© 2002 American Thoracic Society
Effect of Severe Isolated Unilateral and Bilateral Diaphragm Weakness on Exercise PerformanceRespiratory Muscle Laboratory and Lung Function Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical Physiology, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, Garches, France; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Guy's, King's and St. Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Nicholas Hart, M.D., Respiratory Muscle Laboratory, Royal Brompton Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6NP, UK. E-mail: drnhart{at}aol.com
Patients with isolated diaphragm paralysis depend on recruitment of extradiaphragmatic respiratory muscles to increase ventilation, but little is known about exercise performance or the response of the inspiratory muscles to loaded breathing. By convention, unilateral diaphragm paralysis is regarded as a trivial condition whereas bilateral paralysis is considered to be potentially life-threatening. In fact, no data exist concerning exercise performance under these conditions. We studied incremental treadmill exercise performed by eight patients with bilateral diaphragm paralysis, eight patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis, and eight age-matched control subjects. Respiratory muscle endurance (RME) was also measured by an inspiratory threshold loading method. Exercise time, compared with control subjects (671 seconds), was moderately reduced in unilateral diaphragm paralysis (512 seconds, p = 0.07) and further reduced in bilateral diaphragm paralysis (456 seconds, p = 0.02). Similarly, peak minute ventilation was lower in patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis (84 L · min-1, p = 0.01) and in patients with bilateral diaphragm paralysis (69 L · min-1, p = 0.001) compared with control subjects (114 L · min-1). However, patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis and patients with bilateral diaphragm paralysis had increased ratios of peak oxygen consumption to peak minute ventilation compared with control subjects (p = 0.0007 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Nine patients had normal RME; exercise time was moderately increased in these patients (502 seconds) compared with seven patients with reduced RME (461 seconds). In conclusion, although exercise performance is impaired in bilateral diaphragm paralysis, these patients can sustain a reasonable exercise load, particularly if RME is preserved and compensatory mechanisms have developed. In addition, exercise tolerance is diminished in patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis.
Key Words: diaphragm weakness exercise respiratory muscle endurance
Although bilateral diaphragm paralysis was previously regarded as a serious condition that required nocturnal ventilatory support to prevent respiratory decompensation (1), unilateral diaphragm paralysis has been considered as a relatively benign disorder with no serious clinical implications. However, subsequent studies have shown that in the absence of generalized neuromuscular disease or comorbidity, isolated bilateral diaphragm paralysis is far from life-threatening (2), implying that there is compensatory recruitment of the extradiaphragmatic respiratory muscles. Despite this, exertional dyspnea is a common symptom in patients with unilateral and bilateral diaphragm paralysis, but few studies have investigated the impact of isolated diaphragm paralysis on exercise performance (2). In addition to the clinical data that evaluating exercise performance in patients with isolated diaphragm paralysis would generate, it would also provide general data about the role of the diaphragm during exercise. This could be important to patients with other conditions, such as chronic obstructive airway disease, in which diaphragm dysfunction during exercise remains controversial; diaphragm dysfunction in chronic obstructive airway disease may be more critical if isolated diaphragm paralysis conferred substantial exercise limitation. Finally, isolated diaphragm paralysis inevitably results in an increase in the load on the remaining inspiratory muscles. We hypothesized that the ability of the remaining inspiratory muscles to sustain an applied inspiratory load, during a test of respiratory muscle endurance (RME), would be associated with the presence of adaptive mechanisms to compensate for the loss of diaphragm function. Thus, although we would predict exercise performance to be reduced in isolated unilateral and bilateral diaphragm paralysis, the aim of the present study was to quantify the extent of this effect and, by extension, investigate the role of the diaphragm in sustaining exercise.
Subjects The protocol was approved by the Royal Brompton Hospital (London, UK) Ethics Committee. Eight patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis, eight patients with bilateral diaphragm paralysis, and eight age-matched control subjects were included in the study. Demographic details about the patients and control subjects are shown in Table 1 and in the online data supplement, respectively. None of the control subjects participated in regular exercise. All participants were male. We excluded patients with generalized neuromuscular disease, peripheral vascular disease, cardiac dysfunction, and pulmonary disease.
