help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fukunaga, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ishihara, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fukunaga, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ishihara, T.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 166. pp. 994-997, (2002)
© 2002 American Thoracic Society


Original Articles

Sensitivity of Acid-Fast Staining for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Formalin-fixed Tissue

Hajime Fukunaga, Tomoyuki Murakami, Toshikazu Gondo, Kazuo Sugi and Tokuhiro Ishihara

First Department of Pathology, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine; and Department of Clinical Research, National Sanyo Hospital, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Hajime Fukunaga, 1-1-1 Minamikogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan. E-mail: fukunaga{at}sanyou.hosp.go.jp


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Microscopic examination of tissue sections of mycobacterial lesions frequently results in few or no bacilli seen, even if the lesions appear active histologically. This might be due to the effects of the fixative fluid and/or organic solvent, both of which are conventionally used to make tissue sections for histopathology, on the acid-fast staining of bacteria. The present study was performed to examine how formalin and xylene lower the sensitivity of acid-fast staining for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and to clarify the meaning of the staining result in tissue sections. Microscopic observation of mycobacteria smeared on glass slides revealed that both of these agents greatly reduced the sensitivity of acid-fast staining. Moreover, the number of bacilli was calculated in 30 samples of paraffin-embedded granulomatous lesions using acid-fast microscopy and real-time polymerase chain reaction. The numbers of bacilli present that were estimated by real-time polymerase chain reaction were considerably higher than those counted with a microscope. These results suggest that the bacilli are frequently missed or underestimated with acid-fast microscopy on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.

Key Words: formalin • xylene • real-time polymerase chain reaction


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Despite longstanding intense efforts to conquer tuberculosis, this disease remains an expanding global health crisis with 1.86 billion infected people. To overcome tuberculosis, new diagnostic or therapeutic methods based on molecular biology are now being developed. Some are currently in clinical use; e.g., polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for identifying genes related to mycobacterial species or drug-resistant strains (13).

On the other hand, classic laboratory tests, such as sputum smears, bacterial cultures, and histopathologic examination, still play a central role in the screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of this disease. For the time being, these remain the most widely used tests because they offer certain advantages. For example, the microscopic observation of tissue sections permits the distinction between granulomatous lesions and other clinically or radiographically similar lesions including cancers as well as the evaluation of the histologic type and stage of the tubercle lesions.

However, some pathologists have become aware that the number of bacilli in tissue sections stained with acid-fast staining (acid-fast staining histopathology [ASH]) frequently seems to be much lower than that expected from the sputum smear data or the patient's condition. We also have believed that ASH has low sensitivity; therefore, we have re-evaluated its sensitivity. We postulated that the low detectability of ASH is due to formalin and/or xylene, which are used to make preparations of tissue sections but not of smears. All mycobacteria have a lipid-rich cell wall that avidly retains carbolfuchsin, rhodamine, or auramine dye even in the presence of acidic alcohol. Formalin and/or xylene might alter this property of the bacilli.

The present study was performed to examine how formalin and xylene lower the sensitivity of acid-fast staining for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and to clarify the meaning of the staining result in tissue sections.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Preparation of Cell Smear and Acid-Fast Staining
M. tuberculosis H37RV grown in a liquid medium (MYCO-broth; Kyokuto Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan) were fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin overnight. The bacillary density was adjusted to 108 CFU/ml, and the suspension was divided among 24 tubes by twofold serial dilution. Then, 250 µl from each tube was transferred into separate microtubes and centrifuged (6,000 x g, 15 minutes). After removing the supernatant, the cell pellets were dried, and each pellet was resuspended in xylene and incubated for 4 hours at 35°C. After centrifugation, the cell pellets were dried and resuspended in 250 µl of the medium. For the untreated control cells, twofold serial dilutions were used and the cells were resuspended in the medium to the same cell densities.

