help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on April 24, 2003, doi:10.1164/rccm.200207-675OC
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200207-675OCv1
168/1/92    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rice, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rice, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, J. A.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 168. pp. 92-101, (2003)
© 2003 American Thoracic Society


Original Article

Controlled versus Assisted Mechanical Ventilation Effects on Respiratory Motor Output in Sleeping Humans

Anthony J. Rice, Hideaki C. Nakayama, Hans C. Haverkamp, David F. Pegelow, James B. Skatrud and Jerome A. Dempsey

Department of Population Health Sciences and Department of Medicine, John Rankin Laboratory of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Veterans Administration Hospital Pulmonary Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Jerome A. Dempsey, Ph.D., Department of Population Health Sciences, The John Rankin Laboratory of Pulmonary Medicine, 504 North Walnut Street, Madison, WI 53726–2368. E-mail: jdempsey{at}wisc.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Central apneas occur after cessation of mechanical ventilation despite normocapnic conditions. We asked whether this was due to ventilator-induced increases in respiratory rate or VT. Accordingly, we compared the effects of increased VT (135 to 220% of eupneic VT) with and without increased respiratory rate, using controlled and assist control mechanical ventilation, respectively, upon transdiaphragmatic pressure in sleeping humans. Increasing ventilator frequency +1 per minute and VT to 165–200% of baseline eupnea eliminated transdiaphragmatic pressure during controlled mechanical ventilation and prolonged expiratory time (two to four times control) after mechanical ventilation. During and after assist control mechanical ventilation at 135–220% of eupneic VT, transdiaphragmatic pressure was reduced in proportion to the increase in ventilator volume. However, every ventilator cycle was triggered by an active inspiration, and immediately after mechanical ventilation, expiratory time during spontaneous breathing was prolonged less than 20% of that observed after controlled mechanical ventilation at similar VT. We conclude that both increased frequency and VT during mechanical ventilation significantly inhibited respiratory motor output via nonchemical mechanisms. Controlled mechanical ventilation at increased frequency plus moderate elevations in VT reset respiratory rhythm and inhibited respiratory motor output to a much greater extent than did increased VT alone.

Key Words: neuromechanical inhibition • resetting of respiratory rhythm • assisted mechanical ventilation • controlled mechanical ventilation • sleep

Positive pressure mechanical ventilation applied to humans in non–rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep induces a loss of respiratory drive and an associated apnea after cessation of mechanical ventilation, despite normocapnic conditions (15). It is unclear whether these inhibitory effects are dependent on increases in VT (i.e., Hering Breuer mechanism) or are caused by a resetting of the inherent respiratory rhythm by the raised ventilator frequency (3, 68). On the one hand, in a sleeping canine model, small increases in respiratory frequency achieved via controlled normocapnic mechanical ventilation (CMV) resulted in complete abolition of diaphragm electromyogram (EMGdi) (3). On the other hand, in sleeping (5) or awake (9, 10) humans, increases in VT alone, as induced via normocapnic assist CMV (ACMV), resulted in reduced inspiratory effort with relatively little effect on breath timing.

Our aim was to determine the relative contributions of increased respiratory rate and VT to the neuromechanical inhibition of respiratory motor output in the human. To this end, we compared the effects of CMV (at varying frequency and VT) and ACMV (at varying VT) on the amplitude and timing of transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi). We maintained normocapnia and used normoxic and hyperoxic backgrounds to exclude the influence of changing chemical drives and studied subjects during NREM sleep to avoid behavioral influences on respiratory motor output. Based primarily on animal studies (3, 11) and estimates of the sensitivity of the Hering Breuer reflex in the human (1215), we hypothesized that resetting of the respiratory rhythm and complete inhibition of respiratory motor output via normocapnic mechanical ventilation in the human would require an increase in ventilator frequency combined with substantial elevations in VT.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects
Seven healthy adults, two women and five men, age of 36 ± 14 years, with no prior history of cardiopulmonary disease or sleep apnea participated in the study. Sleep architecture was staged during NREM sleep using standard electroencephalography (16). Each subject completed two to three nights of mechanical ventilation trials in stage II and stage III NREM sleep, and subjects were required to sleep on their back for the entire night. Each subject ingested 10 mg of zolpidem 10 to 20 minutes before the lights were turned out. In two subjects, we also completed several ventilator trials during NREM sleep before and after ingesting zolpidem. We observed similar effects of mechanical ventilation on Pdi in trials with and without the zolpidem in these two subjects when studied in the same sleep states.

Subject Consent, Preparation, Ventilator Circuit, and Measurements
The ventilator circuit, the use of continuous positive airway pressure, and flow and pressure measurements have been previously described (1, 5) (see additional details in the online supplement).

CMV
We used a pneumatically powered, electronically controlled mechanical ventilator (Veolar; Hamilton Medical, Rhazuns, Switzerland) that allowed the control of VT, breathing frequency, and inspiratory time (TI). We used three VT settings, 1.3 to 2 times the eupneic VT, and two fixed ventilator frequencies (fR) (+1 and +3 breaths per minute above mean eupneic fR) during 1 minute of normocapnic CMV. The TI was set at the TI observed during spontaneous breathing; thus, increases in VT during CMV were achieved solely by increasing inspiratory flow rate. A square wave inspiratory flow pattern was selected. A servo-controlled flow valve in the ventilator opened during inspiration to supply gas to the subject and to control inspiratory flow rate, pattern, and duration. The ventilator delivered breath was terminated when the servo-controlled flow valve closed after delivering the preset VT. The ventilator delivered VT settings that were within 5 to 10% of the preset VT.

