help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on January 15, 2004, doi:10.1164/rccm.200308-1104OC
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200308-1104OCv1
169/7/822    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griese, M.
Right arrow Articles by Scheuch, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griese, M.
Right arrow Articles by Scheuch, G.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 169. pp. 822-828, (2004)
© 2004 American Thoracic Society


Original Article

Improvement of Alveolar Glutathione and Lung Function but Not Oxidative State in Cystic Fibrosis

Matthias Griese, Jan Ramakers, Angela Krasselt, Vitaliy Starosta, Silke van Koningsbruggen, Rainald Fischer, Felix Ratjen, Bernhard Müllinger, Rudolf M. Huber, Konrad Maier, Ernst Rietschel and Gerhard Scheuch

Department of Pediatrics, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich; Department of Nutrition, University of Hohenheim, Hohenheim; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cologne, Cologne; Inamed, Gauting; Department of Internal Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich; Department of Pediatrics, University of Essen, Essen; and Institute for Inhalation Biology, GSF-Research Center for Environment and Health, Neuherberg, Germany

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Matthias Griese, M.D., Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Lindwurmstrasse 4, D-80337 Munich, Germany. E-mail: matthias.griese{at}med.uni-muenchen.de


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chronic neutrophilic inflammation leads to oxidative damage, which may play an important role in the pathogenesis of cystic fibrosis lung disease. Bronchoalveolar lavage levels of the antioxidant glutathione are diminished in patients with cystic fibrosis. Here we evaluated the effects of glutathione aerosol on lower airway glutathione levels, lung function, and oxidative status. Pulmonary deposition of a radiolabeled monodisperse aerosol generated with a Pari LC Star nebulizer (Allergy Asthma Technology, Morton Grove, IL) connected to an AKITA inhalation device (Inamed, Gauting, Germany) was determined in six patients. In 17 additional patients bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was assessed before and after 14 days of inhalation with thrice-daily doses of 300 or 450 mg of glutathione. Intrathoracic deposition was 86.3 ± 1.4% of the emitted dose. Glutathione concentration in lavage 1 hour postinhalation was increased three- to fourfold and was still almost doubled 12 hours postinhalation. FEV1 transiently dropped after inhalation but increased compared with pretreatment values after 14 days (p < 0.001). This improvement was not related to the lavage content of oxidized proteins and lipids, which did not change with treatment. These results show that, using a new inhalation device with high efficacy, glutathione treatment of the lower airways is feasible. Reversion of markers of oxidative injury may need longer treatment, higher doses, or different types of antioxidants.

Key Words: aerosol • antioxidant • bronchoalveolar lavage fluid • deposition • neutrophils

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene and is the most common lethal hereditary disorder of white individuals. The chronic airway inflammation in CF is characterized by an accumulation of large amounts of activated neutrophils and a persisting bacterial infection of the airways (1). Linked to this inflammation is an abnormal increase in oxidative stress that has been demonstrated by multiple markers, including elevated levels of protein oxidation (2), long-lived oxidants (3), prooxidant cytokines (4), increased oxidative damage to DNA (5), and lipid peroxidation (6). At the same time, the antioxidant capacity in patients with CF is severely reduced compared with control subjects (6). Glutathione in its reduced form is a tripeptide, L-{gamma}-glutamyl-L-cysteinyl-glycine, containing a thiol group. Glutathione represents the normal first-line defense against oxidants released on the respiratory epithelial surface and has a pivotal role as a protective antioxidant against free radicals and other oxidants. In addition, glutathione has been implicated in modulation of redox-regulated signal transduction, regulation of cell proliferation, remodeling of extracellular matrix, apoptosis, and protective conservation of the antiprotease capacity of the lungs (7).

Glutathione is normally present in lower airway fluid at high concentrations (8). The glutathione level of the epithelial lining fluid is decreased in severe inflammatory lung diseases including CF (9, 10). In CF this likely results from the excessive oxidant burden and may also be linked to an abnormal glutathione transport associated with the defective CFTR (1113). A number of in vitro models have demonstrated that exogenous glutathione or other cysteine-donating compounds are able to protect against inflammatory cell–mediated oxidant damage (1419).

