|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The relationship between fitness and genotype in children with
cystic fibrosis (CF) and at least one copy of the
F508 mutation was examined. Genotype was classified according to the second CF mutation. Fitness was measured by peak aerobic capacity (using a modified Bruce protocol during treadmill exercise) and
anaerobic power (using the Wingate test on a cycle ergometer).
The class of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator proteins (CFTR)
mutation was statistically related with aerobic capacity, peak anaerobic power, body mass index, lung function (forced expiratory
volume in one second), and disease severity as measured by the
Shwachman score. Patients with mutations causing defective CFTR
production (Class I) or processing (Class II) had a significantly
lower peak aerobic capacity (28.6 ± 4.2 ml/kg/min and 31.7 ± 5.4 ml/kg/min, respectively) than those with a mutation conferring
defective regulation of CFTR (Class III) (43.9 ± 6.4 ml/kg/min).
The peak anaerobic power in subjects with mutations inducing decreased CFTR conduction (Class IV) or CFTR mRNA (Class V), were
significantly higher (11.4 ± 1.7 and 11.6 ± 1.5 watts/kg, respectively) than children with Class I (9.7 ± 1.4 watts/kg), Class II (9.8 ± 1.4 watts/kg), or Class III (10.5 ± 1.8 watts/kg) mutations. There were no statistically significant differences in the lung function of
patients with the different mutations. These results indicate a relationship between CF genotype and some measures of fitness, the
mechanisms of which remain to be determined.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since the discovery of the genetic defect that causes cystic fibrosis (CF) by Riordan and colleagues (1), attempts have been
made to correlate CF genotypes with clinical assessments (2).
To date, the correlations between genotype and prognosis, mortality, and pulmonary function have been highly variable
(3-5). Previous studies have demonstrated that patients homozygous for the
F508 mutation have an earlier onset of disease, higher sweat chloride levels and a greater prevalence of
pancreatic insufficiency (3, 6, 7). Despite these observations,
patients with the
F508 mutation have a wide range of severity of pulmonary disease, and severe pulmonary disease due to
CF is not restricted to patients homozygous for the
F508 mutation (8-10).
Molecular mechanisms by which genetic mutations disrupt
the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator proteins (CFTR)
have recently been proposed (11, 12). By categorizing these
mechanisms into five different classes, it is possible to better
understand the pathophysiology of the disease process and to
develop therapeutic strategies for improvement in CFTR function (13) according to the class of the mutation. For class I mutations, there is a premature termination of the CFTR mRNA
translation caused by either base substitutions that create stop
codons or by mutations that shift the reading frame or nonsense mutations and result in defects in protein production.
Examples of class I mutations are G542X and W1282X. The
most common mutation,
F508 and the N1303K mutation belong to class II mutations and result in defects in protein processing. In class II mutations, the CFTR protein is degraded in
the endoplasmic reticulum and fails to reach its intended site of action at the plasma membrane. Class III mutations, of
which G551D is an example, are regulatory mutations in
which protein reaches the surface of the cell but fails to respond consistently to cyclic AMP activation signals. Class IV
mutations also result in protein reaching the plasma membrane, but it has altered channel properties that results in defective protein conduction. The genes R117H and R347P are
examples of class IV mutations. Class V mutations result in
reduced amounts of RNA necessary for normal CFTR production.
As several new therapies have been based on the CFTR
mutation class and exercise tolerance is a recommended outcome measure in interventional trials in CF, it is important to
assess the relationship between CFTR mutation class and exercise tolerance in this population (14). The aim of this study
was to investigate the relationship between fitness and nutrition with genotype in children with both CF and at least one
copy of the
F508 mutation. This is the first study that we are
aware of that compares aerobic and anaerobic exercise capacities of patients on the basis of CFTR mutations.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects
Children aged 8 to 17 years that attended the CF clinic at The Children's Hospital at Westmead (Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children), New South Wales, Australia, were randomly selected for the study. The randomization was performed using medical record numbers and uniform random numbers generated by the Numerical Algorithms Group routines GO5CBF and GO5CAF (15). The subjects were excluded if there was a history of pulmonary exacerbation in the month preceding the test. For the purposes of this study, pulmonary exacerbation was defined as increased purulent sputum production, and not just those who received antibiotics or were formally diagnosed by their physicians as have had a pulmonary exacerbation. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants and their parents where applicable.
Parameters of Assessment
Lean body mass was calculated using skinfold thickness and the equations provided by Durnin and Rahaman (16). Height was measured using a Harpenden stadiometer (Seritex, Carlstadt, NJ), and weight by electronic scales (Acme, San Leandro, CA). The body mass index (BMI) was recorded for each subject.