Each CMV trial was preceded by 2 to 3 minutes of stable eupneic breathing. The subject was switched into the ventilator circuit in the CMV mode during expiration and CMV continued for 60 to 90 seconds with FICO2 increased sufficiently to maintain PETCO2 normocapnic. Then the ventilator was switched off during early expiration and FICO2 returned immediately to room air levels near zero CO2. Expiratory time (TE) after the last CMV cycle was calculated as the time from the end of inspiration to the onset of the next spontaneous inspiratory effort, as determined from a negative shift in esophageal pressure (Pes) and an increase in Pdi, which exceeded the cardiogenic artifact.

ACMV
With the ACMV, the subject triggered the ventilator by generating an inspiratory effort of 0.5 to 1 cm H2O. Then the ventilator delivered a preset VT at the preset average TI achieved in eupnea by augmenting inspiratory flow rate. Each subject completed two or three ACMV trials at each of three VT settings, 1.3–2.2 times spontaneous control, during NREM sleep while normocapnia was maintained.

Data Analysis
For each CMV trial, 10 breaths from eupnea immediately before CMV, the entire 60–90 seconds of CMV, and the first three breaths of recovery were analyzed for volume, pressures, timing, and end-tidal gases. We selected for analysis one trial from each subject for each CMV VT/fR combination. The trial was selected for the most constant sleep state and end-tidal (partial) carbon dioxide pressure (PETCO2) closest to eupneic baseline conditions. This amounted to six CMV trials per subject (+1 and +3 fR at VT 135%, 165%, and 200% of eupnea). The same was done for each of the three VT settings used during ACMV, and this resulted in three ACMV trials per subject. In addition, mean values for {Delta}Pdi, {Delta}Pes, gastric pressure ({Delta}Pga) and each of the ventilatory output variables obtained during 1 minute of baseline eupnea for each 15-second interval during CMV or ACMV and for each of the initial three spontaneous breaths after CMV or ACMV were compared using a repeated-measures two-way analysis of variance. When mean values differed significantly, paired post hoc comparisons were made using the Tukey test. Significance was accepted at p < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Effects of CMV on Pdi and Breath Timing
A polygraph recording from a typical CMV trial is shown for one subject (K.H.) in Figure 1A . This trial was conducted at an fR of three breaths per minute above the average spontaneous baseline frequency and a VT that was 200% of spontaneous baseline. Note the cardiogenic artifact superimposed on the Pes and Pga traces, which was especially prominent in this subject. At the onset of CMV, FICO2 was added to maintain PETCO2 1 to 1.5 mm Hg above baseline throughout the CMV trials. CMV caused an immediate positive shift in Pes and a marked reduction in Pdi, which was maintained over the 1-minute period of CMV. A transient increase in end-expiratory lung volume commonly occurred at the onset of CMV, but end-expiratory lung volume returned to or near baseline levels after the initial two to four ventilator cycles, as inferred from the constancy in end-expiratory Pes and Pga. At the cessation of CMV, a 17-second apnea ensued followed by resumption of spontaneous inspiratory efforts. Each of the initial two spontaneous breaths after the apnea had smaller VT and Pdi relative to baseline eupnea (see additional recordings during CMV at smaller VT settings in Figures E1 and E2 in the online supplement).




View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. (A) Polygraph record of a trial of controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) in Subject 1 at a breathing frequency that is three breaths per minute above spontaneous eupnea and a VT that is 200% of spontaneous eupnea. EEG = electroencephalogram spontaneous breathing and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) precedes the CMV trial. The onset of CMV occurs with the increase in Pm. Note the immediate reduction in Pdi at CMV onset and the apnea that followed the cessation of CMV. Also note the cardiogenic artifact on the Pes and Pdi traces. Inspired CO2 was added to prevent the PETCO2 from falling when VT was raised with CMV. (B) A polygraph record of a spontaneous control breath and a single cycle of CMV at a higher VT (200% of eupnea), both obtained from the same trial shown in (A) and recorded at fast speed (28 mm/second). Note the rise in Pes and absence of change in Pdi during inspiration with CMV at high VT.

 
Single spontaneous and associated CMV breaths recorded at fast speed (28 mm/second) are shown in Figure 1B to illustrate the within-breath pressure changes. Note the typical development of negative Pes and positive Pga and Pdi during a spontaneous inspiration, as opposed to an unchanging Pes and Pdi during steady-state CMV at raised VT and frequency (see examples recorded at fast speeds in an additional subject and at two VT settings in Figures E3 and E4 in the online supplement).

Group mean values (n = 7) for {Delta}Pdi are shown throughout all CMV trials in Figures 2A and 2B and for other key variables in Tables 1 and 2 . In all CMV trials, as VT was increased, TI was maintained at or slightly below baseline spontaneous TI; thus, mean (and peak) inspiratory flow rates during CMV averaged 1.6 to 3 times those at baseline. Mean E was increased 1.4 to 2 times baseline, and mean PETCO2 was maintained an average of 0.5 ± 0.1 mm Hg greater than eupnea over all CMV trials.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Changes in {Delta}Pdi averaged over 15-second time intervals during CMV are shown at each of the three increases in VT and at breathing frequencies that averaged three (B) and one (A) breath(s) per minute greater than spontaneous eupnea (n = 7). The first point on the left at zero time is spontaneous eupnea, followed by the four time points during CMV and then the first three breaths during spontaneous breathing in recovery. The break between the end of CMV and the first spontaneous breath indicates the average length of the TE after the final ventilator breath (Figure 3).