Pulmonary Function Tests Lung volumes, carbon monoxide transfer coefficient, and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were measured according to standard guidelines (3). Spirometry, lung volumes, DLCO, and carbon monoxide transfer coefficient were expressed as percentages of the published values (4, 5).
Pressure Measurements
Twitch Transdiaphragmatic Pressure
Maximum Inspiratory Pressure
Dynamic Compliance
Exercise Testing
Respiratory Muscle Endurance Testing
Statistical Analysis
Pulmonary Function Tests Lung function data for control subjects and patients with diaphragm paralysis are shown in Table 2 . Patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis or bilateral diaphragm paralysis had reduced lung volumes with reduction in DLCO. However, the carbon monoxide transfer coefficient was within the range that would be predicted for the reduction in alveolar volume (10).
Respiratory Muscle Tests The Pgas/ Pes ratio during resting breathing, and volitional and nonvolitional inspiratory muscle strength data, are shown in Table 3. A positive Pgas/ Pes ratio, indicating paradoxical abdominal motion, was observed in all patients with bilateral diaphragm paralysis and in four patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis. A normal Pgas/ Pes ratio (less than zero) was observed in the other four patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis. Five patients with bilateral diaphragm paralysis had evidence of expiratory abdominal muscle recruitment during resting breathing, with a Pgas/ Pes ratio greater than +1 (11). As expected, patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis had higher Pesmax values than did patients with bilateral diaphragm paralysis (Pesmax 100.4 ± 27.2 versus 54.2 ± 30.1 cm H2O, respectively; p = 0.02). The Pdimax values were similar to those previously reported for unilateral diaphragm paralysis and bilateral diaphragm paralysis (2, 12).
Exercise Testing Although there was a relatively small but significant reduction in mean exercise time (Ex TLim) between control subjects (671 ± 123 seconds) and patients with bilateral diaphragm paralysis (456 ± 181 seconds; p = 0.02), there was no significant difference between control subjects and patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis (512 ± 190 seconds; p = 0.07) (Table 4) . Similarly, mean peak power was 357 W in control subjects, 348 W in patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis (p = 0.8), and 261 W in those with bilateral diaphragm paralysis (p = 0.05). Peak V·E was lower in both unilateral diaphragm paralysis (p = 0.01) and bilateral diaphragm paralysis (p = 0.001) compared with control subjects. The difference in Ex TLim and V·E peak between unilateral diaphragm paralysis and bilateral diaphragm paralysis did not achieve significance although both were higher in the unilateral diaphragm paralysis group. The V·O2 peak was similar in control subjects and patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis (p = 0.93) and patients with bilateral diaphragm paralysis (p = 0.26). However, patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis or bilateral diaphragm paralysis had increased V·O2 peak/V·E peak ratios compared with control subjects (p = 0.0007 and p < 0.0001, respectively); therefore at a given level of ventilation a higher V·O2 was achieved in both unilateral diaphragm paralysis and bilateral diaphragm paralysis.
Respiratory Muscle Endurance Testing Figure 1 shows log End TLim as a function of PTPes/Pesmax in patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis and patients with bilateral diaphragm paralysis compared with data from 30 normal subjects (9). With this approach, End TLim is expressed as a function of the load/capacity ratio. The normal values for our laboratory are shown by the shaded area (9). Patients 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 (unilateral diaphragm paralysis) and patients 9 and 11 (bilateral diaphragm paralysis) fell outside this area and had reduced RME, whereas patients 2, 6, and 7 (unilateral diaphragm paralysis) and patients 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 (bilateral diaphragm paralysis) fell close to the shaded area and had preserved RME. Table 5 shows the differences between preserved and reduced RME groups. Patients with reduced RME had a shorter duration of disease (p = 0.05), lower FRC (p = 0.03), lower expiratory PTPgas per minute (p = 0.05), and a decreased Cdyn (p = 0.01) compared with the preserved RME group. The patients with preserved RME had a Cdyn similar to that of the control subjects (p = 0.69). The respiratory rate during measurement of Cdyn was similar between patients and control subjects.