On the basis of these data augmentation of the extracellular glutathione level in the lungs may improve antioxidant capacity and counterbalance exaggerated oxidant stress. This objective was tested in pilot studies in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (20), mild asthma (21), and CF (22). The latter study assessed the effect of six inhalations of 600 mg of reduced glutathione, each 12 hours apart, in seven adult patients with CF. Lung epithelial surface inflammatory cell–derived oxidants were suppressed and the level of glutathione increased 1.9-fold 1 hour after the last dose. Although large amounts of glutathione were nebulized in this study, only a relatively small increase in glutathione concentrations in the lung lining fluid was noted. This may be related to the relatively short half-life of glutathione in the respiratory tract (23) or to rapid oxidation of glutathione. In addition, the amount delivered to the lungs may also be of critical importance.

The goal of this study was to evaluate an optimized inhalation system to improve the intrapulmonary deposition of glutathione to assess its tolerance and effects on intrapulmonary glutathione concentrations as well as the state of oxidation of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) constituents.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects and Study Design
Twenty-one adolescents or adults with CF participated in the study (for detailed clinical data, see Table E1 in the online supplement) (Figure 1). Initially, intrathoracic deposition achieved with the nebulizer used was assessed in six patients with CF, using 99mTc-labeled Fe3O4 aerosol particles (24). Standardized inhalation was performed by means of an AKITA inhalation device (Inamed, Gauting, Germany) (see online supplement). The inhalation volume was individualized to 75% of patient's inspiratory capacity. The flow rate was fixed to 200 ml/second during inhalation and exhalation (25). After the end of the inhalation procedure regional deposition and peripheral lung deposition were determined (25).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Algorithm of patient selection and study outline.

 
The second part of the study assessed deposition of glutathione in 17 patients with mild to moderate cystic fibrosis defined as FEV1 greater than 45% of predicted, by means of BAL (Table 1; and see Table E1 in the online supplement). Three to 7 days after the first BAL, inhalation with glutathione was started as three-times daily doses of 300 or 450 mg for 14 days. Four subjects received doses of 300 mg; BAL was performed 1 hour after the last inhalation. Thirteen subjects received 450 mg of glutathione three times daily, of which 9 were assessed by BAL at 1 hour and 4 at 12 hours after the last inhalation. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the participating centers and informed consent from the patients or parents and young adults was obtained before the study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Clinical data on subjects

 
Inhalation of Study Drug
Reduced glutathione sodium salt (Biomedica Foscana, Ferentino, Italy) was reconstituted at a concentration of 200 or 300 mg/ml, which resulted in a tonicity of 1,301 mOsm/L, or 1,952 mOsm/L, and a pH of about 7.0. The total emitted volume was set to 1.5 ml, which was delivered by an individualized number of breaths according to the patient's vital capacity by the AKITA inhalation device (see online supplement). This volume was selected to limit the inhalation time to 20 minutes or less.

Bronchoalveolar Lavage, Sample Preparation, and Biochemical Analysis
BAL was performed in the middle lobe. The return from the first fraction was kept separate from the other three fractions, which were pooled. All manipulations of the samples were done immediately and on ice. After removal of the cells ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid was added to equal volumes, mixed, and centrifuged and the clear supernatant was stored at -70°C for analysis. Reduced and total glutathione were measured by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (26). The fraction of carbonyls was assessed by a sensitive slot-blot assay (27), thiols were determined with a thiol and sulfide quantitation kit (t-6060; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), lipid peroxides were assessed with a PeroXOquant quantitative peroxide assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL), and total protein and urea were determined as described (28).

Statistical Analysis
Individual data and means ± standard error of the mean for n independent determinations are given. Comparisons were made by one-sided t-test, that is, we tested for an increase in glutathione concentrations. Multiple regression analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and linear regression were performed. p < 0.05 was set as the level of significance and exact p values are reported (29).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Lung Deposition with AKITA Device
Intrathoracic deposition in six patients was 85.5 ± 0.9% of the emitted aerosols. Extrathoracic deposition was only 5.5 ± 0.7%, and 9.0 ± 1.2% of the administered aerosol was found on the exhalation filter. Peripheral lung deposition (relative to the emitted dose), determined from the fraction of intrathoracic deposition found in the lungs 24 hours after the end of the inhalation, was 76.9 ± 1.9%. Regional deposition as assessed from the homogeneity of the scans in various areas, showed only minor interindividual variations between the different patients (see Table E2 in the online supplement).