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Average apnea lengths (relative to baseline spontaneous eupnea) after CMV at one and three breaths per minute more than eupnea and at each of the three VT settings maintained during the CMV trials. The average absolute TE in control eupnea that preceded each of the CMV trials was 2.1 ± 0.4 seconds.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Effects of cmv at an increased respiratory frequency (+1 more than eupnea) and vT

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Effects of cmv at an increased respiratory frequency (+3 more than eupnea) and vT

 
At the smallest (i.e., 35%) increase in VT during CMV and at +1 fR, nadir inspiratory {Delta}Pes shifted from negative values in spontaneous baseline breaths to +4 to 5 cm H2O during CMV; peak {Delta}Pga increased 0.7 cm H2O above baseline, and {Delta}Pdi fell to within ±1 cm H2O of zero Pdi. TE was not prolonged significantly after the final ventilator cycle, and {Delta}Pdi and VT were reduced slightly but significantly below baseline on the first spontaneous breath after CMV.

At the two larger increases in VT during CMV (65% and 100% relative to spontaneous eupnea), {Delta}Pes increased to +5.7 cm H2O, {Delta}Pga increased 0.5–2 cm H2O, and mean {Delta}Pdi fell markedly and varied from 0 to -2 cm H2O. Negative values for {Delta}Pdi (range = -0.6 to -5 cm H2O) were observed in five of seven subjects.

After the final CMV cycle with VT at two times eupnea, TE averaged 8–9 seconds or approximately 4.5 times the baseline spontaneous TE, and TE averaged 4–6 seconds when VT was held at 1.6 times eupnea (Figure 3) . On the first spontaneous breath after these post-CMV apneas, the mean {Delta}Pdi and the VT and VT/TI were reduced 20 to 90% below baseline eupneic levels. At each CMV VT, the reduction in {Delta}Pdi during CMV and the prolongation in TE after CMV were not different when CMV was conducted at +1 fR or +3/minute fR above spontaneous eupnea.

In summary, normocapnic CMV at increased fixed fR and VT reduced {Delta}Pdi during CMV and prolonged TE immediately after CMV. These effects were dependent on the VT maintained during the CMV. Reductions in Pdi and VT persisted for the first spontaneous breath immediately after the postventilator apneas.

Effects of ACMV with Increased VT on Pdi and Breath Timing
Figure 4 is a polygraph tracing showing the effects of normocapnic ACMV at a VT 195% of eupnea in subject 1. On the first ACMV breath, Pes shifted from negative to positive, Pga increased slightly, and Pdi was reduced to approximately 40% of spontaneous control. These changes remained throughout the ACMV trial. After cessation of ACMV, TE was prolonged less than 20% of baseline, but the first two or three spontaneous breaths showed a less negative Pes and reduced Pdi and VT relative to spontaneous eupnea.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Typical example of the effects of assist control mechanical ventilation (ACMV) in subject 1 conducted at a VT, which was 195% of spontaneous eupnea. All symbols are as in the legend for Figure 1. Spontaneous breathing plus CPAP precedes the ACMV trial. Note that ACMV begins with the increase in Pm and ceases when Pm returns to its baseline levels. Note the sudden reduction in Pdi and increase in Pes at the onset of ACMV, which were maintained throughout AMCV and then gradually returned to normal during spontaneous breathing after the cessation of ACMV. PETCO2 was maintained at or slightly greater than eupneic levels by the addition of inspired CO2.

 
Figure 5 shows group mean values for {Delta}Pdi and VT during and after ACMV trials. PETCO2 averaged 0.4 ± 0.1 mm Hg greater than control (range = -0.9 to 2.8 mm Hg) over the three types of ACMV trials at increased VT. TI during ACMV remained similar to baseline spontaneous breathing; thus, the increases in VT were achieved by increases in inspiratory flow rate above baseline eupnea by 30% at the smallest increase in VT and by twofold at the highest VT. When VT was raised to 135% of baseline control via ACMV, TE was unchanged, and {Delta}Pdi was reduced to 40% of baseline eupnea. During ACMV at the two higher VT settings, {Delta}Pdi was reduced to less than 20% of eupnea (at 170% VT) and to -1 to -2 cm H2O (at 220% VT). Mean TE was prolonged to 128% and 134% of baseline eupnea during ACMV at 170% and 220% VT, respectively (p < 0.5).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Group mean data (n = 7) for {Delta}Pdi during spontaneous breathing (first data point), normocapnic ACMV averaged over 15-second intervals, and at three levels of VT and during the first three spontaneous breaths after ACMV. The changes in {Delta}Pdi are shown for ACMV at each of three VTs.

 
On the first spontaneous recovery breath after cessation of ACMV, mean TE remained unchanged from baseline eupnea after the 135% VT trial but was prolonged to 120% of baseline TE (p < 0.05) after the 165 and 220% VT trials. These effects of ACMV on TE were less than 20–25% of the mean TE prolongation observed after CMV at comparable VT elevations (Figure 3). {Delta}Pdi was 20–65% less than spontaneous control on the first two recovery spontaneous breaths and returned to near baseline levels by the third to sixth recovery breaths. Similarly, inspiratory flow rate and VT were also reduced in magnitude significantly below control during the first spontaneous recovery breaths (Figure 5), and these reductions were greatest when the VT delivered during the preceding period of ACMV equaled or exceeded 170% of eupneic control.