Relationship between Exercise Performance and Respiratory Muscle Endurance Patients with diaphragm paralysis, whether unilateral or bilateral, were divided into those with preserved and reduced RME (Figure 1). When comparing exercise data between these two groups and the control subjects (Table 6), Ex TLim was decreased in the reduced RME group (p = 0.03). There was a trend for peak V·E values to be higher in the preserved RME group than in reduced RME group, but both were less than for the control subjects. There was no difference in V·O2 peak between the three groups and the V·O2 peak/V·E peak ratio was higher in both preserved and reduced RME groups.
Influence of Paradoxical Abdominal Motion on Exercise and Endurance Performance in Unilateral Diaphragm Paralysis At rest, patients 1, 3, 4, and 5 with unilateral diaphragm paralysis had a Pgas/ Pes ratio greater than zero, indicating paradoxical abdominal motion (11). This occurred in the absence of expiratory muscle recruitment, as judged by end-expiratory and end-inspiratory gastric and esophageal pressures. Compared with the control subjects, Ex TLim was significantly reduced in the subgroup of unilateral diaphragm paralysis patients with paradoxical motion (442 ± 214 seconds; p = 0.03) but not for unilateral diaphragm paralysis patients without paradoxical motion (581 ± 161 seconds, p = 0.4). Similarly, the V·E peak was also greater in patients without paradoxical motion (97.1 ± 12.4 L · min-1) than in patients with paradoxical motion (70.0 ± 8.0 L · min-1; p = 0.01). The V·O2 peak/V·E peak ratio was higher in both unilateral diaphragm paralysis patients with paradox (0.034 ± 0.006; p = 0.001) and without paradox (0.030 ± 0.005; p = 0.02) compared with control subjects (0.024 ± 0.002). RME was preserved in three of four patients without paradoxical motion and reduced in all unilateral diaphragm paralysis patients with paradoxical abdominal motion.
The main finding of this study is that although exercise performance is reduced in patients with isolated unilateral and bilateral diaphragm paralysis, this reduction is not as great as previous data would suggest for bilateral diaphragm paralysis, and greater than expected for patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis; we actually found no difference in Ex TLim or V·E peak between the isolated unilateral and bilateral diaphragm paralysis groups. Furthermore, both sets of patients can still sustain a reasonable exercise load, particularly if RME is preserved. This reduction in exercise performance is associated with reduced peak minute ventilation, and thus the cause is primarily a ventilatory one.
Critique of the Method
Comparison with previous studies. Gosselin and coworkers (17) studied the effect of phrenic nerve section in rats and found that unilateral diaphragm paralysis had no effect on Ex TLim or V·O2 peak but that bilateral diaphragm paralysis reduced both Ex TLim and V·O2 peak. These investigators concluded that there was adequate respiratory muscle reserve in rats to compensate for loss of one but not both hemidiaphragms. However, quadruped studies are not an ideal method for investigation of the effect of diaphragm paralysis on exercise performance in humans because of the differing pulmonary mechanics during exercise between humans and quadrupeds (18).
