help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trapnell, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trapnell, B. C.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 166. pp. 129-130, (2002)
© 2002 American Thoracic Society


Editorial

Granulocyte Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor Augmentation Therapy in Sepsis

Is There a Role?

Bruce C. Trapnell, M.D.

Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati, Ohio

Sepsis is an infection-induced syndrome (1) characterized by a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (2) and a clinical outcome that can be self-limited or as severe as septic shock. The annual incidence and mortality of sepsis in the United States are estimated at 751,000 and 215,000, respectively, with an associated annual cost of approximately $16.7 billion (3). Antibiotics are necessary but not sufficient for treatment of severe sepsis because a number of large, well-designed trials have not shown improvement in mortality despite vast improvements in the antimicrobial armamentarium (4). However, such studies have dramatically expanded our knowledge of the pathophysiology of sepsis (5) and its therapeutically useful division into sequential stages: high risk of infection -> infection -> infection plus systemic inflammation -> septic shock (4). Cytokines, notably tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}), have been identified as important mediators of the systemic inflammatory response and can recapitulate the pathophysiologic events of sepsis in the experimental setting. Large, well-designed clinical trials, however, have not shown that antimediator therapy (e.g., anti–TNF-{alpha} antibody) reduces mortality in sepsis (6). An emerging concept in sepsis is that the hyperinflammatory phase is followed by a compensatory antiinflammatory response syndrome (CARS), resulting in an immunocompromised state wherein mononuclear cells throughout the body are refractory to further stimulation (e.g., by endotoxin) (7). This pathophysiologic state, also referred to as immune paralysis, has attracted substantial attention as a new therapeutic target in severe sepsis.

Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a hematologic growth factor now known to be required for alveolar macrophage function, lung host defense, and surfactant homeostasis (reviewed in [8]). GM-CSF deficiency in mice (generated by gene-targeting) and in humans (due to neutralizing anti–GM-CSF autoantibodies) results in defects in alveolar macrophage function. GM-CSF functional deficiency in these settings leads to development of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and defects in lung host defense. Of relevance to the article by Presneill and coworkers in this issue of AJRCCM (pp. 138–143), GM-CSF restores immunologic functions in monocytes from septic patients (9) and can prevent immune paralysis in endotoxin-desensitized mice.

Presneill and coworkers have conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial of GM-CSF augmentation therapy for the treatment of severe sepsis with respiratory dysfunction (10). This study included 18 patients (10 treatment, 8 placebo) and tested the hypothesis that low-dose GM-CSF infusion (3 mcg/kg/day intravenously for 5 consecutive days) in individuals with severe sepsis and sepsis-related pulmonary dysfunction would improve leukocyte function without exacerbating lung or other organ dysfunction. Treatment and control groups were well-matched for clinical parameters, APACHE II and SOFA scores, and the proportion of subjects with ARDS at enrollment. The treatment was well-tolerated, but did not improve mortality. Notwithstanding this lack of effect on mortality, GM-CSF significantly improved oxygenation, modulated the numbers and functions of blood and alveolar neutrophils, and tended to reduce the prevalence of ARDS.

One interesting observation by Presneill and coworkers is that GM-CSF improved oxygenation in patients with sepsis (10). No mechanism was identified for this improvement. The results, however, could not be explained by changes in several factors known to influence pulmonary gas exchange during mechanical ventilation, including continuous positive airway pressure, alveolar PO2, pulmonary vascular hemodynamics, and cardiovascular resuscitation. Improved oxygenation was associated with a decrease in the proportion of patients developing ARDS in the GM-CSF treatment group (40% to 20%), whereas this proportion increased in the placebo group (37.5% to 62.5%). A link between GM-CSF and reduction in ARDS was previously suggested by a report from this group showing that an elevated GM-CSF level in the lungs early in the course of ARDS was associated with patient survival (11). The power of the present study, however, was not adequate to reach statistical significance. The concept that GM-CSF may modulate function(s) of the respiratory gas exchange surface was also previously suggested by studies in transgenic mice in which overexpression of GM-CSF in the lung produces marked type II alveolar epithelial cell hyperplasia and lung growth. Further studies are clearly needed to assess the role of GM-CSF on lung structure and function and to determine the relationship of GM-CSF and ARDS in severe sepsis with pulmonary dysfunction.

The observation by Presneill and colleagues that GM-CSF stimulated both the number and function of blood neutrophils is consistent with the expected effects of GM-CSF. The lack of statistical significance for the increase in blood neutrophils, however, suggests that GM-CSF dosing was suboptimal to stimulate production of these cells. The reduction in lung neutrophils in the treatment group is more difficult to explain, and again no mechanism was identified. Although the pharmacokinetics and distribution of endogenous murine GM-CSF in mice and of synthetic recombinant human GM-CSF in humans could well be different, data from transgenic mice suggest that GM-CSF is highly compartmentalized between blood and lungs (8). Additional studies should thus explore GM-CSF dose optimization with regard to effects on the function of blood and alveolar leukocyte during sepsis.