Effect of Aerosolized Glutathione on Level of Glutathione in BAL
The mean pretreatment level of reduced glutathione in BAL fluid was 2.9 ± 0.7 µmol/L and varied between 0.6 and 13.6 µmol/L in individual patients (Table 2; and see Table E3 in the online supplement). This level is substantially less than in normal individuals. The mean percentage of reduced to total glutathione was 67%, thus similar to previous observations in patients with CF (22), but less than in normal subjects (greater than 90%) (9, 30). One hour after nebulization of either 300 or 450 mg of glutathione, the level of reduced glutathione in BAL fluid was increased 3.2- and 4.1-fold, respectively (Table 2; and see Table E3 in the online supplement). The percentage of reduced glutathione dropped to 50 and 43%, respectively, indicating that a fraction of the delivered reduced glutathione was readily oxidized.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Bronchoalveolar concentrations of reduced glutathione, oxidized glutathione, and total glutathione in patients with cystic fibrosis

 
Twelve hours after the inhalation of 450 mg of glutathione, the concentration of reduced lavage was increased 1.7-fold compared with the pretreatment level and the percentage of reduced glutathione was not different from baseline (Table 2; and see Table E3 in the online supplement).

The glutathione levels before or after inhalation of glutathione did not correlate with lung function or the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in BAL fluid (data not shown). Total protein (before, 470 ± 175 µg/ml; after 2 weeks of inhalation, 474 ± 175 µg/ml), the fraction of carbonyls (before, 17.0 ± 1.5 pmol/µg protein; after 2 weeks of inhalation, 16.0 ± 1.3 pmol/µg protein), reduced thiols (before, 2.0 ± 0.4 pmol –SH/µg protein; after 2 weeks of inhalation, 3.6 ± 1.1 pmol –SH/µg protein), and lipid peroxide content (before, 3.1 ± 0.4 µmol/L; after 2 weeks of inhalation, 2.8 ± 0.4 µmol/L) did not change significantly with treatment (Figure 2).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Lung function in 17 patients with mild to moderate cystic fibrosis before, 5 minutes after, and 40 minutes after the inhalation of a glutathione aerosol, as well as after 2 weeks of daily glutathione inhalation. A significant drop in FEV1 (top) 5 minutes after the inhalations was observed. This was completely reversible with time and without treatment after 40 minutes. After 2 weeks of inhalation, FEV1 was significantly higher compared with pretreatment levels and the levels after 5 and 40 minutes. The same pattern was observed for FVC (bottom). Data represent means ± SEM, and comparisons were made by repeated measures analysis of variance followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test.

 
Safety and Other Effects of Inhalation of Glutathione Aerosols
Inhalation of glutathione with the AKITA device was well tolerated. A cough and an unpleasant odor of the glutathione solution were reported by some of the subjects as mild and were judged by all participants not to hinder them from continuing the inhalations (see Table E4 in the online supplement). Electronically assessed compliance (see online supplement) was 86.5 ± 3.3% of the number of inhalation breaths that had to be taken during the 2-week period to inhale the targeted dose of glutathione (see Table E1 in the online supplement). Noncompliance occurred among almost all patients, but only sporadically throughout the study period. The time needed to complete nebulization of the targeted dose with 300 or 450 mg of glutathione was 18 ± 1 minutes. Inhalation of glutathione induced an immediate reduction in lung function after 5 minutes that was reversible 40 minutes after the end of the inhalation (Figure 3). After 2 weeks of inhalation of glutathione, FEV1 and FVC were improved significantly compared with pretreatment level (Figure 3). BAL fluid recovery, total number and viability of cells, and differential cell counts were not different before and after the inhalation of glutathione. The predominance of neutrophils, which is characteristic for CF BAL differential cell counts, did not change with treatment (data not shown).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Bronchoalveolar lavage carbonyls (top), thiols (middle), and lipid peroxides (bottom) were not different before and after treatment with inhaled glutathione in 15 patients with mild to moderate cystic fibrosis. Data points represent means of duplicate determinations andindividual values are given. Comparisons were made by paired t-test.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study we showed that an improved method of aerosol delivery yielded an intrathoracic deposition of more than 80% of the emitted dose. Glutathione concentrations in BAL fluid were increased three- to fourfold 1 hour after inhalation and at 12 hours were still almost doubled. Unexpectedly, BAL fluid content of oxidized proteins and lipids did not change with treatment. These results show that supplementation of the lower airways with large amounts of glutathione is feasible. However, changes in the overall degree of oxidation of lavage constituents may need prolonged treatment periods or even higher doses than those used in the present study.

