© 2002 American Thoracic Society
Effects of Glutathione S-Transferase P1, M1, and T1 on Acute Respiratory Illness in School ChildrenDepartments of Preventive Medicine and Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Frank Gilliland, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1540 Alcazar Street, CHP 236, Los Angeles, CA 90033. E-mail: gillilan{at}hsc.usc.edu
The relationships between glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 genotypes and acute respiratory illness were investigated in a cohort of fourth grade school children aged 911 years who resided in 12 southern California communities. We used respiratory illnessrelated absences as a measure of respiratory illness occurrence. We ascertained respiratory illnessrelated school absences using an active surveillance system from January 1996 through June 1996. Genotypes for GSTM1 (null versus present), GSTT1 (null versus present), and GSTP1 (Ile105Val) were determined using genomic DNA from buccal cell specimens. The effects of GST genotypes on respiratory illness were assessed using stratified absence incidence rates and Poisson regression models. GSTP1 genotype was associated with risk for respiratory illness severe enough to result in a school absence. Children who were homozygous for the Val105 variant allele had lower incidence rates of upper and lower respiratory illnesses than did children who were homozygous for the Val105 allele. Children inheriting at least one Val105 allele were protected from respiratory illnesses (relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.650.99). GSTM1 and T1 genotypes were not associated with respiratory illness. We conclude that GSTP1 genotype influences the risk or severity of respiratory infections in school-aged children.
Key Words: GSTM1 GSTT1 GSTP1 respiratory illnesses school absenteeism
Acute respiratory illnesses are an important cause of childhood morbidity (1, 2). Although the etiology of acute respiratory illnesses has been extensively documented, few studies have investigated the role of genetics on acute respiratory illness occurrence during childhood (24). A better understanding of the genetic determinants may allow the establishment of environmental factors in the etiology and provide new directions for therapy and prevention of these common conditions. One approach to identifying genetic factors for respiratory illness occurrence involves candidate gene association studies. In the candidate gene approach, pathways involved in illness pathogenesis are defined and genes with functional polymorphic variants that operate in the pathways are identified (5). With regard to acute respiratory illnesses among school-aged children, viral infections are responsible for the majority of acute respiratory illnesses and exacerbations of chronic illnesses such as asthma, and genes involved in the pathobiology of viral infections may modulate the frequency and severity of respiratory illnesses (2, 69). Evolving evidence supports an important pathophysiologic role for oxidative stress in viral infections and pulmonary immune responses (10, 11). A number of pathways are involved in protection and repair of damage from excessive oxidative stress, including enzymatic antioxidants and hydroperoxide detoxification enzymes (5, 1214). Several members of the glutathione S-transferase (GST) superfamily, notably GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1, are expressed in the respiratory tract and function as enzymatic antioxidants and hydroperoxidases (1416). Each gene has a common functional variant (GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null, and GSTP1 A105G or Ile105Val), supporting the hypothesis that GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 are candidate genes for acute respiratory illness. The Children's Health Study (CHS) offers an opportunity to investigate the associations of GST genotypes with respiratory illness (17, 18). The CHS is a cohort study that includes approximately 6,000 school children residing in 12 communities within a 200-mile radius of Los Angeles. We conducted a substudy within the CHS cohort and collected incidences of respiratory illnessrelated absences ascertained by an active surveillance system to investigate acute respiratory illness occurrence. We sought to determine whether associations exist between GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 genotypes with respiratory illnessrelated absences for a cohort of fourth grade school children aged 911 years who attended schools in the 12 CHS study communities during January 1996 through June 1996 (19).
Details on the design, site selection, subject recruitment, and assessment of health effects for the CHS cohort have been reported previously (17, 19). In this report, we focus on respiratory illnesses that led to school absences among 1,932 children in fourth grade who participated in a substudy of the CHS, the Air Pollution and Absence Study, during the first 6 months of 1996. The study protocols were approved by the University of Southern California's Institutional Review Board for human studies, and informed written consent was obtained from the children's parents.