Effects of ACMV on Within-Breath Pes, Pm, and Pdi
All ventilator cycles during ACMV were accompanied by inspiratory muscle efforts, as judged by a negative mask pressure (Pm) and Pes and a positive Pdi immediately before the onset of inspiratory flow generated by the Pm ventilator. These spontaneous efforts generated during the ventilator trigger phase occurred over 0.1–0.2 seconds, with an average Pm of -0.5 ± 0.1 cm H2O, Pes of -0.6 ± 0.4 cm H2O, and Pdi of 0.6 ± 0.3 cm H2O.

Figures 6A and 6B show a single spontaneous breath + continuous positive airway pressure and associated ACMV cycles recorded at high speed to illustrate the within-breath pressure changes. Note first the typical development of a negative esophageal and positive Pdi during a spontaneous inspiration. During ACMV, initial small changes occurred in Pm, Pes, and Pdi before the ventilator trigger. Then with the onset of ventilator-assisted inspiratory flow and positive Pm (1) at the 140% increase in VT, negative swings in Pes and positive Pdi were greatly reduced, relative to spontaneous, and (2) at the 200% increase in VT, Pes moved in a positive direction and Pdi in a slightly negative direction throughout inspiration.




View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Polygraph records at a fast speed (28 mm/second) of a spontaneous control breath plus CPAP and a single cycle of ACMV, both obtained from subject 1 during an ACMV trial at VT = 140% of eupnea (A) and at 200% of eupnea (B). Note the reduced fall in Pes and rise in Pdi with inspiration during ACMV versus spontaneous breathing at VT 140% of eupnea and the positive Pes and slight fall in Pdi with inspiration during ACMV at 200% of eupneic VT.

 
Effects of Hyperoxia on Pdi and Breath Timing during CMV and ACMV
In two subjects, inspired air was enriched with 60% O2 at a flow rate sufficient to raise PETO2 to 310–325 mm Hg throughout six trials of normocapnic ACMV at VT 180 to 200% of baseline eupnea and nine trials of normocapnic CMV at fR (+1fR) and VT 150 to 180% of eupnea (data not shown). With normocapnic hyperoxic ACMV, reductions in Pdi below spontaneous eupnea averaged 50–60% during the final 15 seconds and 30–40% on the first spontaneous breath after cessation of ACMV. These changes were within ±10% of those after normoxic normocapnic ACMV in these two subjects. Similarly, with hyperoxic normocapnic CMV trials, {Delta}Pdi was reduced to 0 to 1 cm H2O during the final 15 seconds of CMV and TE prolonged four times eupneic control after CMV, as in the normoxic trials.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our findings in sleeping healthy humans have shown that inspiratory motor output, as indicated by {Delta}Pdi, is reduced during controlled, normocapnic mechanical ventilation when ventilator frequency is increased as little as one breath per minute above spontaneous eupnea. The complete elimination of inspiratory motor output also required that VT during CMV be raised 65% or more above eupnea. Prolonged TEs occurred after cessation of CMV, and their length increased in proportion to the magnitude of the VT maintained during the CMV but were independent of further increases in CMV frequency. During assisted normocapnic mechanical ventilation synchronous with inspiratory effort (ACMV), inspiratory motor output was never completely eliminated, and TE was only slightly but significantly prolonged. However, during ACMV at raised VT, Pdi was reduced well below spontaneous control; furthermore, in recovery from ACMV, the initial spontaneous efforts produced Pdi and VT, which were 20–70% below baseline eupneic control breaths. These reductions in spontaneous Pdi and VT in recovery from ACMV were greatest at the two highest VTs maintained during ACMV. Hyperoxia did not prevent the inhibitory effects of either CMV or ACMV on Pdi or apnea during or after mechanical ventilation. We attribute the resetting of respiratory rhythm and apnea caused by CMV to the neuromechanical effects of repeated and augmented lung inflation and the reduced Pdi during and after ACMV to the neuromechancial inhibitory effects on respiratory motor output associated with increased VT.

Use of Pdi to Assess Reduced Respiratory Motor Output during and after CMV and ACMV
The reduction and/or elimination of Pdi during and after both types of mechanical ventilation were substantial and consistent and we believe qualitatively reflected reductions in phrenic motor output, especially when volumes and flow rates were not altered markedly from eupnea. For example, Beck and colleagues (17) used a multiple array of esophageal electrodes to measure crural EMGdi in sedated humans and showed a tight coupling of reductions in EMGdi to those in Pdi during pressure support ventilation at small increments in VT. However, during mechanical ventilation at high VT and flow rate, there are other potential reasons why this mechanical index of respiratory motor output may have been reduced.