The Shwachman score, a clinico-radiological measure of disease severity (17), was recorded at each child's annual progress check. This score, which has a range from 20 (most severe) to 100 (most mild), was used to compare the disease severity of the subjects.
Pulmonary function tests consisted of measuring forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) using a spirometer (Sensormedics 2000; Sensormedics, Yorba Linda, CA).
Peak aerobic capacity was assessed using a modified Bruce protocol (18) on an electronic treadmill (Cardiovit 100, Schiller, Dietikon, Switzerland). Breath-by-breath gas analysis was used to determine peak oxygen uptake (VO2), minute ventilation (VE), and respiratory quotient (RQ). The results were expressed in terms of lean body weight. Anaerobic power was measured using the Wingate test (19) on an electronically braked cycle ergometer (Lode Ergometer, Groningen, the Netherlands). The results of the peak anaerobic power is expressed as per convention in terms of total body mass.
Data Analysis
The subjects were categorized into groups according to CFTR mutation. The five classes of CFTR mutation as described by Welsh and
Smith (12) were adopted for this study. The values for the peak aerobic capacity, anaerobic power, lung function, Shwachman score, and
body mass index for subjects with at least one copy of
F508 mutation
were compared according to the class of the child's second CFTR mutation (I-V). Duncan's Post Hoc test of analysis of variance (ANOVA)
was used to assess differences among the groups for each of the key
outcome variables and to detect the variable with the greatest difference between groups (20). The Pearsons correlation was used to assess the relationship between aerobic capacity and peak anaerobic
power. Power calculations were performed using peak aerobic capacity, peak anaerobic power, lung function, body mass index, and
Shwachman score. These calculations determined that, to detect a 0.5 standard deviation difference between the classes of mutations, with a
significance of 0.05 and power of 80%, a minimum of 10 subjects in
each group would be required. Statistical significance was assigned to
p values less than 0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of the 101 randomly selected subjects, ninety-seven children
with CF agreed to participate in the study. An upper limit of 40 was set for the number of children who were homozygous
for the
F508 mutation. Two patients, both of whom were homozygous for the
F508 mutation, were excluded before testing because of a pulmonary exacerbation in the previous
month. The mean age of the subjects was 14.1 years (range 8.4 to 16.8 years). There was a wide range of disease severity as
measured by the Shwachman score with a mean of 60.0 (range
35 to 100). Twenty-three subjects who participated in the
study were pancreatic sufficient (see Table 1). Pancreatic sufficiency was significantly more common in subjects with class
IV and V second mutations compared with the other classes of
mutations.
|
Those patients with a second mutation in class I had a mean peak aerobic capacity of 29.8 (SEM 4.2) ml/kg/min. This was not significantly different from the mean value of 32.1 (SEM 5.4) ml/kg/min in subjects with class II second mutations (Table 2). However, subjects with class III second mutations had a peak aerobic capacity that was 38.0% (p < 0.05) greater than those with class I second mutations. There were no significant differences in peak aerobic capacity between subjects with class IV and class V second CFTR mutations. However, subjects with class IV second mutations were 22.3% (p < 0.05) greater than those with class III second mutations.
|
Subjects with class III second CFTR mutations had 7.8% (p < 0.05) greater peak power than subjects with class I and II second CFTR mutations, but 10.9% (p < 0.05) lower power than subjects with class IV and V second CFTR mutations. Patients with class I and II second CFTR mutations had the lowest peak anaerobic power, individuals with class III mutations had intermediate power, and those with class IV and V CFTR mutations had the highest power of all groups.
Lung function, as indicated by FEV1, was not significantly different among the groups and was thus unrelated to genotype (Table 2).
The overall correlation between peak anaerobic power and aerobic capacity for children with CF was very good (Pearsons r = 0.77, p < 0.01). The correlation coefficients for these parameters were not significantly different among the groups (r = 0.73, 0.80, 0.73, 0.76, 0.76 for subjects with class I, II, III, IV, and V second CFTR mutations, respectively).
Subjects were categorized into two groups based on BMI: those with second CFTR mutations belonging to classes I and II had a significantly lower (17.6%, p < 0.05) BMI than those with second CFTR mutations belonging to classes III, IV, and V. The Shwachman score of disease severity followed the same trend as BMI. Subjects with class I and class II second CFTR mutations had significantly worse disease scores than subjects with class III, IV, and V second CFTR mutations.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study has demonstrated that there is a significant relationship between the class of the second CFTR mutation and
aerobic capacity, anaerobic power and BMI in patients with
CF who were heterozygous for the
F508 mutation. A second
CFTR mutation, belonging to either class I or II, was associated with a lower peak aerobic capacity and anaerobic power,
as well as a lower BMI and Shwachman score, while class III,
IV, and V second mutations were associated with higher values for these parameters. The results of this study also confirm
an absence of correlation between genotype and lung function.
