help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on October 2, 2003, doi:10.1164/rccm.200302-150OC
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200302-150OCv1
168/12/1512    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by McEvoy, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by McEvoy, R. D.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 168. pp. 1512-1519, (2003)
© 2003 American Thoracic Society

Ventilatory Response to Brief Arousal from Non–Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Is Greater in Men Than in Women

Amy S. Jordan, Danny J. Eckert, Peter G. Catcheside and R. Doug McEvoy

Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park; Department of Physiology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; and School of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Amy Jordan, Ph.D., Sleep Disorders Program at BIDMC, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: ajordan{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Sleep apnea syndromes are more common in men than in women. The ventilatory response to arousal from sleep may be an important determinant of respiratory stability/instability and could contribute to this sex difference. We therefore compared changes in ventilation, end-tidal carbon dioxide (CO2), upper airway resistance, heart rate, and finger photoplethysmogram pulse wave amplitude after both spontaneous and tone-induced arousal from non–rapid eye movement sleep in 13 men and 13 women. At sleep onset, ventilation fell and both upper airway resistance and end-tidal CO2 rose, but these changes were not different between sexes. Spontaneous arousal (duration, 6.6 ± 0.2 seconds) resulted in a biphasic ventilatory response consisting of brief hyperventilation (5 seconds) followed by prolonged hypoventilation (30–40 seconds) on resumption of sleep. The biphasic ventilatory response was greater in men than in women and did not appear to be explained by different wake-to-sleep increments in end-tidal CO2 or upper airway resistance between sexes. Peripheral vasoconstriction with arousal was also greater in men than in women. Ventilatory responses were more marked after tone-induced versus spontaneous arousals and when subjects slept supine compared with the left lateral position. These results suggest that male sex and supine position are associated with greater ventilatory instability after arousal from sleep.

Key Words: sleep apnea • arousal • gender • ventilation

Obstructive sleep apnea and central sleep apnea associated with congestive heart failure are more common in men than in women (1, 2). The cause for this sex difference in prevalence is not known. Respiratory control instability has been proposed as a mechanism underlying sleep-disordered breathing (3). It is possible that some components of central respiratory control may differ between the sexes and thus help explain the difference in prevalence of these sleep-related breathing problems. Arousal from sleep is believed to have a destabilizing influence on the control of breathing (46). In support of this theory, Xie and colleagues (6) found that in patients with central sleep apnea, 37 of 48 episodes of periodic breathing arising from stable sleep were preceded by arousal, hyperventilation, and reduced transcutaneous CO2.

The increase in ventilation after arousal from sleep is thought to arise from increased chemoresponsiveness on return to the waking state, a relatively high PaCO2 that develops in sleep before arousal (see Phillipson and Bowes [7] for review), and a sudden reduction in upper airway resistance (5). Given that the awake hypercapnic ventilatory response has been reported to be higher in men than in women (810), men may be expected to have a larger ventilatory response on awakening for a given sleep-related increase in PaCO2. However, Khoo and colleagues (5) have suggested that the ventilatory response to arousal is largely determined by upper airway resistance changes, with central drive playing only a small part in the response. During non–rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, upper airway resistance has been reported to be higher in men than in women in one study (11), but not different between the sexes in another (12). If upper airway resistance were higher in men than in women during sleep, the ventilatory response to arousal may also be elevated in men, secondary to a release of resistance.

Horner and coworkers (13) and Trinder and coworkers (14) have suggested that arousal from sleep may elicit an independent stimulus or "waking reflex" with both ventilatory and cardiovascular components. If the waking reflex is similar to a startle reflex, it may be higher in men than in women, as Reyes del Paso and Vila (15) reported a greater increase in breathing amplitude (pneumatic transducer) in response to a brief startling tone (100 dB) in men compared with women during wakefulness. The current study was therefore designed to test the hypothesis that the ventilatory response to arousal from sleep is greater in men than women because of one or more of the above-mentioned factors. Given that a startling tone alters respiration, it is possible that arousal responses are different whether they occur spontaneously or are induced with a tone. For this reason we also compared spontaneous and induced arousal responses. Further aims were to determine whether the ventilatory response to arousal is influenced by sleep stage or posture (supine versus lateral position)-induced changes in upper airway resistance. Preliminary findings of this study have been previously reported in the form of an abstract (16).


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects
Thirty-three healthy, nonsmoking subjects (15 men, 18 women in the follicular menstrual phase) not taking any medications gave informed written consent and participated in the study. No subject reported regular snoring (more than one night per week) or any auditory, cardiorespiratory, or sleeping problems. The study was approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of the Repatriation General Hospital (Daw Park, South Australia, Australia).

