help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on December 12, 2002, doi:10.1164/rccm.200208-840OC
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200208-840OCv1
167/7/1016    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albert, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lamm, W. J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Albert, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lamm, W. J. E.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 167. pp. 1016-1020, (2003)
© 2003 American Thoracic Society


Original Article

Left Atrial Pressure Can Be Accurately Transmitted to the Pulmonary Artery despite Zone 1 Conditions

Richard K. Albert and Wayne J. E. Lamm

Denver Health Medical Center and Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado; and Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Richard K. Albert, M.D., Denver Health Medical Center, 777 Bannock, MC 4000, Denver, CO 80204-4507. E-mail: Ralbert{at}dhha.org


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure is not thought to reflect left atrial pressure (Pla) when alveolar pressure (PA) exceeds pulmonary venous pressure because alveolar capillaries collapse and the required continuous fluid column between the pulmonary artery and left atrium is interrupted. However, arterial-to-venous flow can occur when PA exceeds both the pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa) and pulmonary venous pressure (i.e., in Zone 1 conditions), indicating the existence of a continuous patent vascular channel. Accordingly, Ppa should reflect Pla under these conditions. To investigate this connection cannulas were placed in the pulmonary arteries and left atria of eight excised rabbit lungs. Ppa and Pla were set 5 cm H2O above PA, which ranged from 0 to 25 cm H2O. Pla was then reduced in 2 to 4 cm H2O decrements while recording Ppa when arterial-to-venous flow ceased. At all PAs greater than 0 cm H2O, Pla was accurately reflected by the Ppa when both were exceeded by PA. The greater the PA, the lower the Ppa could track Pla below PA. Pla can be accurately measured by a pulmonary arterial catheter under Zone 1 conditions.

Key Words: pulmonary circulation • ARDS • pulmonary arterial wedge pressure

The pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure (Ppao) cannot accurately reflect left atrial pressure (Pla) unless a continuous column of fluid connects the tip of the pulmonary arterial catheter with a downstream pulmonary vein that, in turn, empties into the left atrium. The zonal perfusion model states that arterial-to-venous flow ceases when PA exceeds pulmonary arterial (Ppa) and pulmonary venous pressure (Ppv) because the alveolar capillaries collapse (i.e., Zone 1 conditions) (1). A similar situation exists in Zone 2 (Ppa > PA > Ppv) when the balloon of a pulmonary artery catheter is inflated, as any effect of Ppa on pulmonary capillary pressure is removed, and the capillaries will again collapse when PA exceeds Ppv. Accordingly, chapters in numerous pulmonary and critical care medicine textbooks (27) and reviews of hemodynamic monitoring (812) make the point that Ppao cannot reflect Pla if the tip of the pulmonary arterial catheter is located in a region of lung in which Zone 1 or 2 conditions exist.

We (1316) and others (1722) have previously noted that pulmonary arterial-to-venous flow can occur when the lung is completely in Zone 1. Accordingly, a continuous fluid channel connecting the tip of a pulmonary arterial catheter to a downstream pulmonary vein must exist. The purpose of this study was to determine if such a functional pathway allowed measurement of Pla when PA exceeded both Ppa and Ppv.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Isolated Lung Preparation
The experimental protocol was approved by the University of Washington Animal Care Committee. New Zealand white rabbits of either sex (n = 8, weighing 2.7–3.0 kg) were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (30–50 mg/kg) and given papaverine (3 mg/kg) and heparin (1,000 U) through an ear vein. A tracheotomy was performed and an endotracheal tube was inserted. Animals were mechanically ventilated with a constant-volume piston pump (Harvard Apparatus Co., South Natick, MA), with a VT approximately 10 ml/kg and a rate of 30 breaths per minute. A median sternotomy was performed, the animals were exsanguinated, and cannulas were placed in the pulmonary artery and left atrium. The heart–lung block was placed on the dorsal lung surface, in a warmed, humidified chamber. The lungs were perfused with 30 to 60 ml of TRIS-buffered Tyrode's solution containing 2% albumin, 4% dextran (both from Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) and 15 mg/L papaverine from the arterial reservoir until the venous outflow appeared to be free of blood. The venous outflow was then directed through a narrow horizontal tube that allowed observation of individual drops of fluid at low flow. Ppa and Ppv were measured at the tips of their respective cannulas. The zero pressure reference was the dorsal lung surface. Ventilation was stopped and static PA was adjusted per the experimental protocol. All pressures were measured with a Graphtec Mark 12 Data Managed System, DMS 1000 (Irvine, CA).