The subjects in this study were randomly selected from a
patient group aged 8 to 17 years that attended the CF clinic.
Only four subjects declined to participate in the study, and a
further two subjects were excluded because of a pulmonary
exacerbation. Thus, selection bias was minimized. Before randomization, to study a wide range of genetic mutations and
not just class II second mutations, an upper limit was set at 40 children with a genotype that was homozygous for
F508 mutation.
All patients were recruited from a single center, and the sample size of this study was large compared with previously published studies of exercise capacity in children with CF (21). Certainly the sample size was sufficient to detect several important statistical differences in aerobic capacity and anaerobic power among the different classes of CFTR mutations. Power analysis, taking into account the different classes of CFTR mutations, suggested that type II errors were minimal. Nevertheless, the lack of statistically significant differences in some of the variables (such as lung function) may have been due to inadequate numbers of subjects. However, with ongoing suppuration intrinsic to CF pulmonary disease, there are clearly disadvantages of doing single measurements of exercise tolerance. This may have been a confounding variable in this study.
Kaplan and colleagues (22) demonstrated no differences in
terms of nutrition and exercise tolerance between patients
who were homozygous and heterozygous for the
F508 gene
mutation. The study was limited by the very small sample size.
In addition, all heterozygous patients were combined into a
single group for analysis in that study, failing to take into account the vast spectrum of disease within this patient population. By classifying patients according to the cellular physiological function conferred by class of the CFTR mutation, the
present study has demonstrated significant differences in exercise tolerance, muscle power, and nutrition among different
mutation classes. The correlation between aerobic capacity
and peak anaerobic power was good. This is consistent with a
pervasive pathophysiologic process that affects both aerobic and anaerobic muscle function.
Although CF genotype has been shown to be highly predictive of exocrine pancreatic function (23), to date there has
been no proven association between genotype and pulmonary
status (24). Most recent approaches toward understanding the
genotype-phenotype correlation in cystic fibrosis are focused
on in vitro studies of CFTR function. The impact of nutritional
status on exercise ability in children with CF has previously
been demonstrated (25). Malnutrition severely limits exercise
tolerance in children with advanced CF. In this study, nutrition was directly assessed using measurement of lean body
mass and BMI and, indirectly, using the Shwachman score.
Despite the potential inaccuracies of using these methods of
assessing nutrition, clinically, the nutritional status of children
in this study was adequate. Therefore, the differences demonstrated in this study in aerobic and anaerobic exercise ability among the different classes of CFTR mutations cannot be
completely explained purely on the basis of nutrition. Other
mechanisms must be involved. Sheppard and colleagues (26)
studied the expression of normal and
F508 CFTR in epithelial cells and demonstrated that the
F508 CFTR mutation
produced an immature type of glycosylated core protein due
to defective processing. Other mechanisms by which the different classes of mutations disrupt CFTR function have been
proposed (11, 12). The classes of mutation as described by
Welsh and Smith (12) were adopted for this study and the results indicate that the deficits conferred on epithelial function by the mutations may affect muscle function. CFTR is a single polypeptide comprising two similar halves. Each half has six
transmembrane
-helices followed by a cytoplasmic nucleotide binding domain (NBD) that are separated by an intracellular (R) domain containing numerous sites for phosphorylation by protein kinase A and protein kinase C (1). CFTR is a
chloride ion pore (27) and mutations in the transmembrane
-helices cause alterations in the characteristics of chloride
channel permeation (28). Chloride conductance in skeletal
muscle fibers, which is mediated by CFTR and other chloride channels, is the predominant parameter that contributes to the electrical stability of sarcolemma (29). In class I and II mutations, there is a complete absence of CFTR protein presented
to the apical membrane and, hence, efficient chloride conductance is severely limited. Class IV and V mutations result in
CFTR proteins that reach the apical membrane but have altered chloride channel properties and hence chloride conductance is present but at a reduced level. The varying degrees of
electrical stability conferred on skeletal muscle fibers by the
different classes of CFTR mutations may be a possible explanation for the findings in this study. CFTR chloride channels
require ATP hydrolysis for normal function (30). In addition,
CFTR possesses intrinsic ATPase activity (31). As energy is
released with the degradation of ATP, it may be that depleted
or defective CFTR protein results in inefficient energy production or utilization, which is clinically demonstrated by reduced aerobic capacity and peak anaerobic power.