Participant Characteristics
Respiratory Illness Surveillance We established an active surveillance system using telephone interviews to collect information about the reasons for absences, and we categorized absences as illness-related and nonillness-related (including injuries) and classified illness-related absences into gastrointestinal (GI) and respiratory categories. To ensure adequate parental recall of events associated with the absence of interest, interviews were conducted only for absences that were reported within 4 weeks of occurrence. Parents were contacted after each absence that was reported within 4 weeks to inquire whether the absence was illness-related and if so, what the symptoms were. Each illness-related absence was classified as respiratory or nonrespiratory, on the basis of the reported symptoms. A respiratory illness was defined as an illness that included one or more of the following symptoms: runny nose/sneezing, sore throat, cough (anywet or dry), earache, wheezing, or asthma attack. Respiratory absences were further classified into nonmutually exclusive categories of upper respiratory illness and/or one of two types of lower respiratory illness: lower respiratory illness with wet cough and that with wet cough/wheeze/asthma. An upper respiratory illness was defined as a respiratory illness with one or more of the following symptoms: runny nose/sneezing, sore throat, and earache. GI-related illnesses included illnesses that had "stomach problems" such as vomiting and diarrhea as one of the reported symptoms. On the basis of data collected by the active surveillance system, absences were divided into three mutually exclusive outcomes: nonillness-related absences, illness-related absences, and absences of unknown type (due to failure to obtain necessary classification information). Because some absences were of unknown type, the type-specific absence incidence rates were adjusted for ascertainment failure. To adjust the type-specific incident absence rates, a smoothed daily community-specific information success ratio was calculated, which was defined as the daily proportion of timely absence reports in each community for which sufficient information was obtained to identify the absence as illness or nonillness-related. A symptom-specific incidence rate corrected for ascertainment is of the form (number of incident cases)/(number at risk x smoothed success ratio).
Laboratory Methods
Statistical Analysis Poisson regression models that accounted for overdispersion were used to estimate associations between GST genotypes and respiratory illnessrelated school absences adjusted for potential confounding covariates (20) (additional detail is provided in the online data supplement). Models were fitted to estimate the relative risk of absences associated with each locus using codominant, dominant, recessive, and additive genetic models for the variant alleles. Additive genetic models were assessed using significance of linear terms for the number of variant alleles at each locus. We compared the goodness of model fit values to determine which nested model best described the data by testing differences in model deviances. Model Akaike's Information Criterion was used to compare fits of models that were not nested. On the basis of the study design and a priori consideration of potential confounders, all models included terms for age, sex, ethnicity, and community. If estimates of the genetic effects changed by 10% or more when a covariate was included in the base model, the covariate was included in the final model. Modification of the effects of genotypes by environmental tobacco smoke or asthma status was assessed using nested models and a likelihood ratio test. All analyses were conducted using the GENMOD procedure in the SAS software (21).
Of the 2,081 fourth grade participants, 1,183 (57.2%) provided buccal cells for genotyping assays. The primary reasons for nonparticipation were declines of our invitation to participate in the genotyping study (10.0%) and failure to locate or collect specimens from children who moved or graduated (32.8%). Most participants were 9 years old and reported that they were non-Hispanic or were of Hispanic white ethnicity (Table 1) . Histories of wheezing (33.1%) and asthma (15.6%) were common among participants. At study entry, more than 16.6% of the children were exposed to household smokers. Participants with genotyping were generally similar to those without genotyping; however, more non-Hispanic whites were included in the group with genotyping (60%) than in the group without genotyping (50%). The null genotype for GSTM1 and GSTT1 was present in 43.0% and 22.1% of participants, respectively. The frequency of the homozygous GSTP1 Val105 variant was 13.7%. The allele frequencies are consistent with those reported in other studies (22).