Ten microliters from each tube was dropped onto a nonfluorescent and poly-L-lysine coated glass slide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The smears were stained by Ziehl–Neelsen staining (TB-color; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) or rhodamine–auramine staining (TB Fluorescent Stain Kit; BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and were observed under a conventional light microscope or a fluorescent microscope with Nomarski optics, respectively. The sensitivity of acid-fast staining was evaluated as the percent of positive bacilli among the estimated number of total bacilli (calculated from the higher dilutions where the number of positive bacilli was small enough to be counted visually [< 200 cells/slide]). In the lower dilution series, where the number of positive bacilli was too large to count, the number of positive bacilli was expressed as +++, ++, or + (+++, heavy overlapping of bacilli that were spread all over the slide; ++, bacilli were densely spread all over the slide without heavy overlapping; +, spotty or sparse distribution of bacilli on the slide).

Real-Time PCR and ASH for Tissue Sections
Four micron–thick sections were made from 10% formalin–fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues obtained from the pulmonary or hematopoietic lesions of 30 patients with tuberculosis. A pathologist confirmed that every section included a granuloma and caseous necrosis. The number of bacilli was counted on each Ziehl–Neelsen–stained section using a conventional light microscope.

For DNA extraction, the paraffin was removed by soaking the slides in xylene. Then, the slides were transferred into Tris–EDTA buffer containing decreasing concentrations of ethanol. The tissue sections were scraped off the slides with a swab and were put into Tris–EDTA buffer with microfine glass beads in microtubes. The samples were then sonicated with an ultrasound lyser (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL).

Two types of primers for Mycobacterium genus as well as two types of fluorescence-labeled M. tuberculosis–specific probes that specifically hybridized with the amplified products were designed. The sonicated sample, the primers, the probes, and hybridization buffer (LightCycler DNA Master Hybridization Probes; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) were mixed and were subjected to 60 cycles of amplification with a LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics). Total amount of M. tuberculosis DNA was calculated using the LightCycler software. The number of bacteria per tissue section was estimated by dividing the amount of DNA by the amount of DNA that was calculated to be present in a single cell (0.04 pg). Additional details on the method are provided in the online data supplement.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Influence of Formalin and Xylene on Acid-Fast Staining
Microscopic observation of the smears revealed that the sensitivity of both types of acid-fast stains (Ziehl–Neelsen and rhodamine–auramine staining) for M. tuberculosis decreased drastically with formalin treatment or with the combined treatment of formalin and xylene (Figure 1 , Table 1) . As for the untreated bacilli, the rhodamine–auramine method stained all cells, whereas Ziehl–Neelsen staining stained only 21.8% of all cells. Among the formalin-treated samples, only 5.8% showed positive results with fluorescence staining, and 2.1% showed positive results with Ziehl–Neelsen staining. Moreover, for both formalin- and xylene-treated bacilli, the sensitivities fell to 0.5 and 0.2%, respectively.



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Influence of formalin and xylene on the stainability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the fluorescent acid-fast method (auramine–rhodamine stain). The left panels (A, C, E) are fluorescent images of acid-fast stain–positive bacilli, and the right panels (B, D, F) are differential interference contrast images through Nomarski optics, which visualizes all the bacilli on the glass slide. Each pair of the left and right panels (A and B, C and D, or E and F) shows the same visual field on the same glass slide (x600). The number of bacilli on the three slides is almost the same ({bsim} 2 x 103 cells on a slide). All the cells in the no-treatment group are positively stained (A and B). Formalin only treatment reduces the number of positive cells (C and D). Combined treatment with formalin and xylene causes few cells to be positive.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Fluorescent or ziehl–neelsen staining for acid-fast bacilli treated with or without formalin or formalin and xylene

