-Hydroxysteroid
Dehydrogenase Type II Enzyme in Asthma
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
11
-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (11
-HSD) are responsible for
the conversion of bioactive glucocorticoids to and from inactive metabolites. 11
-HSD2 is generally considered a high-affinity inactivator of natural glucocorticoids, although its activity with synthetic compounds in vivo is unknown. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)
remain the primary antiinflammatory agents for treating asthma,
but little is known about their metabolism in the lung. The aims of
this study were to determine whether the 11
-HSD2 enzyme can
be localized to human airway tissue and whether differential expression of this enzyme relates to asthma severity and ICS needs. We studied airway biopsy specimens from 22 asthmatic subjects, in
two groups: (1) a group not treated with ICS (n = 7); and (2) a
group treated with ICS (range: 200 to 1,500 µg/d; n = 15). A control
population consisted of nine nonasthmatic subjects. Immunostaining was done with an immunopurified antibody to human 11
-HSD2.
Immunoreactivity was generally localized to the endothelium of
vessels in the lamina propria and to airway epithelium both in
asthmatic patients and nonasthmatic controls. There was a statistically significant inverse relationship between the ICS dose required
for effective treatment and the extent of epithelial 11
-HSD2
staining (r =
0.44; p = 0.04). This is consistent with 11
-HSD2
acting as an oxidoreductase that regenerates rather than inactivates
ICS. This study suggests that glucocorticoid sensitivity in the lung is
not determined by ICS breakdown, but may be related to 11
-HSD2 sustaining the activation of synthetic glucocorticoids.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Keywords: 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II enzyme; asthma;
inhaled corticosteroids; endobronchial biopsies; immunohistochemistry
11
-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (11
-HSD) are tissue-specific enzymes responsible for the interconversion of bioactive
endogenous and/or synthetic glucocorticoids to and from their
receptor-inactive metabolites, such as cortisol and cortisone in
humans, and corticosterone and 11-dehydrocorticosterone in
rodents. There exist two isoforms of 11
-HSD: 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type I (11
-HSD1) is a low-affinity nicotinamide adenine nucleotide diphosphate (NADP)-dependent
enzyme that can function bidirectionally but acts mainly as an
oxidoreductase to produce active glucocorticoid, cortisol, or corticosterone; 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II (11
-HSD2) has a high affinity for glucocorticoids (Km ~ 47 nM), is
NAD+ dependent, and acts on natural glucocorticoids as a
dehydrogenase to produce inactive metabolites (1). Paradoxically, increasing evidence suggests that 11
-HSD2 acts as an
oxidoreductase on some metabolites of synthetic and fluorinated
glucocorticoids, therefore potentially enhancing their biologic
potency (2-5).
In the distal tubules of the kidney, 11
-HSD2 acts as a protector of the nonselective mineralcorticoid receptors by preventing their occupation by glucocorticoids, and it modulates access
of glucocorticoids to glucocorticoid receptors. Mutations in this enzyme result in the syndrome of apparent mineralcorticoid
excess, with sodium retention, severe hypertension, growth retardation, edema, renal hyperplasia and hypertrophy (6, 7). 11
-HSD2 has also been found in other tissues controlling local
concentrations of glucocorticoids, such as in the placenta,
where it protects the fetus from the high circulating levels of
maternal glucocorticoids (7, 8), but also in the skin (9-11), brain,
gastrointestinal tract (11), thymus, spleen, and lung (12-15).
Inhaled synthetic glucocorticoids (ICS) remain the primary
effective antiinflammatory treatment agents for asthma, but little is known about the metabolism of ICS in the lung. Schleimer
(13) did not observe metabolism of cortisol in resected samples
taken from three patients with carcinoma of the lung, nor in
minces of airway samples or in pulmonary blood vessels, but
they did find evidence of this process in the pulmonary parenchyma in these patients. 11
-HSD2 immunoreactivity localized
to epithelial cells has been detected in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded airway tissue (14, 15). In vitro studies have shown
11
-HSD activity in human small cell lung cancer (DMS-79)
cell lines (16). Other studies have demonstrated 11
-HSD activity in the human lung fibroblast LU-19 cell line (17) and also
in a human tracheal epithelial cell line (13).