Equipment and Measurements
Inspiratory flow, volume (VT), and minute ventilation (I) were measured on a breath-by-breath basis (gel mask [Respironics Murraysville, PA] and PT36 pneumotachograph [Erich Jaeger, Hoechberg, Germany]) and the expirate was continuously sampled to determine the end-tidal partial pressure of CO2 (PETCO2). Mask pressure (Pmask) and epiglottic pressure (Pepi) were measured as previously described (17) and the peak inspiratory supraglottic airway resistance (Rua) was calculated. To assess the effect of arousal on respiratory neural drive to upper airway dilator and respiratory muscles we also measured genioglossal electromyogram (EMGGG) and surface diaphragmatic (EMGDI) electromyograms. Two-channel electroencephalography (EEG, C3-A2 and C4-A1), left and right electrooculograms, and a submental electromyogram allowed sleep staging and arousal scoring. Cardiovascular parameters (heart rate, finger photoplethysmogram pulse wave amplitude, and ECG-R wave to finger pulse arrival time) were measured on a heart beat-by-beat basis, as previously described (18). Additional methodologic details are provided in the online supplement.

Protocol
Subjects were requested to lie on their left side as much as possible, and to keep their eyes open and stay awake for 10 minutes (for baseline wakefulness data collection) before allowing themselves to fall asleep. The left side was preferentially targeted because our primary objective was to compare ventilatory responses to arousal between sexes with minimal differences in Rua. To examine responses after tone-induced arousal, a 55-dB tone (1 kHz, 0.5 second in duration) was played through ear-insert headphones after 5 minutes of stable Stage 2 sleep. If this failed to arouse the subject a 5-dB louder tone was played a minimum of 2 minutes later. After any brief arousal (> 3 seconds, < 15 seconds, spontaneous or tone induced), 2 minutes of stable sleep was required before another tone was played. If full awakening occurred, another tone was not played until at least 5 minutes of stable sleep had occurred.

Data Analysis
A single trained observer, blinded to all sound and respiratory signals, identified 3- to 15-second arousals arising from, and ending in, stable sleep. Arousals occurring within 5 seconds of the onset of a tone were considered to be tone induced. Arousals without a tone in the 30 seconds prior were designated as spontaneous arousals. All variables were interpolated at 4-second intervals after the onset of the arousal (time 0) and expressed as a percentage of the prearousal level (30 seconds before arousal). Interpolated data from repeated trials were averaged within each subject for each arousal type (spontaneous or tone induced) for a given sleep stage and body position. Not all subjects had arousals in all positions/stages, so statistical analyses were based on available data for each group (see results for subject numbers in each analysis). Analysis of variance for repeated measures was used to compare data for 60 seconds after arousal (15 time points) between sexes, sleep stages, body positions, and arousal types. Where appropriate, Tukey post hoc tests were used to examine significant analysis of variance effects. Anthropometric data were compared between sexes with Student t tests. Means ± SEM are presented and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Where changes approached significance the p value is reported separately.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Anthropometric Characteristics and Sleep Architecture
Four female subjects had markedly abnormal sleep (average sleep onset latency, 186.6 ± 112.5 minutes; sleep efficiency, 22.9 ± 7.7%; arousal index, 47.4 ± 8.1 arousals per hour). There were no brief arousals preceded and followed by stable sleep in these subjects, so all their data were excluded. Eleven other subjects (5 men) were found to snore or have flow limitation at some time during the night and arousals after snoring or flow limitation were discarded because the effect of snoring on arousal responses is unknown. This eliminated all otherwise suitable arousals in one female and one male subject. All data were excluded from one male subject who had no suitable arousals without a mask leak, and the genioglossal data from another subject, in whom one wire electrode became dislodged midprotocol, were excluded.

Repeated brief arousals from stable sleep, without snoring, flow limitation, or mask leaks were obtained in 13 men and 13 women. The men and women did not differ in terms of age (26.2 ± 1.9 and 24.1 ± 1.8 years, respectively), body mass index (22.6 ± 0.5 and 23.2 ± 0.9 kg/m2, respectively), or respiratory function (FEV1 or FVC); however, the women studied had significantly smaller mean body surface area (1.99 ± 0.04 in men compared with 1.74 ± 0.05 m2 in women, p < 0.01). Sleep architecture did not differ between men and women (see Table E1 in the online supplement) and an average of 63 tones were played to each subject (range, 37–99; not significantly different between sexes).