Experimental Protocol
Lungs were initially inflated to 25 cm H2O and then deflated to 0 cm H2O to establish a uniform lung volume history. In five lungs, PA was then raised to 25 cm H2O and returned to 0 cm H2O in steps of 5 cm H2O. At each PA (on the inflation and deflation limb), Ppa and Ppv were briefly raised to 10 cm H2O above PA to recruit all vessels and were then lowered to match PA. Ppv was then lowered below PA in 2 to 3 cm H2O increments. At each step, Ppa was recorded when venous flow ceased (defined as < 1 drop of perfusate draining from the venous cannula in a 10-second period). If Ppa fell to the level of the Ppv, Ppa was recorded and Ppv was reduced another 2 to 3 cm H2O. This process was continued until Ppa remained unchanged and stayed at least 3 cm H2O above Ppv without flow being observed. When this occurred the next step change in PA was made.

In three lungs the above protocol was performed at PA = 5, 15, and 25 cm H2O (set on deflation) before and after generating pulmonary edema. Edema was produced by lowering PA to 10 cm H2O and raising Ppa and Ppv to 30 cm H2O for 5 minutes.

At the end of the experiment, all lungs were weighed and dried in a vacuum oven until the weight was stable and a wet/dry ratio was determined.

The data were plotted with Ppv on the x axis and Ppa on the y axis, and second order polynomial equations of the raw data were used to calculate Y intercepts on inflation and deflation and before and after creating pulmonary edema. These were compared using Students paired t test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Pla could be accurately measured in the upstream pulmonary artery when Pla was less than PA at all PAs greater than 0 cm H2O (Figure 1) . An effect of the lung volume history was also apparent. At PAs greater than 5 and less than 20 this effect was statistically significant (Figure 1). Subtracting the mean Y intercept on inflation and deflation from the PAs at which they were measured demonstrates that the greater the PA, the more Pla could be reduced and still be accurately reflected by Ppa (Figure 2) . The mean ± SD wet/dry ratio of the five lungs studied without causing pulmonary edema was 6.1 ± 0.7. All of the polynomial equations for the individual studies at all PAs had R values greater than or equal to 0.99.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Relationship between pulmonary venous pressure (Ppv) and pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa) at PA of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 cm H2O (line of identity included). Data recorded on the inflation portion of the lung pressure–volume curve are represented by open symbols and solid lines. Data recorded on the deflation portion of the curve are presented by closed symbols and dashed lines. Data from each lung are presented as the same marker. Y intercepts from polynomial equations of the relationship between inflation and deflation (mean ± SD of the individual experiments) are compared using Student's paired t test. At PA = 0 cm H2O, all data were obtained on deflation. At PA = 25 cm H2O, all data were obtained on inflation.

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Pressure below PA that Ppa can reflect Ppv (i.e., PA - Y intercept from Figure 1). The greater the PA, the lower into Zone 1 Ppa reflects Ppv.

 
Pla was accurately reflected in the upstream pulmonary artery when Pla was less than PA at PA = 5, 15, and 25 cm H2O despite the presence of pulmonary edema (Figure 3) . The Y intercepts of the three lungs increased after creating edema, and the change reached statistical significance at PA = 15 and 25 cm H2O. Again, the greater the PA the more Pla could be reduced and still be accurately reflected by Ppa, but edema had the effect of reducing the distance into Zone 1 that Ppv could be lowered and still be reflected by Ppa (Figure 4) . The mean ± SD wet/dry ratio of the three lungs studied before and after causing pulmonary edema was 16.8 ± 2.6 kg. All the polynomial equations for the individual studies done at PA = 15 and 25 cm H2O had R values greater than or equal to 0.98. At PA = 5 cm H2O, five of the R values were greater than or equal to 0.97 and one was 0.77.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Relationship between Ppv and Ppa at PA of 5, 15, and 25 cm H2O before and after causing lung edema (line of identity included). All data were recorded on the inflation portion of the lung pressure–volume curve. Data recorded before edema are presented as open symbols and solid lines. Data recorded after creating edema are presented as closed symbols and dashed lines. Data from each lung are presented as the same marker. Y intercepts from polynomial regressions of pre- and postedema (mean ± SD of the individual experiments) are compared using Student's paired t test.

