|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ARTICLE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The clinical benefit of adding long-acting inhaled
2-agonists as
maintenance treatment to inhaled glucocorticoids (ICS) has been
well established in moderate to severe persistent asthma. The
OPTIMA study, reported by Dr. O'Byrne and colleagues in the current issue of the Journal (pp. 1392-1397), expands this concept to patients with milder disease (1). They evaluated the effect of adding formoterol to a low dose of budesonide over 1 yr in 1,970 mild asthmatics with a mean baseline FEV1 above 85% of
predicted, taking no or a small dose of ICS. The results are worth
highlighting. First, this study convincingly demonstrates the important benefit of a low dose of budesonide (100 µg twice daily)
over placebo in the patient group not receiving ICS at entry into
the study. The second observation is that in mild asthmatics
treated with ICS, a twofold difference in budesonide dose (100 versus 200 µg twice daily) had no clinically noticeable effect,
whereas adding a low dose of formoterol clearly had.
What messages does this study leave us with? First, the current observations further add to the known effects of low doses of ICS on other important outcome measures such as hospital
admissions and mortality (2, 3). Combined with the increasing
proof of safety of ICS at low doses (4, 5), this report provides a
strong plea for the introduction of low doses of ICS, even in patients who are perceived to have very mild disease. A second, more disputable, interpretation of the results could be
that the introduction of devices that combine both compounds
in a single inhaler will simplify asthma treatment even further
than now anticipated. Although adding formoterol to budesonide in the ICS-free group did not produce a further decrease in the exacerbation rate, it did improve baseline FEV1
without influencing reported adverse events. One of the major
goals of asthma treatment is to maintain lung function within
(near) normal limits. Therefore, it could be argued that, apart
from the extra cost involved, there is no good reason for not
combining long-acting
2-agonists with low doses of ICS from
the start of treatment. At the same time, the study indicates that
this combination is also beneficial for mild asthmatics that had
been seen to require a small dose of ICS. Hence, the same
mono-inhaler would fit all patient categories, achieving increased control over monotherapy with ICS, and at the same
time permit a decrease in the dose given to patients at the more
severe end of the spectrum. Before accepting this concept, a
few questions, however, seem worthwhile addressing.
One particular issue is to link the current clinical observations to a better insight into the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. An important, potentially dangerous feature of asthma is the occurrence of exacerbations. A salient feature that emerges from this study of mild asthmatics is the unexpected high frequency of severe exacerbations, 75% of which were identified by the need for oral steroids. This is in broad agreement with other studies in adults or in children with mild asthma (4, 6) and is strikingly similar to data obtained in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma (7). These observations would seem to dissociate the mechanisms that cause exacerbations from those that underlie other clinical criteria of asthma severity such as symptoms or baseline lung function. The pathophysiology of exacerbations remains to be fully explored, but it is tempting to speculate that it may in large part result from bouts of acute inflammation superimposed on existing structural alterations. The extent of airway remodeling in asthmatic airways appears to be largely independent of duration or severity of the disease (8, 9). This could explain why patients, despite differences in asthma severity, have a similar propensity to develop exacerbations in response to an acute inflammatory event.
A key finding in the OPTIMA trial is that a low dose of
budesonide significantly reduces the exacerbation frequency.
Low doses of steroids are unlikely to influence remodeling but
are known to reduce markers of acute inflammation, which
could account for the observed effect (10). Whether formoterol
given in conjunction with steroids reduces the exacerbation frequency merely through functional antagonism at the smooth
muscle level or by exerting any antiinflammatory effects in its
own right, and whether these effects are any different from other
long-acting
2-agonists remains unknown.
Another interesting observation is that whereas in the
OPTIMA study, a twofold higher maintenance dose of budesonide (200 µg twice daily) does not influence the exacerbation
rate, it has been shown in mild to moderate asthma that a fourfold higher dose (400 µg twice daily) clearly does (7). It is within
this latter dose range that ICS have been shown to influence airway remodeling in conjunction with a reduction in the number
of exacerbations (11). It could therefore be hypothesized that
whereas a low dose of ICS influences the exacerbation rate by
an effect on the acute component of airway inflammation, a
substantially higher dose could have an additional effect by influencing remodeling or its progression. To what extent this is
influenced by concomitant treatment with long-acting
2-agonists again needs to be further evaluated. It has been shown
that sputum eosinophil counts are not different in patients treated
for 1 yr with the combination of formoterol plus budesonide
100 µg twice daily versus budesonide 400 µg twice daily (12). That
study, however, did not include markers of airway remodeling.