In patients with CF the CFTR defect results in chronic airway infection because of the inability to clear microorganisms from the respiratory tract. The predominating continuous and extensive neutrophilic cellular infiltrate overwhelms the physiological antioxidant capacity of the epithelial lining fluid and protection of the integrity of the pulmonary epithelia surface against oxidative damage is lost. The chronic excess oxidative stress results in alteration of structural proteins, DNA, membranes, and lipids (6), eventually leading to pulmonary damage and destruction. Decreased levels of glutathione have been found in plasma and lavage fluid of adult patients with CF with pronounced airway inflammation (9). Glutathione can scavenge a broad range of oxidant molecules generated during chronic airway inflammation, and thus improving the glutathione content of the epithelial lining fluid may be a valid and promising therapeutic approach to protect the lungs from oxidative damage. A previous study in seven subjects with CF has demonstrated the feasibility and tolerance of glutathione aerosol in patients with moderate to severe CF (22).

In the present study, further steps toward improved and efficient administration were undertaken. Optimized aerosol delivery, which resulted in high and homogeneous intrapulmonary delivery, was used to increase pulmonary glutathione level. The AKITA device used in this study individually controls a preset breathing pattern so that a slow and deep inhalation allows inhaled particles with an aerodynamic diameter between 2 and 5 µm to penetrate via the oropharynx and larynx into the lungs without being deposited by impacting in the upper respiratory tract. Within the lungs the particles are deposited mainly by sedimentation. Our patients showed pulmonary deposition of 85% of the emitted dose, which is much more than the values obtained without standardization in prior studies, which usually report deposition rates between 10 and 30% (3036). The high pulmonary deposition and low extrapulmonary deposition were achieved without end-inspiratory breath hold times. This suggests that end-inspiratory breath holding is not necessary because of the slow and deep breathing, allowing the residence time of particles in the lungs to be long enough for sufficient deposition. In addition, the interindividual variability in lung deposition was low (see Figure E1 and Table E2 in the online supplement). In some patients ventilation in the upper lobe was poorer than in the other lobes and thus less aerosol reaches these upper lobes (see Figure E1 in the online supplement). This is a typical finding in patients with CF, who often have lung disease, predominantly affecting the upper lobes.

The inhalation of the two concentrations of glutathione was well tolerated. The average rate of adherence was good, sporadic inhalations being skipped, mainly at noon. The efficient intrapulmonary deposition delivered a fairly high amount of a hypertonic solution to the airways. Although this was well tolerated as judged from the oral and written comments of patients, lung function measurements indicated an acute drop in FEV1 that was spontaneously reversible in less than 1 hour. This effect was not observed in the study by Roum and coworkers (22), probably because the first lung function measurement was done 4 hours after the end of the inhalation. Our results are in agreement with those obtained in adult patients with mild asthma. Here, nebulized glutathione has been shown to cause major airway narrowing, induced cough, and breathlessness (21). The latter symptoms were not noted in our study (see Table E4 in the online supplement). In the patients with asthma, neither the high osmolarity nor the acidity of the glutathione accounted for the bronchoconstrictive effect, but it was suggested that sulfite formation from nebulized glutathione might be responsible for this effect. The bronchoconstriction promptly responded to inhaled ß-agonists (37). In our study the bronchoconstrictive effect was spontaneously reversible, that is, without treatment with a ß-agonist (Figure 1). Daily peak flow measurements in the morning and evening before the inhalation procedure (see Figure E2 in the online supplement) did not show any drop in baseline lung function. In contrast, with time peak expiratory flow increased significantly. During the study no ß-agonists, in addition to those regularly taken by the patients before the study (Table 2), were administered. Previously, it has been shown that even the inhalation of physiological saline leads to a transient drop in FEV1 in patients with CF (38).

Interestingly, the overall lung function, that is, FEV1 and FVC, improved by 6–7% over the 14-day inhalation period. As we did not include a control group in this dose-finding trial, the reason(s) for this improvement cannot be determined. They include, among others, increased mucus clearing from the inhalation procedure itself and associated coughing (see Table E4 in the online supplement) or from the hypertonicity of the solution (39). Of interest in this context is the finding that both hyperosmolality and low millimolar concentrations of S-nitrosoglutathione increase the expression, maturation, and function of {Delta}F508 CFTR (40). The inhaled glutathione may serve as a precursor for the formation of nitrosoglutathione (41). In addition, glutathione may act directly as a mucolytic agent (42), and may modify cellular signaling events by transcriptional regulation of redox-sensitive transcription factors such nuclear factor {kappa}B and activator protein-1. Additional processes such as remodeling of the extracellular matrix, apoptosis of cells, and cytokine expression by local immune cells in the lungs have been shown to be influenced by reduced glutathione (7, 14). Large, direct antioxidant effects on BAL proteins and lipids were not observed in this study and are thus unlikely to be responsible for the observed changes in lung function.