Resting Data
Data at rest in the left lateral position during wakefulness and stable NREM sleep are displayed in Table 1 and Table E2 (see the online supplement). I, VT, and peak inspiratory flow (PIF) were significantly higher and Pepi lower in men than in women in wakefulness and sleep. During sleep, I was reduced and PETCO2 levels increased from the waking level. Respiratory frequency was reduced in sleep due to lengthening of both TI and TE, whereas VT did not differ from the waking level. Upper airway resistance also rose from wakefulness to Stage 2 sleep, as PIF decreased despite unchanged Pepi. A similar but nonsignificant trend was observed from wakefulness to Stage 3/4 sleep. There were no statistically significant changes in phasic or tonic EMGGG from wakefulness to NREM sleep. The wake-to-sleep differences in all variables were similar in both sexes and no sex-by-sleep stage interaction effects were observed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Respiratory and upper airway characteristics during wakefulness and sleep

 
Ventilatory Response to Spontaneous Arousal in the Left Lateral Position
Twenty-five subjects (13 men and 12 women) had brief spontaneous arousals from NREM sleep while in the left lateral position (average, 15.6 ± 1.9 arousals per subject). The average duration of arousal was not different between men and women (6.8 ± 0.3 and 6.3 ± 0.4 seconds, respectively). After arousal, I rose briefly, before rapidly declining to below the prearousal level (Figure 1) . This was primarily related to changes in VT; however, significant changes over time were also found in respiratory frequency (Figure 1), TI, and TE. Corresponding to the increase in I was an increase in phasic EMGDI and reductions in PETCO2 and Rua (Figure 1). Both phasic and tonic EMGGG (Figure 1), and tonic EMGDI (data not shown), failed to show statistically significant changes over time after arousal from sleep.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Spontaneous arousal from NREM sleep in the left lateral position in men and women: inspiratory minute ventilation (I), end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2), VT, respiratory frequency (FB), upper airway resistance (Rua), inspiratory phasic diaphragm activity (phasic EMGDI), and inspiratory phasic and expiratory tonic genioglossal activity (phasic EMGGG and tonic EMGGG) interpolated at 4-second intervals after spontaneous arousal from sleep in 13 men and 12 women. The duration of arousal was not different between sexes. Means ± SEM are presented. *Significant sex difference; {dagger}significant sex-by-time interaction effect; {ddagger}trend (p = 0.053) to sex-by-time interaction effect.

 
The changes in I were more marked in men than in women (significant sex and sex-by-time interaction effects; Figure 1). Both postarousal hyperventilation (at 4 seconds) and hypoventilation (maximal at about 20 seconds) were significantly greater in men compared with women (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). VT and PETCO2 (p = 0.053; Figure 1) also showed more pronounced responses in men than women whereas no other variables differed significantly between the sexes over time. Although men had a greater ventilatory increase after arousal than did women, ventilation did not exceed the level during wakefulness in either men or women (see Figure E1 in the online supplement for absolute changes after arousal). Rua did not decrease to the wakefulness level after arousal and was not elevated above the prearousal sleeping level after return to sleep (see Figure E1 in the online supplement). Ventilatory responses to spontaneous arousal from Stage 2 to Stage 3/4 NREM sleep were not different (see description of findings, and Figure E2, in the online supplement).

Spontaneous versus Tone-induced Arousal Responses
Ten women and 13 men had brief spontaneous and tone-induced arousals from NREM sleep while in the left lateral position. The duration of arousal did not differ between the sexes (6.2 ± 0.3 seconds in women and 7.0 ± 0.2 seconds in men) or between arousal types (6.5 ± 0.3 seconds, spontaneous; and 6.8 ± 0.3 seconds, tone induced). The average volume of the tone used to induce arousal was 65.4 ± 1.6 dB and the average latency to arousal was 0.95 ± 0.1 second. Neither tone volume nor latency to arousal differed between the sexes. The time course of changes in I (Figure 2A) , PIF, TI, PETCO2, and both phasic and tonic EMGGG was more marked after tone-induced than spontaneous arousal (arousal type by time effect). VT showed a trend to a similar effect (p = 0.066). Sex differences in I (p = 0.057), VT, and PETCO2 after brief arousal persisted for both arousal types.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of arousal type and body position on the ventilatory response to arousal. Inspiratory minute ventilation (I) interpolated at 4-second intervals after (A) spontaneous or tone-induced arousal from non–rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, n = 23; and (B) after spontaneous arousal in the left lateral or supine body position, n = 22. The duration of arousal was not different between comparison groups. Means ± SEM are presented. *Significant type of arousal by time effect; {dagger}trend (p = 0.055) to significant effect of body position.