First, the intrinsic mechanical properties of the diaphragm were changed during mechanical ventilation, both by the increased VT, and therefore shortened muscle length, and by the increased flow rate, and therefore increased velocity of muscle shortening. Based on phrenic nerve stimulation studies at varying lung volumes and flow rates in humans (18, 19), we estimate that our increases in VT and mean flow rates would have accounted for approximately 20% of the mean reduction observed in Pdi at the maximum VT and flow rate and 5–10% of the reduction in Pdi at the smaller increase in VT and flow rate. Second, phasic activation of expiratory muscles with relaxation of the diaphragm during subsequent inspiration could also have assisted in reducing diaphragmatic pressure development; however, this seems unlikely given the absence of changes in end-expiratory Pga or Pes throughout trials of ACMV. Third, changes in Pdi reflect primarily the activity of the diaphragm; thus, reduced or even eliminated Pdi during mechanical ventilation does not necessarily mean that motor output to all inspiratory pump muscles was similarly reduced. Finally, there were several circumstances during passive mechanical ventilation at high VT where the increases in Pes during inspiration exceeded that in Pga, resulting in a negative Pdi. In these circumstances, the transmission of changes in pleural pressure to the abdominal compartment was attenuated. This may be explained by the retention of passive tension in the diaphragm, as demonstrated by Froese and Bryan (20) in the paralyzed human diaphragm during mechanical ventilation at raised VT with subjects in the supine position. Alternatively, in the supine position, the abdominal contents may push on the diaphragm and impair transmission of all of the {Delta}Pes to the abdomen. Lake and colleagues (10) also reported negative Pdi during pressure support mechanical ventilation in subjects who were awake. Thus, the changes in Pdi during ACMV or CMV at raised VT clearly overestimate the actual reduction in diaphragmatic activity and in the accompanying reduction in central respiratory motor output.

The recovery data obtained during spontaneous breathing in NREM sleep immediately after CMV or ACMV unequivocally demonstrate the significant inhibition of central respiratory motor output that occurred as a result of normocapnic mechanical ventilation. First, our interpretation that CMV completely eliminated central respiratory motor output to all inspiratory muscles is shown by the substantial apneas that consistently followed CMV conducted at increased frequency and at VT settings that were elevated 65% or more above eupnea. Furthermore, post-CMV apneic length was dependent on the magnitude of the VT maintained during CMV. Second, immediately after normocapnic ACMV, TE was prolonged, but only to one-fifth the TE observed after CMV at comparable levels of VT. However, we did consistently observe a significant reduction in Pdi and in VT in the initial two to four recovery spontaneous breaths when compared with the baseline spontaneous eupneic breaths, and these reductions after ACMV were greatest in trials with the higher VT settings delivered during the ACMV. Finally, we note that our interpretation of Pdi data during and after CMV in the human is consistent with previous studies in sleeping dogs, which showed that diaphragmatic EMG (as recorded from indwelling electrodes) was completely eliminated during and immediately after normocapnic CMV (at +1 fR) (3).

Past versus Present Findings Using CMV and ACMV
CMV effects.
Present findings extend previous results (discussed previously in this article) by showing in the sleeping human (1) that the increased frequency of CMV need only be as little as one breath per minute above spontaneous eupnea to eliminate respiratory motor output, but that VT must also be increased at least 65% or more above eupnea and (2) that the duration of the post-CMV apnea lengthened in proportion to the VT applied during CMV. When normocapnic CMV was conducted at average eupneic frequencies and relatively small VT settings, anesthetized or sleeping intact humans entrained their diaphragm EMG to the ventilator (21, 22); accordingly, postventilator apnea did not occur (2, 23). Finally, in awake subjects, CMV trials conducted even at substantial increases in frequency and VT did not always cause postventilator apnea, even when substantial hypocapnia was present (6, 2325); however, one cannot exclude variable effects of wakefulness and behavioral responses to the mechanical ventilator on the control of breathing (15, 24), which were not factors in our present study conducted in NREM sleep.

Most of our findings in sleeping humans on CMV are similar to those in sleeping dogs (3), although there appears to be less volume-sensitive inhibition of respiratory motor output in the human versus the dog. For example, respiratory motor output in the human and dog was sensitive to both CMV frequency and VT; however, the dog required only a 10–20% increase in ventilator VT at raised frequency to cause complete cessation of EMGdi and substantial postventilator apnea, whereas the human required a much larger percentage increase in ventilator VT (Figure 3). At the same time, both species showed substantial VT-dependent apneas after normocapnic CMV.

ACMV effects.
We extend previous findings of normocapnic ACMV effects on reducing respiratory motor output in awake (9, 10, 26) and sleeping (5) subjects by showing that assisted synchronous ventilation will markedly reduce the amplitude of but not eliminate respiratory motor output both during and after ACMV and that this inhibitory effect is VT dependent. TE is also prolonged significantly at high VT during ACMV, but these timing effects are relatively small compared with those elicited by CMV. In apparent contrast to our findings with normocapnic ACMV, Georgopoulos and colleagues (27) reported that Pdi was unaffected by proportional assist ventilation, relative to spontaneous breaths, when comparisons were made during rebreathing at similar levels of raised PETCO2 and VT in awake subjects. However, there are major differences between our studies including the variable effects of state of consciousness and chemoreceptor stimulation on respiratory motor output and the additional important influence (in our study) of a raised VT during ACMV.

Chemoreceptor versus Nonchemoreceptor Influences
We prevented hypocapnia during mechanical ventilation by adding inspired CO2. Despite our control of PETCO2, the question remains as to whether the PCO2 was normocapnic at known peripheral and central chemoreceptor sites (7). First, we have shown that neither CMV (28) nor ACMV (5) at raised FICO2 in subjects who are awake causes systematic changes in the arterial to end-tidal PCO2 difference, findings that agree with the consensus in the animal literature (29). Second, there are laryngeal and lung receptors sensitive to increases in inspired CO2. However, increased FICO2 to the isolated upper airway in intact anesthetized cats (30) or unanesthetized dogs (31) had no effect on phrenic motor output, and increases in lung CO2, per se, were shown to increase breathing frequency and minute phrenic motor output in the anesthetized dog (32).