The children had a median of two incident school absences over the 6-month study period, the number ranging from zero (18.2%) to 14. Forty-two percent reported that they had at least one illness-related absence during the study period, and 29% had at least one respiratory illnessrelated absence. Incidence rates for types of absences varied by ethnicity, educational attainment of a parent or guardian, history of asthma and wheezing, and environmental tobacco smoke exposure (Table 2) . Incidence rates for respiratory illnessrelated absence (0.98/100 children-days) were relatively low but accounted for approximately two-thirds of illnesses resulting in school absences. GI illness accounted for almost all the remaining illness-related absences. Respiratory illness rates varied among children with different GSTP1 codon 105 genotypes. The homozygous GSTP1 variant (Val105) genotype was associated with an approximately 40% decrease in respiratory illness rates, compared with either the homozygous Val105 genotype or heterozygous Val105 genotype (Table 3) . There were no large differences in rates between GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes; however, children with the GSTM1 null genotype had slightly higher rates of respiratory illness than did those with the GSTM1 present genotype. Rates for GI illnesses did not vary substantially within any of the genotypes.
The GSTP1 Val105 variant was protective against acute respiratory illnesses, as manifested by school absences (Table 4) . After adjustment for the 12 communities, ethnicity, sex, and age, children who were homozygous for the GSTP1 Val105 variant allele had significantly lower risk for respiratory illness-related absences than did subjects homozygous for the common Val105 allele. Both the recessive and the additive models for the protective effect of the Val105 variant allele fit the data significantly better that did the codominant model. Based on the Akaike's Information Criterion, the additive model for the number of Val105 variant alleles provided the best model fit. Adjustment for additional covariates including environmental tobacco smoke exposure, asthma, and wheezing did not substantially change the association between GSTP1 genotype and respiratory illnessrelated absences. There was little evidence that environmental tobacco smoke exposure or asthma status modified the protective effects of the GSTP1 Val105 variant allele. GSTM1 and GSTT1 were not significantly associated with acute respiratory illness risk. The effects of the GSTP1 Val105 variant allele remained a significant protective factor in models that included all three genes, and we found no statistically significant genegene interactions among the three loci.
The relationship between genetics and acute respiratory illness has received little research attention. We focused our investigation on three related candidate genes with functional polymorphisms (GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1). Each of the candidate genes is involved in oxidative stress response pathways that are important in the pathobiology of viral respiratory infections, which are the most common cause of respiratory illnesses among children (10, 11, 23). We found that fourth grade children who inherited GSTP1 Val105 variant alleles had a 40% lower risk for respiratory illnesses severe enough to result in a school absence than did children who had a GSTP1 Val105 allele. The protective effect increased as the number of Val105 variant alleles increased and was not explained by the effects of environmental tobacco smoke exposure or asthma status. Because the Val105 allele is a common polymorphism and respiratory illnesses are frequent events, our findings may have important clinical and public health implications that warrant further investigation.
The mechanism for the protective effects of GSTP1 on respiratory illnesses may involve pathways that affect the amount of and responses to oxidative stress (5, 12, 14). GSTs contribute to protection against oxidative stress by using glutathione to detoxify a variety of electrophilic compounds, including oxidized lipid, DNA, and catechol products generated by reactive oxygen speciesinduced damage to intracellular molecules (12, 14). Because GSTP1 is strongly expressed in the respiratory epithelium and is the dominant GST in the lung, variation in GSTP1 function may have larger effects on respiratory health outcomes than do other members of the GST superfamily. The Val105 allele of GSTP1, which causes a substitution of valine for isoleucine in the catalytic domain of the enzyme product, changes the kinetics of the enzyme in a complex manner. The Val105 allele is threefold less active in conjugating 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene; however, it is sevenfold more active in metabolizing some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons but is less active for others (2426). Polymorphic alleles in GSTP1 may contribute to variation in pulmonary response to oxidative stress. The protective role of GSTP1 in removing reactive oxygen species and their secondary products may be related to the risk of respiratory infection because oxidative stress plays a central role in the pathophysiology of acute respiratory infections (10, 11, 23). Viral infection of the respiratory epithelium produces oxidative stress that mediates the production of inflammatory cytokines including interleukin-8, tumor necrosis factor- The effects of GSTP1 