The level of glutathione obtained with an optimized delivery system, that is, a three- to fourfold increase in reduced glutathione 1 hour after the end of inhalation, is substantially higher than the 1.9-fold increase reported by Roum and coworkers (22). Those authors nebulized a higher dose of glutathione (600 mg), which has an estimated intrapulmonary deposition rate of about 20% under normal nebulizing conditions in humans (23). Therefore, even considering the lower doses used in this study, the deposition rate of about 80% achieved high glutathione levels in the lower respiratory tract. As feasibility of the inhalations under everyday conditions was an important goal of this study, we limited the dose to have inhalation times of less than 20 minutes. If needed, an even higher amount of glutathione, that is, 600 mg, might be nebulized with the AKITA device to further increase pulmonary deposition. Alternatively, different approaches to increase alveolar glutathione, including oral or inhaled delivery of precursors of glutathione, such as N-acetylcysteine (43) or an increase in apical glutathione secretion by the pulmonary epithelium (19) may be used.

We reported all results obtained in BAL as concentrations in the recovered lavage fluid, as recommended by the European Task Force on BAL (44). This circumvents the problems associated with erroneous calculation of dilutional factors. For comparison, the urea correction was calculated and the level of reduced glutathione in the epithelial lining fluid before treatment (87 ± 16 nmol/ml) was diminished compared with previously reported values for control subjects (257 ± 21 nmol/ml) and was similar compared with adult patients with CF (78 ± 13 nmol/ml) (9). With glutathione treatment the levels achieved in this study (518 ± 201 nmol/ml) were higher than in these control subjects. Additional values available from normal subjects are 400 ± 21 nmol/ml (45) and 568 ± 53 nmol/ml (46). The level of oxidized glutathione in normal subjects is reported as 31.2 ± 6.5 (46) and 17.2 ± 0.3 nmol/ml (45). In patients with CF the corresponding value is 25 ± 11 nmol/ml, that is, 46% of total glutathione (22). This compares well with the value of 42 ± 7 nmol/ml of epithelial lining fluid, what we found in this study.

The ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione 1 hour after the end of inhalation was clearly shifted toward an increased fraction of the oxidized form. This suggested a rapid usage of the nebulized glutathione within the lung as an antioxidant. Interestingly, at 12 hours after the last inhalation, the level of reduced glutathione was still almost doubled, suggesting a persistent increase in intraalveolar glutathione concentrations. At this time the ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione was unchanged, suggesting that the glutathione-related redox state was not altered. These data are in agreement with the assessments of overall oxidation of BAL proteins, that is, the fraction of thiols and carbonyls, which were unaltered by the treatment. Similarly, concentrations of lipid peroxides, as indicators of lipid oxidation, were unchanged. We did not observe any effects of glutathione inhalation on the total number of cells, their viability, or the differential cell counts obtained. This is in agreement with the previous short-term study of glutathione inhalation in patients with CF (22). It still remains to be investigated whether a longer course of glutathione aerosol administration might change the number or pattern of inflammatory cells and of the oxidative state in the CF lungs. In addition to its mucolytic and antioxidant properties, glutathione may act on pulmonary epithelial cells and the local immune cells in the lungs (7, 14) through redox-sensitive transcription factors or indirectly via S-nitrosoglutathione, through modulation of CFTR function. All these effects, and also those on surrogate markers of the redox potential in BAL fluid, may be addressed in future studies.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors acknowledge the support of Prof. Peter Fürst (Hohenheim, Germany).


    FOOTNOTES
 
Supported by grants from Mukoviszidose eV (Bonn, Germany) and CF-Selbsthilfe (M.G.); glutathione was a gift from Biomedica Foscama (Ferentino, Italy).

This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issues table of contents online at www.atsjournals.org

Conflict of Interest Statement: M.G. has no declared conflict of interest; J.R. has no declared conflict of interest; A.K. has no declared conflict of interest; V.S. has no declared conflict of interest; S.V. has no declared conflict of interest; R.F. has no declared conflict of interest; F.R. has no declared conflict of interest; B.M. is an employee of Inamed GmbH; R.M.H. has no declared conflict of interest; K.M. has no declared conflict of interest; E.R. has no declared conflict of interest; G.S. is an employee of Inamed GmbH.