 
Effect of Body Position on Resting Ventilation and Arousal Responses
Twenty-two subjects (11 men and 11 women) had brief spontaneous arousals from stable NREM sleep in both the left lateral and supine positions. The duration of arousal did not differ between positions (6.5 ± 0.3 seconds, left; and 6.3 ± 0.3 seconds, supine) or between men and women (6.6 ± 0.6 and 6.2 ± 0.3 seconds, respectively). The prearousal characteristics for these subjects in both left and supine positions are presented in Table 2 and Table E3 (see the online supplement). Rua was increased in the supine position and TI was prolonged; however, TE was reduced, resulting in respiratory frequency remaining unchanged. PIF and VT were also reduced in the supine position. I fell on assuming the supine position in the whole group; however, this was related to a reduction in men but not in women (significant sex-by-position interaction). Correspondingly, there were slight changes in PETCO2 in men and women when assuming the supine position (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Influence of body position on respiratory variables during non–rapid eye movement sleep

 
After arousal, TI, PIF, and Rua demonstrated significant position-by-time interaction effects with similar trends seen in I (p = 0.055; Figure 2B), VT (p = 0.056), and PETCO2 (p = 0.073) (see Figure E3 in the online supplement for complete results). Sex differences over time were again found for I (p = 0.051), VT, and PETCO2 (p = 0.055) and tonic EMGGG also showed greater responses in men than women when both positions were considered. Although the normalization process used (expressing postarousal data as a percentage of the prearousal level) was required to assess the effect of arousal per se, it does not allow valid comparison of the effect of position on arousal responses in men compared with women, because the change in position from left to supine affected prearousal conditions differently between sexes. Repeated measures analysis of variance was therefore performed on the absolute changes in ventilation from prearousal, to the maximum (4 seconds postarousal) and minimum (20 seconds postarousal) levels in men and women in both left and supine positions (Figure 3) . This analysis showed that, although resting ventilation was reduced in the supine versus left lateral position in men but not women, and the increment in ventilation on arousal was greater from supine versus lateral sleep (p = 0.04), the effect of posture on the ventilatory increase after arousal was not influenced by sex (p = 0.34; Figure 3). The absolute changes in PETCO2 and Rua after arousal were also greater in the supine versus lateral position (p = 0.04 and p < 0.01, respectively), but this effect of posture was not different between sexes (p = 0.22 and p = 0.29, respectively).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Ventilation, PETCO2, and airway resistance before, during, and after arousal from sleep in men and women in the left lateral and supine positions.

 
Cardiovascular Responses to Spontaneous and Tone-induced Arousals
Spontaneous and tone-induced arousals produced brief tachycardia followed by a small but more prolonged bradycardia, marked finger vasoconstriction lasting 30–40 seconds, and a small decrease in finger pulse arrival time (Figure 4) . Heart rate and pulse arrival time responses were similar between the sexes, whereas females showed a more variable finger pulse wave response to arousal than males. All but one male showed a clearly defined postarousal vasoconstrictor response. In contrast, 5 of the 13 females showed either no response or vasodilatation. As a result, finger photophlethysmogram responses were more marked in men than in women (spontaneous arousal sex effect, p = 0.022; spontaneous arousal sex-by-time effect, p = 0.005; and tone-induced arousal sex-by-time effect, p = 0.045). Heart rate and pulse wave amplitude responses were significantly greater for tone-induced versus spontaneous arousals (heart rate arousal type-by-time effect, p < 0.001; pulse wave amplitude arousal type effect, p = 0.019). Prearousal heart rate was lower and pulse arrival time was longer in men versus women (Table E4; see the online supplement).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Cardiovascular response to spontaneous and tone-induced arousals. Shown are heart rate, finger photoplethysmogram pulse wave amplitude, and ECG-R wave to finger photoplethysmogram pulse arrival time, each expressed as a percentage of the 30-second prearousal mean and interpolated at 1-second intervals for 30 seconds before and 60 seconds after the onset of spontaneous and tone-induced arousals in the left lateral position during Stage 2 sleep. Time 0 corresponds to the onset of EEG arousal. Data represent means ± SEM. n = 13 men and 13 women.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The major finding of this study was that the ventilatory response to arousal from NREM sleep was higher in men than in women, and men developed greater subsequent hypoventilation on resumption of sleep. This occurred in both the lateral and supine positions and in Stage 2 and Stage 3/4 NREM sleep. The sex difference persisted whether the arousal was induced by a tone or occurred spontaneously. In addition, the ventilatory response to arousal was greater in the supine position than in the left lateral position, and when induced by a tone rather than occurring spontaneously. Finger vasoconstriction associated with spontaneous and tone-induced arousals was also more pronounced in men compared with women. These sex, type of arousal, and position-related differences were not explained by differences in arousal duration, which was 6–7 seconds for all comparisons.