Significance of the Findings At any given level of exercise, patients with diaphragm paralysis exhibited a greater oxygen uptake than control subjects despite reduced minute ventilation leading to a highly significant rise in the V·O2 peak/V·E peak ratio. The mechanism underlying this observation is of physiological interest. It has been reported from human studies that respiratory muscle efficiency varies with the task imposed (19), and it would be predicted that the task imposed on extradiaphragmatic muscles in the presence of diaphragm paralysis is different from that imposed when diaphragm function is normal. Indeed, in animal studies, the relationship between mechanical and chemical power is not proportional with differing forces, lengths, and velocities of contraction (20, 21). Although the extradiaphragmatic muscles were not assessed in the current study, available animal data suggest the presence of extradiaphragmatic muscle recruitment in diaphragm paralysis (2225). Sherrey and Megirian (23) reported increased activity of the intercostal muscles during inspiration and increased activity of the oblique muscles during expiration in rats with diaphragm paralysis, whereas Katagiri and coworkers (24) demonstrated in dogs that although the resting length of the intact hemidiaphragm in unilateral diaphragm paralysis is unchanged, during inspiration there is greater shortening and increased activity of the intact hemidiaphragm. The intercostal muscle compensation is thought to be due, in part, to a decrease in reflex inhibition by diaphragm receptors, via phrenic nerve afferents, on the efferent activity of the inspiratory intercostal muscles (25). In contrast to the animal studies (17, 26, 27) that have investigated acute diaphragm paralysis, diaphragm paralysis in our patients was longstanding, with an average time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis of 13.3 ± 9.2 months. This symptom duration to diagnosis is similar to that previously described in the literature (14) and thus the development of compensatory mechanisms would be expected. We observed that patients with reduced RME had a shorter exercise time than those with preserved RME. Thus, investigation of differences between diaphragm paralysis patients with reduced RME and those with preserved RME could generate hypotheses with respect to compensatory mechanisms, particularly as the preserved RME group had diaphragm paralysis for a longer time course (17.2 ± 9.5 versus 8.3 ± 6.3 months; p = 0.05). During the threshold loading test, the patients with preserved RME had greater activation of the abdominal muscles during expiration, reflected by the higher expiratory PTPgas, which would facilitate the following inspiration by allowing passive descent of the diaphragm as the abdominal muscles relax (28). Increased abdominal muscle recruitment during expiration, at rest and during exercise, has been reported in postpoliomyelitic patients (29), in patients with chronic obstructive airway disease (30, 31), in patients with scoliosis (32), and anecdotally by us in bilateral diaphragm paralysis (33). We observed in the present study that during loaded breathing, expiratory PTPgas was greater in those patients with a longer duration of diaphragm paralysis (p = 0.05). Thus, we speculate that abdominal muscle recruitment is a compensatory adaptation, perhaps achieved through a mechanism of cortical plasticity, a mechanism known to operate for nonrespiratory muscles under load (34). Previous studies have reported reductions in lung and chest wall compliance in patients with chronic respiratory muscle disease (3538). We found a reduction in Cdyn in patients with reduced RME compared with both control subjects and patients with preserved RME. This is inconsistent with observations of patients with spinal cord injury and generalized neuromuscular disease, in whom compliance of the lung and chest wall is reported to decrease with time (39), possibly because of changes in lung tissue elasticity, surface tension forces within the alveoli, and stiffening of the rib cage (3538). However, these changes could be less marked in patients with isolated diaphragm paralysis for two reasons. First, expiratory muscle function is normal and risk of chest infection and basal atelectasis is less; second, isolated diaphragm paralysis is not a progressive disease and, as previously noted, there is a capacity for recruitment, adaptation, and training of extradiaphragmatic respiratory muscles.
The significance of the Are the observed reductions in exercise performance clinically significant? Our data suggest that whereas patients with isolated bilateral diaphragm paralysis may have moderate exercise limitation in the course of daily life, patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis are also susceptible to exercise limitation, which could be of importance during heavy exercise. In our experience this tends to be either intense recreational or occupational factors requiring extremes of performance. In summary, exercise performance is unexpectedly high in patients with bilateral diaphragm paralysis and unexpectedly low in patients with isolated unilateral diaphragm paralysis. Although patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis are overall less affected than those with bilateral diaphragm paralysis, there is a subgroup of patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis, identified clinically by the finding of paradoxical abdominal motion during resting breathing, who have reduced exercise performance and RME. Compensatory recruitment of extradiaphragmatic respiratory muscles and the abdominal muscles appears to play an important role in maintaining exercise performance.
The authors would like to thank Prof. Malcolm Green for his help throughout the preparation of this manuscript.
Supported by the Dorothy Osbourne Legacy (N. H.) and the British Lung Foundation (A. H. N.). This article has an online data supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents online at www.atsjournals.org Received in original form October 3, 2001; accepted in final form February 12, 2002
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||