If 11
-HSD, and especially the type II enzyme, exist within
the airways, they could influence the effectiveness of ICS by converting metabolites back into the active form, whether such metabolism occurs locally, or if the metabolites return to the airways, via the circulation. There has been very little research into
such potentially important airway pharmacodynamic issues.
Furthermore, there is evidence of substantial interperson
variability in the tissue expression of 11
-HSD enzyme activity (18), which could potentially relate to the wide spectrum of patients' needs for ICS for asthma control. This potential is emphasized by inhibitors of 11
-HSD2, such as licorice and carbenoxolone (with the active compounds in both cases being
glycyrrhetinic acid or its derivatives), which have been shown
to have antiinflammatory properties (9, 19).
We conducted a study with the aims of determining whether
11
-HSD2 could be localized to airway tissue as represented
by endobronchial biopsy specimens and whether differential
expression of this enzyme may contribute to asthma severity
and to the relative ICS needs of different patients with asthma.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects
Twenty-two asthmatic subjects (meeting American Thoracic Society guidelines [20] for a diagnosis of asthma) were recruited and were divided into two groups: (1) a group not treated with ICS (n = 7); and (2) a group treated with ICS (200 to 1,500 µg/d beclomethasone dipropionate [BDP]; n = 15) (Table 1). There were also nine nonasthmatic volunteer subjects. All subjects were nonsmokers, and the study was approved by the Alfred Hospital Ethics Review Committee. Written informed consent was obtained before commencement of the study. At screening, atopy status, spirometry and airway responsiveness to inhaled methacholine in terms of the provocative dose of methacholine producing a 20% reduction in FEV1 (PD20M) (21) were measured.
|
Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy and Endobronchial Biopsy Procedures
Subject preparation for fiberoptic bronchoscopy and endobronchial biopsy procedures, and specimen processing before immunoperoxidase staining, have been described previously (22).
Immunohistochemical Staining with Anti-11
-HSD2 Antibody
Seven-micron-thick sections of bronchial tissue were cut on a Cryocut
1800 cryostat (Reichert-Jung, Heidelberg, Germany), mounted in duplicate and approximately 21 µm apart, on poly-L-lysine-coated slides,
and fixed with paraformaldehyde-lysine periodate (PLP) for each patient. Immunopurified, polyclonal rabbit primary antibody directed to
the last 16 residues in the carboxy-terminus of human 11
-HSD2
(HUH23) (7) was applied. Staining was done with a standard three-layered, indirect immunoperoxidase technique with biotinylated goat
antirabbit immunoglobulin antibody followed by a peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin antibody (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). Metal-enhanced diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Pierce, Rockford, IL) was used
as the chromogen substrate, and specimens were counterstained with
hemotoxylin. Each staining run included a negative rabbit immunoglobulin (DAKO) control slide and nasal polyp positive control slide.
Slides were coded randomly.
Slides were assessed by a single blinded observer (B.E.O.) and were analyzed with a method previously described (23), using a computerized image analysis system and Image-Pro Plus 3.0 Windows software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD).
Five or more consecutive, nonoverlapping high-power fields (×40 objective) of one section were assessed per patient. HUH23 immunoreactivity was localized to vessel endothelium. The total number of vessels stained in consecutive sections versus those stained specifically with HUH23 was determined by using a collagen type IV antibody. These absolute and relative vessel data have already been published (22), with the current analysis being a further development of this study.
Some immunoreactivity was observed in the epithelial cells lining the airways, and a semiquantitative method of analysis was used, involving a visual scale for both the extent and intensity of staining (24).