Influence of Sex on Ventilatory Response to Arousal
The larger increase in ventilation after arousal from sleep in men compared with women occurred despite similar sleep-related changes in ventilation, PETCO2, and upper airway resistance in both sexes (Table 1). Given these similarities, it seems unlikely that the increased ventilatory response to arousal observed in men is related to a difference in prearousal conditions. The observed sex difference may therefore have occurred because of an elevated hypercapnic ventilatory response in men. Alternatively, men may have an increased waking reflex, which stimulates ventilation more in men than in women after arousal. The enhanced peripheral vasoconstrictor response but equivalent heart rate response observed in men compared with women may be indicative of a patterned autonomic response after arousal from sleep (i.e., sympathetic activation has different effects on different tissues and this may be sex specific) (19, 20). Alternatively, the more pronounced vasoconstriction in men might be secondary to the increased ventilatory response because increased ventilation appears to be associated with cardiovascular activation independent of arousal (21, 22) and deep inspiration results in sex-specific changes in hand blood flow (23).

After the initial hyperpnea and the return to sleep, a reduction in ventilation was observed that was more pronounced in men than in women. During the period of hypoventilation airway resistance was lower than the prearousal level and was not different between sexes. It therefore seems unlikely that the more marked hypoventilation in men was due to elevated upper airway resistance. It is possible that the greater hypocapnia that developed immediately after arousal, when combined with the sleep-related fall in chemoresponsiveness, contributes to a reduction of central respiratory drive on return to sleep. However, we believe this would not entirely explain our findings based on the relatively small sex difference in sleeping hypocapnic ventilatory responsiveness reported by Zhou and coworkers (24). Neural inhibition of respiration after the greater hyperpneic phase in men could further contribute to sex differences in the postarousal ventilatory response.

Tone-induced versus Spontaneous Arousal from Sleep
Most previous studies examining the ventilatory and airway responses to arousal from sleep have examined responses after tone-induced arousal (4, 5, 13, 2527). As mentioned by several of these authors (4, 5, 13, 26), the response after tone-induced arousal might differ from that after spontaneous arousal from sleep, although this had not been tested previously. The current study is the first to demonstrate that the increase in ventilation, as well as heart rate and finger vasoconstrictor responses, after tone-induced arousal are greater than after spontaneous arousal. This occurred despite similar prearousal conditions and duration of arousal. More spontaneous arousals arose from lighter sleep (Stage 2) than tone-induced arousals, however, the ventilatory response to arousal did not differ between sleep stages (see Figure E2 in the online supplement). We therefore do not believe that the differential sleep stage distribution accounts for the greater ventilatory response after tone-induced arousals. The difference between arousal types most likely results from an increased waking reflex after arousal from sleep or additional auditory/startle stimulation of ventilation. After return to sleep, subjects developed greater hypoventilation after tone-induced than spontaneous arousal. The time course of change in resistance was similar between arousal types and thus it appears likely that the reduction in ventilation is a result of more pronounced hypocapnia after the initial increase in ventilation.

The ventilatory response to tone-induced arousal reported in the current study appeared smaller and followed a different time course than some (4, 5), but not all (25) previous studies conducted in healthy individuals. This may reflect different auditory stimuli (5), the phase of respiration at which tones were presented, or different techniques for measuring respiration (4) in previous studies.

Influence of Position on Arousal Responses
All variables except respiratory frequency were different between the left lateral and supine body positions during sleep in these subjects. Upper airway resistance was increased, inspiratory time was prolonged, and expiratory time was shortened in the supine position, suggesting a load compensation response. Despite this, tidal volume was reduced in the supine position, as was minute ventilation for the whole group. However, the reduction in minute ventilation occurred only in men, suggesting load compensation may not have been as effective in men as in women.