on respiratory illnesses may also involve exposure to ambient air pollution (5). We have reported that daily variations in O3 as well as chronic exposure to environmental tobacco smoke were directly associated with respiratory illnessrelated school absenteeism, indicating that O3 and environmental tobacco smoke increase the risk or severity of respiratory infections (19). The increased risk of respiratory infections from exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and ambient air pollution may be mediated by oxidative stress. Oxidants in environmental tobacco smoke and ambient air pollution produce oxidative stress in respiratory epithelial cells and macrophages that are likely to increase the risk of infection. Macrophage function is adversely affected, reducing the ability to inactivate viruses. The oxidative stress from air pollution may add to the elevated levels of oxidative stress from viral infections to increase the severity of illness. Individuals with GSTP1 Val105 alleles may be better equipped to defend against the adverse effect of excess oxidative stress. Taken together, the pathophysiology indicates that individuals who have GSTP1 Val105 alleles may be at lower risk for respiratory infections, symptomatic respiratory illnesses, and school absences. Our active surveillance system for acute respiratory illnesses had some limitations. We used the incidence of respiratory illnessrelated absences as our measure of acute respiratory disease occurrence. We did not test for viral infections and therefore could not distinguish infections from exacerbations of asthma; however, exacerbations of asthma are primarily induced by viral infections. Clearly, some mild respiratory illnesses were not ascertained because mild illnesses may not lead to an absence event. We cannot exclude the possibility that the GSTP1 genotype is associated with increased acute respiratory illness severity but does not influence the incidence of illnesses. However, illnesses of greater severity may be of greater clinical and public health importance. To reduce recall bias, we restricted interviews to absences that occurred within 4 weeks of ascertainment. We do not have data to assess how successful we were in minimizing errors in recall. To aid in recall, we asked parents about a list of symptoms, diagnoses, and treatments for each absence and then used the reported symptoms to assign illness type categories. Some errors in recall are likely to occur but are unlikely to be differential by genotype, suggesting that any misclassification is likely to be nondifferential and reduce the effect toward the null. Therefore, our effect estimates may be low. The restriction of absences to those reported within 1 month of occurrence may have resulted in incomplete ascertainment of the type of absence that may have introduced bias into our study. We believed it was necessary to adopt this restriction to minimize any recall bias of absence events by parents. On the basis of the distributions of the study population in the full and restricted samples of absence days, we found little evidence of any selection bias from the restriction (19). To account for the effects of incomplete ascertainment, the denominator of the rates and the offset in the Poisson models were adjusted for the proportion of absences with information on absence type. We did not have genotyping data from all subjects, making selection bias possible; however, we found no substantial differences in the characteristics of those with genotypes compared with those without genotypes, indicating that any bias from selection by availability of DNA is likely to be small. We conclude that fourth grade school children who inherited a GSTP1 Val105 variant allele have a decreased risk of respiratory illnessrelated school absence, indicating that GSTP1 genotype influences the risk and/or severity of acute respiratory infections in school-aged children. Our findings demonstrate that genes involved in oxidative stress response pathways may be determinants of acute respiratory illness occurrence in children. The protective Val105 allele may have clinical and public health importance for therapeutic and prevention research because the variant is common in many populations and acute respiratory illnesses are frequent causes of morbidity. Further investigation of the relationship between GSTP1 genotype and risk of respiratory illness is warranted.
This study was supported by the California Air Resources Board (Contract A033-186), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Grants 1 P50 ES09581 and 2 P30 ES07048), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Grant R82670801), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (Grant 5R01 HL61768), and the Hastings Foundation.
DISCLAIMER: The statements and conclusions in this report are those of the investigators and not necessarily those of the California Air Resources Board, the Environmental Protection Agency, or the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. The mention of commercial products, their source, or their use in connection with material reported herein is not to be construed as either an actual or implied endorsement of such products. This article has an online data supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents online at www.atsjournals.org Received in original form November 19, 2001; accepted in final form April 25, 2002
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||