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean ± SD, except for PD20M values, which
were log10 transformed and are presented as geometric means and
ranges. Raw data were fitted to a general linear model (25), with account for potential confounders (total area measured, age, sex, FEV1
percent predicted before bronchodilator treatment, PD20M, and atopic
status). Spearman's rank correlation test (two-tailed) was used in determining the relationship between physiologic indices and expression of
11
-HSD2. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Staining with the anti-11
-HSD2 (HUH23) antibody was localized to the endothelium of vascular structures in the lamina
propria and the epithelial cells of the endobronchial biopsy
specimens that were analyzed (Figure 1) both in asthma patients and in nonasthmatic control subjects. The four vascular
indices obtained for the localization of HUH23 staining were:
(1) number of 11
-HSD2-positive vessels/mm2 of lamina propria measured; (2) percentage of vessels positive for 11
-HSD2
(i.e., number of 11
-HSD2-positive vessels/mm2 of lamina
propria measured, divided by the total number of vessels stained for collagen type IV/mm2 of lamina propria measured,
multiplied by 100); (3) percentage of lamina propria area stained
positively for 11
-HSD2; and (4) percentage of total vessel
area stained positively for 11
-HSD2 (i.e., 11
-HSD2-positive area, divided by the total positive vessel area, multiplied by
100). The extent and intensity of positive epithelial staining
with 11
-HSD2 were based on a visual scale of 0 to 4 in increments of 0.5 throughout the biopsy section under analysis.
Thus, for extent of staining observed, 0 = none and 4 > 75% of
epithelial cells stained; whereas for intensity, 0 = no staining
and 4 = very strongly stained. No statistically significant differences were observed in any of the staining indices measured for asthma patients receiving and not receiving ICS nor for asthma patients versus nonasthmatic controls (Tables 2
and 3).
|
|
|
Epithelial basement membrane staining with HUH23 was also observed in all patients and controls, and no obvious differences were observed between the study groups.
There was no significant relationship between clinical physiologic features (PD20M and FEV1% predicted) and 11
-HSD2
staining indices when the two asthma groups were combined
(n = 22) (data not shown). Nor was there any relationship between steroid dose and indices of vascular 11
-HSD2 staining.
However, there was a relatively weak but statistically significant
inverse relationship between steroid dose and extent of epithelial
11
-HSD2 staining (r =
0.44; p = 0.04).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most important outcome of this cross-sectional study was
the finding that 11
-HSD2 is present in the human airways.
Furthermore, we demonstrated an inverse relationship between epithelial staining for 11
-HSD2 and the ICS dose required for asthma control. This observation is consistent with
the previously published finding that, paradoxically, 11
-HSD2 can act as an oxidoreductase and reactivate synthetic
glucocorticoids such as dexamethasone (2-5). There was no
statistical difference in airway staining in asthma patients
treated and those not treated with ICS nor between asthma patients and volunteer controls. This suggests that although 11
-HSD2 may have a role in normal airway physiology, it is unlikely to play a significant part in asthma pathophysiology in
the range of asthma severity of our study patients. The relative
expression of 11
-HSD2 in asthma patients receiving different
doses of ICS would suggest that the local breakdown of ICS to
inactive metabolites does not contribute to the greater need for
ICS in some patients as compared with others. Further studies
are warranted in patients who are particularly resistant to ICS
therapy, and evaluating the activity of 11
-HSD in the airways
will also be important in determining the effects of ICSs.
In this study, 11
-HSD2 immunoreactivity was seen in the
endothelial cells of vascular structures in the lamina propria
and in the epithelium of endobronchial biopsy specimens.
Smith and colleagues (10) found staining of vascular smooth-muscle cells around the dermal arterioles of skin, arterioles of
myocardium, and saphenous vein and renal interlobular arteries when using the same HUH23 antibody in formalin-fixed
and paraffin-embedded tissue samples and with a three-layered immunoperoxidase technique similar to ours (7). In their
study, 11
-HSD2 was apparent in the endothelial cells lining
vascular structures, but was not directly discussed. Brem and
coworkers (26) found the endothelial cells of vessels in rat
aorta to contain 11
-HSD2 messenger RNA. Endothelium could
control entry of endogenously produced steroid from the blood
into the airways under physiologic conditions. It may also potentially modulate the efficacy of systemic glucocorticoids given therapeutically.
However, Schleimer (13) found no metabolism of cortisol
in minced pulmonary blood vessels or in airways (2 to 3 mm in
diameter) from the lungs of three cancer patients. Hirasawa
and associates (14) and Suzuki and colleagues (15), using the
same antibody as ourselves but staining human formalin-fixed
and paraffin-embedded autopsy airway specimens, found 11
-HSD2 expressed only in the epithelium and not in the subepithelial vascular plexus. This could have been due to a postmortem artifact and/or to different processing of the tissue samples.