 
Comparison between Real-Time PCR and ASH in Tissue Sections
Table 2 shows the results of real-time PCR and ASH on 30 tissue sections of tuberculosis lesions (male/female, 19/11; mean age, 63.7 years). Using PCR, M. tuberculosis DNA was detected in cases 1–25 (83% of total cases), whereas using ASH (Ziehl–Neelsen staining), bacilli were detected in cases 14–25 (40% of total cases). All the PCR-negative samples were also ASH-negative (cases 26–30). However, the ASH-negative sections (18 cases) included 13 PCR-positive cases (cases 1–13). The largest number of bacilli observed with ASH was 240 (case 25), whereas the smallest was 1 (cases 13 and 14). On the other hand, the largest number of bacilli estimated from the PCR data was 27,100 x 105 (case 21) and the smallest number was 332 (case 17) among the ASH-positive cases. No significant correlation between the numbers of bacilli estimated by ASH and by PCR was observed (r = 0.055). The case with the highest number of bacilli with ASH was different from the case with the highest number of bacilli with PCR.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Comparison of bacilli numbers per section measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction with those counted by microscopic detection of acid-fast–stained bacilli

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Searching for tubercle bacilli in tissue sections is laborious and time consuming because these bacilli are small and few. Most pathologists doubt the sensitivity of ASH especially when the number of bacilli observed in a tissue is low even when the lesion appears histologically active or many bacilli are present in the sputum. The reason for this low detectability by ASH has not been well studied.

One might think that the number of bacilli in such specimens is low and that ASH is reliable. Indeed, mycobacterial lesions are caused by type IV hypersensitivity; therefore, the extent of inflammation might not correlate well with the amount of bacterial antigen. However, this hypothesis cannot explain the large discrepancy between the sputum smear data and the ASH data in a given patient.

Some researchers have suspected that the organic solvents, which are used to make paraffin-embedded tissue samples, might affect the stainability of mycobacteria by acid-fast staining. This hypothesis seems reasonable because the molecular target of the acid-fast staining dyes (fuchsin, auramine, or rhodamine) is the mycolate on the bacterial surface (4, 5). Mycolate is soluble in organic agents (6) and might be more or less extracted from the cell surface into the liquid. Moreover, this hypothesis is indirectly supported by reports that the Fite method, which is an alternative acid-fast staining technique that uses less xylene in the staining and mounting process, has a higher sensitivity than Ziehl–Neelsen staining (7, 8). The present data clearly demonstrate that the combined use of formalin and xylene markedly reduces the sensitivity of acid-fast staining for mycobacteria, irrespective of the method used (TB-color or TB Fluorescent Stain Kit) (Figure 1, Table 1).

Interestingly, treatment with 10% formalin alone also lowered the sensitivity of bacilli to the staining (Table 1). This is the first report on the effect of formalin on acid-fast staining. Because formalin is a water solution of formaldehyde and is not a lipid-soluble agent, the mechanism for its reduction in the sensitivity of acid-fast staining remains unknown.

These data strongly suggest that the number of mycobacteria in tissue sections is significantly underestimated with conventional acid-fast staining (0.5% with the fluorescent method and 0.2% with Ziehl–Neelsen staining). Why a small fraction of the bacillary population retains its stainability after the treatment is not clear. There might be a large variation in the lipid content of the cell wall among cells.

The high sensitivity of real-time PCR in detecting pathogens is generally well known (919), but the difference in the sensitivity between PCR and ASH observed in this study seems quite large. The estimated number of bacilli from the real-time PCR data was 103 to 109 times larger than the number counted with microscopy among the ASH-positive samples (Table 2). One of the reasons is the effect of formalin and xylene in ASH as presented in the smear experiments. Another reason for the difference between real-time PCR and ASH is that PCR detects not only nuclear DNA in live bacilli but also DNA molecules isolated from killed bacilli and deposited in the stroma or in the phagocytic cells (20). This suggests that PCR may be too sensitive to distinguish between active and inactive or infectious or noninfectious states of the lesion (2134).

The present study definitely and quantitatively demonstrated the effect of formalin and xylene on the stainability of mycobacteria by acid-fast staining and the extremely low sensitivity of ASH. However, this result should not discourage pathologists from using ASH to evaluate mycobacterial lesions. On the contrary, such knowledge may help explain any discrepancy between ASH and sputum smear test results and encourage pathologists to state the possibility of the presence of bacilli in their reports. The real-time PCR technique may not to be superior to ASH in the evaluation of disease activity as described previously. On the basis of the insight into the mechanisms responsible for the decreased sensitivity of acid-fast staining, a novel staining method with higher sensitivity for tissue sections needs to be developed to evaluate the presence of bacilli more correctly.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Drs Takayuki Ezaki and Hiroyasu Takeyama for their general support of this research and Dr. Nagatoshi Fujiwara for his technical assistance. The authors also thankfully acknowledge Sadaki Endo and Kazumi Hori for managing this project as Chiefs of the Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Sanyo Hospital, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Supported by a grant from the Department of Clinical Research, National Sanyo Hospital.