This study has important implications for long-term prognosis as well as response to various therapies in interventional studies. On the basis of aerobic capacity (32), it may be that patients with class III, IV, or V CFTR mutations have a better overall prognosis. However, with new therapies based on the CFTR mutation class (33), exercise testing would be an appropriate method of assessing response.
The results indicate that the previous ambiguity in regard to the relationship between genotype and phenotype in CF may be clarified if interpreted in the light of the molecular mechanisms conferred by the particular mutation. Further studies on the effect of impaired CFTR on skeletal muscles are necessary.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Dr. H. C. Selvadurai, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G IX 8, Canada. E-mail: hiran.selvadurai{at}sickkids.ca
(Received in original form April 9, 2001 and accepted in revised form December 4, 2001).
Acknowledgments:
Supported in part by the Cystic Foundation of New South Wales, Australia.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Riordan J,
Rommens JM,
Kerem BS,
Alon N,
Rozmahel R,
Grzelczak Z,
Zielenski J,
Lok S,
Plavsic N,
Chou J, et al
.
Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA.
Science
1989;
245:
1066-1072
2. Kerem E, Kerem B. Genotype-phenotype correlations in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 1996; 22: 387-395 [Medline].
3.
Kerem E,
Corey M,
Kerem B.
The relation between genotype and phenotype in cystic fibrosis - analysis of the most common mutation
(
F508).
N Engl J Med
1990;
323:
1517-1522
[Abstract].
4. Mohon RT, Wagener JS, Abman SH. Relationship of genotype to early pulmonary function in infants with cystic fibrosis identified through neonatal screening. J Pediatr 1993; 122: 550-555 [Medline].
5.
Lester LA,
Kraut J,
Lloyd-Still J.
DF 508 genotype does not predict disease severity in ethnically diverse cystic fibrosis population.
Pediatr
1994;
93:
114-118
6. Santis G, Osborne L, Knight RA, Hodson ME. Independent genetic determinants of pancreatic and pulmonary status in cystic fibrosis. Lancet 1990; 336: 1081-1084 [Medline].
7. Campbell PW III,, Phillips JA III,, Krishnamani MR, Maness KJ, Hajinski TA. Cystic fibrosis: relationship between clinical status and F508 deletion. J Pediatr 1991; 118: 239-241 [Medline].
8.
Highsmith WE,
Burch LH,
Zhou Z,
Olsen JC,
Boat TE,
Spock A,
Gorvog JD,
Quittel L,
Friedman KJ,
Silverman LM, et al
.
A novel mutation in the cystic fibrosis gene in patients with pulmonary disease
but normal sweat chloride concentrations.
N Engl J Med
1994;
331:
974-980
9.
Moullier P,
Jehanne M,
Audrezet MP,
Mercier B,
Verlingue C,
Quere I,
Guillermit H,
Raguenes O,
Storni V,
Rault G, et al
.
Association of
1078 del T cystic fibrosis mutation with severe disease.
J Med Genet
1994;
31:
159-161
10. Stern RC, Doershuk C, Drumm ML. 3849 + 10kb C-T mutation and disease severity in cystic fibrosis. Lancet 1995; 346: 274-276 [Medline].
11. Tsui LC. The spectrum of cystic fibrosis mutations. Trends Genet 1992; 8: 392-398 [Medline].
12. Welsh MJ, Smith AE. Molecular mechanisms of CFTR chloride channel dysfunction in cystic fibrosis. Cell 1993; 73: 1251-1254 [Medline].
13.
Denning GM,
Ostedgaard LS,
Welsh MJ.
Abnormal localization of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in primary cultures
of cystic fibrosis airway epithelia.
J Cell Biol
1992;
118:
551-559
14. Ramsey B, Boat T. Outcome measures for clinical trials in cystic fibrosis. Summary of Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Conference. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 177-193 [Medline].
15. Numerical Algorithms Group. Nag manual. Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd. Oxford: Oxford Press; 1978.
16. Durnin JVGA, Rahaman MM. The assessment of the amount of fat in the human body from measurements of skinfold thickness. Br J Nutr 1967; 21: 681-689 [Medline].
17. Shwachman E, Kulczycki M. Clinical evaluation and grading criteria for patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Dis Child 1958; 6: 96-98 .
18. Bruce RA. Exercise testing of patients with coronary heart disease: principles and normal standards. Ann Clin Res 1971; 3: 323-332 [Medline].