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Pressure below PA (i.e., PA—Y intercepts from Figure 3) that Ppa can reflect Ppv before and after creating lung edema (mean ± SD). The greater the PA, the lower into Zone 1 Ppa reflects Ppv. Edema reduces the distance into Zone 1 that Ppv can be lowered and still be reflected by Ppa.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The important findings of this study are that (1) Pla can be accurately measured in the upstream pulmonary artery when both Ppa and Pla are below PA (i.e., when the entire lung is entirely in Zone 1 conditions), (2) the distance below PA that Pla can still be measured in the pulmonary artery increases with increasing PA, (3) the transmission of Pla to the pulmonary artery is reduced but can still occur despite considerable lung edema, and (4) the patency of the vascular channel connecting the left atrium to the pulmonary artery under Zone 1 conditions is, at least in part, dependent on alveolar surface tension.

Methodology
Because these lungs were 3 to 6 cm high (depending on PA and the volume history), it was not possible to simultaneously expose all vessels to the same intravascular pressure. The zero pressure reference was set at the bottom of the lung to assure that the entire lung was in the same zonal conditions throughout each experiment. This biases the results against being able to measure Pla below PA, however, because vessels located in the nondependant lung regions were exposed to a pressure that was as much as 6 cm H2O below that seen by vessels located in the dependent regions.

We held PA constant to eliminate potential cyclic changes in zonal conditions and to avoid questions pertaining to time constants of changing zonal conditions. Several studies have demonstrated that pulmonary venules and veins can constrict in response to hypoxia and a variety of vasoactive mediators (2325). Accordingly, pressures measured in the pulmonary artery during flow could be considerably higher than Pla in the setting of pulmonary venoconstriction. We therefore measured Ppa under no-flow conditions and also administered papaverine to eliminate any potential effects of changes in arterial or venous resistance. Although the no-flow condition also mimics the situation that would exist when the balloon of a pulmonary arterial catheter is inflated, the duration of balloon occlusion in patients is generally far shorter than the time we allowed for pressure equilibration (frequently > 5 minutes).

Using a cell-free perfusate reduced any potential problems resulting from settling, hemoconcentration, or clogging of vessels occurring during the time they were exposed to a constant Ppa, Pla, and PA under no-flow conditions. We have directly observed Zone 1 flow in animals with normal hematocrits in vivo (15), although the rate of flow is reduced when the perfusate contains blood (17).

Ability of Upstream Pressures to Reflect Downstream Pressures in Zone 1
Although the zonal model of pulmonary blood flow distribution states that there is no flow in areas of the lung that are in Zone 1 (1), numerous investigators have observed that a continuous, arterial-to-venous pathway must be patent and functional under Zone 1 conditions (1322). In view of this, how can numerous studies have concluded that Pla (or Ppv) cannot be measured in the upstream segment when PA exceeds Ppv?

To answer this question we reviewed each of these studies in detail. In some, it was not possible to discern the specific zonal conditions because the method used to establish the zero pressure reference was not specified (26, 28, 32) or the measurements were not made under Zone 1 conditions (31). In other studies, only summary data were presented such that the vascular and alveolar pressures in the individual experiments could not be determined (28, 30). Three studies presented individual pressure measurements made under well-described zonal conditions.

Roy and colleagues (29) found that when the pulmonary artery catheter was an average of 2.5 cm above the left atrium, Ppao did not reflect Pla when Pla was less than PA (i.e., mean Ppao = 9.9 and 15.2 cm H2O at PAs of 10 and 15 cm H2O, respectively, whereas mean Pla was 6.9 and 8.9 cm H2O, respectively). In the 21 measurements made when PA = 10 cm H2O and Pla was less than PA, however, Ppao was identical to or less than or equal to 0.7 cm H2O above Pla in five, and was actually 2 cm H2O below Pla in one. When PA = 15 cm H2O, Ppao ranged as high as 8.8 cm H2O above PA and exceeded PA by more than 2 cm H2O in 10/24 studies. The duration of balloon occlusion in these experiments was 30 seconds. Similar disparities between Ppao and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were made for catheters with tips located above the left atrium by Berryhill and Benumof (35), who found that Ppao averaged 4.3 cm H2O above PA. The duration of balloon occlusion was not specified.