This article has an online data supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents online at www.atsjournals.org

Received in original form November 13, 2001; accepted in final form July 2, 2002


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Tevere VJ, Hewitt PL, Dare A, Hocknell P, Keen A, Spadoro JP, Young KK. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by PCR amplification with pan-Mycobacterium primers and hybridization to an M. tuberculosis-specific probe. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:918–923.[Abstract]
  2. Long R. Transcontinental spread of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium bovis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:2014–2017.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hidaka E. Sensitive identification of mycobacterial species using PCR-RFLP on bronchial washings. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:930–934.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Harada K, Gidoh S, Tsutsumi S. Staining mycobacteria with carbolfuchsin: properties of solutions prepared with different samples of basic fuchsin. Microsc Acta 1976;78:21–27.[Medline]
  5. Cserni G. Auramine fluorescence for acid-fast bacilli in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;103:114.
  6. Minnikin DE, Minnikin SM, Parlett JH, Goodfellow M, Magnusson M. Mycolic acid patterns of some species of Mycobacterium. Arch Microbiol 1984;139:225–231.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Fite GL, Fite CW. Dye adsorption by mycobacteria. Int J Lepr 1965;33:324–341.[Medline]
  8. Cocito C. Biological, chemical, immunological and staining properties of bacteria isolated from tissues of leprosy patients. Eur J Epidemiol 1985;1:202–231.[Medline]
  9. Rantakokko-Jalava K, Jalava J. Development of conventional and real-time PCR assays for detection of Legionella DNA in respiratory specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:2904–2910.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Qi Y, Patra G, Liang X, Williams LE, Rose S, Redkar RJ, DelVecchio VG. Utilization of the rpoB gene as a specific chromosomal marker for real-time PCR detection of Bacillus anthracis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67:3720–3727.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Mygind T, Birkelund S, Falk E, Christiansen G. Evaluation of real-time quantitative PCR for identification and quantification of Chlamydia pneumoniae by comparison with immunohistochemistry. J Microbiol Methods 2001;46:241–251.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Hayden RT, Uhl JR, Qian X, Hopkins MK, Aubry MC, Limper AH, Lloyd RV, Cockerill FR. Direct detection of legionella species from bronchoalveolar lavage and open lung biopsy specimens: comparison of lightcycler pcr, in situ hybridization, direct fluorescence antigen detection, and culture. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:2618–2626.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Palladino S, Kay I, Fonte R, Flexman J. Use of real-time PCR and the LightCycler system for the rapid detection of Pneumocystis carinii in respiratory specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2001;39:233–236.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Kearns AM, Guiver M, James V, King J. Development and evaluation of a real-time quantitative PCR for the detection of human cytomegalovirus. J Virol Methods 2001;95:121–131.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Komurian-Pradel F, Paranhos-Baccala G, Sodoyer M, Chevallier P, Mandrand B, Lotteau V, Andre P. Quantitation of HCV RNA using real-time PCR and fluorimetry. J Virol Methods 2001;95:111–119.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Logan JM, Edwards KJ, Saunders NA, Stanley J. Rapid identification of Campylobacter spp. by melting peak analysis of biprobes in real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:2227–2232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Brechtbuehl K, Whalley SA, Dusheiko GM, Saunders NA. A rapid real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for hepatitis B virus. J Virol Methods 2001;93:105–113.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Torres MJ, Criado A, Palomares JC, Aznar J. Use of real-time PCR and fluorimetry for rapid detection of rifampin and isoniazid resistance-associated mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:3194–3199.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Espy MJ, Teo R, Ross TK, Svien KA, Wold AD, Uhl JR, Smith TF. Diagnosis of varicella-zoster virus infections in the clinical laboratory by LightCycler PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:3187–3189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Hernandez-Pando R. Persistence of DNA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in superficially normal lung tissue during latent infection. Lancet 2000;356:2133–2138.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Kwon KS, Oh CK, Jang HS, Lee CW, Jun ES. Detection of mycobacterial DNA in cervical granulomatous lymphadenopathy from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue by PCR. J Dermatol 2000;27:355–360.[Medline]