Third, our increases in FICO2 and VT likely had opposing effects on the amplitude of oscillations in arterial PCO2 and pH (33). The effect of changes in arterial PCO2 oscillation at constant mean PaCO2 on ventilatory control are controversial (34, 35); however, in studies which both measured and controlled these oscillations, no effect on respiratory motor output was discernable, at least when VCO2 was at resting levels (36). Certainly, we cannot attribute the reduced respiratory motor outputs after ACMV or CMV to alterations in CO2 oscillations because FICO2 was reduced to room air levels in recovery.

We have additional types of evidence against a significant role for carotid chemoreceptors in accounting for reductions in respiratory motor output during isocapnic mechanical ventilation. First, we found equal amounts of resetting and/or inhibition of respiratory motor output during and after normocapnic CMV and ACMV in normoxia versus hyperoxia. Hyperoxia is known to markedly reduce the carotid chemoreceotor response to CO2 (37, 38). Second, in the sleeping dog, we found that bilateral denervation of the carotid bodies also did not influence the magnitude of inhibition of EMGdi during and after normocapnic CMV or ACMV (unpublished findings from the authors' laboratory) or pressure support ventilation (39). Perhaps medullary chemoreceptor PCO2 was reduced independently of arterial PCO2, but we know of no reason to expect such a dissociation to occur during normocapnic mechanical ventilation.

Our study also provides evidence that the inhibitory influences of mechanical ventilation will occur even in the presence of mild but significant hypercapnia. First, the initial few spontaneous inspiratory efforts after the termination of apneas in recovery from normocapnic CMV showed a VT and Pdi that were consistently reduced significantly below eupneic baseline values, despite a PaCO2 that was undoubtedly significantly greater than eupnea. Second, during isocapnic ACMV at raised VT, we occasionally observed very small inspiratory efforts that failed to trigger the ventilator to deliver the desired VT (see the example in Figure 7 and, recorded at a faster speed, in Figure E5 in the online supplement). Note that despite the resultant transient increase in PETCO2 to 2–3 mm Hg above normocapnia after two successive untriggered efforts, the subsequent inspiratory effort still remained well below those in baseline eupnea. Finally, in sleeping dogs, raising the PETCO2 3–5 mm Hg above eupneic control during CMV at increased frequency and VT did not prevent the elimination of EMGdi or postventilator apneas (3). Similarly, in sleeping humans, inspiratory effort was eliminated via hypocapnic CMV at raised VT and did not return (as CMV was continued) until PETCO2 was increased an average of 6 mm Hg above spontaneous eupnea (40).



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Example of a polygraph record from subject 1 showing the response to normocapnic ACMV at VT 200% of control during which respiratory motor output was markedly reduced during the trial resulting in "untriggered" ventilator breaths and the transient accumulation of CO2. Note the increase in PETCO2 after the untriggered breaths accompanied by a small increase in Pdi. The "untriggered" ventilator cycles are those without a prominent increase in Pm and no VT. The effects of the accumulation of CO2 on within-breath Pdi are shown in Figure E5 in the online supplement.

 
In summary, although we acknowledge the apnea and hypopnea-producing effects of even very small decrements in PaCO2 in sleeping humans (2, 23, 41), we believe the evidence, as outlined previously here, speaks strongly in favor of nonchemoreceptor mediation of the observed elimination or reduction in respiratory motor output during and after isocapnic CMV or ACMV.

Mechanisms of Neuromechanical Inhibition during CMV and ACMV
With synchronous ACMV at increased VT, the amplitude of respiratory motor output was reduced, both during and after mechanical ventilation, and the effect was VT dependent and substantial. However, every ACMV cycle was triggered by an active inspiration, and TE prolongations were relatively small in the immediate postventilator period. Is the reduction in respiratory amplitude an effect of vagal inhibitory feedback from lung stretch? There is limited evidence in intact humans showing relatively small but significant effects on breath timing of dynamic lung volume changes either within or very close to the eupneic tidal range (14, 15). Furthermore, lung denervated lung transplant patients (42), unlike intact subjects (21), showed much difficulty in entraining their spontaneous rhythm to the mechanical ventilator during sleep. Thus, our observed effects of ACMV at high VT primarily on the amplitude of respiratory motor output with relatively small effects on breath timing are consistent with these claims of a highly sensitive volume and perhaps vagal feedback effects on respiratory motor output.

The elimination of respiratory motor output in the human during and after CMV by means of increased ventilator frequency and VT represents a "resetting" of the respiratory rhythm. Two types of powerful influences are responsible for this resetting effect, as previously documented in anesthetized or sleeping dogs and cats (3, 43). First, application of single ventilator breaths during early expiration, that is, in the so-called inflation-sensitive phase of the respiratory cycle, causes TE prolongation (3, 11) whose duration is dependent on the magnitude of the ventilator volume (3). Second, although these TE prolonging effects lasted only for one respiratory cycle (3, 42), repeated ventilator cycles performed at an increased frequency above eupnea exerted a cumulative inhibitory effect on respiratory motor output, thereby lengthening the inflation sensitive phase of each respiratory cycle (3). This time-dependent cumulative inhibitory effect of CMV was manifested in postventilator apneas in both sleeping dogs (3) and humans (Figures 1 and 3) and was analogous to that originally reported in anesthetized piglets secondary to repeated electrical stimulation of the superior laryngeal nerve (44). In the sleeping dog, postventilator apneas first appeared after two or three CMV ventilator cycles, and apnea length increased progressively further as CMV was prolonged up through a duration of approximately 10 ventilator cycles (3). In the dog, tonic expiratory muscle EMG activity was also shown to occur simultaneously with a silent diaphragm EMG throughout the period of passive CMV, as well as during the subsequent apneic recovery period (3).