Although Ppao might reflect PA under Zone 1 conditions (i.e., critical closure occurring at the alveolar level), explanations for how Ppao could exceed PA, particularly by as much as 8.8 cm H2O, are not as clear. We can propose five possibilities. First, there might be problems with the zero pressure reference. Second, the position of the pulmonary arterial catheter or the diameter of the vessel in which it is placed might change as PEEP is increased such that during balloon occlusion the catheters might become over-wedged leading to false high readings as has been reported previously (4, 6). Third, because these studies were done with positive pressure ventilation continuing as PEEP was adjusted, the higher PA produced during tidal inflation could have exceeded the closing pressure for what would otherwise have been a patent Zone 1 pathway at the lower level of PEEP. Fourth, pulmonary venous resistance could increase at higher levels of PEEP (24), and this could retard the runoff of blood from the tip of the pulmonary artery catheter to the left atrium. If this occurred, and insufficient time were given for arterial-to-venous flow to cease, pressures would not equilibrate. Others studies, however, have demonstrated that pulmonary venous resistance actually decreases with increasing levels of PEEP (13, 14). Finally, disparities between Ppao and Pla will increase in direct proportion to the resistance in the circuit downstream of the occlusion and the time allowed for equilibration to occur. The studies noted previously interrupted arterial-to-venous flow for 1 minute or less. We allowed flow to continue until less than 1 drop of perfusate drained from the circulation in 10 seconds. This frequently required up to 5 minutes.

Interestingly, Roy and colleagues (29) also found that when the pulmonary artery catheter was approximately 5 cm below the left atrium, Ppao tracked Pla rather nicely, even when the lung was in Zone 1 (i.e., Ppao = 4.9 and 7.8 cm H2O at PAs of 10 and 15 cm H2O, whereas Pla was 4.2 and 5.9 cm H2O, respectively). This finding suggests that catheter location, rather than the specific zonal conditions, might determine whether downstream pressures can be measured by catheters in the upstream segment.

Hasan and colleagues (33) correlated Ppao and Pla in vivo in animals with normal lungs and in others with unilateral or bilateral lung injury. Ppao rather accurately reflected Pla (i.e., a difference of < 2 mm Hg when Pla was < 9 mm Hg) in animals with normal lungs and those with bilateral injury, until PEEP reached or exceeded 15 mm Hg. At a PEEP of 22 mm Hg, however, Ppao was not able to track Pla in normal lungs when Pla was 13 mm Hg below PA or when Pla was 13.8 mm Hg below PA in lungs with bilateral injury. Although we did not distend our lungs to 22 mm Hg, we found that, at a PA of 25 cm H2O (i.e., 18.3 mm Hg), we could track Pla in the pulmonary artery when Pla was as much as 10 to 15 cm H2O (i.e., 7.3–11.0 mm Hg) below PA in normal lungs and as much as 10 to 12.5 cm H2O (i.e., 7.3–11 mm Hg) below PA in edematous lungs.

Most importantly, in animals with unilateral lung injury, Hasan and colleagues (33) found that Pla was rather accurately reflected by Ppao when Pla was as much as 20 cm H2O into Zone 1 (see their Figure 4). In the normal lungs of animals with unilateral injury, however, the ability of Ppao to track Pla was lost at PEEP levels of greater than approximately 5 cm H2O. The considerable disparity between the Ppao-Pla difference measured when both lungs were normal versus that measured when the pulmonary arterial catheter was positioned in the normal lung of animals with unilateral lung injury was not addressed (33).

Effects of Edema
Edema or lung injury has been found to have no effect on the ability to measure Pla in Zone 1 (30, 33) (at least up to a PEEP of 15 cm H2O in the setting of bilateral lung injury, Reference 33), to allow tracking of Pla somewhat further into Zone 1 (31), and to reduce the ability to measure Pla in animals with unilateral lung injury when the catheter was positioned in the injured lung (33). We observed that edema reduced the ability to track Pla below PA.

