help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doré, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Charalambous, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doré, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Charalambous, B. M.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 167. pp. 663, (2003)
© 2003 American Thoracic Society


Correspondence

Bactericidal activity of antituberculosis drugs

To the Editor:

Gillespie and colleagues (1) propose a new method of assessing the early bactericidal activity of antituberculosis drugs. They recommend that sputum samples are collected daily for at least 5 days and a reiterative single exponential decay model used to model the daily bacterial counts. There are several problems with their approach.

For example, for Patient I4 they have counts on 6 days (Day 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7), and the counts on Days 5 and 7 are both zero. Using their reiterative refinement to fit the exponential model, they omit the data for Days 0 and 1, leaving two non zero counts, and fit a 3 parameter exponential curve to the remaining data. As the number of observations equals the number of parameters, the fitted curve goes through all the observed data. Instead of fitting a model to their data they have fitted the data to their model.

The model obtained after omitting half the observed non zero counts serves no useful purpose since it does not reflect the observed changes in bacterial counts with time. Far more data points would be required in order to reliably fit an exponential curve to the complete data for each patient. A five-parameter model with two exponential terms and a non zero asymptote would better reflect the underlying biological model of an initial rapid bactericidal phase, followed by a slower sterilizing phase. However, in order to reliably fit a double exponential model, daily sputum samples would be required from each patient for 2 or 3 weeks.

Using the changes in the log10 counts over Days 0 to 2 (EBA) and Days 2 to 14 as summary measures (2) is a pragmatic and realistic approach.

Finally, the acknowledgment of a statistician does not guarantee that their advice has been followed or that they have seen the paper before submission.

Caroline J. Doré and Andrew J. Nunn

British Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit London, United Kingdom

REFERENCES

  1. Gillespie SH, Gosling RD, Charalambous BM. A reiterative method for calculating the early bactericidal activity of antituberculosis drugs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:31–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Matthews JNS, Altman DG, Campbell MJ, Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. Br Med J 1990;300:230–235.

 

From the Authors:

An essential requirement for the reiterative exponential decay model for evaluating early bactericidal data is the need to have a minimum of four data points to fit a curve (1). Data points with zero values cannot be accepted for two reasons. First, the limit of detection of quantitative culture is between 102 and 103 cfu/mL. Thus negative cultures may represent samples in which there are less than 1,000 cfu/mL, true negative cultures or a failure of the culture medium to support the growth of small numbers of organisms. Secondly, as Doré and Nunn point out, to use only two points would be fitting the data to the model. The two points in question are not zero as the authors speculate but 5 x 103 cfu/ml and 2 x 104, giving four valid points with which the curve fitting program can calculate a valid curve.

The new model does require further testing ideally using data over 14 days to confirm our preliminary observation that a model with two exponential terms does not describe the data significantly better than a model with one exponential term. We have now examined such data and confirmed our earlier result (1).

We chose not to use linear regression because log transforming data assumes that the variation around each point follows a Gaussian distribution and that the standard deviation is the same at each value of x (2). Experience shows that this is not the case for EBA data and thus we believe that log transformation of early bactericidal data is inappropriate (3, 4). Although adding log10 counts over Days 0 to 2 and Days 2 to 14 has been used as a pragmatic approach for some years the shortcomings of this method have been recognized by many in the field (4, 5).

We believe that the reiterative exponential decay model is a useful new tool for clinical researchers and we hope that others will evaluate it. From their experience we hope that the model can be improved so that we can speed the evaluation of new drugs for tuberculosis (5, 6).

Stephen H. Gillespie, Roly D. Gosling and Bambos M. Charalambous

University College London, Royal Free Campus London, United Kingdom

REFERENCES

  1. Gillespie SH, Gosling RD, Charalambous BM. A reiterative method for calculating the early bactericidal activity of antituberculosis drugs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002:166:31–35.
  2. Motulsky H. Simple linear regression: intuitive biostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995. p. 167–180.
  3. Kennedy N, Fox R, Kisyombe GM, Saruni AO, Uiso LO, Ramsay AR, Ngowi FI, Gillespie SH. Early bactericidal and sterilizing activities of ciprofloxacin in pulmonary tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;148:1547–1551.[Medline]
  4. Sirgel F, Venter A, Mitchison D. Sources of variation in studies of the early bactericidal activity of antituberculosis drugs. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001;47:177–182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. O'Brien RJ. Studies of the early bactericidal activity of new drugs for tuberculosis: a help or a hindrance to antituberculosis drug development? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:3–4.[Free Full Text]
  6. Pablos-Mendez A. Working alliance for TB drug development, Cape Town, South Africa, February 8th, 2000. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2000;4:489–490.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
G. R. Davies, S. H. Khoo, and L. J. Aarons
Optimal sampling strategies for early pharmacodynamic measures in tuberculosis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 594 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doré, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Charalambous, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doré, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Charalambous, B. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2003 American Thoracic Society