19. Ayalon A, Inbar O, Bar-Or O. Relationships among measurements of explosive strength and anaerobic power. In: Nelson RC and Morehouse CA, editors. International series on sport sciences (Vol 1. Biomechanics IV). Baltimore: University Park Press; 1974. p. 572-577.
20. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research, 3rd edition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science Ltd; 1994.
21. Orenstein DM, Nixon PA. Exercise performance and breathing patterns in cystic fibrosis: male-female differences and the influence of resting pulmonary function. Pediatr Pulmonol 1991; 10: 101-105 [Medline].
22. Kaplan TA, Moccia-Loos G, Rabin M, McKey RM. Lack of effect of delta F508 mutation on aerobic capacity with patients with cystic fibrosis. Clin J Sport Med 1996; 6: 226-231 [Medline].
23. Kristidis P, Bozon D, Corey M, Markiewicz D, Rommens J, Tsui LC, Durie P. Genetic determination of exocrine pancreatic function in cystic fibrosis. Am J Hum Genet 1992; 50: 1178-1184 [Medline].
24.
Hamosh A,
Corey M.
Correlations between genotype and phenotype in
patients with cystic fibrosis.
N Engl J Med
1993;
329:
1308-1313
25.
Marcotte JE,
Canny GJ,
Grisdale R.
Effects of nutritional status on exercise performance in advanced cystic fibrosis.
Chest
1986;
90:
375-379
26. Sheppard DN, Carson MR, Ostegaard LS, Denning GM, Welsh MJ. Expression of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in a model epithelium. Am J Physiol 1994; 266: 405-413 .
27. Welsh MJ, Anderson MP, Rich DP, Berger HA, Denning GM, Ostedgaard LS, Sheppard DN, Cheng SH, Gregory RJ, Smith AE. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator: a chloride channel with novel regulation. Neuron 1992; 8: 821-829 [Medline].
28.
Anderson MP,
Gregory RJ,
Thompson S,
Souza DW,
Paul I,
Mulligan RC,
Smith AE,
Welsh MJ.
Demonstration that CFTR is a chloride
channel by alteration of its anion selectivity.
Science
1991;
253:
202-205
29. Conte CD, Franconi F, Mambrini M, Bennardi F, Failli P, Brynat SH, Giotti A. The action of taurine on chloride conductance and excitability characteristics of rat striated muscle fibers. Pharmacol Res Commun 1987; 19: 685-701 [Medline].
30. Gadsby DC, Dousmanis AG, Nam AC. ATP hydrolysis cycles and the gating of CFTR CL channels. Acta Physiol Scand 1998; 643: 247-256 .
31.
Canhui L,
Ramjeesingh M,
Wang W,
Garami E,
Hewryk M,
Lee D,
Rommens JM,
Galley K,
Bear CE.
ATPase activity of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator.
J Biol Chem
1996;
271:
28463-28466
32. Nixon P, Orenstein D, Kelsey S, Doershuk C. The prognostic value of exercise testing in patients with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1785-1788 [Abstract].
33.
Rubenstein RC,
Zeitlin PL.
A pilot clinical trial of oral sodium 4-phenylbutyrate (Buphenyl) in
F508-homozygous cystic fibrosis patients: partial restoration of nasal epithelia CFTR function.
Am J Respir Crit
Care Med
1998;
157:
484-490
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Serisier, A. D. Coates, and S. D. Bowler Effect of Albuterol on Maximal Exercise Capacity in Cystic Fibrosis Chest, April 1, 2007; 131(4): 1181 - 1187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M E Dodd and S A Prasad Physiotherapy management of cystic fibrosis Chronic Respiratory Disease, July 1, 2005; 2(3): 139 - 149. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Moorcroft, M. E. Dodd, J. Morris, and A. K. Webb Symptoms, lactate and exercise limitation at peak cycle ergometry in adults with cystic fibrosis Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2005; 25(6): 1050 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Pianosi, J LeBlanc, and A Almudevar Peak oxygen uptake and mortality in children with cystic fibrosis Thorax, January 1, 2005; 60(1): 50 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Selvadurai, J. Allen, T. Sachinwalla, J. Macauley, C. J. Blimkie, and P. P. Van Asperen Muscle Function and Resting Energy Expenditure in Female Athletes with Cystic Fibrosis Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2003; 168(12): 1476 - 1480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Tobin Pediatrics, Surfactant, and Cystic Fibrosis in AJRCCM 2002 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2003; 167(3): 333 - 344. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. |