|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is frequently prescribed for
postmenopausal women. Epidemiological data suggest that sex hormones may play a role in the expression of asthma, but the mechanism(s) whereby this influence is mediated remain(s) unclear. To better understand the role of physiologic doses of estrogens in airway function, we tested the hypothesis that 17
-estradiol (E2, 10 µg/kg per d for 21 d) given to oophorectomized
female rats modifies airway responsiveness to cholinergic agonists, compared with oophorectomized rats given placebo. In vivo,
the concentration of inhaled acetylcholine (ACh) required to double pulmonary resistance (EC200RL) in anesthetized spontaneously
breathing tracheotomized rats was calculated as an index of airway responsiveness. E2-treated rats were less responsive to ACh
than placebo-treated rats (EC200RL, 9.40 ± 1.48 vs. 1.52 ± 0.85 mg · ml
1, respectively). Ex vivo airway responsiveness was evaluated
with the cumulative concentration-response curve (CCRC) of isolated tracheal segments. Compared with placebo, E2 treatment
significantly increased the EC50 of ACh (p = 0.01) but did not alter
the CCRC to carbachol. Removing the epithelium or treatment
with physostigmine abolished the difference in EC50 of ACh between the groups. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity of homogenized whole trachea was 1.4-fold greater in the E2-treated group
compared with placebo (p = 0.02), whereas no difference was
found in homogenized epithelium-free trachea. We conclude that
E2 treatment decreases airway responsiveness to ACh in ovariectomized rats at least in part by increasing AChE activity dependent
on the presence of the epithelium.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Keywords: acetylcholinesterase; airway reactivity; estradiol; rat
Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is frequently prescribed for postmenopausal women in order to prevent osteoporosis and symptoms related to menopause and to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. These benefits are related to nonreproductive actions of estrogens on the cardiovascular and immune systems, brain, and bone. Side effects must be taken into consideration, however, when envisaging their administration to healthy women.
Epidemiological data suggest a role for estrogens in the etiology and/or evolution of asthma (1). With the onset of puberty, asthma incidence becomes higher in females than in males and remains higher throughout the reproductive years (4). In addition, long-term use and/or high doses of postmenopausal estrogen therapy have been reported to increase the subsequent risk of asthma (5). In contrast, others have suggested that estrogen treatment can be beneficial in asthma (6). However, little is known about the mechanisms by which estrogens may influence airway reactivity.
To investigate the effect of physiological doses of estrogens
on airway reactivity and the mechanisms involved, we gave a chronic physiological dose of 17
-estradiol (E2) to oophorectomized female rats to see whether it could modify the in vivo
airway responsiveness to inhaled aerosolized acetylcholine
(ACh). We then studied ex vivo the contractile response of
isolated trachea to cholinergic agonists and to KCl. As estradiol was found to decrease airway responsiveness to ACh, the
mechanism(s) responsible for this effect was (were) investigated.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals and Procedure
Experiments were performed according to the recommendations of the
French Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. Seven-week-old female Wistar rats (Janvier, France) were anesthetized intraperitoneally with a solution of xylazine (7 mg/kg) and sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg). A bilateral ovariectomy was performed, and a pellet of either 17
-estradiol (0.05 mg for 21 d, that is, 10 µg/kg per d; Innovative
Research of America, Sarasota, FL) or placebo was implanted subcutaneously. An additional group was sham-operated (intact ovaries).
After experiments (17-19 d after pellet implantation), the uterus was removed, drained of fluid, stripped of remaining fat and mesentery, and weighed.
Drugs were obtained from Sigma (La Verpillère, France).
Measurement of Airway Responsiveness to Acetylcholine
Pulmonary mechanics were studied in anesthetized, spontaneously
breathing animals. The necks were opened, and the rats were tracheotomized. A 3-cm length of polyethylene tubing connected to a
Fleisch pneumotachograph (no. 00; Fleisch, Lausanne, Switzerland) was inserted in the trachea to measure air flow (
). Tracheal pressure,
esophageal pressure (measured through a catheter inserted in the
esophagus), and air flow were recorded on a polygraph (Pneumomultitest; EREMS, Toulouse, France). Pulmonary resistance (RL) was determined by the method of Mead and Whittenberger (7).
Aerosols were generated for 60 s, using a Hudson nebulizer (model 1700; Hudson Oxygen Therapy, Temecula, CA) with an output of 0.18 ml/min connected to one side of a Plexiglas box.