The ventilatory response to arousal from sleep was greater in the supine than in the left position. This may be related to prearousal ventilation being lower when supine, or to a larger decrease in resistance after arousal in the supine position (Figure 3). Alternatively, the neural waking reflex may be influenced by posture. The subsequent undershoot in ventilation did not appear to be greater in the supine than in the lateral position (Figure 2). In the supine position, there was a greater postarousal reduction in upper airway resistance than occurred in the lateral position, which gradually returned to the prearousal level over 30 seconds (see Figure E3 in the online supplement). It is possible that the more prolonged reduction in airway resistance reflects greater postarousal upper airway stability in the supine position (compared with prearousal), which protects against more marked hypoventilation. It is important to note that the change in resistance from the lateral to supine position was relatively small in these young healthy subjects. Thus larger increases in resistance in older or snoring subjects may more markedly influence the stable sleeping ventilation and arousal responses than demonstrated in this study.

It may appear somewhat surprising that changes in ventilation and PETCO2 on assuming the supine posture were greater in men than in women, and yet men did not have a more marked position-related change in the arousal response when compared with women. One explanation for this result is that the ventilatory response to arousal may be determined more by a behavioral neural response to waking (i.e., a "waking reflex") than the prearousal conditions. In this way, the waking reflex may mask the effect of the small differences in prearousal conditions found in the current study. This is consistent with the finding of Trinder and coworkers (14) that the magnitude of diaphragm activation after arousal from sleep in normal subjects was not different between spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation despite PETCO2 and ventilation being markedly different between conditions. Also, Carley and colleagues (25) have reported that steady state hypercapnia does not alter the ventilatory response to tone-induced arousal from sleep, providing additional support for this hypothesis.

Possible Relevance to Sleep Apnea Syndromes
The ventilatory response to arousal has been postulated to contribute to the development of periodic breathing in patients with central sleep apnea syndrome (6). In the current study, men were observed to have an increased initial ventilatory response to arousal and greater subsequent hypoventilation than did women. This may be an important factor contributing to the male prevalence of central sleep apnea (1), particularly when combined with the observation that men appear to require a smaller reduction in PETCO2 than women to develop central apnea (24). In addition, some patients with central sleep apnea have been reported to have apneas only in the supine position in sleep (28). Our finding that the ventilatory response to arousal was greater in the supine position may contribute to this effect.

The relevance of the findings presented in this study to obstructive sleep apnea is unclear. Patients with obstructive sleep apnea have large increases in resistance during sleep and might be expected to develop obstructive apnea during hypoventilation after a brief arousal from sleep. However, after arousal in the supine position (when prearousal resistance was elevated compared with the left lateral position) a larger initial response was observed but the subsequent hypoventilation was no more marked than in the lateral position. This may reflect the slow return of resistance to the sleeping level. If patients with obstructive sleep apnea are simply further along a continuum of increased upper airway resistance in sleep, they might be expected to show a larger initial ventilatory response without greater undershoot. However, if the time course of change in resistance is shorter in patients with obstructive sleep apnea then an obstructive respiratory event may occur during the period of low respiratory drive. Clearly the role of arousal from sleep in the pathogenesis and high male prevalence of sleep apnea syndromes requires further investigation.

Methodologic Considerations
There are several important methodologic considerations. First, the subjects studied were heavily instrumented and it is possible that the arousal response may be altered as a result. It is also possible that there is a time of night or circadian variation of the ventilatory response to arousal that was not considered in this analysis.

The particular arousal responses and subjects used for each analysis (influence of sex, sleep stage, and arousal type) varied slightly. Thus there may have been prearousal differences between comparison groups. The sleep-related changes in I, Rua, and PETCO2 were analyzed for each comparison and the only differences were the body position differences reported in Table 2 and a small but statistically significant difference in the resting PETCO2 between sleep stages (44.0 ± 0.7 mm Hg, Stage 3/4; and 43.8 ± 0.6 mm Hg, Stage 2). We therefore feel that subtle differences in prearousal conditions are unlikely to significantly influence the current findings.

In this study breath-by-breath measurements were interpolated after arousal, whereas previous studies have averaged data by breath number after arousal (4, 5, 14, 25, 26, 29). Interpolation was performed so that changes in respiratory frequency were taken into consideration. This technique would not account for observed differences between sexes or conditions. However, interpolation tends to regress data toward baseline and will therefore tend to underestimate the magnitude of the initial hyperpnea. To minimize this effect, an interpolation interval close to total respiratory cycle time was selected and interpolation was not performed across the arousal. A related limitation of the data analysis was that an interaction effect over time was required to identify differences between groups because of the biphasic nature of the response. It is possible that differences in some variables may be lost if the difference is restricted to a small portion of the response analyzed.