Received in original form August 8, 2003; accepted in final form January 11, 2004


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Davis PB, Drumm M, Konstan M. Cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:1229–1256.[Medline]
  2. Van der Vliet A, Nguyen Mai N, Shigenaga M, Eiserich JP, Marelich GP, Cross CE. Myeloperoxidase and protein oxidation in cystic fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000;279:L537–L546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Witko-Sarsat V, Delacourt C, Rabier D, Bardet J, Nguyen AT, Descamps-Latscha B. Neutrophil-derived long-lived oxidants in cystic fibrosis sputum. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1910–1916.[Abstract]
  4. Bonfield T, Panuska J, Konstan M, Hilliard K, Hilliard J, Ghnaim H, Berger M. Inflammatory cytokines in cystic fibrosis lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:2111–2118.[Abstract]
  5. Brown RK, McBurney A, Lunec J, Kelly FJ. Oxidative damage to DNA in patients with cystic fibrosis. Free Radic Biol Med 1995;18:801–806.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Van der Vliet A, Eiserich J, Marelich G, Halliwell B, Cross C. Oxidative stress in cystic fibrosis: does it occur and does it matter? Adv Pharmacol 1997;38:491–513.
  7. Rahman I, MacNee W. Oxidative stress and regulation of glutathione in lung inflammation. Eur Respir J 2000;16:534–554.[Abstract]
  8. Cantin A, North S, Hubbard RC, Crystal RG. Normal alveolar epithelial lining fluid contains high levels of glutathione. J Appl Physiol 1987;63:152–157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Roum J, Buhl R, McElvaney N, Borok Z, Crystal RG. Systemic deficiency of glutathione in cystic fibrosis. J Appl Physiol 1993;75:2419–2424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Hull J, Vervaart P, Grimmwood K, Phelan P. Pulmonary oxidative stress in young children with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 1997;52:557–560.[Abstract]
  11. Gao L, Kim K, Yankaskas J, Forman H. Abnormal glutathione transport in cystic fibrosis airway epithelia. Am J Physiol 1999;277:L113–L118.
  12. Velsor LW, Van Heeckeren A, Day BJ. Antioxidant imbalance in the lungs of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein mutant mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2001;281:L31–L38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kogan I, Ramjeesingh M, Li C, Kidd JF, Wang Y, Leslie EM, Cole SPC, Bear CE. CFTR directly mediates nucleotide-regulated glutathione flux. EMBO J 2003;22:1981–1989.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Haddad JJE, Safieh-Garabedian B, Saadé NE, Land SC. Thiol regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines reveals a novel immunopharmacological potential of glutathione in the alveolar epithelium. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001;296:996–1005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Morcillo EJ, Estera J, Cortijo J. Oxidative stress and pulmonary inflammation: pharmacological intervention with antioxidants. Pharmacol Res 1999;40:393–404.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Aoki T, Suzuki Y, Suzuki K. Modulation of ICAM-1 expression by extra-cellular glutathione in hyperoxia-exposed human pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1996;15:319–327.[Abstract]
  17. Liu B, Andrieu-Abadie N, Levade T, Zhang P, Obeid LM, Hannum YA. Glutathione regulation of neutral sphingomyelinase in tumour necrosis factor-{alpha}-induced cell death. J Biol Chem 1998;273:11313–11320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Abe T, Gotoh S, Highashi K. Attenuation by glutathione of hsp72 gene expression induced by cadmium in cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol 1999;58:69–76.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Venglarik CJ, Girón-Calle J, Wigley AF, Malle E, Watanabe N, Forman HJ. Hypochlorous acid alters bronchial epithelial cell membrane properties and prevention by extracellular glutathione. J Appl Physiol 2003;95:2444–2452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Borok Z, Buhl R, Grimes GJ, Bokser A, Hubbard R, Holroyd K, Roum J, Czerski D, Cantin A, Cystal R. Effect of glutathione aerosol on oxidant–antioxidant imbalance in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lancet 1991;338:215–216.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Marrades R, Roca J, Barbera J, de Jover L, McNee W, Rodriguez-Roisin R. Nebulized glutathione induces bronchoconstriction in patients with mild asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:425–430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Roum J, Borok Z, McElvaney N, Grimes GJ, Bokser A, Buhl R, Crystal RG. Glutathione aerosol suppresses lung epithelial surface inflammatory cell-derived oxidants in cystic fibrosis. J Appl Physiol 1999;87:438–443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Buhl R, Vogelmeier C, Criteanden M, Hubbard RC, Hoyt R Jr, Wilson E, Cantin A, Crystal R. Augmentation of glutathione in the fluid lining the epithelium of the lower respiratory tract by directly administering glutathione aerosol. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:4063–4067.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Moller W, Barth W, Kohlhaufl M, Haussinger K, Stahlhofen W, Heyder J. Human alveolar long-term clearance of ferromagnetic iron oxide microparticles in healthy and diseased subjects. Exp Lung Res 2001;27:547–568.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Brand P, Friemel I, Meyer T, Schulz H, Heyder J, Häußinger K. Total deposition of therapeutic particles during spontaneous and controlled inhalations. J Pharm Sci 2000;89:724–731.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Kuhn KS, Krasselt AI, Fuerst P. Glutathione and glutathione metabolites in small tissue samples and mucosal biopsies. Clin Chem 2003;46:1003–1005.
  27. Robinson CE, Keshavatzian A, Pasco DS, Frommel TO, Winship DH, Holmes EW. Determination of protein carbonyl groups by immunoblotting. Anal Biochem 1999;266:48–57.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Griese M, Maderlechner N, Ahrens P, Kitz R. Surfactant proteins A and D in children with pulmonary disease due to gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:1546–1550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Motulsky H. Intuitive biostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
  30. Bendstrup KE, Chambers CB, Jensen JI, Newhouse MT. Lung deposition and clearance of inhaled 99mTc-heparin in healthy volunteers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1653–1658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Fauroux B, Itti E, Pigeot J, Isabey D, Meignan M, Ferry G, Lofaso F, Willemot JM, Clement A, Harf A. Optimization of aerosol deposition by pressure support in children with cystic fibrosis: an experimental and clinical study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:2265–2271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Katz SL, Ho SL, Coates AL. Nebulizer choice for inhaled colistin treatment in cystic fibrosis. Chest 2001;119:250–255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Coates AL, Dinh L, MacNeish CF, Rollin T, Gagnon S, Ho SL, Lands LC. Accounting for radioactivity before and after nebulization of tobramycin to insure accuracy of quantification of lung deposition. J Aerosol Med 2000;13:169–178.[Medline]
  34. Le Brun PP, de Boer AH, Heijerman HG, Frijlink HW. A review of the technical aspects of drug nebulization. Pharm World Sci 2000;22:75–81.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Nikander K, Agertoft L, Pedersen S. Breath-synchronized nebulization diminishes the impact of patient–device interfaces (face mask or mouthpiece) on the inhaled mass of nebulized budesonide. J Asthma 2000;37:451–459.[Medline]
  36. Geller DE. Choosing a nebulizer for cystic fibrosis applications. Curr Opin Pulm Med 1997;3:414–419.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Marrades RM, Roca J, Barbera JA, de Jover L, MacNee W, Rodriguez-Roisin R. Nebulized glutathione induces bronchoconstriction in patients with mild asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:425–430.
  38. Nikolaizik WH, Trociewicz K, Ratjen F. Bronchial reactions to the inhalation of high-dose tobramycin in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2002;20:122–126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Eng P, Morton J, Douglass J, Riedler J, Wilson J, Robertson C. Short-term efficacy of ultrasonically nebulized hypertonic saline in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 1996;21:77–83.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Howard M, Fischer H, Roux J, Santos BC, Gullans SR, Yancey PH, Welch WJ. Mammalian osmolytes and S-nitrosoglutathione promote deltaF508 cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein maturation and function. J Biol Chem 2003;278:35159–35167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Andersson C, Gaston B, Roomans GM. S-Nitrosoglutathione induces functional DeltaF508-CFTR in airway epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002;297:552–557.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Smith CV, Jones DP, Guenthner TM, Lash LH, Lauterburg BH. Compartmentation of glutathione: implications for the study of toxicity and disease. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1996;140:1–12.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Behr J, Degenkolb B, Krombach F, Vogelmeier C. Intracellular glutathione and bronchoalveolar cells in fibrosing alveolitis: effects of N-acetylcysteine. Eur Respir J 2002;19:906–911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Haslam PL, Baughman R. Guidelines for measurement of acellular components and recommendations for standardization of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Eur Respir Rev 1999;9:25–157.
  45. Cantin AM, North SL, Hubbard RC, Crystal RG. Normal alveolar epithelial lining fluid contains high levels of glutathione. J Appl Physiol 1987;63:152–157.