After an initial measurement of RL, rats were administered an aerosol of saline and increasing concentrations of ACh until RL reached at least 200% of the saline control value. ACh responsiveness was expressed as the concentration of ACh required to increase RL to 200% of the value measured after saline aerosolization (EC200RL).
Measurement of Tracheal Isometric Contraction
Animals were anesthetized and perfused, through a polyethylene catheter inserted into the right ventricle, with saline at 100-mm Hg pressure to remove blood from lungs. The trachea was removed and cut into transverse rings measuring 3 mm in length. Each ring was mounted between two stainless steel clips in vertical 5-ml organ baths of a computerized isolated organ bath system (IOS UF-1; Phymep, Paris, France) filled with modified Krebs solution as described elsewhere (8). The tracheal rings were set at optimal length by equilibration against a passive preload of 2 g, as previously determined for these types of experiments (9). As a general rule, only one agonist was tested in one ring, but different rings from the same animal could be tested under different conditions. Duplicate airway rings from the same animal were studied under each experimental condition, and a mean cumulative concentration-response curve (CCRC), representative of each individual, was obtained.
CCRCs were made by using the spasmogen KCl (3 × 10
3 to
10
1 M), substituted for NaCl in an equimolar amount in the presence
of atropine (10
6 M). The response was expressed as a percentage of
the maximal contractile response observed with ACh (5 × 10
2 M) in
the ring under consideration.
CCRCs were produced to the cholinergic agonists ACh and carbamylcholine chloride (carbachol, CCh). CCRCs to ACh were determined in the presence of physostigmine at a concentration of 5 × 10
8
M for 5 min, which did not alter the resting tension of the tracheal rings
(results not shown). CCRCs to ACh were also produced after removing
epithelium by gently rubbing the lumenal surface with wet gauze.
The mechanical response to cholinergic agonist was expressed as a percentage of the maximal contractile response observed in the considered ring with the considered agonist. The efficacy of an agonist was defined as Fmax, that is, the plateau (maximum) level of the contractile force on the CCRC. The potency was characterized as the EC50, the concentration producing a contractile force of Fmax/2, as graphically determined. A geometric mean EC50 and the SEM were then calculated for each mean curve.
Each tracheal ring was fixed in formalin for histological examination.
Measurement of Cholinesterase Activity
After exsanguination, the trachea was excised and cut longitudinally into
two equal parts, one of which was rubbed to remove the epithelium.
Each part was then homogenized separately, using a glass-to-glass homogenizer, in high-salt extraction buffer containing detergent (10 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1% Triton X-100, 1 M NaCl). The homogenates were
centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min, and the supernatant was removed
to measure AChE activity by the method of Ellman and coworkers (10).
Briefly, the reaction was performed at 20° C in a 1-ml total volume
(0.1 ml of supernatant, 0.9 ml of a reaction mixture containing 25 mM
phosphate buffer [pH 7.0], 0.3 mM dithionitrobenzoate, and 1 mM
acetylthiocholine as a substrate). The production of 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoate was measured at 412 nm with continuous recording of optic density (DO). Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity was measured in the
presence of the specific inhibitor of butyrylcholinesterase activity, tetraisopropyl pyrophosphoramide (iso-OMPA, 10
4 M, preincubated
for 15 min). It was verified that the nonspecific cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine (5 × 10
8 M, preincubated for 5 min) abolished
cholinesterase activity. Acetylcholinesterase activity was normalized,
using the total protein concentration determined by the method of
Lowry and coworkers (11).
Analysis of Data
Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Comparisons between two groups were made by an unpaired t test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be significant.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effect of 17
-Estradiol on Animal Characteristics
Animal body weight gain was lower in the rats given E2 at 10 µg/kg per d compared with controls (15 vs. 53%, respectively). Uterus weight was 4.5-fold greater in the E2 treatment group than in the control group (604 ± 39 vs. 132 ± 4 mg, respectively), indicating an effect of E2 on this target sexual organ (Table 1).
|
Effect of E2 Treatment on Airway Responsiveness to ACh in vivo
As summarized in Table 2, both minute ventilation (expressed per kilogram body weight) and RL before aerosol challenge (basal values) were similar in placebo and E2-treated groups.
|
The mean concentration-response curves for the placebo
and E2-treated groups are shown in Figure 1. The responsiveness of the E2-treated group to ACh was significantly lower
than that of the placebo group (EC200RL, 9.40 ± 1.48 vs. 1.52 ± 0.85 mg · ml
1, respectively).