Our finding of 11
-HSD2 in the epithelial lining of the airways supports the previous findings of Hirasawa and Suzuki
and their coworkers. In addition, 11
-HSD2 has been found in
other epithelia, such as those of the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and glomerular distal tubules of the kidney (7, 27). The presence of 11
-HSD2 in the airway epithelium may again provide a barrier to the penetration of ICS into deeper structures, as well as aiding clearance of excess ICS from the airway.
The patients in our study had stable, mild-to-moderate but
symptomatic asthma. Our initial hypothesis was that those receiving ICS treatment, and especially those taking higher
doses of ICS, would have greater expression of 11
-HSD2
than those not receiving ICS therapy and/or controls (i.e., that
increased enzyme in the airways would be a cause of their relative steroid needs). However, this did not seem to be the
case. Immunohistologically detected expression of an enzyme
does not necessarily equate with its activity. Indeed, there are
a number of factors that may influence the activity of 11
-HSD2
and thus the bioavailability of ICS to their receptors. Such factors include inflammatory cell activation and local presence of
cytokines. One group has found that cell cultures of leukocytes in the presence of interleukin (IL)-5, IL-6, IL-4, and interferon-
, individually or in combination, increased 11
-HSD activity (28). Thus, asthmatic inflammation itself may
conceivably increase ICS breakdown in the airway. Another
group (29) has postulated that 11
-HSD may regulate the antiinflammatory action of endogenous cortisol but not that of
synthetic glucocorticoids (such as beclomethasone dipropionate or fluticasone proprionate) in cultured airway epithelial cells. These are interesting data, but the study that served as the basis for this last suggestion had its shortfalls. It investigated the collective activity of both the 11
-HSD1 and 11
-HSD2 enzymes, without differentiating between the two, and
the epithelial cells used in the study were obtained at autopsy
up to 24 h after death, when enzyme activity may well be altered and/or deteriorating. Moreover, the study did not determine the effect of the enzymes in intact tissue, and 11
-HSD
has been shown to be influenced by a number of local factors,
including growth factors such as epidermal growth factor, which
have been shown to decrease 11
-HSD2 activity (30), and by
local NAD+ concentrations. Conversely, certain steroid hormones have been shown to increase the activity of this enzyme
(30), an effect that could potentially play a role in premenstrual asthma.
Given that our data suggest an inverse relationship between
the extent of epithelial 11
-HSD2 staining and the ICS dose
needed for effective asthma control, we should consider the
possibility that this enzyme operates in the airways as an oxidoreductase of ICS, thus making these steroids more readily
available. Best and coworkers (3) have shown that dexamethasone is variably metabolized in the human kidney, with about
40% of this steroid usually being metabolized. Furthermore,
approximately 70% of 11-dehydrodexamethasone is reconverted to dexamethasone by 11
-HSD2 in vitro. In vivo, the 11-dehydrodexamethasone metabolite can be detected in relatively low concentrations in plasma after patients have received
intravenous injections of dexamethasone. However, rapid turnover of dexamethasone and its 11-dehydrodexamethasone
metabolite in different tissues and variations in this metabolic
balance may affect tissue concentrations of the two steroids
without necessarily affecting their circulating concentrations. It
is possible that plasma levels of metabolites as determined in
clinical trials do not accurately reflect tissue kinetics. In addition, there may be considerable oxidation of glucocorticoids by
other enzymes that is masked by 11
-HSD2 reconversion. Further, there is evidence that the equilibrium for the action of
11
-HSD2 shifts toward reduction in the metabolism of 9
-fluorinated steroids (4, 5), which might play an important role in
local regulation of these synthetic glucocorticoids.
Our study raises the possibility that such local pharmacodynamic factors could be important in influencing how much
ICS a person with asthma needs in order to control their active
disease. We would suggest that future studies should focus on
the oxidoreductase, 11
-HSD1, in addition to 11
-HSD2 and
the balance between the two isozymes. There is evidence that
11
-HSD1 mRNA is more abundant than that for 11
-HSD2
in rat aortic endothelial cells (26), but there are no data on this
balance in pulmonary tissues. The two isoforms may function
together in determining the bioavailability of ICS in the lung,
either in the same dynamic direction when acting on ICS or in
opposition to one another, and it may be the balance of effects
that is crucial.