  46. Behr J, Degenkolb B, Maier K, Braun B, Beinert T, Krombach F, Vogelmeier C, Fruhmann G. Increased oxidation of extracellular glutathione by bronchoalveolar inflammatory cells in diffuse fibrosing alveolitis. Eur Respir J 1995;8:1286–1292.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. Koller, M. Kappler, P. Latzin, A. Gaggar, M. Schreiner, S. Takyar, M. Kormann, M. Kabesch, D. Roos, M. Griese, et al.
TLR Expression on Neutrophils at the Pulmonary Site of Infection: TLR1/TLR2-Mediated Up-Regulation of TLR5 Expression in Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease
J. Immunol., August 15, 2008; 181(4): 2753 - 2763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
J. Prousky
The Treatment of Pulmonary Diseases and Respiratory-Related Conditions with Inhaled (Nebulized or Aerosolized) Glutathione
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., March 1, 2008; 5(1): 27 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
I. Romieu, F. Castro-Giner, N. Kunzli, and J. Sunyer
Air pollution, oxidative stress and dietary supplementation: a review
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2008; 31(1): 179 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
P. K. Vayalil, K. E. Iles, J. Choi, A.-K. Yi, E. M. Postlethwait, and R.-M. Liu
Glutathione suppresses TGF-beta-induced PAI-1 expression by inhibiting p38 and JNK MAPK and the binding of AP-1, SP-1, and Smad to the PAI-1 promoter
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): L1281 - L1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
C. Kariya, H. Leitner, E. Min, C. van Heeckeren, A. van Heeckeren, and B. J. Day
A role for CFTR in the elevation of glutathione levels in the lung by oral glutathione administration
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): L1590 - L1597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
V. Starosta, F. Ratjen, E. Rietschel, K. Paul, and M. Griese
Anti-inflammatory cytokines in cystic fibrosis lung disease
Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2006; 28(3): 581 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
E. F. McKone, J. Shao, D. D. Frangolias, C. L. Keener, C. A. Shephard, F. M. Farin, M. R. Tonelli, P. D. Pare, A. J. Sandford, M. L. Aitken, et al.
Variants in the Glutamate-Cysteine-Ligase Gene Are Associated with Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2006; 174(4): 415 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
H. Grasemann, F. Kurtz, and F. Ratjen
Inhaled L-Arginine Improves Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Pulmonary Function in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2006; 174(2): 208 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
T. J. Moraes, J. Plumb, R. Martin, E. Vachon, V. Cherepanov, A. Koh, C. Loeve, J. Jongstra-Bilen, J. H. Zurawska, J. V. Kus, et al.
Abnormalities in the Pulmonary Innate Immune System in Cystic Fibrosis
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., March 1, 2006; 34(3): 364 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
V. Starosta, E. Rietschel, K. Paul, U. Baumann, and M. Griese
Oxidative Changes of Bronchoalveolar Proteins in Cystic Fibrosis.
Chest, February 1, 2006; 129(2): 431 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
R. L. Lee, R. C. Rancourt, G. del Val, K. Pack, C. Pardee, F. J. Accurso, and C. W. White
Thioredoxin and dihydrolipoic acid inhibit elastase activity in cystic fibrosis sputum
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): L875 - L882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. Bush, F. Accurso, W. MacNee, S. C. Lazarus, and E. Abraham
Cystic Fibrosis, Pediatrics, Control of Breathing, Pulmonary Physiology and Anatomy, and Surfactant Biology in AJRCCM in 2004
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2005; 171(6): 545 - 553.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
B. J. Day
Glutathione: A Radical Treatment for Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease?
Chest, January 1, 2005; 127(1): 12 - 14.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Bishop, V. M. Hudson, S. C. Hilton, and C. Wilde
A Pilot Study of the Effect of Inhaled Buffered Reduced Glutathione on the Clinical Status of Patients With Cystic Fibrosis
Chest, January 1, 2005; 127(1): 308 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. J. Kettle, T. Chan, I. Osberg, R. Senthilmohan, A. L. P. Chapman, T. J. Mocatta, and J. S. Wagener
Myeloperoxidase and Protein Oxidation in the Airways of Young Children with Cystic Fibrosis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2004; 170(12): 1317 - 1323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200308-1104OCv1
169/7/822    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griese, M.
Right arrow Articles by Scheuch, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griese, M.
Right arrow Articles by Scheuch, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2004 American Thoracic Society