|
Effect of E2 Treatment on Isometric Contraction
In isolated intact rings, the CCRC induced by the depolarizing agent KCl did not differ between E2-treated and control groups for either the EC50 or the Fmax (Table 3 and Figure 2). ACh and CCh induced similar maximal contraction in both groups, indicating that E2 treatment had no effect on efficacy of the agonists, whereas the EC50 in response to ACh were about 40-fold greater than those in response to CCh (Figure 3). The response to CCh was similar in rings from E2-treated rats and those from control rats. In contrast, the CCRC to ACh was shifted rightward (about 2-fold) by E2 treatment (Figure 3).
|
|
|
CCRCs induced by ACh did not differ between sham-operated and E2-treated groups for either the EC50 (182.0 ± 51.2 vs. 191.6 ± 37.2, respectively, n = 7, NS) or the Fmax (2.20 ± 0.51 vs. 2.16 ± 0.48, respectively, n = 7, NS). In contrast, placebo-treated ovariectomized rats elicited EC50 values in response to ACh that were lower than those of sham-operated rats (88.0 ± 13.8 vs. 182.0 ± 51.2, respectively, n = 7, p = 0.04).
Physostigmine (5 × 10
8 M, preincubated for 5 min)
shifted the CCRC to ACh to lower concentrations by approximately 1.5 log units in both groups (p < 0.0001) but did not
modify Fmax (Figure 3). Interestingly, physostigmine abolished the difference between E2-treated and placebo-treated
groups in response to ACh.
Removal of the epithelium shifted the CCRC to ACh leftward to lower concentrations by approximately 0.5 log unit (p < 0.001). Removing the epithelium abolished the difference in EC50 between the E2-treatment group and the placebo group, but did not modify Fmax (Figure 3).
Effect of E2 on Acetylcholinesterase Activity
A significant increase in AChE activity was observed in the
E2-treated group compared with the placebo group when the
whole trachea was studied (20.7 [± 1.3] × 10
3 vs. 14.9 [± 1.6] × 10
3 DO/min per mg of protein, respectively, n = 7, p = 0.02). However, after removing the epithelium, no difference
in AChE activity was observed between the E2-treated and
placebo groups (14.0 [± 1.3] × 10
3 vs. 14.1 [± 1.6] × 10
3
DO/min per mg of protein, respectively, n = 7, NS).
Physostigmine (5 × 10
8 M, preincubated for 5 min) abolished most of the cholinesterase activity in intact trachea (with
epithelium) of both the E2-treated and placebo groups (0.9 [± 0.5] × 10
3 vs. 1.1 [± 0.8] × 10
3 DO/min per mg of protein, respectively, n = 7, NS).
In the placebo-treated group, AChE activity related to the epithelium was about 5% of the total AChE activity. In contrast, the epithelial AChE activity in the trachea from E2-treated rats was about 30% of the total AChE activity (Figure 4). Interestingly, calculation revealed that changes induced by E2 corresponded to a 6-fold increase in epithelial AChE activity.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of
17
-estradiol (E2) on the airway responsiveness to cholinergic agonists in ovariectomized female rats. Compared with ovariectomized placebo-treated rats, we found that E2 induced (1)
a decrease in airway responsiveness to ACh in vivo, and (2) a
decrease in the sensitivity to ACh of the tracheal muscle, due
at least in part to (3) an enhancement of acetylcholinesterase
activity dependent on the presence of the epithelium ex vivo.
ERT is currently prescribed for postmenopausal women after loss of their endogenous estrogen and progesterone secretion. Epidemiological studies suggest that this treatment influences either the airway reactivity or the course of asthma (5, 6). The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of physiological doses of estrogens on airway reactivity.
Our results regarding the decrease in airway reactivity in vivo after E2 treatment are in agreement with the study by Lieberman and coworkers (1), in which the effect of ERT on airway reactivity to histamine was studied in 36 postmenopausal women who did not suffer from respiratory disease. The authors found a smaller decrease in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) induced by histamine after 4-6 weeks of ERT compared with the histamine challenge performed before ERT.