In the anesthetized cat, Knox (11) showed that TE prolongation via application of single ventilator breaths during neural expiration required intact vagal feedback. However, in lung transplant humans who were awake and vagally blocked dogs, we showed postventilator apneas after normocapnic CMV at raised frequency and VT (45). Given the evidence cited previously here along with the potentially confounding effects of wakefulness, we propose that the role of vagal feedback in the resetting of respiratory rhythm during CMV needs testing in a sleeping state, where the effects of reflex inhibition may be more readily unmasked.

In summary, present evidence using both CMV and ACMV confirms and extends earlier work (8) that strong and sustained inhibition of the drive to breathe may be exerted by nonchemical feedback influences in the sleeping ventilated human. Furthermore, these inhibitory influences persist beyond the termination of the mechanical perturbations and in the face of rising chemical stimuli. The influence of either mode of mechanical ventilation was critically dependent on the magnitude of the ventilator VT and likely on vagal feedback (discussed previously here). However, a raised fR (with CMV) combined with a moderately augmented VT showed substantially greater and more sustained inhibition of the amplitude and timing of respiratory motor output than did synchronous increases in VT alone (as with ACMV). We attribute this potent cumulative inhibitory effect on breath timing during CMV to repeated application of the ventilator volume during the progressively prolonged inflation-sensitive phase of the respiratory cycle.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Ms. Patricia Kalscheur for manuscript preparation.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Supported by NHLBI, the Medical Research Service of the Department of Veteran's Affairs, an Allen+Hanburys Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (A.R.), and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored institutional training grant (H.H.).

This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents online at www.atsjournals.org