In the case of spontaneous arousals, ventilation increased before EEG changes such that the prearousal baseline level of ventilation was slightly elevated. However, when the data immediately before arousal (–4 seconds) were excluded the average baseline ventilation was only 0.03 L · min–1 lower. This would lower the whole spontaneous arousal response curve down by 0.6%, a change too small to contribute importantly to the results observed.

Finally, measurement of PETCO2 on breaths with low tidal volumes can be problematic, as a plateau in mask CO2 at end expiration may not be reached. It is important to note that the magnitude of hypoventilation observed in this study was not sufficient for this to be a problem and the end-expiratory plateau in mask CO2 was still observed.

Conclusions
In summary, the ventilatory and finger vasoconstrictor responses after brief arousal from NREM sleep are greater in men than in women, and men develop a greater subsequent reduction in ventilation on return to sleep. Greater ventilatory and cutaneous vasoconstrictor arousal responses in men suggest that males may possess a heightened cardiorespiratory waking reflex compared with women. The ventilatory response to arousal is increased in both sexes when supine, but this postural effect on the ventilatory response is not different between the sexes. The ventilatory response to arousal is greater when the arousal is induced by an auditory tone than when it occurs spontaneously, and is not different between Stage 2 and Stage 3/4 NREM sleep. The tendency for men to augment their ventilation more than women immediately after arousal from sleep, and to have greater compensatory undershoot in ventilation on resumption of sleep, may contribute to the male predominance of sleep apnea syndromes.


    Acknowledgments
 
A.S.J. has no declared conflict of interest; D.J.E. has no declared conflict of interest; P.G.C. has no declared conflict of interest; R.D.M. has no declared conflict of interest.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, grant number 138403.

This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents online at www.atsjournals.org

Received in original form February 2, 2003; accepted in final form September 27, 2003