Our control group consisted of placebo-treated castrated female rats in order to avoid any effect of endogenous progesterone and estrogens. The E2 treatment dose of 10 µg/kg per d was chosen as it is a physiological dose (12). Both uterus weight and the body weight gain were in agreement with those previously reported (13). Treatment of ovariectomized rats with estradiol decreases food intake, increases energy expenditure, and consequently reduces body fat content and body weight gain (15). All tracheal rings of the ex vivo experiments were kept for microscopic examination and quantification of both epithelium and smooth muscle. The metabolic effect of estradiol does not affect either epithelium or smooth muscle cross-sectional areas (data not shown).
In the in vivo experiments, basal RL values were similar in both groups. We used spontaneously breathing anesthetized rats as preliminary experiments had demonstrated that rats became apneic and died at high ACh concentrations. In accordance with other studies, we did not determine the maximal RL, and the EC200RL was used to investigate airway responsiveness to different agonists (16). The observed differences in EC200RL between the placebo-treated and E2-treated groups reflect differences in the potency of the agonist ACh.
The depolarizing agent KCl, which ultimately activates voltage-dependent calcium channels, thus inducing contraction (17), leads to an electromechanical coupling of tracheal smooth muscle. E2 treatment did not alter the contractile response of isolated tracheal rings to KCl, suggesting that E2 had no effect on such coupling.
The potency of ACh in rat isolated trachea is strain related (16) and age related (18). In our experiments, CCRCs to ACh of tracheal rings from sham-operated animals elicited an EC50 value close to the value elicited in the E2-treated group and within the range of reported values for age-matched animals (18).
ACh is sensitive to AChE, whereas CCh is totally resistant
to hydrolysis by either AChE or nonspecific cholinesterase (19). This at least partly accounts for the leftward shift of the
CCRC in both groups (1) in response to CCh compared with
ACh, and (2) in response to ACh in rings preincubated with
physostigmine compared with ACh. Physostigmine has been
reported to inhibit cholinesterase with IC50 values of approximately 10
8 M (20). As the CCRCs to ACh in the presence of
physostigmine were similar to the CCRC to CCh, the 5 × 10
8
M concentration of physostigmine, preincubated for 5 min and used in the present study, inhibited most of the cholinesterase activity. This was confirmed by the measurement of cholinesterase activity in homogenized intact trachea (with epithelium) preincubated for 5 min with 5 × 10
8 M physostigmine.
Moreover, we found that E2 treatment had no effect on the
CCRC to CCh compared with controls but resulted in a rightward shift of the CCRC to ACh. Taken together, these observations suggest that the decreased potency of ACh after E2 treatment may be related to increased cholinesterase activity.
We found that compared with the CCRC to ACh of intact tracheal rings, epithelium removal had two effects. First, we observed a leftward shift of the CCRC in both groups, indicating that the airway epithelium modulates the contractile response to ACh. This observation is in agreement with other studies of concentration-response curves to several contractile agents in isolated tracheas of a number of animal species and bronchi from humans (21). Second, we did not observe any further difference in response to ACh due to E2 treatment after epithelium removal. We therefore postulated that the presence of the epithelium is indispensable to the increased cholinesterase activity elicited by E2 treatment. This hypothesis was confirmed by the enzymatic determination of acetylcholinesterase activity in the trachea.
AChE activity in the trachea exists within the epithelium, smooth muscle layer, adventitia, and in the autonomic nerve endings (22). In the guinea pig, the principal mechanism by which the epithelium inhibits tracheal contraction to ACh is via epithelium-derived AChE activity (23). However, epithelial AChE activity was not marked as compared with nonepithelial AChE activity in rat trachea when determined by histochemical staining (22). Our data are consistent with these observations, as the AChE activity related to the epithelium in the control group was only 5% of the AChE activity of the whole tracheal homogenates. In the E2 treatment group, the epithelial AChE activity represented up to 30% of AChE activity of the whole trachea, whereas AChE activity in trachea without epithelium was similar in both groups. In other words, E2 treatment induced a 6-fold increase in epithelial AChE activity.
The effect of E2 on AChE activity in the respiratory tract has already been investigated. Abdul-Karim and coworkers showed that E2 given to oophorectomized rabbits brought about a 4-fold increase in lung cholinesterase activity (24). However, these authors studied AChE activity of the whole homogenized lung, without distinguishing between trachea, bronchi, and lung parenchyma, and did not assess the functional consequences.
