help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spradling, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spradling, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 167. pp. 473-474, (2003)
© 2003 American Thoracic Society


Correspondence

Limited transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

To the Editor:

We were impressed with Nitta and colleagues' report on the limited transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in Los Angeles County (LAC), and we applaud the aggressive surveillance and case management activities of their MDR-TB unit (1). We also read with interest the editorial by Daley, who offers valuable insight into alternative explanations for the findings of the study (2).

The question of whether drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli are less likely than drug-susceptible strains to produce infection and disease has persisted for decades. Reports have demonstrated that transmission of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis occurs even among immunocompetent persons (3, 4). Another report found no lower risk of infection among contacts of isoniazid- and streptomycin-resistant tuberculosis (TB) cases than among contacts of drug-susceptible cases (5). The recent report implies that persons with MDRTB may less readily transmit M. tuberculosis, as evidenced in part by the low proportion of tuberculin skin test (TST) conversions among contacts. The ability to detect conversions in the population tested, however, must be considered.

Using TST conversion to detect recent transmission of M. tuberculosis in persons from areas in which TB (and Bacille Calmette-Guérin) is endemic is problematic. The significance of a positive TST in an MDR-TB contact who did not meet the authors' criteria for conversion is unclear. The reaction may either represent remote infection with drug-susceptible M. tuberculosis or more recent infection with MDR bacilli. Given that most of the MDR-TB cases had been previously (and ineffectively) treated, many of these cases could have infected contacts over an extended period of time. Again, such contacts would not meet the criteria for conversion. In this context, the rate of TST conversions among contacts of MDR-TB cases would underestimate the actual degree of transmission.

Although the number of MDR-TB cases in the United States continues to decline, the proportion of foreign-born persons with MDR-TB continues to increase (6). Accordingly, it is imperative that TB control programs continue aggressive efforts to eliminate MDR-TB, such as those successfully used in Los Angeles County.

Philip Spradling and Renee Ridzon

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia

REFERENCES

  1. Nitta AT, Knowles LS, Kim J, Lehnkering EL, Borenstein LA, Davidson PT, Harvey SM, de Koning ML. Limited transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis despite a high proportion of infectious cases in Los Angeles County, California. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165: 812–817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Daley C. Transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: limited by man or nature? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:742–743.[Free Full Text]
  3. Kenyon T, Ridzon R, Luskin-Hawk R, Schultz C, Paul W, Valway S, Onorato I, Castro K. A nosocomial outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:32–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ridzon R, Kent J, Valway S, Weismuller P, Maxwell R, Elcock M, Meador J, Royce S, Shefer A, Smith P, Woodley C, Onorato I. Outbreak of drug-resistant tuberculosis with second generation transmission in a high school in California. J Pediatr 1997;131:863–868.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Snider D, Kelly G, Cauthen G, Thompson N, Kilburn J. Infection and disease among contacts of tuberculosis cases with drug-resistant and drug-susceptible bacilli. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985;132:125–132.[Medline]
  6. CDC. Reported tuberculosis in the United States, 2000. Available at www.cdc.gov/nchstp/tb/surv/surv2001/default.htm

 

From the Authors:

We thank Drs. Spradling and Ridzon for their thoughtful comments, and concur that multiple studies have documented the transmissibility of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Shortly after we submitted our study (1) for publication, researchers in Milan, Italy published results of a 2-year, population-based study in which all strains were typed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (2); multidrug resistance was one of several factors with statistical significance associated with clustering. This study adds to the body of evidence that indicates the phenomenon of drug resistance does not prevent the spread of TB in susceptible populations.

Although our findings suggested limited transmission of multidrug-resistant TB in Los Angeles County, California, we acknowledge the limitations of currently available investigative tools such as the TST. We carefully selected cut points for TST interpretation in an effort to discriminate between true conversions and booster effects due to bacillus Calmette-Guérin or atypical mycobacteria. Nevertheless, the TST remains an imperfect tool that cannot differentiate between current and distant infection, nor can it detect differences between the drug resistance patterns of infecting strains of M. tuberculosis. Better diagnostic and analytical tools for TB are sorely needed, and would greatly add to our current understanding of the epidemiology of TB.

Annette T. Nitta and Jaimin Kim

Los Angeles County Department of Health Services Los Angeles, California

REFERENCES

  1. Nitta AT, Knowles LS, Kim J, Lehnkering EL, Borenstein LA, Davidson PT, Harvey SM, de Koning ML. Limited transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis despite a high proportion of infectious cases in Los Angeles County, California. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165: 812–817.
  2. Moro ML, Salamina G, Gori A, Penati V, Sacchetti R, Mezzetti F, Infuso A, Sodano L. Two-year population-based molecular epidemiological study of tuberculosis transmission in the metropolitan area of Milan, Italy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;21:114–122.[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spradling, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spradling, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2003 American Thoracic Society