The patency of the pulmonary arterial-to-venous pathway in Zone 1 lungs depends on the presence of surface tension (13, 14, 1722). When surface tension is either very low as a result of a low PA (Figure 1, PA = 0 cm H2O) or when it is eliminated by completely filling the lung with liquid (14), the pathway is collapsed. Accordingly, some of the differing results in the literature may be explained by differences in lung volume and/or degrees of edema or injury.

Clinical Implications
Creating Zone 1 conditions throughout an entire lung allows proof of the concept that the arterial and venous sides of the pulmonary circulation are connected by a pathway that remains open, even when PA exceeds both Ppa and Pla to a considerable extent. Although there are no clinical situations in which such conditions can exist throughout the entire lung, there are numerous circumstances when PA could exceed downstream pressures in some, or the entire lung, and could also exceed Ppa in at least part of the lung. At issue is whether downstream pressures can be measured on the upstream side of the circulation in humans in such situations. Teboul and colleagues (34) have made such measurements and found that the Ppao accurately reflected left ventricular end-diastolic pressure when the latter was as much as 9 cm H2O below PA. The duration of balloon occlusion was not stated. When clinical circumstances are such that PA might exceed Pla (i.e., when higher levels of PEEP are being used), we suggest that balloon occlusion be continued for longer than 30 to 60 seconds seeking evidence of a progressive fall in Ppao below PA.

Received in original form August 9, 2002; accepted in final form December 11, 2002