The effect of E2 on AChE activity was studied more in detail in the brain, as postmenopausal women receiving estrogen
replacement therapy showed a reduced risk of developing
Alzheimer disease, while studies with brains displaying Alzheimer disease lesions have shown that changes occur in the
expression and distribution of AChE (25). Free radicals are
shown to induce an inhibition of brain AChE, which can be
reversed by antioxidant compounds (26). It has been shown
elsewhere that oxidative stress transforms in vitro purified active acetylcholinesterase to an inactivated form (27). In another in vitro model, E2 was shown to decrease the interaction
of AChE with amyloid
-peptide, probably as a result of its
antioxidant properties (28).
In conclusion, we demonstrated that chronic treatment with
a physiological dose of 17
-estradiol decreases airway reactivity in ovariectomized female rats, apparently due at least in
part to an increase in AChE activity in the epithelium. To the
best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration in an experimental model of a beneficial effect of 17
-estradiol on airway responsiveness to acetylcholine and of the mechanism involved. The link between our experimental exploration of
airway reactivity and the pathophysiology of asthma remains
to be established. Further studies are needed to determine whether
such an effect occurs in humans and to what extent this mechanism could represent an additional beneficial effect of endogenous estrogens or ERT after menopause.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to B. Degano, MD, Service d'Exploration Fonctionnelle Respiratoire, CHU Rangueil, 31403 Toulouse Cedex 4, France. E-mail: degano.b{at}chu-toulouse.fr
(Received in original form February 5, 2001 and accepted in revised form August 21, 2001).
Acknowledgments:
The authors thank Beatrice Martinez, Muriel Arnaud,
and Marie-José Fouques for technical assistance, Professor Didier Fournier for advice on extraction and measurement of cholinesterase, and Professor
Jean-François Arnal for helpful discussions and for critical reading of the
manuscript before submission.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Lieberman D, Kopernik G, Porath A, Lazer S, Heimer D. Influence of estrogen replacement therapy on airway reactivity. Respiration 1995; 62: 205-208 [Medline].
2. Beynon HLC, Garbett ND, Barnes PJ. Severe premenstrual exacerbations of asthma: effect of intramuscular progesterone. Lancet 1988; 3: 370-371 .
3.
Zimmerman JL,
Woodruff PG,
Clark S,
Camargo CA.
Relation between
phase of menstrual cycle and emergency department visits for acute
asthma.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2000;
162:
512-515
4.
de Marco R,
Locatelli F,
Sunyer J,
Burney P.
Differences in incidence of
reported asthma related to age in men and women. A retrospective
analysis of the data of the European Respiratory Health Survey.
Am J
Respir Crit Care Med
2000;
162:
68-74
5. Troisi JR, Speizer FE, Willet WC, Trichopoulos D, Rosner B. Menopause, postmenopausal estrogen preparations, and the risk of adult-onset asthma: a prospective cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152: 1183-1188 [Abstract].
6.
Myers JR,
Sherman CB.
Should supplemental estrogens be used as steroid-sparing agents in asthmatic women?
Chest
1994;
106:
318-319
7. Mead J, Whittenberger J. Physical properties of human lung measured during spontaneous respiration. J Appl Physiol 1953; 5: 770-796 .
8.
Mitchell RW,
Kelly E,
Leff AR.
Effect of in vitro preconditioning on tracheal smooth muscle responsiveness.
Am J Physio1
1991;
260:
L168-L173
.
9. Ben-Jebria A, Marthan R, Rossetti M, Savineau JP, Ultman JS. Effect of in vitro exposure to acrolein on carbachol responses in rat trachealis muscle. Respir Physiol 1993; 93: 111-123 [Medline].
10. Ellman GL, Courtney D, Andres V, Featherstone RM. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 1961; 7: 88-95 [Medline].
11.
Lowry OH,
Rosebrough NJ,
Farr AL,
Randall RJ.
Protein measurement
with the Folin phenol reagent.
J Biol Chem
1951;
193:
265-275
12.
Rahimian R,
Laher I,
Dube G,
van Breemen C.
Estrogen and selective
estrogen receptor modulator LY117018 enhance release of nitric oxide in rat aorta.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
1997;
283:
116-122
13. Cheng DY, Feng CJ, Kadowitz PJ, Gruetter CA. Effects of 17 beta- estradiol on endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by acetylcholine in female rat aorta. Life Sci 1994; 55: 187-191 .
14.
Conrad KP,
Mosher MD,
Brinck-Johnsen T,
Colpoys MC.
Effects of 17 beta-estradiol and progesterone on pressor responses in conscious
ovariectomized rats.
Am J Physiol
1994;
266:
R1267-R1272
15. Wade GN, Schneider JE. Metabolic fuels and reproduction in female mammals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1992; 16: 235-272 [Medline].