Finally, it is disappointing that GM-CSF therapy did not improve mortality of sepsis with pulmonary dysfunction. There are several possible reasons for the failure, including the small number of patients studied, uncontrolled use of glucocorticoids, and the lack of patient stratification according to the degree of monocyte deactivation at the time of enrollment. For example, it is plausible that the observed treatment effect was limited to a subgroup of individuals in which immune paralysis was present or more significant. If true, this suggests that stratification of subjects on the basis of monocyte dysfunction might be useful in identifying individuals who could benefit from GM-CSF therapy during sepsis. A recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of GM-CSF to reduce nosocomial infections in very low birth weight neonates also showed no treatment effect (12). Although this study included 264 individuals and used higher GM-CSF doses (8 µg/kg/day) for a longer period of time, it should be also noted that in this study, use of glucocorticoids was not controlled and patients were not stratified with respect to monocyte dysfunction. Based on the observations that (1) individuals in the post-hyperinflammatory phase of sepsis appear to be immunocompromised, (2) late mortality in sepsis is associated with infection, and (3) GM-CSF prevents the immune paralysis in animal models of sepsis, further studies are warranted. From the previous discussion, one could envision that such studies might explore GM-CSF dose optimization and patient stratification based on immunophenotyping on enrollment.

REFERENCES

  1. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald WJ. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee, American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992;101:1644–1655.
  2. Rangel-Frausto MS, Pittet D, Costigan M, Hwang T, Davis CS, Wenzel RP. The natural history of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS): a prospective study. JAMA 1995;273:117–123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 2001;29:1303–1310.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Wheeler AP, Bernard GR. Treating patients with severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 1999;340:207–214.[Free Full Text]
  5. Parrillo JE. Pathogenetic mechanisms of septic shock. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1471–1477.[Free Full Text]
  6. Abraham E, Anzueto A, Gutierrez G, Tessler S, San Pedro G, Wunderink R, Dal Nogare A, Nasraway S, Berman S, Cooney R, et al. Double-blind randomised controlled trial of monoclonal antibody to human tumour necrosis factor in treatment of septic shock. NORASEPT II Study Group. Lancet 1998;351:929–933.
  7. Munoz C, Carlet J, Fitting C, Misset B, Bleriot JP, Cavaillon JM. Dysregulation of in vitro cytokine production by monocytes during sepsis. J Clin Invest 1991;88:1747–1754.
  8. Trapnell BC, Whitsett JA. GM-CSF regulates pulmonary surfactant homeostasis and alveolar macrophage-mediated innate host defense. Annu Rev Physiol 2002;64:775–802.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Williams MA, White SA, Miller JJ, Toner C, Withington S, Newland AC, Kelsey SM. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor induces activation and restores respiratory burst activity in monocytes from septic patients. J Infect Dis 1998;177:107–115.[Medline]
  10. Presneill JJ, Harris T, Stewart AG, Cade JF, Wilson JW. A randomized phase II trial granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor therapy in severe sepsis with respiratory dysfunction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:138–143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Presneill JJ, Waring PM, Layton JE, Maher DW, Cebon J, Harley NS, Wilson JW, Cade JF. Plasma granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor levels in critical illness including sepsis and septic shock: relation to disease severity, multiple organ dysfunction, and mortality. Crit Care Med 2000;28:2344–2354.[Medline]
  12. Bilgin K, Yaramis A, Haspolat K, Tas MA, Gunbey S, Derman O. A randomized trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in neonates with sepsis and neutropenia. Pediatrics 2001;107:36–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
B. C. Trapnell
A Novel Biomarker-guided Immunomodulatory Approach for the Therapy of Sepsis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2009; 180(7): 585 - 586.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
P. C. Joshi, R. Raynor, X. Fan, and D. M. Guidot
HIV-1-Transgene Expression in Rats Decreases Alveolar Macrophage Zinc Levels and Phagocytosis
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., August 1, 2008; 39(2): 218 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
K. Bendtzen, M. Svenson, M. B. Hansen, T. Busch, S. Bercker, U. Kaisers, K. Uchida, D. C. Beck, and B. C. Trapnell
GM-CSF Autoantibodies in Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis
N. Engl. J. Med., May 10, 2007; 356(19): 2001 - 2002.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2002
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2003; 167(3): 294 - 305.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trapnell, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trapnell, B. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2002 American Thoracic Society