More studies are needed to investigate the potentially important 11
-HSD enzyme system and the complex cascade of
events that may modulate ICS bioavailability to determine
their ultimate therapeutic effectiveness in managing asthma
and indeed in managing other respiratory diseases as well.
These enzymes need to be tested in longitudinal studies of ICS
effectiveness in corticosteroid-naïve subjects and also in relatively steroid-resistant asthmatic subjects in whom our hypothesis would suggest the balance of metabolism could be especially adverse.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Professor E. Haydn Walters, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Tasmania Medical School, P.O. Box 252-34, 43 Collins Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia. E-mail: haydn.walters{at}med.monash.edu.au; Haydn.Walters{at}utas.edu.au
(Received in original form May 1, 2001 and accepted in revised form December 18, 2001).
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Ros Bish and Sally Gollant in recruiting patients; Drs. Xun Li and Frank Thien for performing the bronchoscopies on patients and volunteers; Dr. Chris Ward for his advice and support; and Dr. Bernadette Hickey for assistance in early developmental work for the study. Also, we would like to thank Michael Bailey, Senior Lecturer in Medical Statistics in the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine of the Monash University Medical School, for statistical assistance and advice.
Supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and Glaxo Wellcome Australia.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Stewart PM, Krozowski ZS. 11 beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Vitam Horm 1999; 57: 249-324 [Medline].
2.
Li KXZ,
Obeyesekere VR,
Krozowski ZS,
Ferrari P.
Oxoreductase and
dehydrogenase activities of the human and rat 11 beta-hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase type II enzyme.
Endocrinology
1997;
138:
2948-2952
3.
Best R,
Nelson SM,
Walker BR.
Dexamethasone and 11-dehydrodexamethasone as tools to investigate the isozymes of 11
-hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase in vitro and in vivo.
J Endocrinol
1997;
153:
41-48
4.
Diederich S,
Hanke B,
Bäher V,
Oelkers W.
The metabolism of 9
-fluorinated steroids in the human kidney.
Endocr Res
1996;
22:
803-810
[Medline].
5.
Diederich S,
Hanke B,
Oelkers W,
Bäher V.
Metabolism of dexamethasone in the human kidney:nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent 11
-reduction.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1997;
82:
1598-1602
6.
Mune T,
Rogerson FM,
Nikkilä H,
Agarwal AK,
White PC.
Human hypertension caused by mutations in the kidney isozyme of 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase.
Nat Genet
1995;
10:
394-399
[Medline].
7.
Krozowski ZS,
Maguire JA,
Stein-Oakley AN,
Dowling J,
Smith RE,
Andrews RK.
Immunohistochemical localization of the 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II enzyme in human kidney and placenta.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1995;
80:
2203-2209
[Abstract].
8.
Albiston AL,
Obeyesekere VR,
Smith RE,
Krozowski ZS.
Cloning and
tissue distribution of the human 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
type II enzyme.
Mol Cell Endocrinol
1994;
105:
R11-R17
[Medline].
9.
Hennebold JD,
Daynes RA.
Inhibition of skin 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity in vivo potentiates the anti-inflammatory actions
of glucocorticoids.
Arch Dermatol Res
1998;
290:
413-419
[Medline].
10.
Smith RE,
Little PJ,
Maguire JA,
Stein-Oakley AN,
Krozowski ZS.
Vascular localization of the 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II
enzyme.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol
1996;
23:
549-551
[Medline].
11.
Smith RE,
Maguire JA,
Stein-Oakley AN,
Sasano H,
Takahashi K,
Fukushima K,
Krozowski ZS.
Localization of 11
-hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase type II in human epithelial tissues.
J Clin Endocrinol
Metab
1996;
81:
3244-3248
[Abstract].
12.
Murphy BEP.
Cortisol production and inactivation by the human lung
during gestation and infancy.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1978;
47:
243-248
13. Schleimer RP. Potential regulation of inflammation in the lung by local metabolism of hydrocortisone. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1991; 4: 166-173 .
14.
Hirasawa G,
Sasano H,
Takahashi K-I,
Fukushima K,
Suzuki T,
Hiwatashi N,
Toyota T,
Krozowski ZS,
Nagura H.
Colocalization of 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II and Mineralcorticoid receptor
in human epithelia.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1997;
82:
3859-3863
15.