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. West JB, Dollery CT, Naimark A. Distribution of blood flow in isolated lung: relation to vascular and alveolar pressures. J Appl Physiol 1964;19:713–724.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Varon AJ. Arterial, central venous and pulmonary artery catheters. In: Civetta JM, Taylor RW, Kirby LR, editors. Critical care, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1977. p. 847–865.
  3. Voyce SJ, Urbach D, Rippe JM. Pulmonary artery catheters. In: Rippe JM, Irwin RS, Alpert JS, Fink MP, editors. Intensive care medicine, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Little Brown; 1991. p. 48–72.
  4. Leatherman JW, Marini JJ. Clinical use of the pulmonary artery catheter. In: Hall JB, Schmidt GA, Wood LDH, editors. Principles of critical care, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1992. p. 155–177.
  5. Ginosar Y, Pizov R, Sprung CL. Arterial and pulmonary artery catheters. In: Parillo JE, Bone RC, editors. Critical care medicine: principles of diagnosis and management. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995. p. 25–49.
  6. Leatherman JW, Marini JJ. Pulmonary artery catheterization: interpretation of pressure recordings. In: Tobin MJ, editor. Principles and practice of intensive care monitoring. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998. p. 821–837.
  7. Hall JB, Schmidt GA, Wood LDH. Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. In: Murray JF, Nadel JA, editors. Textbook of respiratory medicine, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2000. p. 2413–2442.
  8. Moser KM, Spragg RG. Use of the balloon-tipped pulmonary artery catheter in pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med 1983;98:53–58.
  9. O'Quinn R, Marini JJ. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure: clinical physiology, measurement and interpretation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;128:319–326.[Medline]
  10. Matthay MA. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. Clin Chest Med 1983;4:233–249.[Medline]
  11. Wiedemann HP, Matthay MA, Matthay RA. Cardiovascular-pulmonary monitoring in the intensive care unit (Part 1). Chest 1984;85:537–549.[Free Full Text]
  12. Raper R, Sibbald WJ. Misled by the wedge? The Swan-Ganz catheter and left ventricular preload. Chest 1986;89:427–434.[Free Full Text]
  13. Koyama S, Lamm WJE, Hildebrandt J, Albert RK. Flow characteristics of open vessels in zone 1 rabbit lungs. J Appl Physiol 1989;66:1817–1823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Koyama S, Hildebrandt J. Air interface and elastic recoil affect vascular resistance in three zones of rabbit lungs. J Appl Physiol 1991;70:2422–2431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lamm WJE, Kirk KR, Hanson WL, Wagner WW Jr, Albert RK. Flow through zone 1 lungs utilizes alveolar corner vessels. J Appl Physiol 1991;70:1518–1523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Lamm WJE, Obermiller T, Hlastala MP, Albert RK. Perfusion through vessels open in zone 1 contributes to gas exchange in rabbit lungs in situ. J Appl Physiol 1995;79:1895–1899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lloyd TC Jr, Wright GW. Pulmonary vascular resistance and vascular transmural gradient. J Appl Physiol 1960;15:241–245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Bruderman I, Somers K, Hamilton WK, Tooley WH, Butler J. Effect of surface tension on circulation in the excised lungs of dogs. J Appl Physiol 1964;19:707–712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Glazier JB, Hughes JMB, Maloney JE, West JB. Measurements of capillary dimensions and blood volume in rapidly frozen lungs. J Appl Physiol 1969;26:65–76.[Free Full Text]
  20. Lloyd TC Jr, Wright GW. Pulmonary vascluar resistance and vascular transmural gradient. J Appl Physiol 1960;23:463–474.
  21. Pain MCF, West JB. Effect of the volume history of the isolated lung on distribution of blood flow. J Appl Physiol 1966;21:1545–1550.[Free Full Text]
  22. Rosenzweig DY, Hughes JMB, Glazier JB. Effect of transpulmonary and vascular pressures on pulmonary blood volume in isolated lung. J Appl Physiol 1970;28:553–560.[Free Full Text]
  23. Teboul JL, Andrivet P, Ansquer M, Besbes M, Rekik N, Lemaire F, Brun-Buisson C. Bedside evaluation of the resistance of large and medium pulmonary veins in various lung diseases. J Appl Physiol 1992;72:998–1003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hakim TS, Michel RP, Minami H, Chang HK. Site of pulmonary hypoxic vasoconstriction studied with arterial and venous occlusion. J Appl Physiol 1983;54:1298–1302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Albert RK, Lamm WJ, Henderson WR, Bolin RW. Effect of leukotrienes B4, C4, and Dr on segmental pulmonary vascular pressures. J Appl Physiol 1989;66:458–464.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hobelmann CF Jr, Smith DE, Virgilio RW, Shapiro AR, Peters RM. Left atrial and pulmonary artery wedge pressure difference with positive end-expiratory pressure. Surg Forum 1974;25:232–234.[Medline]
  27. Lozman J, Powers SR Jr, Older T, Dutton RE, Roy RJ, English M, Marco D, Eckert C. Correlation of pulmonary wedge and left atrial pressures: a study in the patient receiving positive end expiratory pressure ventilation. Arch Surg 1974;109:270–277.[Medline]
  28. Neville JF Jr, Askanazi J, Mon RL, Kane PB, Hanson EL, Webb WR. Determinants of pulmonary artery wedge pressure. Surg Forum 1975;26:206–208.[Medline]
  29. Roy R, Powers SR Jr, Feustel RJ, Dutton RE. Pulmonary wedge catheterization during positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation in the dog. Anesthesiology 1977;46:385–390.[Medline]
  30. Tooker J, Huseby J, Butler J. The effect of Swan-Ganz catheter height on the wedge pressure-left atrial pressure relationship in edema during positive end-expiration pressure ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1978;117:721–725.[Medline]
  31. Berryhill RE, Benumof JL. PEEP-induced discrepancy between pulmonary arterial wedge pressure and left atrial pressure: the effects of controlled vs. spontaneous ventilation and compliant and noncompliant lungs in the dog. Anesthesiology 1979;51:303–308.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Shasby DM, Dauber IM, Pfister S, Anderson JT, Carson SB, Marrat F, Hyers TM. Swan-Ganz catheter location and left atrial pressure determine the accuracy of wedge pressure when positive end-expiratory pressure is used. Chest 1981;80:666–670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Hasan FM, Weiss WB, Braman SS, Hoppin FC Jr. Influence of lung injury on pulmonary wedge-left atrial pressure correlation during positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985;131:246–250.[Medline]
  34. Teboul JL, Zapol WM, Brun-Buisson C, Abrouk F, Rauss A, Lemair F. A comparison of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure during mechanical ventilation with PEEP in patients with severe ARDS. Anesthesiology 1989;70:261–266.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2003
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 239 - 253.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200208-840OCv1
167/7/1016    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albert, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lamm, W. J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Albert, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lamm, W. J. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2003 American Thoracic Society