, therefore, may be crucial in providing fibroblast precursors. Injury of the lung is common after transplantation. Acute and organizing diffuse alveolar damage, obliterative bronchiolitis, and bronchiolitis obliterans and organizing pneumonia have been reported in transplanted patients (14). The relationship between lung damage and cell types that migrate to damaged area from blood is unknown, but donor-derived cells could contribute to these pathologic conditions. In summary, we demonstrate that type I alveolar epithelial cells and lung fibroblasts can be derived from circulating stem/progenitor cells in a radiation/elastase-induced emphysema model. Parabiotic mice may provide appropriate models for studying pathophysiologic mechanisms that involve circulating stem/progenitor cells contributing to the repair/regeneration, or abnormal repair, of lung tissue.
The authors acknowledge the extensive assistance of Dr. C Kuszynski and L. Wilke of the Cell Analysis Core Facility.
Supported by the Nebraska Research Initiative. This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents at www.atsjournals.org Conflict of Interest Statement: S.A. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; C.B. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; X.L. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; F.Q.W. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; T.K. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; Q.F. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; X.W. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; M.H. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; J.G.S. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript; S.I.R. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. Received in original form July 7, 2003; accepted in final form July 27, 2004
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||