16. Eidelman DH, Dimaria GU, Bellofiore S, Wang NS, Guttman RD, Martin JG. Strain-related differences in airway smooth muscle and airway responsiveness in the rat. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 144: 792-796 [Medline].
17.
Coburn RF,
Baron CB.
Coupling mechanisms in airway smooth muscle.
Am J Physiol
1990;
258:
L119-L133
18. Preuss JMH, Goldie RG. Age-related changes in muscarinic cholinoreceptor function in guinea-pig and rat airways. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 1999; 360: 179-186 [Medline].
19. Taylor P. Cholinergic agonists. In: Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Rall TW, Murad F, editors. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 7th edition. New York: Macmillan; 1985. p. 100-109.
20.
Atack JR,
Yu QS,
Soncrant TT,
Brossi A,
Rapoport SI.
Comparative inhibitory effects of various physostigmine analogs against acetyl- and
butyrylcholinesterases.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
1989;
249:
194-202
21. Folkertsa G, Nijkampa FP. Airway epithelium: more than just a barrier! Trends Pharmacol Sci 1998; 19: 334-341 [Medline].
22.
Ohrui T,
Sekizawa K,
Yamauchi K,
Ohkawara Y,
Nakazawa H,
Aikawa T,
Sasaki H,
Takishima T.
Chemical oxidant potentiates electrically
and acetylcholine-induced contraction in rat trachea: possible involvement of cholinesterase inhibition.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
1991;
259:
371-376
23. Koga Y, Satoh S, Sodeyama N, Hashimoto Y, Yanagisawa T, Hirshman CA. Role of acetylcholinesterase in airway epithelium-mediated inhibition of acetylcholine-induced contraction of guinea-pig isolated trachea. Eur J Pharmacol 1992; 220: 141-146 [Medline].
24.
Abdul-Karim RW,
Drucker M,
Jacobs RD.
The influence of estradiol-17
on cholinesterase activity in the lung.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
1970;
108:
1098-1101
[Medline].
25. Massoulié J, Pezzementi L, Bon S, Krejci E, Valette FM. Molecular and cellular biology of cholinesterases. Prog Neurobiol 1993; 41: 31-91 [Medline].
26. Tsakiris S, Angelogianni P, Schulpis KH, Stavridis JC. Protective effect of L-phenylalanine on rat brain acetylcholinesterase inhibition induced by free radicals. Clin Biochem 2000; 33: 103-106 [Medline].
27. Weiner L, Kreimer D, Roth E, Silman I. Oxidative stress transforms acetylcholinesterase to a molten-globule-like state. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1994; 198: 915-922 [Medline].
28. Bonnefont AB, Munoz FJ, Inestrosa NC. Estrogen protects neuronal cells from the cytotoxicity induced by acetylcholinesterase-amyloid complexes. FEBS Lett 1998; 441: 220-224 [Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Catley, M. A. Birrell, E. L. Hardaker, J. de Alba, S. Farrow, S. Haj-Yahia, and M. G. Belvisi Estrogen Receptor {beta}: Expression Profile and Possible Anti-Inflammatory Role in Disease J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2008; 326(1): 83 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Lim and L. Kobzik Sexual Tension in the Airways: The Puzzling Duality of Estrogen in Asthma Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., May 1, 2008; 38(5): 499 - 500. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Matsubara, C. H. Swasey, J. E. Loader, A. Dakhama, A. Joetham, H. Ohnishi, A. Balhorn, N. Miyahara, K. Takeda, and E. W. Gelfand Estrogen Determines Sex Differences in Airway Responsiveness after Allergen Exposure Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., May 1, 2008; 38(5): 501 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Carey, J. W. Card, J. W. Voltz, D. R. Germolec, K. S. Korach, and D. C. Zeldin The impact of sex and sex hormones on lung physiology and disease: lessons from animal studies Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): L272 - L278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Card, M. A. Carey, J. A. Bradbury, L. M. DeGraff, D. L. Morgan, M. P. Moorman, G. P. Flake, and D. C. Zeldin Gender Differences in Murine Airway Responsiveness and Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammation J. Immunol., July 1, 2006; 177(1): 621 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Weiss and S. Shore Obesity and Asthma: Directions for Research Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2004; 169(8): 963 - 968. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. TOBIN Asthma, Airway Biology, and Nasal Disorders in AJRCCM 2001 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 598 - 618. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. |