Concern exists that the clinical benefit of adding long-acting
2-agonists could result in underdosing of steroids. The consequences of this possibility on airway morphology and its functional implications remain to be established. Only then will we
know what is really the lowest effective dose of ICS that can
be included in combination regimens.
In conclusion, the OPTIMA study clearly supports using
the combination of long-acting
2-agonists with a low dose of
ICS in patients with mild persistent asthma. At the same time,
the study raises a number of interesting questions. Unless these
are resolved, it would seem that instituting this combination in
all asthma patients, as simple an option as it might seem, is
probably too simple.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
O'Byrne P.
Barnes PJ, Rodriguez-Gomez G, Runnerstrom E, Sandstrom T, Svenson K, et al. Low dose inhaled budesonide and formoterol in mild persistent asthma: the OPTIMA randomized trial.
Am J
Respir Crit Care Med
2001;
164:
1392-1397
2. Donahue JG, Weiss ST, Livingston JM, Goetsch MA, Greineder DK, Platt R. Inhaled steroids and the risk of hospitalization for asthma. JAMA 1997; 277: 887-891 [Abstract].
3.
Suissa S,
Ernst P,
Benayoun S,
Baltzan M,
Cai B.
Low-dose inhaled corticosteroids and the prevention of death from asthma.
N Engl J Med
2000;
343:
332-336
4. The Childhood asthma management program research group. Long-term effects of budesonide or nedocromil in children with asthma. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1054-1063.
5.
Agertoft L,
Pedersen S.
Effect of long-term treatment with inhaled
budesonide on adult height in children with asthma.
N Engl J Med
2000;
343:
1064-1069
6. Dennis SM, Sharp SJ, Vickers MR, Frost CD, Crompton GK, Barnes PJ, et al . . Regular inhaled salbutamol and asthma control: the TRUST randomised trial. Therapy Working Group of the National Asthma Task Force and the MRC General Practice Research Framework. Lancet 2000; 355: 1675-1679 [Medline].
7.
Pauwels RA,
Löfdahl C-G,
Postma DS,
Tattersfield AE,
O'Byrne P,
Barnes PJ, et al
.
. Effect of inhaled formoterol and budesonide on exacerbations of asthma.
N Engl J Med
1997;
337:
1405-1411
8.
Boulet LP,
Turcotte H,
Laviolette M,
Naud F,
Bernier M-C,
Martel S, et al
.
. Airway hyperresponsiveness, inflammation and subepithelial
collagen deposition in recently diagnosed versus long-standing mild
asthma: influence of inhaled corticosteroids.
Am J Respir Crit Care
Med
2000;
162:
1308-1317
9.
Chu HW,
Halliday JL,
Martin RJ,
Leung DY,
Szefler SJ,
Wenzel SE.
Collagen deposition in large airways may not differentiate severe asthma from
milder forms of the disease.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1998;
158:
1936-1944
10.
Jatakanon A,
Kharitonov S,
Lim S,
Barnes PJ.
Effect of differing doses
of inhaled budesonide on markers of airway inflammation in patients
with mild asthma.
Thorax
1999;
54:
108-114
11.
Sont JK,
Willems LN,
Bel EH,
Van Krieken JH,
Vandenbroucke JP,
Sterk PJ.
Clinical control and histopathologic outcome of asthma when using airway
hyperresponsiveness as an additional guide to long-term treatment. The
AMPUL Study Group.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1999;
159:
1043-1051
12.
Kips JC,
O'Connor BJ,
Inman MD,
Svensson K,
Pauwels RA,
O'Byrne PM.
A long-term study of the antiinflammatory effect of low-dose
budesonide plus formoterol versus high-dose budesonide in asthma.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2000;
161:
996-1001
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. B. Bacharier, C. Dawson, G. R. Bloomberg, B. Bender, L. Wilson, and R. C. Strunk Hospitalization for Asthma: Atopic, Pulmonary Function, and Psychological Correlates Among Participants in the Childhood Asthma Management Program Pediatrics, August 1, 2003; 112(2): e85 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J-M. Ignacio-Garcia, M. Pinto-Tenorio, M.J. Chocron-Giraldez, F. Cabello-Rueda, A.I. Lopez-Cozar Gil, J-M. Ignacio-Garcia, and E. de Ramon-Garrido Benefits at 3 yrs of an asthma education programme coupled with regular reinforcement Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2002; 20(5): 1095 - 1101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Grosser and B. Smith Low dose budesonide improved asthma control in mild asthma; adding formoterol improved control in corticosteroid treated patients Evid. Based Med., July 1, 2002; 7(4): 120 - 120. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. TOBIN Asthma, Airway Biology, and Nasal Disorders in AJRCCM 2001 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 598 - 618. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. |