Suzuki T,
Sasano H,
Suzuki S,
Hirasawa G,
Takeyama J,
Maramatsu Y,
Date F,
Nagura H,
Krozowski ZS.
11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
type II in human lung: possible regulator of mineralcorticoid action.
J
Clin Endocrinol Metab
1998;
83:
4022-4025
16.
Parks LL,
Turney MK,
Gaitan D,
Kovacs WJ.
Expression of 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II in an ACTH-producing small cell lung
cancer.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol
1998;
67:
341-346
[Medline].
17.
Pagè N,
Warriar N,
Govindan MV.
11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
activity in human lung cells and transcription regulation by glucocorticoids.
Am J Physiol
1994;
26:
L464-474
.
18.
Soldan M,
Nagel G,
Losekam M,
Ernst M,
Maser E.
Interindividual variability in the expression and NNK carbonyl reductase activity of 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type I in human lung.
Cancer Lett
1999;
45:
49-56
.
19. Brown P, Teelucksingh S, Matusiewicz SP, Greening AP, Crompton GK, Edwards CRW. Cutaneous vasoconstrictor response to glucocorticoids in asthma. Lancet 1991; 337: 576-580 [Medline].
20. American Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with chronic pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;136:225-244.
21.
Beach JR,
Young CL,
Avery AJ,
Stenton SC,
Dennis JH,
Walters EH,
Hendrick DJ.
Measurement of airway responsiveness to methacholine: relative importance of the precision of delivery and the method
of assessing response.
Thorax
1993;
48:
239-243
22.
Orsida BE,
Li X,
Hickey B,
Thien F,
Wilson JW,
Walters EH.
Vascularity in asthmatic airways: relation to inhaled steroid dose.
Thorax
1999;
54:
289-295
23. Li X, Wilson JW. Increased vascularity of the bronchial mucosa in mild asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 56: 229-233 .
24. Bentley AM, Durham SR, Robinson DS, Menz G, Storz C, Cromwell O, Kay B, Wardlaw AJ. Expression of endothelial and leukocyte adhesion molecules intercellular adhesion molecule-1, E-selectin, and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in the bronchial mucosa in steady-state and allergen-induced asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1993; 92: 857-868 [Medline].
25. SAS statistical package. Version 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 1996.
26.
Brem AS,
Bina RB,
King TC,
Morris DJ.
Localization of two 11beta-OH steroid dehydrogenase isoforms in aortic endothelial cells.
Hypertension
1998;
31:
459-462
27.
Stein-Oakley AN,
Maguire JA,
Dowling J,
Perry GJ,
Krozowski ZS,
Thomson NM.
11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II enzyme is
expressed in normotensive and hypertensive patients with renal disease.
Nephrology
1998;
4:
81-86
.
28.
Evagelatou M,
Peterson SL,
Cooke BA.
Leucocytes modulate 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11
-HSD) activity in human granulosa-lutein cell cultures.
Mol Cell Endocrinol
1997;
133:
81-88
[Medline].
29.
Feinstein MB,
Schleimer RP.
Regulation of the action of hydrocortisone
in airway epithelial cells by 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase.
Am J
Respir Cell Mol Biol
1999;
21:
403-408
30.
Darnel AD,
Archer TK,
Yang K.
Regulation of 11
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II by steroid hormones and epidermal growth factor
in the Ishikawa human endometrial cell line.
J Steroid Biochem Mol
Biol
1999;
70:
203-210
[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. M. Adcock and P. J. Barnes Response Chest, February 1, 2009; 135(2): 586 - 586. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Wenzel, H. W. Chu, P. Silkoff, S. O'Sullivan, L. Poulter, M. Akveld, and C. M. Burke Ensuring Quality in Pharmaceutical Studies Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2003; 168(8): 1010 - 1012. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Suzuki, K. Koyama, A. Darnel, H. Ishibashi, S. Kobayashi, H. Kubo, T. Suzuki, H. Sasano, and Z. S. Krozowski Dexamethasone Upregulates 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 in BEAS-2B Cells Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2003; 167(9): 1244 - 1249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Tobin Asthma, Airway Biology, and Nasal Disorders in AJRCCM 2002 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2003; 167(3): 319 - 332. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. |