  22. Li JY, Lo ST, Ng CS. Molecular detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in tissues showing granulomatous inflammation without demonstrable acid-fast bacilli. Diagn Mol Pathol 2000;9:67–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Madhavan HN, Therese KL, Gunisha P, Jayanthi U, Biswas J. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in epiretinal membrane in Eales' disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:822–825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ikonomopoulos JA, Gorgoulis VG, Zacharatos PV, Manolis EN, Kanavaros P, Rassidakis A, Kittas C. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for the detection of mycobacterial DNA in cases of tuberculosis and sarcoidosis. Mod Pathol 1999;12:854–862.[Medline]
  25. Salian NV, Rish JA, Eisenach KD, Cave MD, Bates JH. Polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in histologic specimens. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1150–1155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Tarng DC, Su WJ, Huang TP. PCR diagnosis on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues with acid-fast stain and culture negativity in chronic dialysis patients of cervico-mediastinal tuberculous lymphadenitis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13:1543–1546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Marchetti G, Gori A, Catozzi L, Vago L, Nebuloni M, Rossi MC, Esposti AD, Bandera A, Franzetti F. Evaluation of PCR in detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues: comparison of four amplification assays. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:1512–1517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Riggio MP, Gibson J, Lennon A, Wray D, MacDonald DG. Search for Mycobacterium paratuberculosis DNA in orofacial granulomatosis and oral Crohn's disease tissue by polymerase chain reaction. Gut 1997;41:646–650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Hardman WJ, Benian GM, Howard T, McGowan JE Jr, Metchock B, Murtagh JJ. Rapid detection of mycobacteria in inflammatory necrotizing granulomas from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue by PCR in clinically high-risk patients with acid-fast stain and culture-negative tissue biopsies. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106:384–389.[Medline]
  30. Rish JA, Eisenach KD, Cave MD, Reddy MV, Gangadharam PR, Bates JH. Polymerase chain reaction detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in formalin-fixed tissue. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:1419–1423.[Abstract]
  31. Richter E, Schluter C, Duchrow M, Hahn M, Rusch-Gerdes S, Galle J, Flad HD, Gerdes J. An improved method for the species-specific assessment of mycobacteria in routinely formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. J Pathol 1995;175:85–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Popper HH, Winter E, Hofler G. DNA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in tuberculosis and sarcoidosis detected by polymerase chain reaction. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;101:738–741.[Medline]
  33. Ninet B. Detection of mycobacterial nucleic acids by polymerase chain reaction in fixed tissue specimens of patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Diagn Mol Pathol 1999; 8:145–151.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Rich EA. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-stimulated production of nitric oxide by human alveolar macrophages and relationship of nitric oxide production to growth inhibition of MTB. Tuber Lung Dis 1997;78:247–255.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S. Chakravorty, M. K. Sen, and J. S. Tyagi
Diagnosis of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis by Smear, Culture, and PCR Using Universal Sample Processing Technology
J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2005; 43(9): 4357 - 4362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
C. L. Fuller, J. L. Flynn, and T. A. Reinhart
In Situ Study of Abundant Expression of Proinflammatory Chemokines and Cytokines in Pulmonary Granulomas That Develop in Cynomolgus Macaques Experimentally Infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2003; 71(12): 7023 - 7034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Tuberculosis, Lung Infections, Interstitial Lung Disease, and Journalology in AJRCCM 2002
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2003; 167(3): 345 - 355.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fukunaga, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ishihara, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fukunaga, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ishihara, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2002 American Thoracic Society