help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weisman, I. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ross, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weisman, I. M.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 167. pp. 1451, (2003)
© 2003 American Thoracic Society


Correspondence

ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing

To the Editor:

The recent ATS/ACCP Statement on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) (1) discusses when arterial blood gas analysis might be required and points out the need for further decision analysis for invasive versus noninvasive CPET. I would like to comment on this issue.

The cardiopulmonary and metabolic adaptations to a required oxygen uptake can be described mathematically by two equations (2):

(1)

(2)

Where: O2 represents oxygen uptake (ml/minute), E represents minute ventilation (L, BTPS), VD/VT represents dead space/tidal volume ratio, PaCO2 represents partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (mm Hg), R represents respiratory exchange ratio, represents cardiac output (L/minute), S/t represents physiological shunt, CO2 represents mixed venous oxygen content (ml/L), and Cc'O2 represents oxygen content in the end pulmonary capillary blood exposed to alveolar PO2 (PAO2) (ml/L).

Noninvasive CPET measures O2, E, and R. S/t is approximated from oximetry.

As can be seen in Equation 1, which is also discussed in the article, without measuring PaCO2, values for PaCO2 and VD/VT must be assumed in the interpretation of the ventilatory response to exercise. As is pointed out, this assumption is tenuous in persons with significant cardiopulmonary disease.

A review of Equation 2 indicates that only O2 is actually measured in a noninvasive CPET. Although the cardiac output is generally assumed to be normal, various physiological abnormalities may cause it to be significantly elevated. To illustrate: under normal physiological conditions at a O2 of 1500 ml/minute, would be about 13 L/minute [1500 = (1–0.1)(1–70/200) 200]. However, if for example, CO2 were 120 ml/L due to less peripheral oxygen extraction, S/t were 0.25 due to pulmonary gas exchange abnormalities, and Cc'O2 were 180 ml/L due to anemia or alveolar hypoventilation leading to a reduced PaO2, then = 33 L/minute [1500 = (1–.25)(1–120/180) 180]. A noninvasive CPET would not be able to ascertain all these abnormalities and would be unable to determine why the heart rate response to oxygen uptake was high. It might erroneously be attributed to a low stroke volume when it was due to other factors leading to a larger than expected cardiac output for that level of oxygen uptake.

In summary, in seriously ill patients, when detailed cardiopulmonary and metabolic information is required, noninvasive assessment may not be enough. It may be necessary to measure both arterial blood gasses and cardiac output or mixed venous oxygen content.

Robert M. Ross

Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Texas

REFERENCES

  1. American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians. ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:211–277.[Free Full Text]
  2. Ross RM. Interpreting exercise tests. Houston: CSI Software; 1989.

 

From the Authors:

We appreciate Dr. Ross's comments on the ATS/ACCP Statement on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) (1). Specifically, Dr. Ross highlights an example where noninvasive CPET may not adequately or completely distinguish physiological abnormalities. Two mass balance equations are used to identify cardiac and pulmonary factors that may impact noninvasive measurement of oxygen consumption (O2). In Dr. Ross's example, the patient has a high cardiac output related to a reduction in peripheral muscle O2 extraction, and low oxygen carrying capacity (due to anemia?) with an apparent normal/near normal O2. The work rate, which may be helpful, is unreported. However, we feel that his example contains some unrealistic assumptions. The assumed cardiac output of 33 L/minute would be unusual for a patient. This leads to an exaggerated contrast. We question Dr. Ross's statement that shunt fraction can be approximated from pulse oximetry (Section III.1.8 of ATS/ACCP Statement). As gas exchange abnormalities were apparent (due to O2 desaturation) in the example he poses, arterial blood gases (ABGs) would be appropriate. Inspection of other noninvasive resting and CPET variables not mentioned by Dr. Ross might assist in the differential diagnosis of the subject's exercise intolerance.

Dr. Ross correctly states that noninvasive CPET provides limited information on the quantitation of cardiac output and O2 extraction. Noninvasive CPET would, however, suggest possible sources of abnormalities. The cardiovascular support necessary to achieve a given O2 involves heart rate, stroke volume, arterial O2 content, and % extraction of O2 from muscle. It is not possible from heart rate alone to distinguish which one or more of these elements may be altered. Important information for evaluation would be work rate; using Dr. Ross's numbers, a O2 of 1500 mL/minute would be typical for a work rate {cong} 100 watts in normals. Therefore, if these data were collected at 150 watts, a clear problem in O2 delivery would be indicated, specifically suggesting inadequate cardiovascular response. Finally, anemia would be known by measuring hemoglobin before exercise testing.

In summary, we agree with Dr. Ross that noninvasive CPET may sometimes be inadequate and that more invasive testing is often helpful/necessary in selected cases. This is clearly noted within the ATS/ACCP Statement and is explicitly recommended when certain patterns of response emerge from noninvasive tests (Sections III.2, VIII.7.2, IV.5.1). Important considerations include: clinical setting, reasons for CPET, available resources, and health care provider judgment. We believe that additional studies are required for optimal decision analysis (Section IX.3).

Kenneth C. Becka, Richard Casaburib, Bruce D. Johnsonc, Darcy D. Marciniukd, Peter D. Wagnere and Idelle M. Weismanf

a University of Iowa Medical Center Iowa City, Iowa
b Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance, California
c Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota
d Royal University Hospital Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
e University of California Medical Center at San Diego San Diego, California
f William Beaumont Army Medical Center El Paso, Texas

REFERENCES

  1. American Thoracic Society. American College of Chest Physicians. ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:211–277.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
E. Diamond
Developing a Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Laboratory
Chest, December 1, 2007; 132(6): 2000 - 2007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weisman, I. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ross, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weisman, I. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2003 American Thoracic Society