Received in original form July 9, 2002; accepted in final form April 23, 2003


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Leevers AM, Simon PM, Dempsey JA. Apnea after normocapnic mechanical ventilation during NREM sleep. J Appl Physiol 1994;77:2079–2085.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Henke KG, Arias A, Skatrud JB, Dempsey JA. Inhibition of inspiratory muscle activity during sleep: chemical and non-chemical influences. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;138:8–15.[Medline]
  3. Satoh M, Eastwood PR, Smith CA, Dempsey JA. Nonchemical elimination of inspiratory motor output via mechanical ventilation in sleep. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1356–1364.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Manchanda S, Leevers AM, Wilson CR, Simon PM, Skatrud JB, Dempsey JA. Frequency and volume thresholds for inhibition of inspiratory motor output during mechanical ventilation. Respir Physiol 1996;105:1–16.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Wilson CR, Satoh M, Skatrud JB, Dempsey JA. Non-chemical inhibition of respiratory motor output during mechanical ventilation in sleeping humans. J Physiol 1999;518:605–618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Puddy A, Patrick W, Webster K, Younes M. Respiratory control during volume-cycled ventilation in normal humans. J Appl Physiol 1996;80:1749–1758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Younes M. Apnea following mechanical ventilation may not be caused by neuromechanical influences. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1298–1300.[Free Full Text]
  8. Dempsey JA, Skatrud J. Apnea following mechanical ventilation may be caused by nonchemical neuromechanical influences. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1297–1301.[Free Full Text]
  9. Fauroux B, Isabey D, Desmarais G, Brochard L, Harf A, Lofaso F. Nonchemical influence of inspiratory pressure support on inspiratory activity in humans. J Appl Physiol 1998;85:2169–2175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lake FR, Finucane KE, Hillman DR. Diaphragm inhibition with positive pressure ventilation: quantification of mechanical effects. Respir Physiol 1999;118:149–161.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Knox CK. Characteristics of inflation and deflation reflexes during expiration in the cat. J Neurophysiol 1973;36:284–295.[Free Full Text]
  12. Iber C, Simon PM, Skatrud JB, Mahowald MW, Dempsey JA. The Breuer-Hering reflex in humans: effects of pulmonary denervation and hypocapnia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:217–224.[Abstract]
  13. Hamilton RD, Winning AJ, Horner RL, Guz A. The effect of lung inflation on breathing in man during wakefulness and sleep. Respir Physiol 1988;73:145–154.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Polacheck J, Strong R, Arens J, Davies C, Metcalf I, Younes M. Phasic vagal influence on inspiratory motor output in anesthetized human subjects. J Appl Physiol 1980;49:609–619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. BuSha BF, Judd BG, Manning HL, Simon PM, Searle BC, Duabenspeck JA, Leiter JC. Identification of respiratory vagal feedback in awake normal subjects using pseudorandom unloading. J Appl Physiol 2001;90:2330–2340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Rechtschaffen A, Kales A. A manual of standard terminology, techniques, and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects. Bethesda, MD: National Institute for Neurological Diseases and Blindness; 1971.
  17. Beck J, Gottfried SB, Nevalesi P, Skrobik Y, Comtois N, Rossini M, Sinderby C. Electrical activity of the diaphragm during pressure support ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:419–424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Polkey MI, Hamnegard C-H, Hughes PD, Rafferty GF, Green M, Moxham J. Influence of acute lung volume change on contractile properties of human diaphragm. J Appl Physiol 1998;85:1322–1328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Beck J, Sinderby C, Lindstrom L, Grassino A. Crural diaphragm activation during dynamic contractions at various inspiratory flow rates. J Appl Physiol 1998;5:451–458.
  20. Froese AB, Bryan AC. Effects of anesthesia and paralysis on diaphragmatic mechanics in man. Anesthesiology 1974;41:242–255.[Medline]
  21. Simon PM, Zurob AS, Wies WM, Leiter JC, Hubmayr RD. Entrainment of respiration in humans by periodic lung inflations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:950–960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Graves CL, Glass L, Laporta D, Meloche R, Grassino A. Respiratory phase locking during mechanical ventilation in anesthetized subjects. Am J Physiol 1986;250:R902–R909.[Medline]
  23. Skatrud JB, Dempsey JA. Interaction of sleep state and chemical stimuli in sustaining rhythmic ventilation. J Appl Physiol 1983;55:813–822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Corfield D, Morrell MJ, Guz A. The nature of breathing during hypocapnia in awake man. Respir Physiol 1995;101:145–160.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Datta AK, Shea SA, Horner RL, Guz A. The influence of induced hypocapnia and sleep on the endogenous respiratory rhythm in humans. J Physiol (Lond) 1991;440:17–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Scheid P, Lofaso F, Isabey D, Harf A. Respiratory response to inhaled CO2 during positive inspiratory pressure in humans. J Appl Physiol 1994;77:876–882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Georgopoulos D, Mitrouska I, Webster K, Bshouty Z, Younes M. Effects of inspiratory muscle unloading on the response of respiratory motor output to CO2. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:2000–2009.[Abstract]
  28. Simon PM, Skatrud JB, Badr MS, Griffin DM, Iber C, Dempsey JA. Role of airway mechanoreceptors in the inhibition of inspiration during mechanical ventilation in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:1033–1041.[Medline]
  29. Scheid P, Piiper J. Blood/gas equilibrium of carbon dioxide in lungs: a critical review. Respir Physiol 1980;39:1–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Bartlett D Jr, Knuth SL, Leiter JC. Alteration of ventilatory activity by intralaryngeal CO2 in the cat. J Physiol 1992;457:177–185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lee LY, Morton RF, McIntosh MJ, Turbek JA. An isolated upper airway preparation in conscious dogs. J Appl Physiol 1986;60:2123–2127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Bartoli A, Cross BA, Guz A, Jain SK, Noble MIM, Trenchard DW. The effect of carbon dioxide in the airways and alveoli on ventilation: a vagal reflex studied in the dog. J Physiol (Lond) 1974;240:91–109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Cross BA, Grant BJB, Guz A, Jones PW, Semple SJG, Stidwill RP. Dependence of phrenic motoneurone output on the oscillatory component of arterial blood gas composition. J Physiol 1979;290:163–184.
  34. Phillipson EA, Duffin J, Cooper JD. Critical dependence of respiratory rhythmicity on metabolic CO2 load. J Appl Physiol 1981;50:45–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Bennett FM, Tallman RD Jr, Grodins FS. Role of VCO2 in control of breathing of awake exercising dogs. J Appl Physiol 1984;56:1335–1337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Takahashi E, Tateishi I, Yamamotor K, Mikami T. Effect of withdrawal of respiratory CO2 oscillations on respiratory control at rest. J Appl Physiol 1991;70:1601–1606.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Rodman JR, Curran AK, Henderson KS, Dempsey JA. Carotid body denervation in dogs: eupnea and the ventilatory response to hyperoxic hypercapnia. J Appl Physiol 2001;91:328–335.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Lahiri S, Delaney RG. Stimulus interaction in the response of the carotid body chemoreceptor single afferent fibers. Respir Physiol 1975;24:249–266.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Nakayama H, Smith CA, Rodman JR, Skatrud JB, Dempsey JA. Carotid body denervation eliminates apnea in response to transient hypocapnia. J Appl Physiol 2003;94:155–164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Simon P, Dempsey JA, Landry DM, Skatrud JB. Effects of sleep on respiratory muscle activity during mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;147:32–37.[Medline]
  41. Meza S, Mendez M, Ostrowski M, Younes M. Susceptibility to periodic breathing with assisted ventilation during sleep in normal subjects. J Appl Physiol 1998;85:1929–1940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Simon P, Habel AM, Daubenspeck JA, Leiter JC. Vagal feedback in the entrainment of respiration to mechanical ventilation in sleeping humans. J Appl Physiol 2000;89:760–769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Lewis J, Bachoo M, Polosa C, Glass L. The effects of superior laryngeal nerve stimulation on the respiratory rhythm: phase resetting and after effects. Brain Res 1989;517:44–50.
  44. Lawson EE. Recovery from central apnea: effect of stimulus duration and end-tidal PCO2 partial pressure. J Appl Physiol 1982;53:105–109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Leevers AM, Simon PM, Xi L, Dempsey JA. Apnoea following normocapnic mechanical ventilation: a demonstration of control system inertia. J Physiol (Lond) 1993;472:749–768.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
J. A. Dempsey
Crossing the apnoeic threshold: causes and consequences
Exp Physiol, January 1, 2005; 90(1): 13 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2003
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 239 - 253.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Sleep-Disordered Breathing, Control of Breathing, Respiratory Muscles, Pulmonary Function Testing in AJRCCM 2003
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 254 - 264.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200207-675OCv1
168/1/92    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rice, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rice, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, J. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2003 American Thoracic Society