help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cardell, L. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cardell, L. O.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 166. pp. 131-132, (2002)
© 2002 American Thoracic Society


Editorial

The Paranasal Sinuses and a Unique Role in Airway Nitric Oxide Production?

Lars Olaf Cardell, M.D., PH.D.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Malmö University Hospital Malmö, Sweden

Enzymes responsible for nitric oxide (NO) production have been demonstrated both in the nose and in the paranasal sinuses. In the sinuses, NO levels have been reported to be several-fold higher than in the nose. This has led to the suggestion that the paranasal sinuses are the main site for NO production within the airways (1). Until the report by Weitzberg and Lundberg (2) in the current issue of AJRCCM (pp. 144–145), there have been no attempts to investigate if NO found in the paranasal sinuses could enter the nasal cavity and perhaps spread further down in the lower airways. Since the first report by Lundberg and colleagues in Nature Medicine (1), there have been few papers published in the area. So far, only 15 subjects have been studied using intrasinusal NO measurements (1, 3, 4). In a report by Haight and colleagues, nearly 90% of nasal NO in the one subject investigated, the principal author himself, was derived from the nose; they found that high NO levels could develop in the nasal cavity during a period of stagnation even if the ostia connecting the nasal cavity with the sinuses were occluded (4). These data challenged the viewpoint of Lundberg and coworkers that the sinuses are the main source of NO in the upper respiratory tract (1, 3). The report presented in this issue further supports the original idea by demonstrating that humming caused a more than tenfold increase in NO levels in the nasal cavity. The authors state that this form of continuous phonation causes the air to oscillate, which in turn increases the exchange of air between the sinuses and nasal cavity (2). Although the extent of such gas exchange in humans is largely unexplored, it is known that the oscillation of air occurring normally within the respiratory cycle facilitates the exchange of gases between the sinuses and the nasal cavity (5); this observation supports the presently introduced theory.

The proposed role for the sinuses as mere reservoirs for NO as put forward by Haight (4) requires further discussion and analysis. In a recent set of experiments, we found that continuous measurements of NO in air sample from the cannulated maxillary sinuses always displayed a high initial peak before returning to a much lower steady state level (6). The finding of a very high concentration of NO in air trapped in the human maxillary sinus and a much lower steady state level in air sampled from the nose appears to fit somewhere between the contradictory reports of Lundberg and Haight (1, 4). The peak values are in line with the values reported in the Lundberg papers (1) and support the idea of a special role for the paranasal sinuses in the airway production of NO. However, they also emphasize the role of the sinuses as reservoirs enabling NO to reach extremely high levels. In the latter aspect, our data are in line with Haight (4) and stress the fact that the chamber construction of the sinuses is important for NO accumulation. This conclusion is also partly supported by data derived from nasal NO sampling after unilateral maxillectomy (7). Additional confirmation for a central role for the sinuses in NO production comes from studies demonstrating that during ostial occlusion, which might occur in acute sinusitis and severe nasal polyposis, nasal NO levels are reduced (8). Further support for this interpretation is provided in the finding of large differences between the nasal and sinus response to local administration of L-NAME, a well-characterized inhibitor of NO production (3). The special role of the paranasal sinuses in the airway production of NO is underscored by comparing the original work on NO presented in Nature Medicine and recent data derived from intrasinusal sampling of carbon monoxide (1, 9). As with NO, carbon monoxide is produced in both the upper and lower airways, but when sampling from the maxillary sinuses, the obtained levels of carbon monoxide do not differ from the levels sampled directly from the nose (9).

It is presently not known how the production of NO in the sinus is regulated. The finding of inducible nitric oxide synthase in the mucosa suggests an enzymatic component in this process. In the present issue of AJRCCM, Weitzberg and Lundberg propose that measuring NO during humming could function as an easy noninvasive method for evaluation of sinus ostial patency, and that such a test could aid in identifying subjects at risk of developing sinusitis (2). Their suggestion is based on the assumption that the ostium is a key factor in the pathogenesis of sinusitis. It is also intriguing to speculate that the ostium has a direct role in the regulation of intrasinusal NO production. During pathologic conditions, the sinus can be sealed off through an obstruction of the ostium. Similar to what happens in the sealed off middle ear, a negative pressure is then formed in the sinus through the resorption of gases into the mucosa (10). In parallel with lowering of the pressure, relative hypoxia develops inside the sinus cavity. Hypoxia is one of the most powerful inducers of NO production, and hypoxic induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase activity could therefore be one consequence of ostial occlusion. In support for this idea are recent data from pressure chamber experiments demonstrating that a decrease of sinus pressure, such as seen in upper airway allergy or infection, can cause an increase in NO production (11). If there is a way for the high amounts of NO present in the paranasal sinuses to enter the nasal cavity in large quantities, as suggested by Weitzberg and Lundberg (2), this could serve an important role in the nasal defense against invading microorganisms (12). There might also be, at least in theory, a pressure-hypoxia related mechanism enabling an increase in sinus production of NO when inflammatory or infectious diseases cause swelling of the adjacent mucosa and temporary ostial occlusion.

REFERENCES

  1. Lundberg JO, Farkas-Szallasi T, Weitzberg E, Rinder J, Lidholm J, Anggaard A, Hokfelt T, Lundberg JM, Alving K. High nitric oxide production in human paranasal sinuses. Nat Med 1995;1:370–373.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Weitzberg E, Lundberg JON. Humming greatly increases nasal nitric oxide. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:144–145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Lundberg JO, Rinder J, Weitzberg E, Lundberg JM, Alving K. Nasally exhaled nitric oxide in humans originates mainly in the paranasal sinuses. Acta Physiol Scand 1994;152:431–432.[Medline]
  4. Haight JS, Djupesland PG, Qjan W, Chatkin JM, Furlott H, Irish J, Witterick I, McClean P, Fenton RS, Hoffstein V, et al. Does nasal nitric oxide come from the sinuses? J Otolaryngol 1999;28:197–204.[Medline]
  5. Aust R, Falck B, Svanholm H. The intrinsic functions of the paranasal sinuses in health and inflammation. Rhinology 1984;22:105–107.[Medline]
  6. Andersson JA, Cervin A, Lindberg S, Uddman R, Cardell LO. The paranasal sinuses as reservoirs for nitric oxide. Acta Otolaryngol 2002; (in press).
  7. Qian W, Chatkin JM, Djupesland PG, McClean P, Zamel N, Irish JC, Haight JS. Unilateral nasal nitric oxide measurement after nasal surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:952–957.[Medline]
  8. Arnal JF, Flores P, Rami J, Murris-Espin M, Bremont F, Pasto I, Aguilla M, Serrano E, Didier A. Nasal nitric oxide concentration in paranasal sinus inflammatory diseases. Eur Respir J 1999;13:307–312.[Abstract]
  9. Andersson JA, Uddman R, Cardell LO. Carbon monoxide is endogenously produced in the human nose and paranasal sinuses. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;105:269–273.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Drettner B, Aust R. Pathophysiology of the paranasal sinuses. Acta Otolaryngol 1977;83:16–19.[Medline]
  11. Andersson JA, Cervin A, Lindberg S, Uddman R, Cardell LO. A decrease of maxillary sinus pressure, such as seen in upper airway allergy or infection, results in an increase of upper airway NO levels. Acta Otolaryngol 2002;(in press).
  12. Bogdan C. Of microbes, macrophages and nitric oxide. Behring Inst Mitt 1997;99:58–72.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Asthma, Airway Biology, and Nasal Disorders in AJRCCM 2002
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2003; 167(3): 319 - 332.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cardell, L. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cardell, L. O.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2002 American Thoracic Society