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Sin DD, Fitzgerald F, Parker JD, Newton G, Floras JS, Bradley TD. Risk factors for central and obstructive sleep apnea in 450 men and women with congestive heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1101–1106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1230–1235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Younes M. The physiological basis of central apnea and periodic breathing. Curr Pulmonol 1989;10:265–326.
  4. Badr MS, Morgan BJ, Finn L, Toiber FS, Crabtree DC, Puleo DS, Skatrud JB. Ventilatory response to induced auditory arousals during NREM sleep. Sleep 1997;20:707–714.[Medline]
  5. Khoo MC, Koh SS, Shin JJ, Westbrook PR, Berry RB. Ventilatory dynamics during transient arousal from NREM sleep: implications for respiratory control stability. J Appl Physiol 1996;80:1475–1484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Xie A, Wong B, Phillipson EA, Slutsky AS, Bradley TD. Interaction of hyperventilation and arousal in the pathogenesis of idiopathic central sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:489–495.[Abstract]
  7. Phillipson EA, Bowes G. Control of breathing during sleep. In: Cherniack NS, Widdicombe JG, editors. Handbook of physiology: The Respiratory System. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society; 1986. p. 649–689.
  8. Aitken ML, Franklin JL, Pierson DJ, Schoene RB. Influence of body size and gender on control of ventilation. J Appl Physiol 1986;60:1894–1899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. van Klaveren RJ, Demedts M. Determinants of the hypercapnic and hypoxic response in normal man. Respir Physiol 1998;113:157–165.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. White DP, Douglas NJ, Pickett CK, Weil JV, Zwillich CW. Sexual influence on the control of breathing. J Appl Physiol 1983;54:874–879.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Trinder J, Kay A, Kleiman J, Dunai J. Gender differences in airway resistance during sleep. J Appl Physiol 1997;83:1986–1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Rowley JA, Zhou X, Vergine I, Shkoukani MA, Badr MS. Influence of gender on upper airway mechanics: upper airway resistance and Pcrit. J Appl Physiol 2001;91:2248–2254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Horner RL, Rivera MP, Kozar LF, Phillipson EA. The ventilatory response to arousal from sleep is not fully explained by differences in CO2 levels between sleep and wakefulness. J Physiol 2001;534:881–890.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Trinder J, Padula M, Berlowitz D, Kleiman J, Breen S, Rochford P, Worsnop C, Thompson B, Pierce R. Cardiac and respiratory activity at arousal from sleep under controlled ventilation conditions. J Appl Physiol 2001;90:1455–1463.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Reyes del Paso GA, Vila J. Respiratory influences on the cardiac defense response. Int J Psychophysiol 1993;15:15–26.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Jordan AS, Eckert DJ, Catcheside PG, McEvoy RD. The ventilatory response to arousal from Stage 2 sleep is greater in healthy men than women [abstract]. Sleep 2002;25S:A345.
  17. Jordan AS, Catcheside PG, O'Donoghue FJ, Saunders NA, McEvoy RD. Genioglossus muscle activity at rest and in response to brief hypoxia in healthy men and women. Selected Contribution. J Appl Physiol 2002;92:410–417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Catcheside PG, Chiong SC, Mercer J, Saunders NA, McEvoy RD. Noninvasive cardiovascular markers of acoustically induced arousal from non-rapid-eye-movement sleep. Sleep 2002;25:797–804.[Medline]
  19. Dart AM, Du XJ, Kingwell BA. Gender, sex hormones and autonomic nervous control of the cardiovascular system. Cardiovasc Res 2002;53:678–687.[Free Full Text]
  20. Morrison SF. Differential control of sympathetic outflow. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2001;281:R683–R698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Lorenzi-Filho G, Dajani HR, Leung RS, Floras JS, Bradley TD. Entrainment of blood pressure and heart rate oscillations by periodic breathing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:1147–1154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Trinder J, Merson R, Rosenberg JI, Fitzgerald F, Kleiman J, Douglas Bradley T. Pathophysiological interactions of ventilation, arousals, and blood pressure oscillations during Cheyne–Stokes respiration in patients with heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:808–813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Cooke JP, Creager MA, Osmundson PJ, Shepherd JT. Sex differences in control of cutaneous blood flow. Circulation 1990;82:1607–1615.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Zhou XS, Shahabuddin S, Zahn BR, Babcock MA, Badr MS. Effect of gender on the development of hypocapnic apnea/hypopnea during NREM sleep. J Appl Physiol 2000;89:192–199.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Carley DW, Applebaum R, Basner RC, Onal E, Lopata M. Respiratory and arousal responses to acoustic stimulation. Chest 1997;112:1567–1571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Carlson DM, Carley DW, Onal E, Lopata M, Basner RC. Acoustically induced cortical arousal increases phasic pharyngeal muscle and diaphragmatic EMG in NREM sleep. J Appl Physiol 1994;76:1553–1559.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Khoo MC, Shin JJ, Asyali MH, Kim TS, Berry RB. Ventilatory dynamics of transient arousal in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Respir Physiol 1998;112:291–303.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Bradley TD, McNicholas WT, Rutherford R, Popkin J, Zamel N, Phillipson EA. Clinical and physiologic heterogeneity of the central sleep apnea syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986;134:217–221.[Medline]
  29. Trinder J, Whitworth F, Kay A, Wilkin P. Respiratory instability during sleep onset. J Appl Physiol 1992;73:2462–2469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
D. J. Eckert and A. Malhotra
Pathophysiology of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Proceedings of the ATS, February 15, 2008; 5(2): 144 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ERRHome page
B. Buyse and the participants of working group 2
Treatment effects of sleep apnoea: where are we now?
Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2007; 16(106): 146 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. J. Eckert, R. D. McEvoy, K. E. George, K. J. Thomson, and P. G. Catcheside
Genioglossus reflex inhibition to upper-airway negative-pressure stimuli during wakefulness and sleep in healthy males
J. Physiol., June 15, 2007; 581(3): 1193 - 1205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
E. Nalivaiko, P. G. Catcheside, A. Adams, A. S. Jordan, D. J. Eckert, and R. D. McEvoy
Cardiac changes during arousals from non-REM sleep in healthy volunteers
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): R1320 - R1327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. P. Patil, H. Schneider, J. J. Marx, E. Gladmon, A. R. Schwartz, and P. L. Smith
Neuromechanical control of upper airway patency during sleep
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2007; 102(2): 547 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. S. Jordan, A. Wellman, J. K. Edwards, K. Schory, L. Dover, M. MacDonald, S. R. Patel, R. B. Fogel, A. Malhotra, and D. P. White
Respiratory control stability and upper airway collapsibility in men and women with obstructive sleep apnea
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2005; 99(5): 2020 - 2027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. S. Jordan, R. D. McEvoy, J. K. Edwards, K. Schory, C.-K. Yang, P. G. Catcheside, R. B. Fogel, A. Malhotra, and D. P. White
The influence of gender and upper airway resistance on the ventilatory response to arousal in obstructive sleep apnoea in humans
J. Physiol., August 1, 2004; 558(3): 993 - 1004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Control of Breathing, Respiratory Muscles, Pulmonary Function Testing in AJRCCM 2003
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 254 - 264.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200302-150OCv1
168/12/1512    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by McEvoy, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by McEvoy, R. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2003 American Thoracic Society