help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 164, Number 7, October 2001, 1109a-1109b

REBUTTAL FROM DRS. PLATTS-MILLS, WOODFOLK AND SPORIK


    ARTICLE
TOP
ARTICLE
REFERENCES

We would like to focus on two of the arguments that von Mutius has presented. The first is that because many children wheeze in early childhood, any effects on prevalence would have to occur in infancy or even in utero. The second is that because exposure to farm animals can be protective, the decline in farming could have led to the increase in asthma.

There is no doubt that early wheezing is common and that many children who subsequently have persistent wheezing, that is, asthma, have had episodes of some kind in the first 2 years of life. However, the evidence that early wheezing has increased is less clear. Indeed, in the Mayo Clinic study, the only evidence of an increase is related to children over 4 years of age (1). It is important to realize that more than half the cases of asthma have a later onset and that the disease could have increased in prevalence because of increased persistence rather than increased incidence (2, 3). We would argue that many changes in life style, including diet, immunization, increasing obesity, and the associated decline in physical activity, could all have contributed to the increase in asthma in childhood. Given the poor evidence of in utero sensitization to dust mite or other inhalants, and the fact that antibody responses to mite are minimal before age 2 years, it seems unlikely that in utero events can explain the effect (4).

von Mutius and colleagues in Bavaria have elegantly shown that early contact with farm animals can decrease the risk of sensitization and asthma. This would seem to be the same phenomenon that Blackley reported in 1873 (5). We suggest that the real changes in cleanliness in the United States occurred early in the 20th century. Those changes coincide with the increase in seasonal hay fever. By contrast, the increase in asthma, particularly in the poorest sections of the American population, has occurred over a period when it is difficult to identify any changes comparable to the transition from a rural to urban existence.


    References
TOP
ARTICLE
REFERENCES

1. Yunginger J, Reed C, O'Connell E, Melton J, O'Fallon W, Silverstein M. A community-based study of the epidemiology of asthma. Incidence rates, 1964-1983. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 146: 888-894 [Medline].

2. Ronmark E, Jonsson E, Platts-Mills TAE, Lundback B. Incidence and remission of asthma in school children: report from the Obstructive Lung Disease in Northern Sweden Studies. Pediatrics 2001; 107: E37 .

3. Sporik R, Holgate ST, Platts-Mills TAE, Cogswell JJ. Exposure to house-dust mite allergen (Der p I) and the development of asthma in childhood. N Engl J Med 323:502-507.

4. Platts-Mills TAE, Woodfolk JA. Cord blood proliferative responses to inhaled allergens: is there a phenomenon? (Editorial). J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000; 106: 441-443 [Medline].

5. Blackley CH. Experimental research in the causes and nature of catarrhus aestivus (hay fever or hay asthma). [Reprinted from Baillière Tindall & Cox, 1873]. London: Dawson; 1959.






This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2001 American Thoracic Society